We all need t disscuss...

[curious2c]

these finer points of specifics with accuracy. There is a deep seated need for direct information dealing with the necessary evils of having disscussions about things such as this. If we can't disscuss this without getting angry and starting to shout out names and call each other unmentionable things then we, as adults and humans are lacking in the most basic of respects to each other. So...without further ado...what should we do about the thing that bothers you most in this thread?

Any W-A-A-A-s? Whines? Cries? Moans, shouts, groans, yells, bells, whistles,bristles,dancing on graves, spitting on graves, pissing on graves, digging ones own graves. Come-on you know you want to.

Say it, yell it, shout it, spell it, spin it, get jiggy wit it.


Oh, and thank you for your support.

 

[MissTaken]

I have to say that I completely agree with you, curious 2c.

An open discussion is definitely over due.

As for me, I never resort to tantrum behavior and seldom rant.

So, in my way, I am telling one and all, to shape or ship out.


So, can someone please tell me what we are talking about?

 

[Wiggles]

I think I need to go to bed...

 

[curious2c]

I have to say that I completely agree with you, curious 2c.

An open discussion is definitely over due.

As for me, I never resort to tantrum behavior and seldom rant.

So, in my way, I am telling one and all, to shape or ship out.


So, can someone please tell me what we are talking about?

Why we are taling about these finer points of specifics and how our disscussion should be tothe point and direct too.

 

[Ice Cold]

I have to agree with the maxims transcibed and implied within said structure and applaud the theorems allocated and inferred in its context.

 

[curious2c]

I think I need to go to bed...



Nighty night Wiggles. Sleep tight, don't let ___________ bite.

 

[HeavyStick]

This thread gives me gas.

 

[Wiggles]

If you see him, tell him he's welcome to all the biting he can muster up.

 

[Guest]

This thread gives me gas.

Oh baby...your AV gives me something else..........

 

[MissTaken]

I have to agree with the maxims transcibed and implied within said structure and applaud the theorems allocated and inferred in its context.

You would!

Now that curious2c has answered my question, I feel I can comment in a more meaningful and specific manner with regard to the issue at hand.

As we all know, in times such as these, this discussion if of paramount importance and requires focus and concentration as well as an open mind.

As such, the discussion seems to be proceeding nicely, even if Ice is doing his usual kissing up.

Nevertheless, he does make a point.

 

[littlekateyes]

ok

 

[HeavyStick]

ok

yes your AV is.........

 

[curious2c]

Ah yes, but his point is one that can be adjusted to show the opposite side of the issues as well. One has a responsibility to explore both sides and then to conclude the path which is logically the proper one to follow. As such, the maxims implied here are very vague and we need to ferret out the possible inferences that are contained within said statements.

 

[MissTaken]

ok

And there you have it!

Very nicely stated, lke. You are an asset to the group.

 

[MissTaken]

Ah yes, but his point is one that can be adjusted to show the opposite side of the issues as well. One has a responsibility to explore both sides and then to conclude the path which is logically the proper one to follow. As such, the maxims implied here are very vague and we need to ferret out the possible inferences that are contained within said statements.

I had a ferret bit me once, so please, no ferreting.

However, yes, Ice was a bit vague in his ass kissing, er response. If the first party were to make such inferences to the second party by way of the third party, the prima facia evidence would as yet be unclear.

Littlekateyes is correct, of course.

 

[Nora]

y'all is makin' muh haaayud hurt.

 

[Ice Cold]

I have to kiss up... Wine if fine, and candy is dandy... but Ice is Nice.

 

[curious2c]

I have just inferred by the timepiece on the wall in my room, that I have to rest now. I hope that more persons post to this thread with their ideas and weigh in on this important topic at hand. I shall check back in on it tomorrow and see if my thoughts have changed or are still on track. night all...

 

[littlekateyes]

Littlekateyes is correct, of course.

I wish

 

[curious2c]

I wish

No wishing about it hon. You are right on target.

 

[Ice Cold]

While conurring with some facets, It must be ascertained that the ambiquities and vaqueness in the discourse make it empirically difficult to decifer with clarity and impartiality the inherit trappings of examing the polarities of the situation.

 

[JazzManJim]

I fail to see how the precision of the argument might improve it. After all, does not the free exchange of ideas imply that a certain and expected amount of verbosity as thoughts are introduced, expounded upon at length, options tested and retested int he crucible of public opinion and thereby reduced to their prime elements?

I do, however, concur that the rampant and some would say frivolous use of the ad hominem discussion technique is undesirable. Not only does it close avenues of conversation but it is also extremely de classe.

 

[littlekateyes]

Hi JazzMan

 

[MissTaken]

NO kidding, ice.
This is certainly a bigger task than I had originally anticipated. You would think that the issues at hand would be simple enough to clarify and then, we could come to a resolution, however only one of us is falling into step with the proposed Communication Policy vis a vis Section 2.4 part a.

Now, if were all to get on the same page and think out of the box, we might find that the disparities aren't as big as they initially appeared, but as long as we continue to avoid the specific issues, the paradoxical relationship between the cause and effect will continue to be misconstrued.

 

[Ice Cold]

Once again you are correct Miss T. But the proposed issues have a tendecy for confluence, allowing for the obscurity upon which we now find ourselves trying to unravel. If we could compartmentalize these issues and limit our scope to better examine the components, perhaps we will achieve the clarity needed to resolve the issues of duality and the misinterpetation that is perceived between the parties.