What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whenever you come skidding into stage center, I'm reminded of a John Candy imitation of Tom Cruise in Risky Business.:rolleyes:

Except I'm a lot closer to Cruise than Candy, have been for a year and a half now. But truthfully I never was Candy's size.

Not to get in the way of your ill-fitting fat jokes or anything. :rolleyes:
 
You know, I've been around long enough that I shoould have known that. Why doesn't everybody have him on that list of idiots we ignore again?

I've had Meme on ignore for a long time. I only bother to "read post" when someone else engages the half-wit.
 
Wait wait. When he writes something stupid it's copy and past and when he writes soemthing not stupid it's copy and past? Is this fucker a bot?

Oh no, you can tell when he writes something original from his head because his real "voice" is drastically different and it won't go beyond maybe two or three spaced-out sentences, with a few misspelled words. He C&P's about 95% of the time and unabashedly, which just makes his bullshit stand out even more.

If you manage to get his goat on his C&P's or pull his card on his misfires and fuck-ups, he'll just post a short blurt. AFAIK, he's never come to this site to post or talk about anything erotic or sex related, only to parrot-paste politics from whatever blog he's reading. That's how pathetic the shit is, because even Vette has a big titties pic thread that I have to give him props for.
 
No it didn't. Most of that was yanked piecemeal from a Forbes opinion piece. A majority of it verbatim.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/04/recovery-indicators-unemployment-opinions-columnists-recession.html

This may surprise you but ... I didn't draw the graph either. :rolleyes:


Back to the actual point of my previous post:

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAna...5089&xmpSource=&width=710&height=472&caption=

The graphic from Investor's Business Daily denotes the comparitive movement of government spending to unemployment. As the chart shows "such spending doesn't work. Not only are we adding nearly $1.5 Trillion a year to our debt, but we still have 6.95 million fewer jobs that we had at our peak before the meltdown."

Note the downhill turn of employment compared to the uphill climb of government spending starting in 2008.

The graph is appropriately titled: The Failure Of Stimulus
 
No it didn't. Most of that was yanked piecemeal from a Forbes opinion piece. A majority of it verbatim.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/04/recovery-indicators-unemployment-opinions-columnists-recession.html


Thanks for posting the link. Made you google! :D asshole!


Anyone who doubts my assertion that I quote portions of articles that I agree with, and embedded with my own opinion, should certainly compare my previous post to the article linked.

Hardly "a majority of it verbatim".
 
That picture of you in Alaska, I believe it was, is a thing of the past? If so, I take it back.:)

That was 85 LBS ago.

You have to have been in a cave not to have seen me point out the exact same thing, repeatedly, to Koaladipshit and Powerdolt.
 
That was 85 LBS ago.

You have to have been in a cave not to have seen me point out the exact same thing, repeatedly, to Koaladipshit and Powerdolt.

The best part is that he looks a helluva lot more like John Candy from his recent pics than you do.
 
That was 85 LBS ago.

You have to have been in a cave not to have seen me point out the exact same thing, repeatedly, to Koaladipshit and Powerdolt.

You still didn't answer, how smart can you be to let yourself get so morbidly obese.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top