Why have Republicans stopped bragging about the stock market?

3.5% unemployment, best in 50 years. Is American really going to remove the President from office? hardly.
 
My Apple stock is crushing it today as well, new 52-week high of $271 per share! It's close to being a 36-banger stock for me.
 
Last edited:
The vacillation between Trump's cheap-trick economics and his trade wars causes the DOW to go up and down, but the cheap-trick part of the equation is what will cause the ultimate collapse.

Of course the stock market goes into a feeding frenzy when regulations are gutted and taxes are cut. Any two-bit political hack can pull off that trick with the help of his Republican-held Senate and House during his first two years. The stock market does not think beyond a time horizon of a couple of years.

He is borrowing from future generations to throw a party today. BFD, Deplorables. Your repugnant policies and repugnant tactics will lead to a crash that will make the GW Bush crash look like a minor event, and this time, there will be no bailout for the big banks and brokerage firms.
 
Cheap-trick economics, the hallmark of the Republican Party. Gimme now and screw the future.
 
memo to mello

If you have to show pictures of a child on this site have a bit of sense and pixelate over their faces.
 
3.5% unemployment, best in 50 years. Is American really going to remove the President from office? hardly.
Of course, in the first 3 years of Obama's second term, the unemployment rate fell by 28.75%.
The three years of Trump's it's declined by almost as much, 25.5%.

I'm sure you'll tell us what a good job Obama did with the unemployment rate.

The labor force participation rate really hasn't moved much, up slightly but hasn't really changed significantly.
 
The picture was from the DailyMail with an interview with his parents. If they wanted their kid's face pixelated, they would have demanded it themselves.

Posting pictures of semi clothed children on a porn site is at best grossly insensitive, whether quoted or not, and I don't give a damn for your pathetic excuses. The child's parents did not know that some fuckwit would repost the picture of their child on a porn site.

And if you are relying on the Daily Mail you really do have incredibly low standards.
 
Posting pictures of semi clothed children on a porn site is at best grossly insensitive, whether quoted or not, and I don't give a damn for your pathetic excuses. The child's parents did not know that some fuckwit would repost the picture of their child on a porn site.

And if you are relying on the Daily Mail you really do have incredibly low standards.

idiot:cool:
 
Of course, in the first 3 years of Obama's second term, the unemployment rate fell by 28.75%.
The three years of Trump's it's declined by almost as much, 25.5%.

I'm sure you'll tell us what a good job Obama did with the unemployment rate.

The labor force participation rate really hasn't moved much, up slightly but hasn't really changed significantly.

big idiot
 
Posting pictures of semi clothed children on a porn site is at best grossly insensitive, whether quoted or not, and I don't give a damn for your pathetic excuses. The child's parents did not know that some fuckwit would repost the picture of their child on a porn site.

And if you are relying on the Daily Mail you really do have incredibly low standards.

Your virtue signaling is ridiculous. This is a thread about the stock market. The idea that
you inferred that the pic of a burn victim was even remotely sexualized has more to say
about you than me. Also, here's a pic of a child that the mod Laurel posted on her,
"For Those Having a Bad Day" thread. She and others have done the
same on other non-sexual threads. Are you going to go all super-woke douchbag
on them as well?
 
Back
Top