What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[Busybody]

http://redrobinchronicles.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/representing_black_males_as_thugs_278172509_std.jpg


THIS

IS

WHO

YOU

ASPIRE

TO

 

[unregistered]

 

[kbate]

You seem to present yourself as a woman much of the time and now you get tripped up talking like a girl, you're in a perpetual 28 day grouch...so go play with your titties and shut up.::

No misogyny here either.

 

[unregistered]

 

[kbate]

It's so threatening, isn't it????:

You misspelled fuckwitted again.

 

[Busybody]

No misogyny here either.

grow up

 

[Busybody]

whats the difference between a pile of shit


http://www.mindwafers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/pile-of-shit-on-the-road.jpg


and NIGGER KUZ?>>>>>>>>>>>http://irateirishman.com/blog/irateirishman.com/httpdocs/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/muhdikcomposite-300x291.jpg






































































NOTHING!

 

[Busybody]

http://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/you-mad-bro.png

 

[kbate]

grow up

Tell that to the immature boys who think witty is calling someone a woman and then using a "28 day" joke to explain away his opponent's angst.
or who thinks 'faggot" is a deep cutting insult because Gay is Bad.
or who thinks 'N' is a cutting insult for anyone who disagrees.

and so on. . .

I've had better from second graders.

 

[Busybody]

Tell that to the immature boys who think witty is calling someone a woman and then using a "28 day" joke to explain away his opponent's angst.
or who thinks 'faggot" is a deep cutting insult because Gay is Bad.
or who thinks 'N' is a cutting insult for anyone who disagrees.

and so on. . .

I've had better from second graders.

Im sure you have

BUT

grow up!!!!!!!!


Unless LIT will institute these laws



Minnesota Bill to Ban K-12 Speech That Denies Fellow Students a “Supportive Environment”

Eugene Volokh • March 4, 2013 11:03 pm


That’s H.F. No. 826, which requires schools — including private schools that get any “public funds or other public resources” — to ban, among other things, “bullying” at school, defined as


use of one or a series of words, images, or actions, transmitted directly or indirectly between individuals or through technology, that a reasonable person knows or should know, under the circumstances, will have the effect of interfering with the ability of an individual, including a student who observes the conduct, to participate in a safe and supportive learning environment. Examples of bullying may include, but are not limited to, conduct that:
1.places an individual in reasonable fear of harm to person or property, including through intimidation;
2.has a detrimental effect on the physical, social, or emotional health of a student;
3.interferes with a student’s educational performance or ability to participate in educational opportunities;
4.encourages the deliberate exclusion of a student from a school service, activity, or privilege;
5.creates or exacerbates a real or perceived imbalance of power between students;
6.violates the reasonable expectation of privacy of one or more individuals; or
7.relates to the actual or perceived race, ethnicity, color, creed, religion, national origin, immigration status, sex, age, marital status, familial status, socioeconomic status, physical appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, academic status, disability, or status with regard to public assistance, age, or any additional characteristic defined in chapter 363A of a person or of a person with whom that person associates, but the conduct does not rise to the level of harassment.

First, what does interfering with “the ability of an individual ... to participate in a ... supportive learning environment” mean, exactly? Say that students are talking over lunch about how a classmate committed a crime, cheated, said racist things, treated his girlfriend cruelly, or whatever else, which causes people to feel hostile towards the classmate. That interferes with his ability “to participate in a ... supportive learning environment.” Presumably that’s now forbidden, right?

Second, what on earth does “creat[ing] or exacerbat[ing] a real or perceived imbalance of power between students” mean? What kind of power? Social power? Financial power? Power within student-run institutions, such as clubs or businesses that students set up?

Third, what does “violates the reasonable expectation of privacy of one or more individuals” mean? The disclosure of private facts tort doesn’t really tell us, because it is by design limited to speech said to a large group. Would a girl telling a friend that her ex-boyfriend has an STD violate the ex-boyfriend’s reasonable expectation of privacy? (What if the boyfriend is hitting on the friend?) Would revealing a secret qualify? Revealing an acquaintance’s religious or political beliefs, if the acquaintance views them as a private matter?

Fourth, “relates to the actual or perceived race, ethnicity, color, creed, religion, national origin, immigration status, sex, age, marital status, familial status, socioeconomic status, physical appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, academic status, disability, or status with regard to public assistance, [or] age ... of a person or of a person with whom that person associates” would require restrictions on a vast range of speech.

Condemning illegal aliens, Scientologists, people who marry too young, people who are flunking out of school, or people who are on welfare would have to be forbidden as “bullying.” That’s true whether one says this about a student, about the students’ family members (“person with whom that person associates”), or presumably about the group as a whole: After all, even a general condemnation of illegal aliens might interfere with the ability of an illegal alien student who “observes the conduct” to “participate in a ... supportive learning environment.” (It’s not very supportive when people think that people like you should be deported, no matter how strong the case for deportation might be.)

Now public schools have broader authority to restrict student speech than does the government acting as sovereign. But even public schools’ authority is limited (see here for more details); and a public school policy that’s this broad would, I think, be unconstitutionally overbroad and thus invalid on its face, see, e.g., Saxe v. State College Area School Dist. (3d Cir. 2001) (Alito, J.). The government’s use of funds for private schools — even funds that amount to a small fraction of the school’s budget — as leverage to suppress a wide range of speech at those schools is even more constitutionally problematic, see FCC v. League of Women Voters (1984). And beyond that, the proposal’s overbreadth is bad policy as well as being unconstitutional.

For more on this topic, see my 2011 testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights about possible problems with restrictions on supposed “bullying” in K-12 schools.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Tell that to the immature boys who think witty is calling someone a woman and then using a "28 day" joke to explain away his opponent's angst.
or who thinks 'faggot" is a deep cutting insult because Gay is Bad.
or who thinks 'N' is a cutting insult for anyone who disagrees.

and so on. . .

I've had better from second graders.

Cue the "but....but...Vetty is a product of his times!" apologists.

 

[Busybody]

Tell that to the immature boys who think witty is calling someone a woman and then using a "28 day" joke to explain away his opponent's angst.
or who thinks 'faggot" is a deep cutting insult because Gay is Bad.
or who thinks 'N' is a cutting insult for anyone who disagrees.

and so on. . .

I've had better from second graders.

some jokes are funny, some are sad, some are stupid

if one takes umbrage at all things said

they will need a big umbrella for the umbrage

 

[kbate]

some jokes are funny, some are sad, some are stupid

if one takes umbrage at all things said

they will need a big umbrella for the umbrage

Offense offered and ignored becomes habit. I make people aware that their words are based on ignorance and intolerance. What they do from then on is their choice just as the tone of future communications with them are my choice.

It is called child rearing and at 65+ Veggeman should be on the teach side rather than the learn side.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

Offense offered and ignored becomes habit. I make people aware that their words are based on ignorance and intolerance. What they do from then on is their choice just as the tone of future communications with them are my choice.

It is called child rearing and at 65+ Veggeman should be on the teach side rather than the learn side.

the words

IGNORANT and INTOLERANT have long ceased to have any meaning whatsoever

 

[kbate]

the words

IGNORANT and INTOLERANT have long ceased to have any meaning whatsoever

As demonstrated by your continued existence .

 

[Busybody]

As demonstrated by your continued existence .

yeah

THAT


The words have ceased to have any meaning

Along with the word....RACIST!

 

[richard_daily]

No misogyny here either.

He'll be along later to compliment your tits.

 

[Busybody]

richard_daily
This message is hidden because richard_daily is on your ignore list.

Reply


STFU, NIGGER DAILY

 

[bra_man69]

He'll be along later to compliment your tits.

And afterwards you'll rape and lie to her.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

You seem to present yourself as a woman much of the time and now you get tripped up talking like a girl, you're in a perpetual 28 day grouch...so go play with your titties and shut up.

I didn't get tripped up over anything. You glean a morsel of info from your internet umbilical cord and you think you got something. Then start jumping up and down doing a show with your closeted feather boas like you was an cutting room floor extra in Paris Is Burning. You just a totes pressed bitch, as usual. And I'm the one pressing you.

And all this pseudo J. Bravo bravado coming from someone who has trouble actualizing BASIC your/you're english language concepts and has a general fear of women (who aren't plastic) overall? Yeah, I'm so fucking stigmatized. Your attempt to cut me using gender and still fucking up doing that was about as sharp as a warm stick of butter.

Now go totes struggle some more and make a weak joke about titties, menstrual cycles, panties or go back to your tried-and-true tropes of asses and scat-fetish, sit back in your Lay-Z-Boy, enjoy your racist shitstain boyf's nut-licking, have a Coke, crack a smile and enjoy the rest of another fucking wasted day derping your fears online.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mf26580anr1qg1lsq.gif

See, I made it easy for you. There's a .gif of a black woman laughing at my clowning you. Two things more powerful than you that you fear combined into one. Now, in your expected reply designed to save face in front of your shitstain friends, make a reference about me using her gender to represent me in the negative OR if you actually DO "live like you got a pair," reference her ethnicity BEFORE your main racist shitstain jawn beats you to it in the way you'd LIKE to do it but are too pussy to show.

(vette frantically races to find out what "jawn" means)

 

[Busybody]

whats the difference between a pile of shit


http://www.mindwafers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/pile-of-shit-on-the-road.jpg


and NIGGER KUZ?>>>>>>>>>>>http://irateirishman.com/blog/irateirishman.com/httpdocs/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/muhdikcomposite-300x291.jpg






































































NOTHING!

 

[unregistered]

 

[hogjack]

It is called child rearing.

A continuing factor for priest transfers.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The only pressing going on around here is my palm dribbling you around before laying you up in the shit can.

I always thought you might be an effeminate metro male, still wet with mama's milk...or a girl, it's ok; oh, and be advised, I don't give a shit if I'm up on your teenie bopper vernacular, which I consider to be childish anyway. Time to grow up kid.

That's the best you got, huh?

"Teenie bopper" dialect got your geriatric ass running for the definition, though.

You so totes pressed you can't even go back into that fail of a Menendez thread because of all the omelettes to be made from the eggs on your face.

The only thing you got dribbling in your palm is that warm stick of butter you mistake for your manhood and keep trying to use as a knife. And the only thing you got laying up is your racist shitstain nut cozy above you making you feel warm during the wintertime between your thighs.

Have fun derping and failing with the rest of your day, Stop-Loss.

http://i.imgur.com/JoWlG.gif