Why is Trump so stupid?

[Rightguide]

Entire Panel of Undecided Voters Backs Trump After Town Hall: ‘He Owns the Room’​

By Laura Wellington, The Western Journal Feb. 22, 2024 8:00 pm

Five undecided South Carolina voters joined Fox News host Laura Ingraham following a recent Fox News town hall featuring former President Donald J. Trump. The town hall took place this past Tuesday.

Ingraham interviewed Jason, Tracy, Eric, Dakota, and Matt the Monday prior to the town hall and after it. With all among them on the fence as to who they would vote for prior to hearing Trump, every one of them was pulling towards Trump by the end.

One of the reasons Trump had such a strong impact on them was he left the petty, negative flavoring off the table, not using even a single jibe against his competition. Instead, he led with solutions and genuinity. That’s the exact recipe that will positively impact undecided voters away from his only Republican rival in the South Carolina presidential primary, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley.

Haley is currently trailing the former president by a huge margin, playing the long game in hopes that Trump will be forced out of the running by the myriad of indictments against him, one can only assume. Based on likely voters to participate in the upcoming primary this Saturday, Trump is leading Haley 65 percent to 35 percent, according to a Suffolk University/USA Today survey.

More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/entire-panel-undecided-voters-backs-trump-town-hall/

Rob is sad.

 

[dmallord]

He's plumbed these depths:

Teamsters Union Makes Major Donation to Republicans After Meeting With Trump​

By Mike LaChance Feb. 22, 2024 10:20 pm

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters’ political action committee reported a $45,000 donation to the Republican National Committee’s (RNC) convention fund last month in a stark departure from the union’s history of giving primarily to Democrats.

The Teamsters PAC — known formally as Democrat, Republican, Independent Voter Education — earmarked the donation on Jan. 25, according to federal elections filings reviewed by Fox News Digital. The contribution was reported weeks after former President Trump, the clear front-runner to secure the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, met with Teamsters President Sean O’Brien and days before a second meeting between the two on January 31.

In a statement, Teamsters spokesperson Kara Deniz said the contribution was approved in December, before the union’s two meetings with Trump, and will be dispatched to the RNC soon. An RNC official told Fox News Digital that it has not received the contribution and that the Teamsters haven’t reached out about it.

Deniz added that it represented the first time the Teamsters would participate in both the Republican and Democrat conventions in more than two decades.

More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...kes-major-donation-republicans-after-meeting/

Read it and weep.

They're offering that donation from large reserves built up because of the economic gains Joe Biden created. Thanks Joe Biden!

And note to the RNC - keep checking your mailbox, I'm sure it is on the way. [edit: Please don't use it for Trump's legal defense fund.]

 

[Bray123]

He's plumbed these depths:

Teamsters Union Makes Major Donation to Republicans After Meeting With Trump​

By Mike LaChance Feb. 22, 2024 10:20 pm

GatewayPundit bollocks for the uneducated....

More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...kes-major-donation-republicans-after-meeting/

Read it and weep.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...donation-exposes-divisions-members-rcna140136

More like Trump threatened to shut down the union so they are backing both horses in the race to try to keep him happy. Because threats and extortion is the Trump way.

Remember when Trump hired non-union actors to pretend that they were union members supporting him in a dispute?

Trump has often been at odds with unions, and two major unions — United Auto Workers and the AFL-CIO, have already endorsed Biden. The AFL-CIO has attacked the former president on labor issues, calling his record "catastrophic for workers." Similarly, UAW President Shawn Fain railed against the former president in a speech endorsing Biden, calling Trump a "scab" and adding that "Donald Trump is a billionaire, and that’s who he represents."

 

[DaddysSissySlut24]

Why does the person who made this thread want to be seen as a hypocrite and viewed as the Village Idiot? Why do I say this? Because, ok, granted maybe the question is posed as bait and not an actual perception by the person. In that case, this person is NOT a hypocrite and indeed is rather clever, much like a detective getting a perp to reveal things...

But if not, I stand by my descriptors, why? Anyone who thinks Trump is stupid needs to then explain the amassing of over a billion dollars in personal wealth, ok? There are 735 billionaires in the U.S. so it's not common. As well, Trump achieved what some would argue is the most powerful position...in the world. You can argue that point and I would say it's valid argument...I mean...the Pope?...Taylor Swift?...So even if you can argue one of these...the joint probability of a person being a billionaire AND POTUS? That is a fucking low-ass number, OK? I happen to know a shit-ton on probability and yes, "low-ass" IS the correct nomenclature.

What really gets me...and I truly weep for society...is that this is a ad hominem attack! It's name-calling which ideally one abandons around, ohhhh...12 years of age? And that's if you're...you know...tarded? It's a conclusion with no argument. I would have zero issue with "Why Does Trump Act in Stupid Ways?" that is a very different psuedoquestion.

Here is the irony. I don't know with any certainty, but I can imagine that right now, the person I am referencing is feeling butthurt. "Oh I've been attacked!" and I get the feeling because, well, I have thoughts on this person's, well...never mind...but notice I've attacked nobody! I've not called anyone anything, and have not even addressed in any conclusive manner, the motivation for this thread. Why? Because I am NOT the product of sex between siblings! I'm just not! And I was never kicked in the head...by any animal let alone a mule...nor have I suffered any major blows to the brain...now, there is the matter of substantial illicit substance abuse (really? use!) but LET HE WHO HATH...whatever the fuckin' bible says, I don't know. So in conclusion OH MY GOD! WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT A BROWN DOG?! (slips away undetected)

 

[SmokingFap]

Why does the person who made this thread want to be seen as a hypocrite and viewed as the Village Idiot? Why do I say this? Because, ok, granted maybe the question is posed as bait and not an actual perception by the person. In that case, this person is NOT a hypocrite and indeed is rather clever, much like a detective getting a perp to reveal things...

But if not, I stand by my descriptors, why? Anyone who thinks Trump is stupid needs to then explain the amassing of over a billion dollars in personal wealth, ok? There are 735 billionaires in the U.S. so it's not common. As well, Trump achieved what some would argue is the most powerful position...in the world. You can argue that point and I would say it's valid argument...I mean...the Pope?...Taylor Swift?...So even if you can argue one of these...the joint probability of a person being a billionaire AND POTUS? That is a fucking low-ass number, OK? I happen to know a shit-ton on probability and yes, "low-ass" IS the correct nomenclature.

What really gets me...and I truly weep for society...is that this is a ad hominem attack! It's name-calling which ideally one abandons around, ohhhh...12 years of age? And that's if you're...you know...tarded? It's a conclusion with no argument. I would have zero issue with "Why Does Trump Act in Stupid Ways?" that is a very different psuedoquestion.

Here is the irony. I don't know with any certainty, but I can imagine that right now, the person I am referencing is feeling butthurt. "Oh I've been attacked!" and I get the feeling because, well, I have thoughts on this person's, well...never mind...but notice I've attacked nobody! I've not called anyone anything, and have not even addressed in any conclusive manner, the motivation for this thread. Why? Because I am NOT the product of sex between siblings! I'm just not! And I was never kicked in the head...by any animal let alone a mule...nor have I suffered any major blows to the brain...now, there is the matter of substantial illicit substance abuse (really? use!) but LET HE WHO HATH...whatever the fuckin' bible says, I don't know. So in conclusion OH MY GOD! WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT A BROWN DOG?! (slips away undetected)

 

[Aglaopheme]

I’ve blocked them, enough is enough.

 

[KeithD]

explain the amassing of over a billion dollars in personal wealth, ok?

Inheriting money that would be more than this if he'd just left it in the bank.
Fudging the books to hide income.
Avoiding paying any taxes.
Manipulating the bankruptcy laws and leaving investors holding the bag.
Only paying vendors 20 percent on the owed dollar if even that.
Lying, lying, lying.
Encouraging being bribed.
Getting suckers like you to send his pockets money.

And he didn't think up how to get this done by himself. He was taught by other crooks.

Was this a trick question?

 

[dmallord]

Why does the person who made this thread want to be seen as a hypocrite and viewed as the Village Idiot? Why do I say this? Because, ok, granted maybe the question is posed as bait and not an actual perception by the person. In that case, this person is NOT a hypocrite and indeed is rather clever, much like a detective getting a perp to reveal things...

But if not, I stand by my descriptors, why? Anyone who thinks Trump is stupid needs to then explain the amassing of over a billion dollars in personal wealth, ok? There are 735 billionaires in the U.S. so it's not common. As well, Trump achieved what some would argue is the most powerful position...in the world. You can argue that point and I would say it's valid argument...I mean...the Pope?...Taylor Swift?...So even if you can argue one of these...the joint probability of a person being a billionaire AND POTUS? That is a fucking low-ass number, OK? I happen to know a shit-ton on probability and yes, "low-ass" IS the correct nomenclature.

What really gets me...and I truly weep for society...is that this is a ad hominem attack! It's name-calling which ideally one abandons around, ohhhh...12 years of age? And that's if you're...you know...tarded? It's a conclusion with no argument. I would have zero issue with "Why Does Trump Act in Stupid Ways?" that is a very different psuedoquestion.

Here is the irony. I don't know with any certainty, but I can imagine that right now, the person I am referencing is feeling butthurt. "Oh I've been attacked!" and I get the feeling because, well, I have thoughts on this person's, well...never mind...but notice I've attacked nobody! I've not called anyone anything, and have not even addressed in any conclusive manner, the motivation for this thread. Why? Because I am NOT the product of sex between siblings! I'm just not! And I was never kicked in the head...by any animal let alone a mule...nor have I suffered any major blows to the brain...now, there is the matter of substantial illicit substance abuse (really? use!) but LET HE WHO HATH...whatever the fuckin' bible says, I don't know. So in conclusion OH MY GOD! WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT A BROWN DOG?! (slips away undetected)

Remember, brown dog, to beg your master to put your lease back on your chain when you return through the hole in the fence you crawled out of.

You use "a (sic) ad hominem" in your post along with "...ohhhh...12 years of age? And that's if you're...you know...tarded?" Do you think your post doesn't seem to portray you as a hypocrite and viewed as the Village Idiot? Talk about a six-year-old mentality!

So, in conclusion, get back into your master's yard, bullshitter, before the city pound comes for you. However, you won't be able to slip away undetected. Everyone has your tag number after your rant.

 

[Deleted member 1215945]

 

[Bray123]

Trump has said that anyone like Kamala Harris (i.e. 'black') will only be able to get work as his golf caddy in his post-election world.

He's not keeping it secret. He's shouting his aims and racism across the internet.

 

[dkovic77]

Trump has said that anyone like Kamala Harris (i.e. 'black') will only be able to get work as his golf caddy in his post-election world.

He's not keeping it secret. He's shouting his aims and racism across the internet.

Good luck winning when you can’t sway black voters….a platform of job re-classification based on race seems like a great plan to ensure you won’t get those votes.

 

[Rightguide]

Remember, brown dog, to beg your master to put your lease back on your chain when you return through the hole in the fence you crawled out of.

You use "a (sic) ad hominem" in your post along with "...ohhhh...12 years of age? And that's if you're...you know...tarded?" Do you think your post doesn't seem to portray you as a hypocrite and viewed as the Village Idiot? Talk about a six-year-old mentality!

So, in conclusion, get back into your master's yard, bullshitter, before the city pound comes for you. However, you won't be able to slip away undetected. Everyone has your tag number after your rant.

Another master class in the art of arrogance and curmudgeonly assault and battery. You present yourself as the quintessential busybody. Always insisting on inflicting the long-suffering patience of others with your haughty attitude transforming every casual encounter into an inquisition showcasing your air of unearned superiority and tiresome verbal puffery.

 

[dmallord]

Another master class in the art of arrogance and curmudgeonly assault and battery. You present yourself as the quintessential busybody. Always insisting on inflicting the long-suffering patience of others with your haughty attitude transforming every casual encounter into an inquisition showcasing your air of unearned superiority and tiresome verbal puffery.

master class...arrogance...curmudgeonly...quintessential...haughty attitude...casual encounter?... and verbal puffery.

The Village deserved his castigation, though it will have little effect for all the effort put into the rebuke. Trumpian behaviorism is so infectious it would require substantial surgery to halt the disease. It is more likely that the cure for it would be as bad as the amputation.

I read about a Trumpian involved in an auto accident. The surgeon had to perform the first-ever bilateral body surgery–split him right down the middle and tossed away the entire left side of his body! Not to worry, Rightguide. The Republican is fine; he is... "all right" now!

You, sire, are the master of master-class art and pretentious buffoonery. I pass the crown...