What represents incest

Wyatt, you're saying the American's shouldn't vote but you don't know what we're voting on?
Not good.

Yes, a chad is the little piece of paper that gets punched out.
 
Hi Never,

Never said:
Wyatt, you're saying the American's shouldn't vote but you don't know what we're voting on?
Not good.

Yes, a chad is the little piece of paper that gets punched out.

Thanx mate for confirming that :p Im sure glad i got that correct :)
Everyone is entitled to vote. If you don't have your say then you should not complain later!


Peter :)
 
Wyatt said:
I'll go for the committee.I don't think you Americans should be allowed to go for a voting system after your "Chad" episode.Can anyone tell me are we voting on whether me having sex with my cousin would be A) immoral B)illegal C)just yuck! or D)none of the above.Judging by the feedback people are either disgusted or they've been there done it and bought the Tee shirt.whet is a chad anyway?

I think only Shadowsource has said on this thread that he has actually done it, but he doesn't seem to be confirming whether it was his aunt or his cousin that he fucked. For the rest of us, you got a few votes for each of your potential answers I think.

Legally, I think both cousin and aunt/uncle is incest. But I'm not a lawyer and I have no clue if the law differs by state. I expect that it does. For me, all of them would be in the "just yuck" category as well as the immoral category. That is personal opinion, however.

Pokerman has the same question I did, though. What about the aunt/uncle who isn't your blood relative? I think that legally they are probably still in the incest category, but I'm not sure. The physical dangers aren't there as far as having a child with a close relative, since they aren't a blood relative. But, my guess is these relationships are still considered incest because the power/control remains with the older aunt/uncle in many cases. That gives the aunt or uncle an unfair advantage in influencing their niece/nephew into the incestuous relationship.

Throw in another scenario where the aunt/uncle is not a blood relative and is closer in age to the niece/nephew. That scenario is probably a little harder call incest- it is more like an affair.

Just my 2 cents, but you asked.
 
A couple of days ago on Jeraldo they had women who were leaving their husbands for their aunts.

I wish the Man would stop watching that show.
 
insest is after the social worker kocks before that its just goooood sexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
Never said:
A couple of days ago on Jeraldo they had women who were leaving their husbands for their aunts.

I wish the Man would stop watching that show.

The women were leaving their husbands for their aunts? Or the men were leaving their wives for their aunts? Either is bizzare.
 
"Anyone else any thoughts on is a cousin incest?"

Of course it is incest!
 
Cheyenne:
"The women were leaving their husbands for their aunts? Or the men were leaving their wives for their aunts? Either is bizzare."


The women were leaving their husbands for their aunts. (The women's aunts)
 
Anyone else any thoughts on is a cousin incest?"

Of course it is incest!

Then Queen Victoria and Prince Albert commited incest.King William and Queen Mary also.Both sets of first cousins.Queen Victoria may not have been amused but she was obviously incestuous.Has shadowsource confirmed if it was his aunt or cousin he did the deed with?Also seems a grey area as to legality of first cousins in UK.Any Brits any views or is it a Royal privelege?
 
I would think that Prince Charles would be the poster child for No More Incest.

In most localities second cousins and any cousin with the word "removed" in the title are legally allowed to marry. First cousings are not. Take it from there.

If that's not enough, go and ask a breeder of any sort of critter why then never breed close relatives.
 
With regards to critter breeding.If you race dogs,pigeons or horses it is not uncommon to breed to a common ancestor.An animal may have the same grand parents appearing on both sides of its pedigree.This would be our idea of first cousins.The idea is to try to get the progeny to inherit the best characteristics of said ancestors.Then you cross out on the next generation to TOTALLY unrelated animal.The genetic term is line breeding.It is a common practice.Luckily I realise I am not a pigeon......and I definitely have no qualities whatsoever that anyone would wish to perpetuate by line breeding.....but I do have a nice smile :0)
 
Never said:
Cheyenne:
"The women were leaving their husbands for their aunts? Or the men were leaving their wives for their aunts? Either is bizzare."


The women were leaving their husbands for their aunts. (The women's aunts)

EWWWW! Not only did their wives dump them, but they got dumped for women instead? Not to mention closely related women?

I'll bet the men ran as fast as they could in the opposite direction.
 
I think it comes down to boundaries...even if the neice or aunt isn't a blood relative, it's overstepping a defined boundary which needs to be clearly defined in our lives in order for us to function socially (as a society). I guess what really matters is how hot she is...
 
Back
Top