Why did the DOJ side with Darren Wilson ?

From here; flubbed the link earlier.



The point is they're trying to reach a "settlement" with the DOJ. They think it can do something to them.

At this point, the Ferguson PD's credibility with the people of Ferguson is so shot to Hell -- not just because of Brown/Wilson but because of everything in the DOJ's other report, all the blatant racism and shakedown-artistry -- probably the only way to police the town effectively is to abolish it and let the county police take over. The governor or whoever has the authority should step in here.

I see the locals are talking to the DOJ, and that might do some good. It can't do any harm. I don't know what they mean by a "settlement." Why should anybody pay anything to anybody because a thuggish young man was killed by a cop who was defending himself against a physical attack? :confused:

I referred to those three people as "anon." because their names were not included in what I read about it.
 
I see the locals are talking to the DOJ, and that might do some good. It can't do any harm. I don't know what they mean by a "settlement." Why should anybody pay anything to anybody because a thuggish young man was killed by a cop who was defending himself against a physical attack? :confused:

Great question, & I respond with one... Where is your proof that is how the scenario went down?

You have none? Didn't think so.

Fact is if anyone locally or nationally pressed charges against that man for killing MB, he could appeal or give up to millions of interviews from home, a cell, etc. Today, tomorrow, in 10 years, Micheal can do none of that due to what was clearly something that man should not have done, especially not without some form of punishment.

Fact is also that the average citizen expects a police officer's job description to basically be to "uphold the law". Personally, I also expect it to include protecting the average citizen. Wilson failed at one, & did the exact opposite of the other. I don;t care if you execute him, put him behind bars, or neither of the above, but you also don't allow him to carry a badge or gun for a split-second ever again.
 
Great question, & I respond with one... Where is your proof that is how the scenario went down?

You have none? Didn't think so.

Fact is if anyone locally or nationally pressed charges against that man for killing MB, he could appeal or give up to millions of interviews from home, a cell, etc. Today, tomorrow, in 10 years, Micheal can do none of that due to what was clearly something that man should not have done, especially not without some form of punishment.

Fact is also that the average citizen expects a police officer's job description to basically be to "uphold the law". Personally, I also expect it to include protecting the average citizen. Wilson failed at one, & did the exact opposite of the other. I don;t care if you execute him, put him behind bars, or neither of the above, but you also don't allow him to carry a badge or gun for a split-second ever again.

I don't personally have any proof, but there are the facts that the grand jury refused to indict and the DOJ refused to charge Wilson. Elsewhere on this thread or on similar ones are listed numerous details documenting the struggle for Wilson's gun and the proof that it did happen and the fact that Brown was rushing at Wilson in attack mode.

Police are expected to uphold the law, and that includes preventing deadly attacks on their persons, which is what Wilson did. They are also expected to protect the average citizen, but Brown was a huge, murderous thug, not an average citizen.
 
...but there are the facts that the grand jury refused to indict and the DOJ refused to charge Wilson.

Those are undeniable facts. That either was the right action/decision is not a fact. (Reminds me of a TV episode I love from roughly 50 years ago where a man has a job interview given by a machine, which the machine explains is to lessen the chances of "the human error".)

Police are expected to uphold the law, and that includes preventing deadly attacks on their persons, which is what Wilson did.

I've never been a cop, nor wanted to be one. However, if I were walking past a cop on a hypothetical sidewalks & a man pointed a gun at me, I'd want any nearby police to pull their weapon & stop the attack on me, not beat the would-be shooter to it!

They are also expected to protect the average citizen, but Brown was a huge, murderous thug, not an average citizen.

Not going to discuss their comparative sizes, but it's undeniable Wilson is now a murderer, whereas Brown can't hurt anyone, nor can he be an educator, a parent (or other relative), a role model, or... Long bit short, anything that requires one to be alive.
 
Officer Wilson is 6'4" and 210 pounds. Should we call him a huge murderous thug too?
 
Officer Wilson is 6'4" and 210 pounds. Should we call him a huge murderous thug too?

That would be an exaggeration. You can call him big, though. I also would not call him murderous because he killed somebody in self defense. He might be a thug, although I have no reason to think he is. I don't know what he does in his off-duty hours. :confused:
 
Captain Rick Henke. Sgt. William Mudd. Two veteran commanders, 2nd & 4th in Ferguson PD command, respectively. Not even in Bizarro World are they anons. People who claim "evidence" in their words should know better.

Officer Wilson is 6'4" and 210 pounds. Should we call him a huge murderous thug too?

I don't see why not.

Cops can be murderers and cops can be thugs. The badge is not a shield from their mentality. And Wilson was already problematic prior to his murdering Brown because of his trigger-happy fear of big black demons coming to eat his soul.
 
That would be an exaggeration. You can call him big, though. I also would not call him murderous because he killed somebody in self defense. He might be a thug, although I have no reason to think he is. I don't know what he does in his off-duty hours. :confused:
You said Michael Brown was murderous. Who did he murder?
 
Well, jes' thank the Good Blue-Eyed N' Blonde-Haired Lord Jesus Christ we have so many upstanding, good-behavioral and law-abiding angelical whites in this mighty nation of our'n to bring balance to The Force from the dark side.

Now! Who wants to go riot over some pumpkins? Raise yer hands!

http://aattp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/10-19-2014-9-06-28-AM.jpg



http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m040suCQ0D1rpglhvo1_400.gif

Monetizing racism. Hell, the highly problematic-in-his-career Darren Wilson got to be a near-millionaire for actualizing every gun-toting shitstain's wet dream. To be fair, some shitstains don't actually get away with it in the end, but when you've got a deeply entrenched racist police system to buddy up behind your back when the going gets tough, it's like having a never-pay-off gratis Platinum Visa for life.

Nice work, if you can get it.

He wasn't killed for Jaywalking. That's just disingenuous. He was killed for resisting arrest.
 
I see the locals are talking to the DOJ, and that might do some good. It can't do any harm. I don't know what they mean by a "settlement." Why should anybody pay anything to anybody because a thuggish young man was killed by a cop who was defending himself against a physical attack? :confused:

I referred to those three people as "anon." because their names were not included in what I read about it.

I thought the locals had already talked to everyone that would listen and quite a few that wouldn't listen. Some even did so under oath.
They lied.
 
Officer Wilson is 6'4" and 210 pounds. Should we call him a huge murderous thug too?

Did he rob a store? Did he attack a cop? Did he stop traffic? Was he high?
No, he stopped a murderous thug who did all of the above.
 
I see the locals are talking to the DOJ, and that might do some good. It can't do any harm. I don't know what they mean by a "settlement." Why should anybody pay anything to anybody because a thuggish young man was killed by a cop who was defending himself against a physical attack? :confused:

The "settlement" has nothing to do with Brown/Wilson, it has to do with the other DOJ report, all the racism and shakedown-artistry in the Ferguson PD. And it would not involve paying the DOJ money, it would involve cleaning up their act. If that is possible.
 
The "settlement" has nothing to do with Brown/Wilson, it has to do with the other DOJ report, all the racism and shakedown-artistry in the Ferguson PD. And it would not involve paying the DOJ money, it would involve cleaning up their act. If that is possible.

Usually, when somebody refers to a "settlement" in a situation which is alleged here, they mean a monetary one. I haven't seen the DOJ report but, given the nature of the AG, I would presume it to be quite biased.
 
He wasn't killed for Jaywalking. That's just disingenuous. He was killed for resisting arrest.

Because A led to B, there is nothing wrong with connecting the logic stream.

And if certain people still want to label Brown as a "murdering thug" because of their privileged fears, then I have no fucks given for telling it like it is, however seemingly disingenuous to technical eyes.

Officer Wilson had no police record? OK then.

Yeah. He apparently had a spotless record as a policeman, didn't you know?
 
Because A led to B, there is nothing wrong with connecting the logic stream.

And if certain people still want to label Brown as a "murdering thug" because of their privileged fears, then I have no fucks given for telling it like it is, however seemingly disingenuous to technical eyes.



Yeah. He apparently had a spotless record as a policeman, didn't you know?

That's bullshit and it is totally disingenuous. Wilson didn't shoot him when he saw him in the middle of the street. Brown's actions in resisting arrest led to the escalation and the eventual shooting.
 
too many people watching, DOJ was hijacked by the obama regime and they are not ready to come out as terrorist yet
 
a special kind of racist pop tart you are ... by that I mean retard




Because A led to B, there is nothing wrong with connecting the logic stream.

And if certain people still want to label Brown as a "murdering thug" because of their privileged fears, then I have no fucks given for telling it like it is, however seemingly disingenuous to technical eyes.



Yeah. He apparently had a spotless record as a policeman, didn't you know?
 
Because A led to B, there is nothing wrong with connecting the logic stream.

And if certain people still want to label Brown as a "murdering thug" because of their privileged fears, then I have no fucks given for telling it like it is, however seemingly disingenuous to technical eyes.



Yeah. He apparently had a spotless record as a policeman, didn't you know?

Don't know about that but he didn't come from robbing a story just before he was attacked.
 
That's bullshit and it is totally disingenuous. Wilson didn't shoot him when he saw him in the middle of the street. Brown's actions in resisting arrest led to the escalation and the eventual shooting.

It's not bullshit because if it weren't for the jaywalking, Wilson had no reason to pull Brown over. Because the so-called "robbery" bullshit excuse was unknown to Wilson.

The "resisting" is incidental and if Wilson had been a proper policeman there wouldn't have been a need to shoot to kill. Funny how Brown ended up being murdered in the middle of the street, innit?
 
Back
Top