U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anytime you have the power to create your own money there is a risk others will laugh at it. This is why we need an independent Fed (sorry Ron, I want someone other than Congress controlling our money supply). But gold doesn't solve that problem, unless you own all of it. Russia, China, South Africa... all have huge reserves. THEY could devalue a gold-based economy just like the Fed printing more paper money could.
Especially when economic reality isn't good enough, and you think you can amend economic law with wishful thinking.
Not if the ratio of gold to currency was controlled by statute, and the notes were redeemable in gold.
How did that work for Spain when the discovered the silver mines of South America?
If that is true, then why is one of the main counter arguments that we don;t have enough gold in the world to supply our needs?
![]()
![]()
I read somewhere that 1/7th of the world's gold is owned by married Indian women...
All money is nothing but a place-marker to make trade more convenient. You trade dollars, Euros, gold, silver, glass beads, sea shells, etc for something else. It doesn't matter what that place marker is, it only matters that people have confidence in what they can trade it for.
Russia, China and South Africa don't care so much about our statutes.
Russia and China are not printing our dollars. The object is to impose discipline on the Fed. The point is a gold standard where the ratio of gold to dollars is required by law and those dollars are redeemable for whatever the statute requires, leaves the power in the hands of the market, not in the hands of government. If the government tried to inflate, the market (the citizen) could redeem his dollars for gold, thus reducing the ratio of gold, thus preventing the government from further inflation by imposing the discipline of the law onto the government.
Russia and China are not printing our dollars. The object is to impose discipline on the Fed. The point is a gold standard where the ratio of gold to dollars is required by law and those dollars are redeemable for whatever the statute requires, leaves the power in the hands of the market, not in the hands of government. If the government tried to inflate, the market (the citizen) could redeem his dollars for gold, thus reducing the ratio of gold, thus preventing the government from further inflation by imposing the discipline of the law onto the government.
But they are not total economic idiots...
Now, our Democrat Party is proving to be that.
![]()
![]()
Ancillary: South Africa did not liberate the mines and flood the markets with diamonds.
One of us has a gross conceptual error here, and I'm fully willing to admit that it may be me.
But... you are saying we need a standard where there is a certain ratio of gold to dollars. Assume we have a ton of gold, and tie that to X number of dollars. Ok?
Now Russia comes along and dumps another ton of gold on the world market. Wouldn't the dollar's value be cut in half?
We need to go on the diamond standard! They are a girl's best friend.
The beauty of gold is that it goes into other uses, therefore manufacturing and jewelry prices would undergo a price deflation benefitting the consumer.
Well, then a mixed commodity basket because as we know, she needs gold too...
"No huggin'
"No kissin'
"Till I get a weddin' ring!"
![]()
![]()
![]()
"Don't hand me no lines and keep your hands to yourself!"
Now Russia comes along and dumps another ton of gold on the world market. Wouldn't the dollar's value be cut in half?
Until the Russian gold comes into Reserve through taxation, the U.S. Reserve cannot issue additional script against it.
The market price of goods would naturally go up, hurting those who have no gold for a time, but as taxation took more gold into the U.S. reserve, the prices would stabilize and more script could be issued against the new reserves.
So why not just use something simpler... like a dollar!!!! Brilliant!
Don't need a shovel to dig it up.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Yes
All I'm saying is to go back to the system that served us well for over a hundred years, from the founding of the country to 1913. Establish the definition of what a dollar is in terms of gold, and write a statute that carves the ratio into rock, make the dollar redeemable in gold, thus putting a stop to the official inflation of our money.
You can read Rothbard's analysis here for free:
The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar
http://mises.org/daily/1829
An outside entity cannot easily devalue a gold based system as long as gold is a permitted currency, all they can do purchase goods for gold.
The only way they can debase the currency is to mix their gold with other metals,or attempt to issue false scrip.
Adding more gold to the system, only increases the wealth in the system, which is why gold mining did not ruin the economy of the world and why the conquest of Mexico by Spain, enriched Spain until they squandered the gold on other ventures.