What are the Politics of Lara Logan's Tits?

Lara Logan continues to be the subject of Celebrity Gossip....while the plight of hundreds of journalists attacked each year goes to the bottom of the "news" pile.

America loves a nice pair of tits.


Lara Logan Faces Mental Breakdown- Medical Experts
Top medical experts, consulted by The ENQUIRER, agree the gutsy blonde beauty could be facing a crippling mental crisis if she returns to hellish war zones like the ones where her fearless reporting made her famous.

"She's insisting on burying her feelings by going right back to work - which is putting her in danger once again," Dr. Jamie Turndorf, an internationally known therapist who has not treated Logan, told The ENQUIRER.

"She's setting herself up for a breakdown… a physical, emotional or mental collapse."

Get the full story only in the new ENQUIRER - on sale now.
 
In answer to the thread's question, the way I see it is that Lara Logan's beautiful big full breasts are bipartisan....she has one on the left and one on the right ;)
 
In answer to the thread's question, the way I see it is that Lara Logan's beautiful big full breasts are bipartisan....she has one on the left and one on the right ;)

Personally, I think she's going to be keeping them out of sight from here on out.

And that this whole thing is being manipulated by her as a way to replace Katie Couric.

Lara's tits are just pawns in her clever career climb.
 
The Lara Logan Episode: How Identity Politics Influence Media Coverage at...
In a column republished at Jewish World Review, Caroline Glick raises some interesting questions:Why have Western media outlets provided so little coverage about the widespread attacks on foreign journalists in and around Cairo's Tahrir Square?In the case of the beating and sexual assault suffered by CBS correspondent Lara Logan, why was so little attention given to the perpetrators of the attack?

http://hedgehogcentral.blogspot.com/2011/02/lara-logan-episode-how-identity.html
 
Sexism in the Lara Logan matter is starting to (finally) emerge as a topic.

Sexual Assault Coverage by Media Shows Double Standard, Paternalism, and Sexism
by Walter Brasch

CBS's withholding information about the attack in order to protect the correspondent's privacy is hypocritical, and trumpets a double standard that the news media are somehow exempt from the reporting practices it demands of news sources.



There can be no justification for the rogue gangs of thugs who attacked Logan, dozens of journalists, and hundreds of citizens. But, from the story of reporter and citizen courage against a 30-year dictatorship, no matter how benevolent it may have appeared, there emerged another story, one not as dramatic, nor as compelling, nor as important. But it is a story, nevertheless.

Because of deadlines and a sense of having to get the story at any cost, news organizations sometimes become in-your-face inquisitors. Privacy isn't usually something the more aggressive news organizations give to those they want on air or in print. It's still common to see microphones stuck inches from faces of people who have suffered tragedies.

But when it comes to one of their own, news organizations seem to have a different set of standards. The brutal attack upon Logan occurred Feb. 11, but it was four days until CBS released any statement. After a brief review of the facts, CBS refused to make further comment or to respond to reporter inquiries. "Logan and her family respectfully request privacy at this time," the network said. A four-day delay to give a basic statement is inexcusable by CBS; a statement that it did not give more information about the attack in order to protect the correspondent's privacy is hypocritical, and trumpets a double standard that the news media are somehow exempt from the reporting practices it demands of news sources.

There is another factor in this mini-story. Judith Matloff, a journalism professor at Columbia University, told the L.A. Times, "Generally, female correspondents do not come out and talk about it [sexual assaults] because they worry that they won't get sent on assignments again."

Paternalism in the news profession often has editors and news directors, most of whom are male, "protecting" their female reporters and correspondents.

Journalists and news crews who go into dangerous situations, including riots, demonstrations, and war, must be trained to deal with violence—and must be given every assistance by their organizations when they have been harassed or attacked.

But, for news executives to discriminate on who to send because of the "fear" that women may be subjected to sexual assault, and for women not to report it to their bosses, is to acknowledge that they, and probably society, haven't come far in eliminating sexism within the profession.


source:
http://baltimorechronicle.com/2011/022811Brasch.shtml
 
Last edited:
I think she needs to take her top off so we can examine for evidence.

Spectacular tits, she has.

The part about all of this that bothers me is not so much that she's used her good looks to advance her career...so has John Roberts, who started as a V-Jay.

It's the paternalistic, sexist way in which everyone got so exited about Lara logan being assaulted....while the dozens of other journalists assaulted and worse in Egypt...didn't even get a mention in passing.

So,for so-called "Lit Feminists" to defend the patriarchy for treating her like a Barbie Doll...is just bizarre.
 
Lara Logan Rally in Cairo Cancelled

Turns our Egyptian women were against it.

“I would love to see this group fighting [sexual] harassment and not promoting the fact the one foreigner was assaulted,” wrote one female commentator by the name of Arwa Atef Shalaby.

“We all get assaulted; it happens everywhere to all of us. No girl in Egypt or any country was not harassed by a guy. I think that’s just life, there are perverts all over the world it has nothing to do with the revolution.”
 
Back
Top