Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
^^^I see you are celebrating the fact that Lit is not enforcing its Sitewide Content Guidelines, contrary to their assertion that those guidelines apply to all content on Lit, including the bulletin board forums.

This failure to enforce guidelines is concerning to those who are the subject of posts on this thread and others that glorify shooting or beating up members of another political group, beating up law enforcement officials, or encouraging the use of violence to bring about political change whenever elections have an "undesired" outcome. However, it is up to Lit about whether or not they choose to enforce their guidelines.

Federal officials have been notified that this is taking place on Lit. In the future, if a Lit reader becomes the subject of an investigation as the result of committing an act of violence or another activity "...that is illegal in the United States", and the violator is shown to get inspiration from posts on Lit, Lit will likely have to defend why they did not enforce their content guidelines.

As posters on this thread become more emboldened to write about illegal acts, both you and Lit are leaving a document trail that may aid in future investigations and policy changes for this site. While it is unfortunate that Lit is not taking proactive measures to prevent the encouragement of illegal acts, this document trail would aid in determining who encouraged this activity on a mass media basis in the first place.
I remember 0berry Davis and Attack Watch!

Ahahahahahahahaha!


Make sure you use 2 zs!
 
The gun-grabbers have lamented that they wish to have a discussion and gun owners just won’t cooperate. Maybe that’s because experience has shown us our attempts to educate and inform are met with closed minds devolving into insults and worse. The intent of those who would mandate disarmament is to lecture, not converse, and to dictate to gun owners the terms of their surrender.


And that pretty well covers it . . . .
 
The gun-grabbers have lamented that they wish to have a discussion and gun owners just won’t cooperate. Maybe that’s because experience has shown us our attempts to educate and inform are met with closed minds devolving into insults and worse. The intent of those who would mandate disarmament is to lecture, not converse, and to dictate to gun owners the terms of their surrender.


And that pretty well covers it . . . .
That it does.
 
Dammit!!!!!! Back to barrel shopping again. The company that I ordered from only does stainless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top