Why are feminists defending Lena Dunham's molestation of her sister?

[LJ_Reloaded]

Perhaps it's because she's a woman and feminists don't want women to be punished for any crime whatsoever?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Story is several months old. Where have you been?

 

[tactful]

Story is several months old. Where have you been?

Probably looking for ladder, to climb out of the gutter.

 

[Mike_Yates]

Lena Dunham is a very unattractive woman and I would not have sex with her if she was the last woman on the planet.

And obviously she also has some very serious issues and sexual dysfunctions.

 

[badbabysitter]

Perhaps it's because she's a woman and feminists don't want women to be punished for any crime whatsoever?

and Lena Dunham was seven at the time....




but good work on being outraged by what your right wing masters tell you to be outraged by

 

[Mike_Yates]

I lost whatever little respect that I had for Lena Dunham after learning that she molested her own sister.

That's fucking disgusting! There is something mentally wrong with this woman!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

and Lena Dunham was seven at the time....

And the boy in the FIRST link I provided was SIX YEARS OLD

yet unlike Lena Dunham he was busted for molesting his sibling

Why? Because feminism says only boys can be found guilty of that.

but good work on being outraged by what your right wing masters tell you to be outraged by

What right wing masters? Now you're just making shit up.

I've never followed any right wing master and you know it. Lena Dunham admitted to molesting her sister. She wrote about it in her own book. Are you saying "right wing masters" made her write that?

Well? Are you?

If not then you can't accuse me of having any "right wing masters"

stupid bitch, why don't you just go kill yourself and join your credibility in hell?

 

[badbabysitter]

And the boy in the FIRST link I provided was SIX YEARS OLD

yet unlike Lena Dunham he was busted for molesting his sibling

Why? Because feminism says only boys can be found guilty of that.

so you're more upset that Lena Dunham hasnt been punished then you are concerned with the injustice being doe to the boy

your entire thread title was about attacking Lena.. not defending the boy

you dont want justice for the boy.. you just want to see her punished

What right wing masters? Now you're just making shit up.

I've never followed any right wing master and you know it.

http://static.gamespot.com/uploads/original/372/3721937/2349150-laughing-hysterically.gif


oh wait.. you're being serious?

so when you kept posting all those op-eds from right wing Indian newspapers about thier outrage with a law that hasnt existed for 7 years... ..they werent you spouting the right wing line

you are a proud member of a movement in which 80 per cent of them are self identified as white conservative men..


you have used the term social justice warrior on several occasions.. a word invented by the champion of all things liberal; Glenn Beck

you trot out Chrsitina Sommers in your defense of Gamer Gate... completely ignoring that she works for a right wing think tank, and writes for a right wing journal


and your most recent acheivement.. declaring the Daily Caller to not be a right wing rag..despite it being founded and owned by Tucker Carlson.. with regular columnists, Dick Cheney, Ann Coulter, and Dubya...somehow also ignoring it is a favoured newsite for that Lit liberal busybody

with the exception of abortion.. you tow the GOP company line when it comes to women....

it's hilarious because you are literally the only one who cant see this

Lena Dunham admitted to molesting her sister. She wrote about it in her own book. Are you saying "right wing masters" made her write that?

Dude, do you have any idea what she actually said... right wing blogs claim she's admitted to that

here's what she said


Lena Dunham, the creator of the hit television series Girls, has issued an apology after being attacked in the US for passages in her recently released memoir which critics have said amount to the sexual abuse of her younger sister.

Dunham, 28, who this week cancelled a planned appearance at book events in Antwerp and Berlin, initially struck a defiant tone after parts of the book, Not That Kind of Girl, were highlighted by the right-wing press.

The passages cited include one that describes an incident when Dunham was seven and her sister was one and playing on the driveway. Dunham writes that “curiosity got the best” of her and she opened her sister’s vagina only to call for her mother when she found the toddler had “six or seven pebbles in there”.

“My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina,” Dunham wrote. “This was within the spectrum of things that I did.”

In another passage that has attracted critics she describes trying to persuade her sister to “kiss her on the lips for five seconds” by offering gifts of sweets or coins. “Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl, I was trying,” wrote Dunham.

The website Truth Revolt, which says its mission is to “unmask leftists in the media for who they are” wrote that the book sees Dunham describe “using her little sister at times essentially as a sexual outlet”.

Kevin Williamson in National Review wrote that there is “no non-horrific interpretation” of the episode with the stones. Dunham’s parents, he said, “were, in their daughter’s telling, enablers of some very disturbing behaviour that would be considered child abuse in many jurisdictions”.

Dunham initially took to Twitter in what she described as a “rage spiral”.

“The right-wing news story that I molested my little sister isn’t just LOL – it’s really fucking upsetting and disgusting. And by the way, if you were a little kid and never looked at another little kid’s vagina, well, congrats to you,” she wrote.

“Usually this is stuff I can ignore but don’t demean sufferers, don’t twist my words, back the fuck up bros. I told a story about being a weird seven-year-old. I bet you have some too, old men, that I’d rather not hear … Sometimes I get so mad I burn right up.”


But Dunham has now released a more conciliatory statement, in which she says she is “dismayed over the recent interpretation of events described in my book Not That Kind of Girl”.


“First and foremost, I want to be very clear that I do not condone any kind of abuse under any circumstances,” wrote Dunham. “Childhood sexual abuse is a life-shattering event for so many, and I have been vocal about the rights of survivors. If the situations described in my book have been painful or triggering for people to read, I am sorry, as that was never my intention.”

She added she was “also aware that the comic use of the term ‘sexual predator’ was insensitive, and I’m sorry for that as well”.

“As for my sibling, Grace, she is my best friend, and anything I have written about her has been published with her approval,” concluded the statement.

Dunham’s lawyers have also written to Truth Revolt demanding an apology and threatening legal action. The letter,

obtained by the Hollywood Reporter, sees Dunham’s lawyer write that the article “is false, fabricated, and has the obvious tendency to subject my client to ridicule, and to injure her in her occupation”.

Truth Revolt’s Ben Shapiro, editor-in-chief, wrote that “we refuse to withdraw our story or apologise for running it, because quoting a woman’s book does not constitute a ‘false’ story, even if she is a prominent actress and leftwing activist. Lena Dunham may not like our interpretation of her book, but unfortunately for her and her attorneys, she wrote that book – and the First Amendment covers a good deal of material she may not like.”

Dunham tweeted at the weekend: “I wish my sister wasn’t laughing so hard” about the situation. Grace Dunham has also now defended her sister. She tweeted: “Heteronormativity deems certain behaviours harmful, and others ‘normal’; the state and media are always invested in maintaining that … As a queer person: I’m committed to people narrating their own experiences, determining for themselves what has and has not been harmful,” and that “2day, like every other day, is a good day to think about how we police the sexualities of young women, queer, and trans people”.

Well? Are you?

If not then you can't accuse me of having any "right wing masters"

I can... you repeated their bullshit and never bothered to have an independent thought.. they said " jump".. and you said " how high, master?"

stupid bitch, why don't you just go kill yourself and join your credibility in hell?

and then he ends it with more violence fantasies.. just like when he said he wanted the discourse to be civil and was tired of name calling

you do your masters proud

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

so you're more upset that Lena Dunham hasnt been punished then you are concerned with the injustice being doe to the boy

your entire thread title was about attacking Lena.. not defending the boy

you dont want justice for the boy.. you just want to see her punished

I want equal treatment in the eyes of the law you stupid bitch.

so when you kept posting all those op-eds from right wing Indian newspapers about thier outrage with a law that hasnt existed for 7 years... ..they werent you spouting the right wing line

Those aren't right wing Indian newspapers.

You literally just lied through your teeth half a dozen MORE times after this and you did this because you know this entire forum is a bunch of rabid feminists who believe any shit that comes out of your mouth.

The passages cited include one that describes an incident when Dunham was seven and her sister was one and playing on the driveway. Dunham writes that “curiosity got the best” of her and she opened her sister’s vagina only to call for her mother when she found the toddler had “six or seven pebbles in there”.

“My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina,” Dunham wrote. “This was within the spectrum of things that I did.”

SHE FUCKING OPENED HER OWN SISTER'S.... SHE OPENLY ADMITTED TO ... I can't even write the fucking words, it's just that damned sick.

SHE ADMITTED TO IT YOU LYING JACKASS

In another passage that has attracted critics she describes trying to persuade her sister to “kiss her on the lips for five seconds” by offering gifts of sweets or coins. “Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl, I was trying,” wrote Dunham.

SHE ADMITTED TO MOLESTING A KID IN HER OWN DAMNED WORDS

Truth Revolt has fuck all to do with that. It's written right there in her book. A boy who came even close to doing that went to jail, but she gets to walk.

You're more like a right wing Republican than Truth Revolt.

Your accusations of me having ANY links to right wingers is smashed.

Crushed.

Pulverized.

Incinerated.

VAPORIZED.

The ashes that were once your credibility are scattering to the wind. You right wing fuck.

 

[Mike_Yates]

There is something very sick and morbid with this Lena Dunham woman.

I do not respect her.

 

[badbabysitter]

I want equal treatment in the eyes of the law you stupid bitch.

no, you dont... you want her punished and him free.. that's not equal treatment

Those aren't right wing Indian newspapers.

because you say so? bitch, please

you literally said the same thing about the Daily Caller

and I couldnt help but notice you didnt mention any of the other heroes of yours I mentioned.. funny that

You literally just lied through your teeth half a dozen MORE times after this and you did this because you know this entire forum is a bunch of rabid feminists who believe any shit that comes out of your mouth.

so you're saying you didnt claim the Daily Caller wasnt right wing? that you didnt use Christina Sommers as an antigamer gate figure, that you havent used Glen Becks " social justice warrior" as an insult

we're not all rabid feminists.. we're just not puppets to right wing masters like you are

SHE FUCKING OPENED HER OWN SISTER'S.... SHE OPENLY ADMITTED TO ... I can't even write the fucking words, it's just that damned sick.

SHE ADMITTED TO IT YOU LYING JACKASS


SHE ADMITTED TO MOLESTING A KID IN HER OWN DAMNED WORDS


And the boy in the FIRST link I provided was SIX YEARS OLD

yet unlike Lena Dunham he was busted for molesting his sibling

and this above is why you dont give a shit about the boy, you're more concerned with her being punished

the only way for the boy to get justice for doing something you dont see as wrong... is for Lena Dunham to get punished..... for something you dont see as being wrong for the boy

what do you suggest? is the only way for this boy to acheive justice is for Lena Dunham to be punished?

do you want the boy to be not punished, but lena to be punished?

do you want them to be both punished?

or do you want both of them to be not punished

your answer will be quite revealing

Truth Revolt has fuck all to do with that. It's written right there in her book. A boy who came even close to doing that went to jail, but she gets to walk.

read above

You're more like a right wing Republican than Truth Revolt.

fine, show me where I link articles to right wing sites and figures... like you do

Your accusations of me having ANY links to right wingers is smashed.



Crushed.

Pulverized.

Incinerated.

VAPORIZED.

The ashes that were once your credibility are scattering to the wind. You right wing fuck.

so you still deny using Christina Hoff Summers, Glenn Becks invented language, and the Daily Caller?


...let alone a white supremists one sided understanding of hypergamy?


you so funny

 

[Boxlicker101]

As far as I'm concerned, no child of five or six or seven should be arrested or charged for "playing doctor," butt or anything. I think the worst part was the six year old boy who touched the other child's bare buttock and is now charged with some kind of statutory rape. For one thing, the girl said there was no penetration, which would mean the touching was not a sex act and was not illegal.

However, if some stupid prosecutor wants to charge somebody, all participants should be charged because everything was consensual and they were all under 12 years old.

BTW, D was not accused of molesting his sister. It was a different child, one who was there with her brother for a play date. Not that there should be a particle of difference, but just to keep the facts straight.

 

[badbabysitter]

As far as I'm concerned, no child of five or six or seven should be arrested or charged for "playing doctor," butt or anything. I think the worst part was the six year old boy who touched the other child's bare buttock and is now charged with some kind of statutory rape. For one thing, the girl said there was no penetration, which would mean the touching was not a sex act and was not illegal.

However, if some stupid prosecutor wants to charge somebody, all participants should be charged because everything was consensual and they were all under 12 years old.

BTW, D was not accused of molesting his sister. It was a different child, one who was there with her brother for a play date. Not that there should be a particle of difference, but just to keep the facts straight.

I dont think the boy or Dunham should be punished for playing doctor..the parents and prosecutor should get the stick removed from their ass

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

no, you dont... you want her punished and him free.. that's not equal treatment

Show where I ever said that. Oops, you can't, because as usual you're a liar.

because you say so? bitch, please

you literally said the same thing about the Daily Caller

NOT a Conservative site.

so you're saying you didnt claim the Daily Caller wasnt right wing? that you didnt use Christina Sommers as an antigamer gate figure, that you havent used Glen Becks " social justice warrior" as an insult

The Daily Caller is NOT Right Wing, nor is Christina Sommers, Glenn Beck did NOT invent "Social Justice Warrior"

That's four lies by you so far.

we're just not puppets to right wing masters like you are

Five lies.

The truth is you like molesting children and you're just mad that Lena Dunham got away with it. That's what your REAL problem is.

 

[badbabysitter]

Show where I ever said that. Oops, you can't, because as usual you're a liar.

so why the fuck are you more angry at her... then you are about what's being done to him?

NOT a Conservative site.

The Daily Caller is a politically conservative[2][3] news and opinion website based in Washington, D.C., United States. Founded by Tucker Carlson, a libertarian conservative[4][5] political pundit, and Neil Patel, former adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller launched on January 11, 2010. In late 2012, The New York Times reported that the site had quadrupled its page view and total audience and had become profitable without ever buying an advertisement for itself.[6]

The Daily Caller is NOT Right Wing

The Daily Caller is a politically conservative[2][3] news and opinion website based in Washington, D.C., United States. Founded by Tucker Carlson, a libertarian conservative[4][5] political pundit, and Neil Patel, former adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller launched on January 11, 2010. In late 2012, The New York Times reported that the site had quadrupled its page view and total audience and had become profitable without ever buying an advertisement for itself.[6]

, nor is Christina Sommers,

Sommers is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

AEI is the most prominent think tank associated with American neoconservatism, in both the domestic and international policy arenas.[14] Irving Kristol, widely considered a father of neoconservatism, was a senior fellow at AEI (arriving from the Congress for Cultural Freedom following the widespread revelation of the group's CIA funding)[15] and many prominent neoconservatives—including Jeane Kirkpatrick, Ben Wattenberg, and Joshua Muravchik—spent the bulk of their careers at AEI

Glenn Beck did NOT invent "Social Justice Warrior"

I looked it up.. you're right on this one.. I suppose I should have just shortened it " social justice as a negative thing.. which seems to be your forte

That's four lies by you so far.

one out of four actually

Five lies.

read above..

The truth is you like molesting children and you're just mad that Lena Dunham got away with it. That's what your REAL problem is.

ah... so you wont answer it

do you want the boy to see justice... or Dunham punished?

it's a simple question

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

Look, dude. I am no fan of feminism, but isn't this horse a bit dead to keep beating it? Every fucking thread about the perfidy of feminists, real or imagined. Sure, yes, there are flakes in feminism. I'll agree with you there. The hesitation of the moderates to condemn them is what annoys me about feminism, just as the reluctance of moderate Islam to condemn extremists annoys me about that.

Still, Jesus, man! I thought that I was anti-feminist, but I don't obsess over it like this.

 

[Mike_Yates]

Legally speaking, could Lena Dunham be prosecuted for child molestation?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Wait...

LeJackass actually tried to claim that "The Daily Caller" wasn't a RW rag?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha.. *cough* hah!

It's good to know that LeMorons never change their stripes.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

so why the fuck are you more angry at her... then you are about what's being done to him?

I'm angry that EQUAL TREATMENT was not achieved or even attempted here.

The Daily Caller is a politically conservative[2][3] news and opinion website based in Washington, D.C., United States. Founded by Tucker Carlson, a libertarian conservative[4][5] political pundit, and Neil Patel, former adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller launched on January 11, 2010. In late 2012, The New York Times reported that the site had quadrupled its page view and total audience and had become profitable without ever buying an advertisement for itself.[6]

Lie #1. As I said before your problem is you LIKE molesting children and you'll find any justification you can to distract the issue away from this.

The Daily Caller is a politically conservative[2][3] news and opinion website based in Washington, D.C., United States. Founded by Tucker Carlson, a libertarian conservative[4][5] political pundit, and Neil Patel, former adviser to former Vice President Dick Cheney, The Daily Caller launched on January 11, 2010. In late 2012, The New York Times reported that the site had quadrupled its page view and total audience and had become profitable without ever buying an advertisement for itself.[6]

Lie #2. Your problem is you LIKE molesting children and you'll find any justification you can to distract the issue away from this.

Sommers is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

AEI is the most prominent think tank associated with American neoconservatism, in both the domestic and international policy arenas.[14] Irving Kristol, widely considered a father of neoconservatism, was a senior fellow at AEI (arriving from the Congress for Cultural Freedom following the widespread revelation of the group's CIA funding)[15] and many prominent neoconservatives—including Jeane Kirkpatrick, Ben Wattenberg, and Joshua Muravchik—spent the bulk of their careers at AEI

Lie #3. Your problem is you LIKE molesting children and you'll find any justification you can to distract the issue away from this.

do you want the boy to see justice... or Dunham punished?

it's a simple question

Both should either be punished or let go. Your question has been answered. AGAIN.

I want the law to treat this behavior equally without regards to gender. All you've done here is make up LIES about me and LIES about factual sources to distract attention away from the fact that a woman child molestor is getting lionized by the media while a boy who did the same thing went to jail. You LIKE the status quo and you DON'T LIKE anyone who questions it.

Well fuck you, because I'm going to keep questioning it and fighting it until the law treats everyone equally.

Oh and by the way most Conservatives around here would call me a SJW even regarding THEIR policies concerning women, race issues, and, well, EVERYTHING PERIOD. That makes you look like an even BIGGER liar and idiot than you already are.

 

[badbabysitter]

I'm angry that EQUAL TREATMENT was not achieved or even attempted here.

but you dont want to pick a side... because you're so upset bwahahahahaha

Lie #1. As I said before your problem is you LIKE molesting children and you'll find any justification you can to distract the issue away from this.


Lie #2. Your problem is you LIKE molesting children and you'll find any justification you can to distract the issue away from this.


Lie #3. Your problem is you LIKE molesting children and you'll find any justification you can to distract the issue away from this.

bwahahahahahahaha... oh man... that is the most epic meltdown I've seen in ages...

I even admitted to being wrong about Beck.. but you.. oh man... now that I've shown you that you were completely wrong about something, you start raving and screaming

putting your fingers in your ears and throwing a tantrum is not considered a legit debate tactic... if you are indicative of the Men's Rights Movement...it's hardly suprising they get mocked, because you can't take that kind of 12 year old shit seriously

post 13... I'm already on record stating neither should be punished

Both should either be punished or let go. Your question has been answered. AGAIN.

this is literally the first time you answered.. and that's not even an answer

if you want to see them both punished./.. you wouldnt have been outraged by his treatment... if you dont want to see her punished, you wouldnt have been outraged by hers either

I want the law to treat this behavior equally without regards to genderAll you've done here is make up LIES about me and LIES about factual sources

bwahahahahahahah.. still cant face the truth about the Daily caller or Sommers

to distract attention away from the fact that a woman child molestor is getting lionized by the media while a boy who did the same thing went to jail.

so you dont feel the boy deserves it... but you still think she does

need to get your stories straight

either the boy deserves punishment or he doesnt

You LIKE the status quo and you DON'T LIKE anyone who questions it.

you can't pick a side... how is it that me not questioning the status quo.. .. I made my decision.. you dont want to support the boy, you dont want to stand against the boy.... you want to do nothing but cluck your tongue

Well fuck you, because I'm going to keep questioning it and fighting it until the law treats everyone equally.

but you're not fighting it... you officially delcared nuetrality, bwahahahahaha

Oh and by the way most Conservatives around here would call me a SJW even regarding THEIR policies concerning women, race issues, and, well, EVERYTHING PERIOD. That makes you look like an even BIGGER liar and idiot than you already are.

sure.... now find something from the Daily Caller to support that

bwahahahahahahaha

 

[badbabysitter]

Wait...

LeJackass actually tried to claim that "The Daily Caller" wasn't a RW rag?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha.. *cough* hah!

It's good to know that LeMorons never change their stripes.

this is one of the most epic meltdowns I've seen in ages

he has no idea how much laughter he brings to the world

 

[CNYCarol]

Oh please, they're children! Their knowledge of sexual matters is nearly non-existant. This is simply a case of an adult seeing something and blowing it all out of proportion.

As a comical aside, my sister had a chat with her 4 year old daughter, explaining that she had a vagina because she was a girl and her brother had a penis because he was a boy.

A few days later she saw her brother peeing and asked, "Is that your penis? I don't got a penis, I got a gina."

Like the children in the article, she had nearly ZERO concept of sexual matters.

 

[pointless]

smells like wet socks in here.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

but you dont want to pick a side... because you're so upset bwahahahahaha

Equality only picks one side: equal punishment and protection under the law.

You seem to have a problem with that.

bwahahahahahahaha... oh man... that is the most epic meltdown I've seen in ages...

I even admitted to being wrong about Beck.. but you.. oh man... now that I've shown you that you were completely wrong about something, you start raving and screaming

putting your fingers in your ears and throwing a tantrum is not considered a legit debate tactic... if you are indicative of the Men's Rights Movement...it's hardly suprising they get mocked, because you can't take that kind of 12 year old shit seriously

Calling you out as a liar for accusing my sources of being right wing rags is not a meltdown or a tantrum.

It is fact.

And that is why the VAST MAJORITY of this country both believes in equality and yet wants nothing to do with feminism.

if you want to see them both punished./.. you wouldnt have been outraged by his treatment... if you dont want to see her punished, you wouldnt have been outraged by hers either

To call you as dumb as a rock is to insult rocks.

I am outraged by the lack of equal treatment. I am outraged at the fact that justice was not blind here.

so you dont feel the boy deserves it... but you still think she does

need to get your stories straight

You're a bald faced liar.

Can anyone on Lit comprehend what "equal treatment under the law" means? Apparently you claim it means letting him off and punishing her.

As long as you're too retarded to understand what "equal treatment under the law" means you continue to be the reason why I am part of the 80% and you're part of the hated 20%.

And you're STILL a fucking child molestation defender.

 

[badbabysitter]

Equality only picks one side: equal punishment and protection under the law.

You seem to have a problem with that.

if either of them go to jail for playing doctor... yeah, I have a problem with that

you have no problem with the kid going to jail... just as long as lena does as well

that's " equality" in the sense you dont give a shit about the kid.. you'd rather him be punished, jsut as long as she gets punished

Calling you out as a liar for accusing my sources of being right wing rags is not a meltdown or a tantrum.

dude.. i literally cited you how they were right wing sources

everyone here on the left knows Daily Caller, everyone here on the right knows Daily Caller is right wing, every politico in North Am,erica knows the Daily caller is a right wing.. [B]the people that own and run the Daily Caller think it's a right wing rag[/B]

how is it that you dont?

and you just denied and denied and denied... and kept repeating yourself ad nauseum as to avoid what is being said.. that's a child sticking fingers in his ears and screaming lalalalalalalala...

It is fact.

dude, you were shown facts and you ignored each and every single one

And that is why the VAST MAJORITY of this country both believes in equality and yet wants nothing to do with feminism.

yet the minute a woman does something bad you attriute it to feminism.. even if she has literally no connection to feminism... and if the vast majority of people arent feminists.. then by your own standards they cant be feminists... so you lie about the women and about feminism.. by your own argument

To call you as dumb as a rock is to insult rocks.

did you get that from the Daily Caller?

I am outraged by the lack of equal treatment. I am outraged at the fact that justice was not blind here.

once again, if both went to jail.. you'd be happy the kid is in jail

I would not be .. because that is an injustice

You're a bald faced liar.

also get the from the Daily Caller?

Can anyone on Lit comprehend what "equal treatment under the law" means? Apparently you claim it means letting him off and punishing her.

I believe in justice... for both of them.. neither of them should be punished

you want them to be both punished, or not punished

you just cant make a stand

As long as you're too retarded to understand what "equal treatment under the law" means you continue to be the reason why I am part of the 80% and you're part of the hated 20%.

oh I know what it means.. it means you want the kid punished or not punished...

And you're STILL a fucking child molestation defender.

dude, I dont want the kid to go to jail for playing doctor..said it several times now.. something you have not

you dont give a shit for the kid... just as long as they are either punished or not.. that doesnt make you a hero.. that makes you wishwashy

if your kids play doctor.. you think they should go trial?


because that would be equal treatment under the law