What's with all these Deplorables killing dogs? 🐕

RoryN

You're screwed.
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Posts
57,417
Why is this a theme with them? 🤔

Project 2025 mastermind allegedly told colleagues he killed a dog with a shovel

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/24/project-2025-kevin-roberts-killed-dog

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem writes about killing her dog in new book

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/n...kristi-noem-writes-about-killing-dog-in-book/

200.webp


Post in thread 'All Lit members who are part of the Revolutionary Vanguard, check in here!' https://forum.literotica.com/thread...-vanguard-check-in-here.1612489/post-99071616
 
told university colleagues about two decades ago that he had killed a neighborhood dog with a shovel because it was barking and disturbing his family, according to former colleagues who spoke to the Guardian

“My recollection of his account was that he was discussing in the hallway with various members of the faculty, including me, that a neighbor’s dog had been barking pretty relentlessly and was, you know, keeping the baby and probably the parents awake and that he kind of lost it and took a shovel and killed the dog. End of problem,” said Kenneth Hammond, who was chair of the university’s history department at the time.

Two other people – a professor and her spouse - recall hearing a similar account directly from Roberts at a dinner at his home. Three other professors also said they heard the account at that time from the colleagues who said they had heard it directly from Roberts.

None recall Roberts – who worked at the university as an assistant professor from 2003 to 2005 ever saying that the dog he allegedly said he killed was actively threatening him or his family.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/24/project-2025-kevin-roberts-killed-dog

anyone surprised?

the people who can come up with the blueprints for Project 2025 can hardly be seen as the types who have empathy for animals OR people

the fact he felt good/validated/manly for telling and retelling the story (if it's even true and not something he invented to make him appear 'macho') shows what kind of person he is.
 
That's just awful but killing a million aborted babies a year is perfectly fine. :)
 
That's just awful but killing a million aborted babies a year is perfectly fine. :)
Please let us know which Dem leader killed a million aborted anything last year or any other year.

And how do you kill an aborted baby? That's a double-negative so are the killed aborted babbys now zombie babbys?
 
Most Deplorables don't care about babies. If they saw a dark-skinned baby lying in the street and needing help, they would probably let it die, and brag about it later.

They care about Christianity, and forcing it upon others. Their "pro-life" fight is nothing but a front.

(Simce they're being so quick to run from the thread topic, I guess the Deplorable dog killers aren't going to challenge the premise.) 😎
 
Ah, so if the leaders aren't doing the killing themselves, they're innocent!
Haha! This must be one of the witty gotcha truths you speak of yourself deploying to easily put the libs in their place.
 
Abortion doesn't involve babies.

Playing with words. So what exactly is the difference between a 9 month old fetus and, a few hours later, a live baby? It suddenly changes? Some sort of scientific transformation known only to Democrats takes place? Love to know what that is, and forget all the bullshit. There is no difference except a couple of hours.

Abortion involves babies in the same way that murder involves a victim.
 
Playing with words. So what exactly is the difference between a 9 month old fetus and, a few hours later, a live baby?
Birth

It suddenly changes?
The definition changes

Some sort of scientific transformation known only to Democrats takes place? Love to know what that is, and forget all the bullshit. There is no difference except a couple of hours.
There is a difference in multiple ways, including scientific definition.

Abortion involves babies in the same way that murder involves a victim.
It does not. Abortion involves pregnancies.

The only reason you need to involve the word baby is to invoke an emotional response for yourself and others. Abortion is a medical procedure to terminate a pregnancy.
 
Last edited:
The definition changes
There is a difference in multiple ways, including scientific definition.

Semantics. The baby is the same.

There is a difference in multiple ways, including scientific definition.

Semantics. The baby is the same.

Abortion is a procedure to murder a baby

Mind you, it's a bit pointless arguing. We will always disagree on that one
 
Please let us know which Dem leader killed a million aborted anything last year or any other year.

And how do you kill an aborted baby? That's a double-negative so are the killed aborted babbys now zombie babbys?
Ken is a bit of a dumbass, please forgive him.
 
If I get Deplorables to turn this into an abortion thread, I'm gonna throw a party. That would be too good of a pwn! 😄 🥳
 
Playing with words. So what exactly is the difference between a 9 month old fetus and, a few hours later, a live baby? It suddenly changes? Some sort of scientific transformation known only to Democrats takes place? Love to know what that is, and forget all the bullshit. There is no difference except a couple of hours.

Abortion involves babies in the same way that murder involves a victim.
As you no doubt know but refuse to acknowledge, 99% of all American abortions occur prior to 21 weeks. A fetus is not viable at this point in development so calling a fetus a "baby" at this point is a crass "appeal to emotion" and intellectually dishonest.

You're focusing on 1% to the exclusion of the other 99%. There are no abortions as a matter of "convenience" at 7 to 9 months. Generally something catastrophic has occurred in the development of a fetus at this point that necessitates the termination of a pregnancy.
 
Back
Top