SpeareChucker
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2017
- Posts
- 24,614
You are such an ignorant fool. The problem is not what happened before he was pushed/taken to the ground ( how ever you wish to describe it), but what occurred after.
Once the person was on the ground, and no longer any threat, no action was taken to ensure his safety. He was injured, and seriously as shown by the blood.
At that point the officer should have ether A: taken direct action, or B: ensured an ambulance was called and made sure either himself or another officer remained with the person until such time as medical aid arrived.
The fact is, neither of the officers did that, and that is why they are at fault.
I would really like to hear what was said when the officer used his radio, that might shed much more light on the whole situation.
The lines used to disperse crowds must not break,
the police did what they were supposed to do, there
are other officers for mop-up and EMS was summoned.
You post seems to stem from not being educated in
crowd-control tactics and techniques.
The person in the wrong here was the known radical
agitator who decided not to be a peaceful protestor
but a recalcitrant confrontationist refusing to obey
lawful instructions to back up and away.
He has a right to protest, but municipalities also
have a right to regulate and permit and
require peaceful compliance.