Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Allah has been merciful and has blessed me bountifully with exactly no desire or even the vaguest of hankerings for a boat of and size, shape or description.


So, kill some time and take his money, I reckon.
 
Allah has been merciful and has blessed me bountifully with exactly no desire or even the vaguest of hankerings for a boat of and size, shape or description.


So, kill some time and take his money, I reckon.
Pretty much what it boils down to. Damn shame though, it's going to be a tack driver.
 
This is the essence of your adolescent thinking: "The whole fucking thing is broken. Nothing fucking works. Every armed man for himself. Fuck the rest of the world, because they're nothing but a bunch of pussies".

Thank you, Holden Caufield.

It being Black History Month, I'll focus the more inspiring work of courageous non-violent leaders who promote the social change required to develop a more perfect union.

Go play wirh your guns, make daily diary entries for your followers, and argue with Bn2f.

Well said, though I wouldn’t call what Bn2f does to Wat on a daily basis arguing.

🤔

Taking what little is left of Wat’s manhood(?) and usurping Wat’s thread would be more accurate.

👍

👉 Wat 🤣

🇺🇸
 
The Alinskyites soldier on. Lacking substance, like monkeys, they throw shit. As the election looms ever closer I expect their desperation, and rhetoric, to become ever more shrill. Demented even.

Locally, as I predicted, the "assault weapons" ban along with the magazine capacity restrictions aren't even going to make it out of the senate committees for a vote. Apparently there are still some democrats with a grasp on reality.

There was once a neophyte attorney that posted regularly here on Lit. She was fervently anti-gun. Then one day she had an epiphany, she realized that the second amendment was the guarantor of all the other amendments in the Bill of Rights.

We see, and continue to see, efforts on the part of the government, their lackeys in the press, and even in our school systems to restrict the freedom of speech, the press, and even religion that is outside the bounds that they deem 'acceptable.'

One example of this encroachment is the rush to enact 'Red Flag' laws. On the surface this all seems reasonable. I too think that there are some few that shouldn't possess, or have access to, firearms and for the most part there are already laws on the books to prevent that. The fatal flaw in those laws is the lack of "due process" and trust me, that is going to come back to bite many legislators in the ass. They pass these laws under the auspices of 'public safety.' Really?

By their own admission virtually ALL of the anti-gun posters in this thread have already confessed that they have NO fear/concern for their own safety. As a matter of fact they make light of those of us that are vigilant. So if that is the case why are these laws, and others like it, required? Are those legislators really looking out for you, or themselves? They are public figures who seem to think that they are superstars not unlike Taylor Swift but are without the means to provide for their own security, so they disarm you at every opportunity by any means possible while not voting themselves 24/7 security because of the political optics if they do.
 
The Alinskyites soldier on. Lacking substance, like monkeys, they throw shit. As the election looms ever closer I expect their desperation, and rhetoric, to become ever more shrill. Demented even.

Locally, as I predicted, the "assault weapons" ban along with the magazine capacity restrictions aren't even going to make it out of the senate committees for a vote. Apparently there are still some democrats with a grasp on reality.

There was once a neophyte attorney that posted regularly here on Lit. She was fervently anti-gun. Then one day she had an epiphany, she realized that the second amendment was the guarantor of all the other amendments in the Bill of Rights.

We see, and continue to see, efforts on the part of the government, their lackeys in the press, and even in our school systems to restrict the freedom of speech, the press, and even religion that is outside the bounds that they deem 'acceptable.'

One example of this encroachment is the rush to enact 'Red Flag' laws. On the surface this all seems reasonable. I too think that there are some few that shouldn't possess, or have access to, firearms and for the most part there are already laws on the books to prevent that. The fatal flaw in those laws is the lack of "due process" and trust me, that is going to come back to bite many legislators in the ass. They pass these laws under the auspices of 'public safety.' Really?

By their own admission virtually ALL of the anti-gun posters in this thread have already confessed that they have NO fear/concern for their own safety. As a matter of fact they make light of those of us that are vigilant. So if that is the case why are these laws, and others like it, required? Are those legislators really looking out for you, or themselves? They are public figures who seem to think that they are superstars not unlike Taylor Swift but are without the means to provide for their own security, so they disarm you at every opportunity by any means possible while not voting themselves 24/7 security because of the political optics if they do.
I imagine that you stroked your tiny penis the entire time you were writing this.
Please, go ahead, tell me I'm wrong.
 
Darker shades probably represent states where residents lawfully purchase their firearms and reasonably accurate measurements can be estimated. White and lighter shades represent probably represent states with higher ratios of illegally acquired, unregistered firearms where it’s impossible to guess how many are possessed.
 
Yeah, because there shouldn't be any way of coming up with this "data" except by guessing.


I was surprised that as deep blue as Hawaii is, they have a higher percentage. And it looks like Bidenland is lowest, unless I missed something.
 
Should be, "known owners of guns". I went for many years owning guns that were not registered. Bought from individuals or inherited.


Yeah, or more likely "internet posted bullshit to make us look like we know something." Allah only knows what they're using for data, but there seems to be a lot of that these daze.
 
Darker shades probably represent states where residents lawfully purchase their firearms and reasonably accurate measurements can be estimated. White and lighter shades represent probably represent states with higher ratios of illegally acquired, unregistered firearms where it’s impossible to guess how many are possessed.
Ok, I'll go ahead and say that you couldn't - who gives a fuck about this graph?!
There... Fixed it.
 
Yeah, or more likely "internet posted bullshit to make us look like we know something." Allah only knows what they're using for data, but there seems to be a lot of that these daze.
Haha!
I'm pretty sure that when you posted this - "Who knows what they were using for data" was not your intended place of conclusion.
Geez - you're terrible at this. :oops:
 
Pussies gonna puss . . . .


"I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do."

~ Robert A. Heinlein
 
Pussies gonna puss . . . .


"I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do."

~ Robert A. Heinlein
I am free because I can think on my own. I am free because, although I am sometimes moved and in awe of the quotes and sayings of others, I can still put into my own words on paper or in person my own feelings. A person dropping the sayings of others is cute and endearing in high school and maybe in an intro sociology class at a technical college, but for it to be done constantly by a grown assed man indicates to me that this person really has not lived, despite whatever they google to tell me they have.
 
I am free because I can think on my own. I am free because, although I am sometimes moved and in awe of the quotes and sayings of others, I can still put into my own words on paper or in person my own feelings. A person dropping the sayings of others is cute and endearing in high school and maybe in an intro sociology class at a technical college, but for it to be done constantly by a grown assed man indicates to me that this person really has not lived, despite whatever they google to tell me they have.
Man, I come here and say lotta shit, but goddamn...
This here is pretty impressive. Lol.
I've said before that this is MY THREAD. Despite whatever name it changes to. Despite my glee in admitting that I do not own or have any general knowledge of the AP Glocker 747. This post is just another example of why.
Wat is spineless and feckless. In addition to not being able to adequately defend himself verbally, he can't assist his other allies here. He is weak. And I don't mean to say that this is "my thread" as any ego thing - I want and have seen the posters here show real fear from other members popping up out of the blue and just shooting their false masculinity postings to shreds. I LOVE IT! I've seen wat, chobs, and TH be humiliated. I LOVE IT! I know that some have thought twice about posting here and I LOVE IT! This thread can say whatever on the heading but it is in the ownership of the good and righteous who make those who do not respect the responsibility nor try to curb the consequences of toxic gun worship run, shut down, and cower. It is THEN that I imagine they feel a sliver of what the children in Uvalde and Newtown felt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top