Word use question

[HornyHenry]

Hi, smart authors.

I'm writing this story and keep wondering about how to properly say this.
I have used Cum and Came in the way I feel thay should be used, but started wondering if there was a standard way to use them. Two examples:

He had not came and ...

I couldn't have came like that without you.

It couldn't be "have cummed" "have cum" could it?

Thanks in advance. Keep writing everyone.

 

[Handley_Page]

Hi, smart authors.

I'm writing this story and keep wondering about how to properly say this.
I have used Cum and Came in the way I feel thay should be used, but started wondering if there was a standard way to use them. Two examples:

He had not came and ...

I couldn't have came like that without you.

It couldn't be "have cummed" "have cum" could it?

Thanks in advance. Keep writing everyone.

I'd go for "I couldn't have cum without you"

I do not think there is (or perhaps should be ) for a past tense of Cum.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Avoid auxillary verbs. They confuse the meaning and entangle the prose. Auxillary verbs add a passive patina to the action, too.

 

[PennLady]

According to the submission guidelines I've seen on some publishers' sites, the verb is "come" -- and "came" in past tense -- and the noun is "cum." That's how I use them and I find it keeps things clear. It also eliminates the need to look for past tense of "cum." "Cummed" looks dumb to me, for example.

So for your examples, I'd write:

He had not come.

I couldn't have come like that without you.

Other examples:

She came harder than she ever had before.

His cum dripped off of her face.

 

[sr71plt]

Generally, "come" is the verb and "cum" is the noun. So, in your example, "have come" should be the most acceptable.

Since there's such a difference in the use of "come," I hope that eventually "cum" will be acceptable as the verb for orgasm/ejaculation too (and maybe "cummed"). "Have came" is not, I don't think, ever going to fly in any use.

 

[sr71plt]

"Cummed" looks dumb to me, for example.

I can see the day when "cummed" is accepted, as in "He cummed down the front of her dress," to pull it completely away from the standard definition of "come/came."

 

[PennLady]

I can see the day when "cummed" is accepted, as in "He cummed down the front of her dress," to pull it completely away from the standard definition of "come/came."

That day may come (or cum) and I will still think "cummed" looks and sounds stupid.

 

[sr71plt]

That day may come (or cum) and I will still think "cummed" looks and sounds stupid.

But until it does, I'll be looking at the "come" usage and thinking, "now that's just wrong to do with the standard definition and expect readers to instantly see the distinction."

 

[PennLady]

But until it does, I'll be looking at the "come" usage and thinking, "now that's just wrong to do with the standard definition and expect readers to instantly see the distinction."

Hmmm. Well, can't say I agree on that one. I've never had a problem with the distinction myself, and never had feedback from anyone who did. I think the context makes it plenty clear. Perhaps there are some beginners or newbies who aren't clear on the lingo -- but there's always a time when you don't get something. Once it's explained or you see an example, then it should be clear going forward.

 

[SamScribble]

I'm with you, PennLady. 'Cummed' just seems clumsy.

 

[TE999]

I could see using the word 'cummed' in a sentence, but only in the context of dialogue, ie: "Then he done cummed in my sissas mouf", otherwise it's sounds wrong like using 'snuck' for 'sneaked' (even though it's accepted).

 

[Darkniciad]

There's at least one commenter who has been talking down his nose at people for a couple of years if "come" is used for either the noun or the verb.

I've had to giggle when I've seen the follow-up comments citing dictionaries proving the troll doesn't know what he's talking about, though.

I have cummed
you have cummed
he has cummed
we have cummed
you have cummed
they have cummed
I had cummed
you had cummed
he had cummed
we had cummed
you had cummed
they had cummed
I will have cummed
you will have cummed
he will have cummed
we will have cummed
you will have cummed
they will have cummed
I would have cummed
you would have cummed
he would have cummed
we would have cummed
you would have cummed
they would have cummed

Read any of that aloud, and you instantly become a cartoon stereotype

 

[HornyHenry]

Lol

Thank God, I've never used "cummed" anywhere except in that first post.
I thank you for your help. This cleared it up for me.
Sometimes the blood that is supposed to be used for thinking is visiting other parts...

 

[HornyHenry]

This really clears things up

According to the submission guidelines I've seen on some publishers' sites, the verb is "come" -- and "came" in past tense -- and the noun is "cum." That's how I use them and I find it keeps things clear. It also eliminates the need to look for past tense of "cum." "Cummed" looks dumb to me, for example.

So for your examples, I'd write:

He had not come.

I couldn't have come like that without you.

Other examples:

She came harder than she ever had before.

His cum dripped off of her face.

So, my revised examples could be:
His cum had not come... (reminds me of something I wrote about a churn)and

I couldn't have come like that without you. or
I couldn't have cum like that without you.
Which would mean something entirely different and interesting.

Thanks again!