What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's always just Obama? Congress gets a free pass all the time? Who has the purse power, did they change the rules when I was out taking a walk?

In the wingnut mind, Congress only is at fault when a Republican is in the oval office, and the democrats are power otherwise...

When it's reversed, suddenly, that logic goes out the window.

It's strange how that works.
 
Who woulda thought?????:rolleyes:

Study: More Than Half a Trillion Dollars Spent on Welfare But Poverty Levels Unaffected
“The vast majority of current programs are focused on making poverty more comfortable … rather than giving people the tools that will help them escape poverty.”


(CNSNews.com) – The federal government is not making much headway reducing poverty despite spending hundreds of billions of dollars, according to a study by the libertarian Cato Institute.

Despite an unprecedented increase in federal anti-poverty spending, the national poverty rate has not declined, the study finds.

ince President Obama took office [in January 2009], federal welfare spending has increased by 41 percent, more than $193 billion per year,” the study says.


Study Here:

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/PA694.pdf


Bigger unemployment checks needed.
 
In the wingnut mind, Congress only is at fault when a Republican is in the oval office, and the democrats are power otherwise...

When it's reversed, suddenly, that logic goes out the window.

It's strange how that works.

hahaha

isn't it strange how democrats and liberals neeeeeeeeever do that ;)
 
The Clinton economy was a product of Ronald Reagan as well.

Trickle DOWN does NOT work!

:mad: ;) ;)

The Wealth of a Nation works best trickle-down. A Republic and an Economy work best trickle-up. A Socialist believes just the opposite.
A_J, the Stupid

(An Economy is the set of all transactions. Government is mutual cooperation for successful transacting. Wealth is the outcome of successful transactions.)
 
Bailouts...

;) ;)

In January 2008, President George W. Bush was scrambling to bolster the American economy. The subprime mortgage industry was collapsing, and the Dow Jones industrial average had lost more than 2,000 points in less than three months.

House Minority Leader John A. Boehner became the Bush administration’s point person on Capitol Hill to negotiate a $150 billion stimulus package.

In the days that followed, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. made frequent phone calls and visits to Boehner. Neither Paulson nor Boehner would publicly discuss the progress of their negotiations to shore up the nation’s financial portfolio.

On Jan. 23, Boehner (R-Ohio) met Paulson for breakfast. Boehner would later report the rearrangement of a portion of his own financial portfolio made on that same day. He sold between $50,000 and $100,000 from a more aggressive mutual fund and moved money into a safer investment.

The next day, the White House unveiled the stimulus package.

Boehner is one of 34 members of Congress who took steps to recast their financial portfolios during the financial crisis after phone calls or meetings with Paulson; his successor, Timothy F. Geithner; or Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, according to a Washington Post examination of appointment calendars and congressional disclosure forms.

The lawmakers, many of whom held leadership positions and committee chairmanships in the House and Senate, changed portions of their portfolios a total of 166 times within two business days of speaking or meeting with the administration officials. The party affiliation of the lawmakers was about evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans, 19 to 15.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ials/2012/06/24/gJQAnQPg0V_story.html?hpid=z1

19-15, but the minority leader gets named above the fold...

:rolleyes:

No media bias!
 
Stocks struggle on economy worries

Consumer confidence slips, while home prices rise in most major US cities. Worries over Europe's debt crisis persist as Spanish borrowing costs soar. News Corp. may split up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top