LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
I'm going to chance a guess here that feminists - more like female chauvinists - who read this thread, will be angrier at me posting this, than at the damage these false rape claims do to the credibility of cases by women who really ARE raped.
Maybe some years in the future, after trolling this thread, you'll stop and think, "Hey, when women make false rape claims, won't it make juries more skeptical toward other cases, too? Like, say, the legitimate cases?"
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-05-26/india/39538054_1_justice-g-p-mittal
Women using rape laws for vengeance, Delhi high court says
NEW DELHI: For the third time in less than a week, the Delhi high court has decried that rape laws are often misused by women.
Flagging the issue in a judgment on Saturday, Justice Kailash Gambhir said rape cases are being used as "a weapon for vengeance and vendetta" to harass and even force a boy to marry.
While granting anticipatory bail to a man facing rape charges from a woman claiming to be his wife, HC added that in many cases woman first has consensual sex but later files rape case against her boyfriend when the relationship breaks up in order to force him to get married, making not only "mockery" of the marriage but also inflating the statistics of rape cases.
"Many of the cases are being reported by those women who have consensual physical relationship with a man but when the relationship breaks due to one reason or the other, the women use the law as a weapon for vengeance and personal vendetta to extort money and sometimes even to force the boy to get married to her," HC said advocating extreme caution to judges who should "cautiously examine the intentions of the girl to find out whether the rape complaint is genuine or has malafide motives".
Earlier this week, Justice G P Mittal and Justice Suresh Kait in separate judgments quashed FIR's relating to rape of a minor and gang-rape of a private executive respectively, after they found too many discrepancies or contradictions in victims' statements. The common theme in all three judgments was the advice to courts not to get swayed by mere allegations of rape, howsoever heinous, but sift through evidence before convicting anyone.
Maybe some years in the future, after trolling this thread, you'll stop and think, "Hey, when women make false rape claims, won't it make juries more skeptical toward other cases, too? Like, say, the legitimate cases?"
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-05-26/india/39538054_1_justice-g-p-mittal
Women using rape laws for vengeance, Delhi high court says
NEW DELHI: For the third time in less than a week, the Delhi high court has decried that rape laws are often misused by women.
Flagging the issue in a judgment on Saturday, Justice Kailash Gambhir said rape cases are being used as "a weapon for vengeance and vendetta" to harass and even force a boy to marry.
While granting anticipatory bail to a man facing rape charges from a woman claiming to be his wife, HC added that in many cases woman first has consensual sex but later files rape case against her boyfriend when the relationship breaks up in order to force him to get married, making not only "mockery" of the marriage but also inflating the statistics of rape cases.
"Many of the cases are being reported by those women who have consensual physical relationship with a man but when the relationship breaks due to one reason or the other, the women use the law as a weapon for vengeance and personal vendetta to extort money and sometimes even to force the boy to get married to her," HC said advocating extreme caution to judges who should "cautiously examine the intentions of the girl to find out whether the rape complaint is genuine or has malafide motives".
Earlier this week, Justice G P Mittal and Justice Suresh Kait in separate judgments quashed FIR's relating to rape of a minor and gang-rape of a private executive respectively, after they found too many discrepancies or contradictions in victims' statements. The common theme in all three judgments was the advice to courts not to get swayed by mere allegations of rape, howsoever heinous, but sift through evidence before convicting anyone.
