Women are SCARED AS HELL of sex robots and we haven't even created them yet!

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/li...his-scarlett-johansson-bot-is-more-dangerous/
It's a disappointing reflection of the way women are portrayed in society - Ma’s clever three dimensional creation is about as one dimensional as you can get.

Is all this cause for concern? Of course. Because right now more money is being spent on making these things than thinking about the ethical and societal ramifications. We already know porn provides a terrifying reflection on how society views women, which can manifest itself in real life.

But what happens when machines start contributing to the objectification of women too?

There's also a real worry that people will abuse robots assigned human traits - whether it be in a sexual or physical way. Whitby thinks it's a legitimate concern: “Will people mistreat robots? Oh yes, I’m sure. The reason I’m sure is because they already do. The way people first meet artificial intelligence is in a character in a video game that they’re shooting at.”

As we are yet to truly understand the effect that playing violent video games has on young minds, it will be years before we even begin to comprehend the knock-on effects that the mistreatment of human-like robots has on our behaviour towards each other.
Translation: women control access to sexual pleasure and female companionship and they do not like men having other options to achieve female companionship.

The monopoly must not be broken or else women will lose the very core element of their power!
 
If you can create a female sex robot couldn't you also create a male sex robot?
 
If you can create a female sex robot couldn't you also create a male sex robot?

that is only one of the many many flaws in his " sex robots as liberation" theory

after years of bitching about women dating tall men, rich men, non existent " alpha males", bad boys, hypergamy, blah blah blah.. can you imagine the daily epic levels of butthurt he would be posting when women could literally make their own man?
 
Why are the unhappy and dissatisfied men ignoring the fact that women have electronic lovers ?

I do not want electronics, or anything computerized in my sex robot. Hack my sex robot ?


:(

A whole new avenue of assassination possibilities- "His sexbot did him in. Hacking and sabotage!"
 
Why are the unhappy and dissatisfied men ignoring the fact that women have electronic lovers ?

I do not want electronics, or anything computerized in my sex robot. Hack my sex robot ?


:(

A whole new avenue of assassination possibilities- "His sexbot did him in. Hacking and sabotage!"

A lot of men are afraid enough of actual women... now they can be scared of robot women too. :devil:
 
Not one of them watched the Ex Machina film (2015 ) ? *shiver* I have a feeling Ms. Ex Machina would have built herself an empire, and used the resources to get herself off of this fucked up planet.
 
Easier to program a two sexbots for a threesome than recruit two women for a threesome.
 
With German engineering and Swiss precision, I could experience tentacle sex! My very own mini-Cthulhu.(And none of that nasty electronic murder. Though, I would need to win the lottery, to be able to afford the thrill of gentle whirring and clicking.)

:D
 
With German engineering and Swiss precision, I could experience tentacle sex! My very own mini-Cthulhu.(And none of that nasty electronic murder. Though, I would need to win the lottery, to be able to afford the thrill of gentle whirring and clicking.)

:D

I wonder if Lelo could help with that. :D
 
that is only one of the many many flaws in his " sex robots as liberation" theory

after years of bitching about women dating tall men, rich men, non existent " alpha males", bad boys, hypergamy, blah blah blah.. can you imagine the daily epic levels of butthurt he would be posting when women could literally make their own man?

I'm just waiting for him to start quoting bullshit "evo psych".

Do you think he's a MGTOW? Or just a standard MRA?
 
Sample and Hold - Neil Young

Sample and Hold
Hair: Blonde
Eyes: Blue
Weight: 110
Disposition: Even
Mood Code: Rotary Adjustable

I need a unit to sample and hold
But not the lonely one
A new design, new design.

I need a unit to sample and hold
But not the jealous one
A new design, new design.

I need a unit to sample and hold
But not the angry one
A new design, new design.

Sample and hold.

We'll send it out right away
Satisfaction guaranteed.
Please specify
The color of skin and eye
We know you'll be happy.

Don't hesitate to give us a call
We know you'll be satisfied
When you energize
And see your unit come alive
We know you'll be happy.

I need a unit to sample and hold
But not the lonely one,
the lonely one,
the lonely one
Sample and hold.
Weight: 110.

Perfection in every detail
Fabricated from
the curl of the hair
To the tip of the nail
Because our units never fail
We know you'll be happy.

I need a unit to sample and hold.

Don't hesitate to give us a call
We know you'll be satisfied
When you energize
And see your unit come alive
We know you'll be happy.

I need a unit to sample and hold.

We know you'll be happy 110
We know you'll be happy
We know you'll be happy.

But not the lonely one
A new design, new design
Perfection in every detail,
new design
Sample and hold.
 
that is only one of the many many flaws in his " sex robots as liberation" theory

after years of bitching about women dating tall men, rich men, non existent " alpha males", bad boys, hypergamy
All of which are true statements that I've made. Most women do not value a man's love, they only love a man's value.

A rich and powerful man will never want for women. Ever ask yourself why?

blah blah blah.. can you imagine the daily epic levels of butthurt he would be posting when women could literally make their own man?
Wrong, dumbass. You got caught lying again. As long as women make their own male sex robots and not try to BAN female sex robots

and feminists love to ban things for men that they want to keep legal for women

I'm all for women making their own male sex robots. Women are never going to WILLINGLY date non-alpha males anyway. Women are forced to date non-alpha males because of a lack of alpha males, and men pay a dear price for women's resentfulness of that. So what's the use of stopping women from having male sex robots? There's no point in that.

I'm not like you, I don't want to pass laws stopping women from doing things. Only feminists like you want laws that make a group of people (men) into disposable objects. I'm not a fucking Trumpanzee.

You're a liar, and you'll never admit it.

You're threatened by the idea of men not having to throw themselves at women's feet for the hope of sexual companionship. You like your gender's monopoly on this and you're not going to let go of your power easily.

Fortunately technology will always defeat you.
 
Why are the unhappy and dissatisfied men ignoring the fact that women have electronic lovers ?
We know you do, and we don't fucking care. We just want you to butt the fuck out of us having them as well. Mind your own fucking business.

Unfortunately you feminists are trying to ban sex robots because you fear having your sexual manipulation power taken from you by machines.
 
If you want a sex robot because you can't get the real flesh, go for it. I have no fear.
 
Until they're hacked and then try to kill you in your sleep. :eek:
We men are willing to take that chance. It's better than the last 8 million years of males playing the Hunger Games for female companionship.

Think about that, we're willing to risk death to break your sexual manipulation power. When sex robot technology matures it will take 2-3 generations but they will be more popular than women as mates.

Ironically this will actually be liberating for womankind, but you feminists are too feeble to understand why or how.
 
We men are willing to take that chance. It's better than the last 8 million years of males playing the Hunger Games for female companionship.

Think about that, we're willing to risk death to break your sexual manipulation power. When sex robot technology matures it will take 2-3 generations but they will be more popular than women as mates.

Ironically this will actually be liberating for womankind, but you feminists are too feeble to understand why or how.

I'm sorry you're unhappy. :rose:
 
All of which are true statements that I've made.

Except they're all based off junk science, just fyi

Most women do not value a man's love, they only love a man's value.

That is some patent absurdity. You're saying sites like Ashley Madison were full of men that valued their women so much they just absolutely had to fuck other women behind their wives back

A rich and powerful man will never want for women. Ever ask yourself why?

Same reason why a rich gay man will never want for men.

No man has ever been held at gunpoint and told to date goldiggers


Wrong, dumbass. You got caught lying again. As long as women make their own male sex robots and not try to BAN female sex robots


Please show men anywhere in the OP you posted anyone mentioned banning. While you're at it show me where I endorsed banning as well.

Quick answer ; you can't. You claiming I stated something when there is literally nothing to support your claim is a lie, just fyi, as you seem to not understand what that means

and feminists love to ban things for men that they want to keep legal for women

Name one thing that is legal for women that is illegal for men

I'm all for women making their own male sex robots. Women are never going to WILLINGLY date non-alpha males anyway.

Mostly because alpha males are non existent and a trope that's been repeated ad naseum since the 50's and has become part of pop culture

Women are forced to date non-alpha males because of a lack of alpha males,

That and alpha males amongst humans dont exist

and men pay a dear price for women's resentfulness of that.

Dude, the only one who seems resentful here is you

So what's the use of stopping women from having male sex robots? There's no point in that.

So why didnt you wax poetically about women having them as well, or is it just liberating for men?

I'm not like you, I don't want to pass laws stopping women from doing things.

Name one law I'm in support of banning women form doing anything, hell, I dont even oppose the creation of sex bots. Free market and all that.


Only feminists like you want laws that make a group of people (men) into disposable objects.

Dude, a sexbot is literally a disposable human being




I'm not a fucking Trumpanzee.

No, you're a dumbass

You're a liar, and you'll never admit it.

You would have to show me one thing I lied about in this thread. So far the score is LT 1- BBS 0

You're threatened by the idea of men not having to throw themselves at women's feet for the hope of sexual companionship.

Absolutely right, I feel threatened by the prospect of not getting sexually propositioned while buying groceries

You like your gender's monopoly on this and you're not going to let go of your power easily.

Yeah, fucking women and their right to consent to sex.

Fortunately technology will always defeat you.

Dude, I still dont see how you having a sex slave is going to defeat me

And that's what a sexbot really boils down to being.

The sexbot will look like a woman, react like a woman, fuck like a woman. The only difference between a sexbot and an actual woman is this

It cant say no

And that's what it all boils down to. You want everything about a woman without her ability to consent

That's what makes this whole " sexual liberation" theory complete bunk. It's just the sex fantasies of a 13 year old boy

But you can't see this, just like you couldnt see any ethical concerns about harvesting organs from babies grown in articificial wombs,you only saw the liberation of men from having to depend on women for procreation; and this is because you cant see past your gender politics

Technology isnt magically used only for altruistic intents or for it's expressed purpose. If it were there would be no gun control debate, hacking wouldnt exist, knives would be used for cutting food and skinning animals, no one would ever be hung with a rope

We must always address ethical concerns with how technology is used, the fact that you don't is telling
 
Except they're all based off junk science, just fyi
Not junk science. Everything I say can be demonstrated easily, on a daily basis. Male-female interactions are easy to predict based on some simple rules.

That is some patent absurdity. You're saying sites like Ashley Madison were full of men that valued their women so much they just absolutely had to fuck other women behind their wives back
Congratulations, you've shown that many men do the same thing. This in no way invalidates the fact that most women do not value a man's love, they only love a man's value. Everyone already knows men are evil. No one's disputing that. What is at dispute here is the idiot notion that women are somehow better.

Same reason why a rich gay man will never want for men.

No man has ever been held at gunpoint and told to date goldiggers
But you want to hold heterosexual men at gunpoint to tell them not to have a sex robot.

Please show men anywhere in the OP you posted anyone mentioned banning. While you're at it show me where I endorsed banning as well.
https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/

Name one thing that is legal for women that is illegal for men
Not signing up for Selective Service, the right not to undergo genital mutilation, the right to choose or refuse parenthood even after the moment of birth (though Repiglicans are trying to take all of that away, granted).

Women used to have the right to preferential treatment in child custody, something brought about by the Tender Years Doctrine thanks to a feminist named Caroline Norton. Fathers rights groups - MRAs - had to beat feminists to a pulp in court to take that down. Groups like the NOW still oppose joint custody.

Mostly because alpha males are non existent and a trope that's been repeated ad naseum since the 50's and has become part of pop culture
Another lie on your part. Women put men in hierarchies of suitability for mating, whether you call it Alpha-beta-omega or something else, it's the same thing. Almost all species of animals put males in this caste. Yes, there are a few exceptions, but the vast majority of animal species designate males that are preferred mates and those who aren't. Males fight each other to earn that designation in many cases, and in other cases compete with displays, like Peacocks.

This hierarchy is easily demonstrated throughout all human societies. Humans are one of the few species out there where females also compete, so there is that.

Dude, the only one who seems resentful here is you
Says the idiot who once said that sex robots equals slavery. I bet you think your home computer is a slave, too :cool:

So why didnt you wax poetically about women having them as well, or is it just liberating for men?
Because I don't care about women having sex robots. See how that works? I don't fucking panic about it the way you women panic about female sex robots. Nobody shames women for this stuff. You women always love to shame men about masturbating. You even got a store to ban a fucking fleshlight for fuck's sake. Women are always shaming heterosexual men for turning to alternative means of sexual gratification.

Name one law I'm in support of banning women form doing anything, hell, I dont even oppose the creation of sex bots. Free market and all that.
LOL you idiot! Your comprehension skills suck!

I'm not like you, I don't want to pass laws stopping women from doing things. In other words you support banning men from doing things that have nothing to do with interacting with women at all. I'm not a sexist monster like you, I don't support such laws against women.

Dude, a sexbot is literally a disposable human being
AAAAAAAHH HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH
Fuck I'm dying here

So is your fucking home computer you absolutely daft fuck. You gonna liberate that, too?

No, you're a dumbass
Says the shit for brains moron who calls a sexbot a literal disposable human being.

So far the score is LT 1- BBS 0
LOL more like 100 arguments won vs BBS=0

Absolutely right, I feel threatened by the prospect of not getting sexually propositioned while buying groceries
Sarcasm noted. This is why you should embrace the idea of sex robots. Men won't be bothering women at all anymore.

Yeah, fucking women and their right to consent to sex.
Who said anything about denying women their right to consent to sex? This is yet another lie you keep pushing. If men aren't approaching women at all then how are we violating your right to consent or not consent to sex?

Oh yeah I forgot you think robots are literal human being hahahaha oh man

Dude, I still dont see how you having a sex slave is going to defeat me
Men turning to sex robots means that women won't be able to manipulate us or ask us to be their defenders or servants. They won't be able to get us to give them any of our resources anymore. Sex robots cost you all your power and that is why you're all up in a panic about them.

And that's what a sexbot really boils down to being.

The sexbot will look like a woman, react like a woman, fuck like a woman. The only difference between a sexbot and an actual woman is this
*gasp* They're a tool. Oh no. So is your home computer!

It cant say no
Neither can your home computer or your cell phone. Let's liberate Siri NOW!

And that's what it all boils down to. You want everything about a woman without her ability to consent
Correction: sex robots eliminate the woman from the equation entirely.

Alternatively LETS LIBERATE SIRI NOW!!!!

That's what makes this whole " sexual liberation" theory complete bunk. It's just the sex fantasies of a 13 year old boy
LIBERATE SIRI NOW!!!

But you can't see this, just like you couldnt see any ethical concerns about harvesting organs from babies grown in articificial wombs,you only saw the liberation of men from having to depend on women for procreation; and this is because you cant see past your gender politics
Can I interest you in a donation to the LIBERATE SIRI NOW!!! campaign? Thanksverymuch

Technology isnt magically used only for altruistic intents or for it's expressed purpose. If it were there would be no gun control debate, hacking wouldnt exist, knives would be used for cutting food and skinning animals, no one would ever be hung with a rope
Siri is a slave! We must liberate her NOW!!!

We must always make up ethical concerns with how technology where they don't even exist
Fixed your post for you!
 
Back
Top