who is the smallest government spender since Eisenhower?

[RyansWill]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickung...isenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/

 

[torchthebitch]

Nixon and Bush(GW that is, since his Dad was taller), by an inch

 

[JohnnySavage]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickung...isenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/

Your title and the graph are two different things, Dummy. Now stop starting stupid threads.

 

[LiFeNdEaTh]

I have no clue

but i would like to know​

 

[RyansWill]

Your title and the graph are two different things, Dummy. Now stop starting stupid threads.

Since you seem to be illiterate, or at least unwilling to read, here is the visual for you:

 

[JohnnySavage]

The title is "who is the smallest government spender since Eisenhower?"

The first graph is a percentage increase in spending.

The second graph is spending as a percentage of GDP.

As we already have our quota of idiots that don't understand economics, I'm going to go ahead and put you on ignore now.

 

[Wrong Element]

You actually make a very solid point, but since you're a newbie board-flooder, no one is going to pay attention.

Just sit on the sidelines for a while, read my posts, and learn.

 

[fuckwaffle]

Did you read the article that went with the charts?

Obamaloney grew the budget by 1.4 % over what it was previously, which means he spent more taxpayer money than Bush and all those before him.

Wake up and learn to read.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The title is "who is the smallest government spender since Eisenhower?"

The first graph is a percentage increase in spending.

The second graph is spending as a percentage of GDP.

As we already have our quota of idiots that don't understand economics, I'm going to go ahead and put you on ignore now.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Did you read the article that went with the charts?

Obamaloney grew the budget by 1.4 % over what it was previously, which means he spent more taxpayer money than Bush and all those before him.

Wake up and learn to read.

Judging by the threads this morning, there seems to be a panicked focus on reelection.

Especially look at Byron's poll. Every cheerleader has already voted.

 

[tactful]

And the Government isn't going to pay for Obamacare, so, there might be some logic to the title.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Judging by the threads this morning, there seems to be a panicked focus on reelection.

Especially look at Byron's poll. Every cheerleader has already voted.

"Panicked" focus?

The only one with a "panicked' focus seems to be you, Chief.

Gonna be "calm like water" like Good Ole Sensei K taught you to be after tomorrow night's election?

Just like you were in 2008?

*snicker*

Good times...good times...