Well done Australia - Hey Twonk Dyk...this is for you too...ahahah

[Guest]

 

[Guest]

Rightooh.

Better get my knee socks up.

 

[QuickDuck]

Yes well.... Howard is a little fucktard who has his head up his arse.

He is only there because there is no credible opposition at the moment.

I had to laugh at the "modern airforce" comment, since our "strike" aircraft are a combination of F-111 and F/A-18.

The F-111s are mostly grounded because of metal fatigue in the wings.

We constantly buying more second hand wings from the USAF from the ones you have in storage.

Our F/A-18s.... well we are suffereing the same problems that the US military are with them.

Our Navy is half decent except for our subs which .... well lets just say we bought alot of lemons.

I think if it came down to it, a bad guy with a pea shooter would hurt us more.

 

[Guest]

 

[p_p_man]

Howard has the balls to step up and say it.

Talk's cheap.

ppman

 

[bored1]

Talk's cheap.

ppman

You should know When is Turkey going to be admitted to the EU? Hows the RDF coming along? Only 6 more days until you can bash America about Pearl Harbor.

 

[p_p_man]

You should know When is Turkey going to be admitted to the EU? Hows the RDF coming along? Only 6 more days until you can bash America about Pearl Harbor.

Soon

Fine

Don't want to except to say 'Where was your carrier fleet at the time?'



ppman

 

[Pagliacci]

I liked the part about amending the charter so that UN member nations could strike first "if they believe" that terrorists are about to strike.

That shows stupidity on a level that's hard to match.

 

[bored1]

Soon

Fine

Don't want to except to say 'Where was your carrier fleet at the time?'



ppman

Safely out at sea, as we all know that FDR knew that the Imperial Japanese Navy was about to strike

 

[p_p_man]

I liked the part about amending the charter so that UN member nations could strike first "if they believe" that terrorists are about to strike.

That shows stupidity on a level that's hard to match.

That's the bit I like, given a few amendments. Delete 'if they believe' and insert 'if they have undisputed proof'...

ppman

 

[p_p_man]

Safely out at sea, as we all know that FDR knew that the Imperial Japanese Navy was about to strike

Well there you go then. America bashing over Pearl Harbour now declared officially closed...

On this thread anyway...



ppman

 

[Guest]

 

[Pechorin]

Is Howard up for re-election soon?

 

[Kuntmode]

n/a

The only balls the Australian Prime Minister has are the ones that are dangling round his chin.

* Compliments of President George W Bush *


Do the Australian Prime Minister's comments coincide with the recent relevations, that the Australian Government was pre-warned about the bombing in Bali and did nothing?



___________________________________________________

 

[QuickDuck]

I liked the part about amending the charter so that UN member nations could strike first "if they believe" that terrorists are about to strike.

That shows stupidity on a level that's hard to match.

Actually yes, that about sums little johny up quite nicely

 

[QuickDuck]

Is Howard up for re-election soon?

nope.... he won last year by a huge margin.

we tried... we honestly did.

 

[QuickDuck]

Is Howard up for re-election soon?

hmmm actually.....

Crean accuses PM of talking up war

December 2 2002

Prime Minister John Howard was trying to talk up war as a diversion to the Liberal Party's disastrous showing in the Victorian election, Opposition Leader Simon Crean said today.

Asian nations have responded angrily to Mr Howard's suggestion that international law be changed to allow pre-emptive strikes against terrorists in other nations.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Kevin Rudd said Mr Howard was using language designed to make him look hairy-chested to his domestic audience.

"But I really question the wisdom of the Prime Minister using this language in terms of how it is read in terms of our neighbours and friends in the region," Mr Rudd told ABC radio.

"As it is being read, it is seen as Australia under John Howard contemplating a possibility of an attack on our neighbours in South-East Asia."

Mr Howard has said the world is confronted by a problem not imagined when the United Nations Charter was drawn up to resolve problems between nations.

However Mr Rudd said the United Nations charter had served the international community by and large well for more than half a century.

Mr Crean said the prime minister's suggestion sent the wrong message to Australia's regional neighbours.

"The prime minister only ever wants to talk war," Mr Crean told reporters.

"I'm for saying we've got to engage our regional neighbours, we've got to talk a collective responsibility, a common solution to fighting terror together, not starting to threaten them."

Mr Crean said Mr Howard's talk of terrorism and hints of tax cuts to come were designed to distract voters from Labor's landslide election win in his home state of Victoria.

"John Howard is ever the diversionist," he said.

"The prime minister should just accept the result in Victoria, as humiliating as it is for the Liberal Party, as humiliating as it is for his role in the campaign.

"He should cop it on the chin and not start talking up war."

story found hear

 

[Guest]

 

[Kuntmode]

n/a

It is bewildering to come across someone with so much hatred for Arabs, so much passion for Israel, and so much support for a conservative Monarchist in the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard.
You class yourself as someone of intellect and high stature Hanns Schmidt, but display the most hypocritical view on politics I have ever encountered.

What the fuck are you? A hardline right wing Liberalised Yiddish loving egotistical warmongering Bulletin board journalist?

 

[Guest]

 

[Guest]

Re: n/a