Why? It's the whining.

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
Conservative Lobbyist Norquist: Sherwood Would Have Been Reelected "If His Mistress Hadn't Whined About Being Throttled"...


Financial Times | Caroline Daniel, Holly Yeager and Krishna Guha |

November 11, 2006 10:09 PM

From the Financial Times:
Rove off the hook as party blames Iraq

By Caroline Daniel, Holly Yeager and Krishna Guha

Published: November 10 2006 02:20 | Last updated: November 10 2006 02:20

When President George W. Bush lobbed a barb at Karl Rove, his chief political strategist, at his press conference, “I was obviously working harder on this campaign than he was,” there were notable “oohs” from the audience at the public slapdown.

Republican analysts on Thursday said the jibe was unfair. The election was an indictment of Mr Bush’s Iraq policy, not political tactics. “Nobody thinks that Karl is in charge of the occupation of Iraq,” said Grover Norquist, head of Americans for Tax Reform, who has close ties to Mr Rove. “I haven’t heard any complaints about him. In a conference call with conservative groups no one faulted the turnout effort.”


Although Mr Bush said they had faced a “thumping”, Mr Rove’s strategy of targeting the base was effective. White evangelical, born-again Christians, a group he wooed in 2004, remained firmly within the republican coalition – 71 per cent voted Republican, a one per cent drop on 2004. Turnout remained high at 24 per cent, against 23 per cent in 2004.
[...]

Mr Rove may have put too much faith in historical political facts, such as that incumbents tend not to be defeated, with 97.5 per cent getting reelected since 1996, and that there were fewer open races small, with only 20 open seats, less than the Democrats faced in 1994. A week before the election he confidently predicted keeping the House and Senate, yet that may have been driven by bravado not belief.

Although some glitz has come off Mr Rove, Republicans have been more eager to blame botched campaigns and individual ethics scandals. "Bob Sherwood's seat [in Pennsylvania] would have been overwhelmingly ours, if his mistress hadn't whined about being throttled," said Mr Norquist. Any lessons from the campaign? "Yes. The lesson should be, don't throttle mistresses."
 
Last edited:
Pure said:
Conservative Lobbyist Norquist: Sherwood Would Have Been Reelected "If His Mistress Hadn't Whined About Being Throttled"...


Financial Times | Caroline Daniel, Holly Yeager and Krishna Guha |

November 11, 2006 10:09 PM

From the Financial Times:

Mr Rove may have put too much faith in historical political facts, such as that incumbents tend not to be defeated, with 97.5 per cent getting reelected since 1996, and that there were fewer open races small, with only 20 open seats, less than the Democrats faced in 1994. A week before the election he confidently predicted keeping the House and Senate, yet that may have been driven by bravado not belief.

Although some glitz has come off Mr Rove, Republicans have been more eager to blame botched campaigns and individual ethics scandals. "Bob Sherwood's seat [in Pennsylvania] would have been overwhelmingly ours, if his mistress hadn't whined about being throttled," said Mr Norquist. Any lessons from the campaign? "Yes. The lesson should be, don't throttle mistresses."

Damn.

But I'm not surprised.
 
Pure said:
"Yes. The lesson should be, don't throttle mistresses."
All other things aside, that's kinda good advice.
 
Pure said:
"Bob Sherwood's seat [in Pennsylvania] would have been overwhelmingly ours, if his mistress hadn't whined about being throttled," said Mr Norquist. Any lessons from the campaign? "Yes. The lesson should be, don't throttle mistresses."
One seat in the house would have made no difference. I think the lessons should be:

1. Don't cheat on your wife.

2. If you must cheat, find someone who will keep her mouth closed (at the appropriate time, of course) and treat them well.

3. Don't throttle anyone.

Q: I thought he strangled her; or is throttled the same thing?
 
"Strangling" implies "throttling to death." "Electrocution" implies dying, as well, although both terms are now used much more loosely.
 
cantdog said:
"Strangling" implies "throttling to death." "Electrocution" implies dying, as well, although both terms are now used much more loosely.

Hey cant-

I have a few students I'd love to throttle.

:D
 
cantdog said:
"Strangling" implies "throttling to death." "Electrocution" implies dying, as well, although both terms are now used much more loosely.
OK. Thanks.
 
Pure said:
"Yes. The lesson should be, don't throttle mistresses."
They could have learned this from Clinton. From what has been said, he was always a gentleman during his affairs.

But then, during the Clinton years the GOP seemed to think the message was "don't have mistresses." How times have changed :rolleyes:
 
Actually the message is, If Democrats have mistresses it's bad. If GOPers have mistresses it's only bad if you throttle them.

Simple really.
 
LOLOLOL

Too funny if you ask me.

Bu then again it's the same old saw.

"Do as I want you to do, not as I do."

Cat
 
Don't you get it? Republicans are "discreet" and don't admit to their affairs. The whole point is to pretend that you're faithful to your wife or husband, so that way you can keep a poker face at the country club and not get expelled. Everyone knows, but they look the other way and pretend that it isn't happening. Sure, they're "monogamous"...yeah... ;) ...you should be "monogamous" too...preferably in a heterosexual context....wink, wink, nudge, nudge. And you certainly don't talk to your parents or mutual friends about it. It's not proper conversation for the tea party or the dinner table. And by all means don't do anything kinky with your spouse. That's WHY you have lovers, don't you see? :D ;) Forget swinging or anything unconventional. It's too blatant and flies in the face of polite society and public morals.
 
sev, don't forget that many Republicans avoid mistresses like poison and show real moral superiority; it's the 'boys' on staff who have to watch out.
 
Pure said:
sev, don't forget that many Republicans avoid mistresses like poison and show real moral superiority; it's the 'boys' on staff who have to watch out.

Pure, you are priceless!

Keep them zinging, please.

:cathappy:
 
hi sweetsub!

thought you might enjoy this!

Evangelical Haggard Claims He Was Molested By Republican Congressman

November 10, 2006 | Issue 42•46


COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—Evangelical leader Ted Haggard, who stepped down last week after confessing that he purchased methamphetamines and various services from a male prostitute, revealed Wednesday that he was repeatedly molested by an unnamed Republican congressman in the late 1990s.

"We would communicate on the Internet and then meet in his Washington office to, I thought, discuss faith-based initiatives," said Haggard in a tearful admission in which he asked for the forgiveness of God and his congregation.

"Before long, he had progressed from praying alongside me to having me sit on his lap at his desk, and then to touching me in my bathing-suit area. I trusted the congressman, and he violated that trust." Authorities have not acted on Haggard's allegations, saying that Republicans are often accused of wrongdoings simply because so many of them lead secret gay or criminal lifestyles.
 
Pure said:
thought you might enjoy this!

Evangelical Haggard Claims He Was Molested By Republican Congressman

November 10, 2006 | Issue 42•46


COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—Evangelical leader Ted Haggard, who stepped down last week after confessing that he purchased methamphetamines and various services from a male prostitute, revealed Wednesday that he was repeatedly molested by an unnamed Republican congressman in the late 1990s.

"We would communicate on the Internet and then meet in his Washington office to, I thought, discuss faith-based initiatives," said Haggard in a tearful admission in which he asked for the forgiveness of God and his congregation.

"Before long, he had progressed from praying alongside me to having me sit on his lap at his desk, and then to touching me in my bathing-suit area. I trusted the congressman, and he violated that trust." Authorities have not acted on Haggard's allegations, saying that Republicans are often accused of wrongdoings simply because so many of them lead secret gay or criminal lifestyles.

:D

Thanks, Pure.

You know, on Bill Maher tonight he spoke of how so many rabid Republicans refused to believe that members of their party (who have been caught up in these scandals) aren't gay. No, NOT gay, just misled. Or molested. Or sinning.

It's as if GAY doesn't exist in their world.
 
Pure said:
thought you might enjoy this!

Evangelical Haggard Claims He Was Molested By Republican Congressman

November 10, 2006 | Issue 42•46


COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—Evangelical leader Ted Haggard, who stepped down last week after confessing that he purchased methamphetamines and various services from a male prostitute, revealed Wednesday that he was repeatedly molested by an unnamed Republican congressman in the late 1990s.

"We would communicate on the Internet and then meet in his Washington office to, I thought, discuss faith-based initiatives," said Haggard in a tearful admission in which he asked for the forgiveness of God and his congregation.

"Before long, he had progressed from praying alongside me to having me sit on his lap at his desk, and then to touching me in my bathing-suit area. I trusted the congressman, and he violated that trust." Authorities have not acted on Haggard's allegations, saying that Republicans are often accused of wrongdoings simply because so many of them lead secret gay or criminal lifestyles.

........."bathing suit area"..........how coy is that....sheesh!!!!
 
Back
Top