Why are Lit Libs so vicious and angry?

So intolerance is ok if the motives are right.

Theres lotsa shit sane-smart people dont tolerate. Like your average baby mama and her pups cost taxpayers $60,000 per year. AFDC, Medicaid, Section 8 rent, free bus passes, free tuition to Nail Tech U, WIC, etc. Our bus line added up the costs to tote baby mamas around, and it would be lots cheaper to buy the women new cars.
 
Like that President Obama was born in Kenya?

WE ARE RETARDS!! Kenya say it with me? WE ARE RETARDED!!!
 
So intolerance is ok if the motives are right.

It's a paradox that philosophers marginally smarter than me and definitely smarter than you have grappled with for centuries.

The basic dilemma of tolerance is fundamentally impossible. If something is intolerable, we cannot and should not tolerate it. Some people argue that tolerance is defensible only when it serves to support or protect some greater public good.

When we demand unilateral unconditional tolerance from others, we're asking them to give up their desire to drive out beliefs they detest.

Derp.
 
I have asked you more than once to make a case for voting for Obama.

Romney wants to outlaw abortion, birth control, even probably tampons. He hates women and is racist which was proven back in 08 when he said that African Americans are dogs. Do you really want somebody like Hitler in the white house? Keep the white house white, huh? Noone who isn't a racist or a full blown retard could vote repukelickin That's why I'm being nice calling you all retards.
 
I have asked you more than once to make a case for voting for Obama.

And you misunderstand the burden of proof here.

In a status quo situation (and in this case, it's Barack Obama serving as President of the United States, duly elected by a majority of Americans), the onus on you to tell us why change (in this case, electing Mitt Romney) would better serve the needs of all Americans.

This seems to be something you are unable or unwilling to articulate.

....not that it matters much at this late date. There's less than 100 hours until America goes to the polls. Virtually everyone has made their decision and very few will be persuaded to vote otherwise.
 
Romney wants to outlaw abortion, birth control, even probably tampons. He hates women and is racist which was proven back in 08 when he said that African Americans are dogs. Do you really want somebody like Hitler in the white house? Keep the white house white, huh? Noone who isn't a racist or a full blown retard could vote repukelickin That's why I'm being nice calling you all retards.

I'm guessing there are many here on Lit voting for Obama for the exact same reasons.
 
It's a paradox that philosophers marginally smarter than me and definitely smarter than you have grappled with for centuries.

The basic dilemma of tolerance is fundamentally impossible. If something is intolerable, we cannot and should not tolerate it. Some people argue that tolerance is defensible only when it serves to support or protect some greater public good.

When we demand unilateral unconditional tolerance from others, we're asking them to give up their desire to drive out beliefs they detest.

Derp.

So you agree that intolerance is acceptable if the motives are right.
 
You may want to rethink that.

Why? It's a simple fact. Adjusted for inflation the debt from WW2 was roughly equal to our current debt and it was nearly paid off (and would have been had Reagan not changed the Tax Code) my Grandparents, your parents, paid their debt off before dying. Sure you helped but they didn't leave SHIT for me. There is no reason you should be leaving your grandchildren or my children with debt and the only reason we are going to is because you refuse to pay it down. It's a plain and simple fact.
 
Well when you layout a cogent fact filled argument like that how could anyone disagree with you.

Do you really need me to think for you? Are you really not able to arrive by an opinion on your own?


*laughing* Many liberals have facts just like that, explaining why they dislike Romney.

I dislike Romney because he's an empty suit devoid of any new ideas. If Republicans had wanted a CEO to be President, they should have looked to Jack Welch. At least he has the moral fiber to stand on his own two feet.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top