What DO you get for $1000 an hour?

[SlickTony]

Either I don't understand sex or I don't understand economics. Seeing as how I have been active for 38 years and a Litizen for 5, it must be the latter.

 

[fifty5]

The closest I've ever been to a hooker was when one hitched a lift. I was mostly thinking of something else, so it wasn't until she started telling me what she'd do and how much it would cost that the penny dropped.

However dumb that shows me to be, it did confirm my otherwise uninformed prejudice that if I could afford any given hooker, she wouldn't be worth hiring. My suspicion is that the high price ones are good enough actresses to make their clients forget that it's all for money, whether that means talking politics or straight bullshit.

 

[angela146]

Why pay $5k for a call girl? Why use an escort service?

1. $5k doesn't mean as much to Spitzer as it does to most people.

$5,000 for a call girl is a lot of money only if you don't have much money.

Spitzer has lots of money, much of it inherited.

When he spends $5k, he isn't thinking, "wow, I'm going to have to pinch my pennies for the next couple of months." He's thinking, "Can I just give you $20k now so I don't have to keep going back to the bank every time? I'm a busy guy. I've got constituents to screw."

2. Age and Class

From his perspective, he's getting a woman who is young enough to be his daughter (though not as young as his actual daughters) and someone who is isn't sleazy.

I'm guessing the service screens the girls to make sure they don't sound like they're from Brooklyn, don't chew gum and don't act low-class when they're with high-class men. They know how to walk in heels, know how to apply makeup so it looks good and looks invisible. They know what clothes to wear and how to wear them. They know how to be clean (in all senses of the word).

They know the difference between $100/ounce perfume and the cheap stuff. They have hair that looks and feels good. Their bikini lines are waxed with no ingrown hairs and no red/raw areas. They don't have shaving scars on their legs. They wear high-quality stockings that fit perfectly and have no runs.

Their clothes don't smell like cigarette smoke, nor do they smell like hookers, nor do they smell like the last guy they were with.

They can walk into a five-star hotel and not be spotted as a cheap whore by the concierge.

3. Professional quality sex.

The service probably makes sure that the girl knows how to give deep-throat, how to keep her teeth off of his dick and how to swallow most of the come but let just a little bit dribble onto her chin.

The guy has been married for twenty years. He knows how to fuck and she'd better be able to handle whatever moves he uses with her. She needs to know when to relax and when to squeeze. She has to anticipate what's next and be ready to respond to it without being awkward.

She needs to know what to touch and how to touch it.

She needs to be as good a lay as his wife is. Remember, his wife has been doing it with him for two decades. He is accustomed to good sex.

When I was twenty-two, I didn't know how to do a tenth of the stuff that a $5k/ hour call-girl does. I still don't. I'm good at having sex with my own husband, but I'm awkward with anyone else.

4. She's more than just a hooker.

The girl can sing. She has actual talent beyond the gymnastics of the bedroom.

Imagine being in the middle of foreplay and suddenly having the woman you're with sing to you... I would bet that most of the $5k girls have something going on other than just screwing. They can pull out some kind of surprise that says, "I'm not just a body to fuck. I'm interesting."

(On a side note...)

Personally, if I were getting paid $5k to have sex with the governor of New York, I probably would not have to fake an orgasm.

Assuming I knew who he was, I'd be thinking, "Wow, I'm getting fucked by the actual governor - yeah, that really powerful guy I see on the news all the time - yeah, a guy who prosecuted the Gambino crime family and lived to tell about it. This guy is pretty damned ballsy."

"... and I'm getting paid for it? This sure beats getting laid by some dweeby college student."

Yes, I know, there are rumors that she didn't know who he was. If so, that's a damned shame. If you're going to get fucked by someone really powerful, wouldn't you want to know who he was as it was happening?

Screwing a governor is proably a once-in-a-lifetime experience, even for a $5k whore.

 

[SlickTony]

The girl can sing. She has actual talent beyond the gymnastics of the bedroom.

Imagine being in the middle of foreplay and suddenly having the woman you're with sing to you...

Screwing a governor is proably a once-in-a-lifetime experience, even for a $5k whore.

OTOH, there's an old saying: no woman who's been with the king ever goes away unsatisfied. What's implied is that seldom is she going to say she's unsatisfied. Even though Angie Dickinson said of JFK, something like "the best 30 seconds of my life."

I would say that I can fulfill at least 75% of Point 2. Hey, I can't help I'm probably closer to Spitzer's age than to his daughters.'

Hell, I can sing. The guy before last who had a high opinion of my singing ended up having his way with me. Even if that was 35 years ago.

I wish whatshername the best with her singing career.

 

[3113]

She needs to be as good a lay as his wife is. Remember, his wife has been doing it with him for two decades. He is accustomed to good sex.

I think your logic is faulty here. Just because he's been having sex with his wife for two decades doesn't mean he's accustomed to good sex. Not to dis his wife, but you can't assume that all good and happy marriage have good sex. Some good and happy marriages actually have lousy sex (and this is presuming that the marriage was good and happy!).

Not saying this is the case with Mr. and Mrs. Spritzer--just that you can't assume that his wife is a good lay or that she gives him what he wants just because they've been together for so long. There are wives who have never given their husbands what they really want...and vice versa.

Now, given that this guy is rich and spends money on sex with hookers and may have been doing this for two decades...THAT means he's probably accustomed to good sex.

 

[angela146]

I think your logic is faulty here. Just because he's been having sex with his wife for two decades doesn't mean he's accustomed to good sex. Not to dis his wife, but you can't assume that all good and happy marriage have good sex. Some good and happy marriages actually have lousy sex (and this is presuming that the marriage was good and happy!).

Not saying this is the case with Mr. and Mrs. Spritzer--just that you can't assume that his wife is a good lay or that she gives him what he wants just because they've been together for so long. There are wives who have never given their husbands what they really want...and vice versa.

I s'pose... It's just difficult for me to envision staying with someone for a long time if they were *never* good at it.

Sure, it might have been good in the past and he might stay with her for the kids or inertia or political expediency, but a twenty year marriage that didn't include a bunch of years of good sex somewhere along the way? And they stayed married?

Yuck! That would be a good reason in and of itself to pay $5k for a good lay.

 

[impressive]

...a twenty year marriage that didn't include a bunch of years of good sex somewhere along the way?

It's been done.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

I agree with LIAR. The dollar value has a mental effect on many men....and women.

If you were alive in the late 19th Century you could buy a Monet or Van Gogh for lunch money. The art didnt get better when its price inflated.

Money is how a lot of people do pissing contests these days.

 

[lesbiaphrodite]

I have been in the world where one pays high dollars for sex, and I can tell you as a former client, you get something from the women who choose to do it that you never get from other women. It's a fact. I do not regret one red cent spent in this manner. Memorable on every level.

 

[3113]

I s'pose... It's just difficult for me to envision staying with someone for a long time if they were *never* good at it.

I find it hard to believe too, but, evidently, many such couples exist, possibly more than ones that have a good sex life, and they claim to be content and in love and such in spite of the fact that the sex is so-so. I mean, you'd think they'd get some sexual counseling, but an amazing number of people still think sex is private and "dirty" and just for having kids not for pleasure, so what does it matter if you enjoy it or not? And then there are husbands/wives who need something more that they're afraid to ask for--or if they ask for get refused. Like the wife who feels disgust if her husband wears a dress during sex, or the husband who can't deal with his wife's bisexuality.

Not my way of thinking, but there is it. People can love and adore each other yet not quite match up in bed. Which, again, doesn't mean I've any idea if this is the case with the Spritzers. They might have had a wonderful sex life.

Yuck! That would be a good reason in and of itself to pay $5k for a good lay.

LOL! I'm in full agreement. But it's not beyond the pale for a young man with political ambitions to view prospective spouses in terms of whether they'd be good at fulfilling the role of political-wife first, and leaving off the "good in bed" requirement. As we see, it's easy enough for such men to get the good sex elsewhere.

 

[elsol]

What do you get out of a $1000 hooker?

The same thing that you get out of a $1000 pair of shoes.

They may be better, shoe wise, than a $100 pair of shoes. But not ten times better.

What you get, more than anything, is a sense of "I can afford $1000 pussy/shoes".

The guy knows he get $1000 pussy without blinking... pussy most guys aren't allowed to pet never mind fuck. There's something beyond just saying 'I can afford $1000 pussy.'

There's a power in buying her body in the simplest type of transaction there is... I give you A and you give me U.

 

[Huckleman2000]

I used to be an Analyst/Consultant, and the company I worked for billed clients at the rate of $8000/day, 1/2 day minimum. I didn't make anywhere near that much, but I learned that what people want for $1000/hr. is to hear that they're smart and good looking and will make investors a lot of money. I suspect 'Kristen' is a lot more convincing saying those things than I was.

 

[rgraham666]

That's why I failed as a consultant. I kept telling the truth. "It can't be done with the time and resources you've allotted."

Then they wouldn't renew my contract and the word about me became "Not a team player."

Humans.