Who has been banned before?

Hard_Rom

Northumbrian Skald
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Posts
13,623
If you have been banned and returned with an alt post here. If you dare.
 
It can't be an alt if you only have one account. Impossible by definition. :)

"If you were banned and returned with an alt..."

Nope. Pretty self explanatory. You're making it far more difficult than need be.
 
This thread will be full of fake cancer cunts with no real reason to live.

It's sadly. :)
 
Never banned under any name. Only accurately suspected as anything but a new poster once, and only a handful of people noticed. This was not Conager.

Only one person caught Conager as Que due to an error for well over a year. When a second error was noticed, I outed Conager and directly tie it to my root account.

Conager has the distinction of being the only holder of the Blurt thread that NO ONE complained about.

No one suggested Conager was in anyway objectionable until "he" first voiced political opinions, then the usual assholes decided he is an asshole. (Valid.)

No unrevealed alt of mine has ever said a single disagreeable thing to anyone that has any history with Que.

I think it is hillarious that my frank admissions are extrapolated to mean things I have clearly excluded as possibilities, and demonstrated with this alt, yet there are still many members that cling to the fiction that "Skiddles" with what he often refers to as tbe "army of alts" is a seperate and distinct person from the most obvious of posters who often reveals his glee through projection with what he calls "the board's puppetmaster."

He has no other genuine reason for his neutral interactions other than the perverse joy he gets at pulling one over on the board. He has only superficial interactions with others and regularly pines for connections he lacks. He gets positive strokes from those he attacks on behalf of, but those are less effusive accolades then he feels he deserves. He wants to been seen as ascerbic Sean, but cannot hold that frame when anyone stands up to him. He sulks, and often attacks others when he sees frendships develop to what he curiously calls, "off-board."

Can you imagine any person on the board actually wanting to stop by to have dinner with "Skiddles?"
 
Never banned under any name. Only accurately suspected as anything but a new poster once, and only a handful of people noticed. This was not Conager.

Only one person caught Conager as Que due to an error for well over a year. When a second error was noticed, I outed Conager and directly tie it to my root account.

Conager has the distinction of being the only holder of the Blurt thread that NO ONE complained about.

No one suggested Conager was in anyway objectionable until "he" first voiced political opinions, then the usual assholes decided he is an asshole. (Valid.)

No unrevealed alt of mine has ever said a single disagreeable thing to anyone that has any history with Que.

I think it is hillarious that my frank admissions are extrapolated to mean things I have clearly excluded as possibilities, and demonstrated with this alt, yet there are still many members that cling to the fiction that "Skiddles" with what he often refers to as tbe "army of alts" is a seperate and distinct person from the most obvious of posters who often reveals his glee through projection with what he calls "the board's puppetmaster."

He has no other genuine reason for his neutral interactions other than the perverse joy he gets at pulling one over on the board. He has only superficial interactions with others and regularly pines for connections he lacks. He gets positive strokes from those he attacks on behalf of, but those are less effusive accolades then he feels he deserves. He wants to been seen as ascerbic Sean, but cannot hold that frame when anyone stands up to him. He sulks, and often attacks others when he sees frendships develop to what he curiously calls, "off-board."

Can you imagine any person on the board actually wanting to stop by to have dinner with "Skiddles?"

Hush.
 
Never banned under any name. Only accurately suspected as anything but a new poster once, and only a handful of people noticed. This was not Conager.

Only one person caught Conager as Que due to an error for well over a year. When a second error was noticed, I outed Conager and directly tie it to my root account.

Conager has the distinction of being the only holder of the Blurt thread that NO ONE complained about.

No one suggested Conager was in anyway objectionable until "he" first voiced political opinions, then the usual assholes decided he is an asshole. (Valid.)

No unrevealed alt of mine has ever said a single disagreeable thing to anyone that has any history with Que.

I think it is hillarious that my frank admissions are extrapolated to mean things I have clearly excluded as possibilities, and demonstrated with this alt, yet there are still many members that cling to the fiction that "Skiddles" with what he often refers to as tbe "army of alts" is a seperate and distinct person from the most obvious of posters who often reveals his glee through projection with what he calls "the board's puppetmaster."

He has no other genuine reason for his neutral interactions other than the perverse joy he gets at pulling one over on the board. He has only superficial interactions with others and regularly pines for connections he lacks. He gets positive strokes from those he attacks on behalf of, but those are less effusive accolades then he feels he deserves. He wants to been seen as ascerbic Sean, but cannot hold that frame when anyone stands up to him. He sulks, and often attacks others when he sees frendships develop to what he curiously calls, "off-board."

Can you imagine any person on the board actually wanting to stop by to have dinner with "Skiddles?"


Ummm....ok. :)
 
Back
Top