MechaBlade
irrumatio king
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2002
- Posts
- 43,346
Not necessarily true anymore. It's often a money/power thing.webbo1 said:Religion is the base for ALL war
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not necessarily true anymore. It's often a money/power thing.webbo1 said:Religion is the base for ALL war
Of course he is.crzydesert said:We'll by those standards than Satan himself is a christian!
So when he instructs the faithful to kill unbelievers, how does that fit in?KRCummings said:He told us not to kill. He can do whatever He pleases and I'm not gonna argue with Him about it.
Oh yes, and that.MechaBlade said:What about when he told Abraham to kill Isaac?
The CofE is a state religion in name only. And enforced is far too strong a word.someplace said:This was a very interesting thread to read and I enjoyed the varied comments.
What struck me from the beginning, and which no one picked up on, was that the threadstarter is in the UK, which has a state religion. Most of the discussion over the previous 9 pages was by those in the US, which has an opposite attitude about government sanctioned/sponsored religion.
Perhaps it is the subject for another thread, but I wonder how much of the blanket premise "Christianity is obviously doomed" was developed through the cultural progression of growing up and living under a state-enforced religion?
Per Genesis, God told Abraham to kill Isaac knowing full well that he (God) wasn't going to let him go through with it. It was purely a test of Abraham's faith and commitment to God.Oscuridad said:Oh yes, and that.
SeanH said:The CofE is a state religion in name only. And enforced is far too strong a word.
Lavared said:Per Genesis, God told Abraham to kill Isaac knowing full well that he (God) wasn't going to let him go through with it. It was purely a test of Abraham's faith and commitment to God.
Why the supreme being, creator of the universe, wouldn't simply look into Abraham's heart and know how strong his faith was is beyond my ken. Perhaps the act was not for God but was for Abraham so that he (Abraham) would understand the depth of his own faith.
Yes, schools in the Uk teach religion as part of the curriculum. Comparative religion. Even in my Catholic high school, we learned about Islam, Judaism, Hinduism and others.someplace said:Correct me if I have misinformation, but don't schools in England teach religion as a regular part of their curriculum? That is very different from in the States, and most Americans on this forum would go ballistic if this country had an official religion that was taught in all schools to all students. Our president is not also the head of a particular state-ordained and sponsored religion.
There is a difference in outlook between the two cultures on this subject. It is much more about choice in the States. With the exception of a few converted Catholics and evangelicals, most of the Brits I've known or met are as apathetic toward religion as they are toward government.
My point was that this apathy played into the initial statement of this thread. That's all.
Well you seem to have put your finger on one of the central problems, yes.MechaBlade said:The New Living Translation. ALL OTHER VERSIONS ARE HERESY!!
Do you have a map of the core similarities?crzydesert said:The Holy Bible.
I know there are different versions such as king james, new international, the living Bible, the New king james version.......but the core meaning throughout these Bibles are the same.
What have you heard?Oscuridad said:Do you have a map of the core similarities?
Because that's not what I heard.
But how many do even that?hotguy1234 said:the best version is either Greek ( New Testament ) or Hebrew for the Old Testament. Then you can translate it out of the original language for better accuracy.
That is more then most people are capable of, so I would suggest a combination of a few translations. That way you can tell through the similarities in the translations what is often the best translation.
If he did did indeed disprove polytheism, he was just one god shy of disproving monotheism.MechaBlade said:Yes, but Abraham had to be prepared to kill. My point is that God says not to kill, but there are exceptions. He says "Thou shall not kill" but it's not exactly set in stone (rimshot).
I also find it distressing that you disagree with some of the rules, but you still believe in them. I'm not sure if that's better or worse than people who pick and choose what they like out of the Bible. I can only hope you haven't stoned any blasphemers yet.
How do you disprove polytheism? I'm curious.
Or anything that exists specifically and explicitly outside of the rules of evidence.MechaBlade said:And stoning blasphemers? Is that just Punishment? When is not okay to kill?
I feel the same way about monotheism, but I asked because I think it's impossible to disprove polytheism.
Then why not throw out the old testament?crzydesert said:I believe the Bible is for corporal punishment.
Was there any stoning of blasphemers in the New Testament? I don't think there where but I could be wrong. Things changed after Jesus died on the cross.
Most of the horror show is in Leviticus.MechaBlade said:False assumption, especially from the Roman/Greek theology point of view.
False assumption. Even the Judeo-Christian god gets angry sometimes.
It's leviticus something or another.
Some christians say we have to take the bible as a whole.KRCummings said:That's Leviticus which is old, old, old testament.
I thought we were talking about Christians who follow the teachings of Jesus who said not to go around killing people.
It's also interesting to note that even with a state religion Britian's population enjoys much greater religious diversity than the U.S.someplace said:This was a very interesting thread to read and I enjoyed the varied comments.
What struck me from the beginning, and which no one picked up on, was that the threadstarter is in the UK, which has a state religion. Most of the discussion over the previous 9 pages was by those in the US, which has an opposite attitude about government sanctioned/sponsored religion.
Perhaps it is the subject for another thread, but I wonder how much of the blanket premise "Christianity is obviously doomed" was developed through the cultural progression of growing up and living under a state-enforced religion?
It's not the act of an omniscient god.Lavared said:Per Genesis, God told Abraham to kill Isaac knowing full well that he (God) wasn't going to let him go through with it. It was purely a test of Abraham's faith and commitment to God.
Why the supreme being, creator of the universe, wouldn't simply look into Abraham's heart and know how strong his faith was is beyond my ken. Perhaps the act was not for God but was for Abraham so that he (Abraham) would understand the depth of his own faith.
To put their beliefs before their children's lives if god says so?someplace said:And to serve as an example for thousands of generations to come.