Which god

WTH do I care about your feelings on snow? And is TH wrong then? He’s here taking a dump on your praise of religion. Lol

I have no praise for, or against, religion. It's against the workplace safety rules around here and getting written up for a safety rules violation can have horrible consequences that follow you for eternity.
 
WTH do I care about your feelings on snow? And is TH wrong then? He’s here taking a dump on your praise of religion. Lol

Not my fault you like snow. I bet you even enjoy a scoop of it in a paper cone. With colors and flavors like yellow...
 
As previously noted in various other threads, Derpy lies like Trump.

For those who think that they are following Christ whilst supporting the ability of people to harm children,
Isaiah 1:15 "When you spread out your hands in prayer, I hide my eyes from you. Even when you offer many prayers, I am not listening. Your hands are full of blood."
You're taking Isaiah 1:15 out of context.... read the entire chapter, the prophet Isaiah was speaking to the tribe of Judah in regards to their rebellion/disobedience against God... he warned then of a possible coming judgment....
No, God's warning against harming children is direct , whom ever places a stumbling block(harms) in front of a child, for it is better the (the offender) have a mill stone placed around his neck and thrown into the sea.... not an exact quote but you get the idea..... Luke 17:2......
 
You're taking Isaiah 1:15 out of context.... read the entire chapter, the prophet Isaiah was speaking to the tribe of Judah in regards to their rebellion/disobedience against God... he warned then of a possible coming judgment....
No, God's warning against harming children is direct , whom ever places a stumbling block(harms) in front of a child, for it is better the (the offender) have a mill stone placed around his neck and thrown into the sea.... not an exact quote but you get the idea..... Luke 17:2......

He's all about fucking up while insisting that it's not him but the rest of the world doing wrong.
 
Where? You just asserted the suggestion, you didn't justify what makes the suggestion at all logical or rational.
Even if God did not exist, religion would still be holy and sublime.
God is the only being who, to govern, need not even exist.

- Charles Baudelaire, from "Intimate Papers
 
Even if God did not exist, religion would still be holy and sublime.
God is the only being who, to govern, need not even exist.

- Charles Baudelaire, from "Intimate Papers
How is that at all an answer to the question about your claim that the complexity of the universe suggests a 'divine intelligence' or that the finite nature of the big bang suggests an 'infinite beginner'?

You've taken two observations (complexity of the universe and finite nature of the big bang) and then asserted those observations 'suggest' a 'divine intelligence' and 'infinite beginner'.

On what basis? How is this 'suggested'? What's the rationale behind your claim either of those observations suggests anything? Someone could equally claim they suggest vanilla ice cream is the best flavour and that assertion is just as backed up as yours (ie: not at all).
 
How is that at all an answer to the question about your claim that the complexity of the universe suggests a 'divine intelligence' or that the finite nature of the big bang suggests an 'infinite beginner'?

You've taken two observations (complexity of the universe and finite nature of the big bang) and then asserted those observations 'suggest' a 'divine intelligence' and 'infinite beginner'.

On what basis? How is this 'suggested'? What's the rationale behind your claim either of those observations suggests anything? Someone could equally claim they suggest vanilla ice cream is the best flavour and that assertion is just as backed up as yours (ie: not at all).

Hay now, don't you go dissin vanilla ice cream.
 
How is that at all an answer to the question about your claim that the complexity of the universe suggests a 'divine intelligence' or that the finite nature of the big bang suggests an 'infinite beginner'?

You've taken two observations (complexity of the universe and finite nature of the big bang) and then asserted those observations 'suggest' a 'divine intelligence' and 'infinite beginner'.

On what basis? How is this 'suggested'? What's the rationale behind your claim either of those observations suggests anything? Someone could equally claim they suggest vanilla ice cream is the best flavour and that assertion is just as backed up as yours (ie: not at all).

What a weak lil puss you are.
You’re objecting to JE posting about intelligent design but say nothing to HisA waxing poetic on the mind of an all knowing God.
 
What a weak lil puss you are.
You’re objecting to JE posting about intelligent design but say nothing to HisA waxing poetic on the mind of an all knowing God.
You're whining that I just completely ignore some users here?

Cry some more. 🤭😄
 
You're whining that I just completely ignore some users here?

Cry some more. 🤭😄
Lol. Nope. That’s typical for all the conservatives here. Cut and run. Don’t answer but demand that of others ONLY when you feel you may have the upper hand. I don’t expect you ever to answer but it’s always good for the liberal soul to show your hypocrisy.
 
Lol. Nope. That’s typical for all the conservatives here. Cut and run. Don’t answer but demand that of others ONLY when you feel you may have the upper hand.
I never demand anyone answer me on any subject. All time here by everyone is entirely optional.
I don’t expect you ever to answer but it’s always good for the liberal soul to show your hypocrisy.
HisArpy is on my list of people I outright ignore, having previously engaged him where I concluded he's either intellectually dishonest or intellectually incapable of understanding basic English.

The difference being I'm not going to shit talk about him or name call him, unlike the numerous idiots here who do so. He simply made my list of "Don't waste time engaging". He is neither the first nor the last on that list.
 
I never demand anyone answer me on any subject. All time here by everyone is entirely optional.

HisArpy is on my list of people I outright ignore, having previously engaged him where I concluded he's either intellectually dishonest or intellectually incapable of understanding basic English.

The difference being I'm not going to shit talk about him or name call him, unlike the numerous idiots here who do so. He simply made my list of "Don't waste time engaging". He is neither the first nor the last on that list.
Awwwww. Now you’re just trying to flatter me by having me know that I’m still on your list for conversation and engagement. 💋 Whisper more sweet nothings in my ear about you ignoring HisA.
 
Awwwww. Now you’re just trying to flatter me by having me know that I’m still on your list for conversation and engagement. 💋 Whisper more sweet nothings in my ear about you ignoring HisA.
I have an ignore list that you're not on yet, and you consider this flattering? Ok then, whatever floats your boat. 🤷‍♂️
 
I have an ignore list that you're not on yet, and you consider this flattering? Ok then, whatever floats your boat. 🤷‍♂️
Hey. You and I agree on insurance for weapons. It’s baby steps but I’ll take that as progress. 🙂
 
Back
Top