Whistleblower

[icanhelp1]

Oddly enough the same one that heads up the DOJ that thought there was no issue with that phone call. Imagine that.

It’s about fucking time. Drain the Swamp!!!

 

[Aglaopheme]

Oddly enough the same one that heads up the DOJ that thought there was no issue with that phone call. Imagine that.

Unfathomable.

 

[icanhelp1]

Unfathomable.

There was nothing wrong with the phone call. Investigating corruption in the 2016 campaign, Hillary’s dirt digging episodes needs to be done! Believe me the truth will set you free!

 

[adrina]

Unfathomable.

But hey, it's ok cuz Trump did it.

See above.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Thanks for verifying that all "credible" means is that the whistleblower was someone actually involved who could have actually had access to, been privy or witness to whatever the complaint was filed about.

Exactly as I said.



So about that war....are you and the comrades ready???

Also in the statement:

ICIG "determined that other information obtained during the ICIG’s preliminary review supported the Complainant’s allegations.”

 

[cowslinger64]

There was nothing wrong with the phone call. Investigating corruption in the 2016 campaign, Hillary’s dirt digging episodes needs to be done! Believe me the truth will set you free!

Jeezus, you are another right wing broken record of fuckin stupid.


Can't defend trump without hilary, obama or tds... ever.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Jeezus, you are another right wing broken record of fuckin stupid.


Can't defend trump without hilary, obama or tds... ever.

They be hardwired to hate! "Buttery Males"!

 

[cowslinger64]

They be hardwired to hate! "Buttery Males"!

Lol..


At least queball pretends to be smart, even whilst being a condescending prick.. and perhaps even has a modicum of intelligence which is overshadowed by the trainwreck his life is. Which really begs the question why hasn't he done a single thing with his vast intellectual superiority?


Back to the point... everyone else on the right, are really just fucking morons. It's obnoxious. Lol

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Anyone one else feel like we are living in the prequel to the First Purge?

 

[Conager]

STEPHANOPOULOS: You have been criticized by the president and others for comments you made in your opening statement at the hearing on Thursday. I want to show a bit of it right here.

SCHIFF: I’m going to say this only seven times so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of it. This is in sum and character what the president was trying to communicate.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That was you making up dialogue, putting it in the president’s mouth. If the facts are as damning as you say, why make up dialog for dramatic effect, even if it’s a parody, as you say?

That is a very good question, George

 

[Conager]

Unfathomable.

Your inability to fathom is not surprising, given your depth.

Also in the statement:

ICIG "determined that other information obtained during the ICIG’s preliminary review supported the Complainant’s allegations.”

WHAT "other information?"

For the fourth time, since there is NO first hand knowledge in the complaint and the transcript does not support the narrative detailed in the complaint, WHERE is the "additional evidence" and first hand accounts that are at variance with the actual content of the call that team "Get Trump" never expected him to release?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Narrator: "Unable to ascribe positions to his political opponents on Literotica without being mercilessly ridiculed, Conager spent his declining years ascribing positions to politicians he disagreed with."

 

[Dribble]

Your inability to fathom is not surprising, given your depth.



WHAT "other information?"

For the fourth time, since there is NO first hand knowledge in the complaint and the transcript does not support the narrative detailed in the complaint, WHERE is the "additional evidence" and first hand accounts that are at variance with the actual content of the call that team "Get Trump" never expected him to release?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/icig-statement-whistleblower-complaint/index.html

Wanna try again cowboy? Lol.

 

[Dribble]

Of course....there is always the fake news fallback

 

[zipman]

Your inability to fathom is not surprising, given your depth.



WHAT "other information?"

For the fourth time, since there is NO first hand knowledge in the complaint and the transcript does not support the narrative detailed in the complaint, WHERE is the "additional evidence" and first hand accounts that are at variance with the actual content of the call that team "Get Trump" never expected him to release?

The transcript (summary) absolutely does support the narrative detailed in the complaint.

Your denials don't change that no matter how much you repeat it.

 

[Conager]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/icig-statement-whistleblower-complaint/index.html

Wanna try again cowboy? Lol.

For the fifth time: What first-hand knowledge of WHAT?

He had NO first-hand knowledge about the actual telephone call which is the only thing advanced to show wrong-doing even though there was none on the call.

The only other items that he could have been privy to would have been the things already discussed such as the fact that military aid was withheld and then released but that's already been shown to have had no impact whatsoever on the call, was not mentioned in the call, and was not known to the Ukrainians until a month after the call.

Such information would only be relevant if the vall actually covered what the "whistleblower" said that it said.

But it didn't.

You do realize that Schiff has admitted there was no quid pro quo and is now backpedaling to the position that it doesn't matter that the entire basis for the complaint was not true?

Want to try again, dribbler?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

STEPHANOPOULOS: You have been criticized by the president and others for comments you made in your opening statement at the hearing on Thursday. I want to show a bit of it right here.

SCHIFF: I’m going to say this only seven times so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of it. This is in sum and character what the president was trying to communicate.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That was you making up dialogue, putting it in the president’s mouth. If the facts are as damning as you say, why make up dialog for dramatic effect, even if it’s a parody, as you say?

That is a very good question, George

Whoever wrote that opening remark by Schiff should be fired. No doubt about that. It was an absurd way to open that hearing and was a betrayal of the solemnity and seriousness of the occasion. In the end, it was a relatively minor distraction of a damning hearing with the DNI.

It is a mystery to me how you identify that fact and yet can not comprehend how the content of the whistleblower report and the transcript of the call where the POTUS is using the withholding foreign aid as leverage for getting a foreign power to participate in opposition research for his 2020 election bid is manifest.

I suspect the real answer is it is not over your head, and you are willfully being ignorant.

 

[Conager]

Whoever wrote that opening remark by Schiff should be fired. No doubt about that. It was an absurd way to open that hearing and was a betrayal of the solemnity and seriousness of the occasion. In the end, it was a relatively minor distraction of a damning hearing with the DNI.

It is a mystery to me how you identify that fact and yet can not comprehend how the content of the whistleblower report and the transcript of the call where the POTUS is using the withholding foreign aid as leverage for getting a foreign power to participate in opposition research for his 2020 election bid is manifest.

I suspect the real answer is it is not over your head, and you are willfully being ignorant.

Schiff, the Chairman of the Intelligence Committee should be fired? I agree.

He was not under oath but he deliberately mischaracterized the call into the Congressional Record. It's inexcusable.

Trump did no such thing. You (and Schiff) are completely mischaracterizing the xall.

 

[Dribble]

Jesus fucking christ...stop pretending. I dont have access to that. You dont either. But those that do...have reviewed it and have gone on record as saying....yep....the whistle blower did have first hand knowledge. I strongly suggest you read the link I provided

 

[Dribble]

But it is fake news....fake I say....all of it....a conspiracy

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Schiff, the Chairman of the Intelligence Committee should be fired? I agree.

He was not under oath but he deliberately mischaracterized the call into the Congressional Record. It's inexcusable.

Trump did no such thing. You (and Schiff) are completely mischaracterizing the xall.

Your willful ignorance is noted for posterity.

 

[zipman]

Washington (CNN)The intelligence community inspector general is forcefully pushing back against assertions made by President Donald Trump and several Republican lawmakers about the whistleblower complaint that has rocked Washington in recent weeks.

In a rare statement released Monday, the inspector general addressed a false claim pushed by Trump and some of his allies on Capitol Hill, including House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy of California and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, that the whistleblower lacked firsthand knowledge of the conduct outlined in the complaint and therefore the allegations were based on "hearsay." But the statement from the inspector general made clear that the whistleblower was not simply communicating secondhand knowledge.
"The whistleblower stated on the form that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information," the statement read. "The ICIG reviewed the information provided as well as other information gathered and determined that the complaint was both urgent and that it appeared credible. "

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/icig-statement-whistleblower-complaint/index.html

 

[Conager]

Jesus fucking christ...stop pretending. I dont have access to that. You dont either. But those that do...have reviewed it and have gone on record as saying....yep....the whistle blower did have first hand knowledge. I strongly suggest you read the link I provided

He had first hand knowledge of something. If the call had been what he said it was that would mean something. Since the ENTIRE PREMISE for the complaint was what was conveyed in the call was invalid, the supporting evidence that this guy works there, that aid was (for a time) with-held is not relevant unless the call was as he said it was.

It was not.

If Trump did some other wrongdoing that didn't happen in the call it's not identified in the complaint. Since there was not any wrongdoing in the call, whatever supporting evidence he does or does not have about what he THOUGHT was wrongdoing on a call he didn't here matters not at all.

' but we have witnesses showing them leaving the market and getting into a green car!"

"Someone else has been apprehended for the crime."

But we have evidence!"

 

[von_Bismarck]

Queef chooses the weirdest hills to die on.

 

[zipman]

Queef chooses the weirdest hills to die on.

LOL, but it's funny as hell to watch him die on it.