Why, Again, Are We Supposed to be so Tolerant Towards Islam?

VinnyVeritas

Libertarian Sage
Joined
Oct 11, 2022
Posts
2,842
It's a real Liberal conundrum after having adopted Islam as their religion of choice (over evil Christianity):

The all-Muslim city council in Hamtramck, Michigan, has fired two human relations commissioners after they flew the LGBTQ pride flag on public property in violation of a recent law banning such flags.

As Breitbart News reported in June, the all-Muslim city council “voted unanimously on Tuesday to approve a resolution that would ban the LGBTQ+ Pride flag from being flown on the city’s public property.” The report said:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...r-flying-lgbtq-pride-flag-on-public-property/


Now, I know nobody saw this on MSNBC, the other alphabets, The Times, either NY or LA, the "good, truthful" websites...


;) ;)
 
The opposition or support of a religion is not the same as support or opposition to a theocracy. A person is free to choose and practice their religion. They are not free to create governmental laws to enforce religion.

Hope this helps. 👍
 
You're quoting Breitbart as a sensible source? Dude, you'll be quoting Trope Social next.

But surely Breitbart should be hailing this city as a paragon of virtue; they've been calling for this policy since for ever.
 
No. It's going to evolve in a Muslim-bashing tirade because to people who think like you, in the victimhood hierarchy, gay Trmups Muslim.
 
The Christians who are murdering women trying to save themselves from death during pregnancy are telling us that we shouldn't be tolerant of Muslims.

The hypocrisy is palpable.
 
The Christians who are murdering women trying to save themselves from death during pregnancy are telling us that we shouldn't be tolerant of Muslims.

The hypocrisy is palpable.
Hyperventilation is unhealthy.
 
Question. Are these Muhammad/Mecca Muslims or are they NOI Muslims? Same name, different people/beliefs, kinda like Catholics and Protestants but worse. The Mecca Muslims might have half an idea that this is 'Murrika and that they're in it. The NOI wants to burn it down unless white devils willingly sign it over to them.


Ask Malcom. Oh wait . . . .
 
If a single one of you 'Noids had gone to the facts, I wouldn't have to debase myself by posting on an AJ/Spearcatcher thread. The language of the Hamtramck flag ordinance reads in part,


"
The City of Hamtramck does not allow any religious, ethnic, racial, political, or sexual orientation group flags to be flown on the City's public properties, and that only, the American flag, the flag of the State of Michigan, the Hamtramck Flag, the Prisoner of War flag on City property."

That type of policy is very common across the country and is appropriate for government owned properties and facilities.
 
d62ad026016bbe292a4b3f8f963fa9df72886b49.png
 
I note the false equivalency as the Left rushes to defend and deflect when it comes to their religion of choice.

B-b-b-but Christians. It's like the caught bank robber who says, "Why single me out? that guy over there, that Jean Valjean, he stole some candlesticks!"

*chuckle*

They made my point better than I could. The Left always holds Islam harmless while considering Christianity as the devil's own handiwork, the bane of mankind.

[Again, for the record, I'm an Atheist.]
 
Again, my point is reenforced.

The Left is a gathering of oikaphobes (Roger Scruton).
You have no point.

Islam is a religion that some people practice. If you wish to not be tolerant of someone else's religion, that's up to you. That's not a defense of any religion...that's a defense of freedom of religion.

(And for the record, I don't give a fuck what religion you do or do not believe in)
 
Back
Top