Marquis
Jack Dawkins
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2002
- Posts
- 10,462
In case you haven't picked up on it by now, I'm that guy who gets off on creating controversy over minor issues.
Controversy, not conflict.
Not that I mind a little conflict if it comes, but my goal is never to seek conflict.
With that said, I have a question based on a young lady I happen to know quite well.
This young lady happens to be the darling of one of the finest Masters and sensual artists I know. She gets flogged, whipped, tied up, waxed (not the bikini kind), cupped, trained and basically played with in every way possible.
She gets fucked too, but only by her boyfriend who is another male entirely, who she is not all that submissive with. Basically, her duty to the Master of which I spoke is to enjoy the countless pleasures and orgasms he enjoys bestowing upon her.
Now, posturing aside, who is really serving who here?
This is a girl who does not like to give head, does not like anal and considers almost any form of pleasing her primary partner to be honorary or punishment.
Now I'd like to bring in my patented:
"COME ON!"
Don't get me wrong, she's a great friend of mine and I love her to death, but I hear her talking about being a sub and I can't help but think something is wrong with this picture.
So my question to you is, when is a sub not a sub?
Let me provide a few sample answers which shall be, for purposes of this discussion, be considered, dry, banal, mundane and otherwise unnecessary.
1. It's a free world and we love everyone and we should accept everyone and if she says she's a sub it's her business, don't judge, don't criticize, don't hate.
1a. To which my rebuttal is as such; YOU UNORIGINAL BITCH/BASTARD! I HAVE HEARD THIS SHIT SO MANY TIMES I AM FORCED TO WRITE IN CAPS. For once, can we pretend like we're all having a nice campfire chat, or perhaps a midnight sleepover talk instead of speaking to our graduating class?
2. I'm a mean, harsh, selfish Dom, who couldn't possibly comprehend that subs deserve to be played with like little bunny rabbits and never expected to put out a damn thing.
2b. Guilty as charged.
Controversy, not conflict.
Not that I mind a little conflict if it comes, but my goal is never to seek conflict.
With that said, I have a question based on a young lady I happen to know quite well.
This young lady happens to be the darling of one of the finest Masters and sensual artists I know. She gets flogged, whipped, tied up, waxed (not the bikini kind), cupped, trained and basically played with in every way possible.
She gets fucked too, but only by her boyfriend who is another male entirely, who she is not all that submissive with. Basically, her duty to the Master of which I spoke is to enjoy the countless pleasures and orgasms he enjoys bestowing upon her.
Now, posturing aside, who is really serving who here?
This is a girl who does not like to give head, does not like anal and considers almost any form of pleasing her primary partner to be honorary or punishment.
Now I'd like to bring in my patented:
"COME ON!"
Don't get me wrong, she's a great friend of mine and I love her to death, but I hear her talking about being a sub and I can't help but think something is wrong with this picture.
So my question to you is, when is a sub not a sub?
Let me provide a few sample answers which shall be, for purposes of this discussion, be considered, dry, banal, mundane and otherwise unnecessary.
1. It's a free world and we love everyone and we should accept everyone and if she says she's a sub it's her business, don't judge, don't criticize, don't hate.
1a. To which my rebuttal is as such; YOU UNORIGINAL BITCH/BASTARD! I HAVE HEARD THIS SHIT SO MANY TIMES I AM FORCED TO WRITE IN CAPS. For once, can we pretend like we're all having a nice campfire chat, or perhaps a midnight sleepover talk instead of speaking to our graduating class?
2. I'm a mean, harsh, selfish Dom, who couldn't possibly comprehend that subs deserve to be played with like little bunny rabbits and never expected to put out a damn thing.
2b. Guilty as charged.