icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 20,087
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Dalai Bama (peace be upon him) and St Rodham will never have to really face the music. Their legacy’s will be sullied (more than they already are) and I think that’s about the most we can hope for. I hope I’m wrong about that…
36-62%?Armed Citizens Stop Far More Active Shooters Than the FBI Said, New Report Reveals
1 Comment / By Shay Bottomley / October 7, 2025
A decade-long review by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) said armed citizens have stopped active shootings at least 10 times more often than reflected in commonly cited federal tallies, arguing that defensive actions by private individuals are significantly undercounted in official and media summaries.
In an update released Monday and shared with Washington Secrets, the center reported that good Samaritans halted 36% to 62% of active-shooter incidents from 2014 through 2024, compared with 3.7% in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s published reports.
The CPRC attributed the gap to definitional limits and classification choices in federal data.
The group said the FBI’s approach excludes situations where an armed citizen displays a firearm but does not fire, even when the display stops an attack.
https://wokespy.com/armed-citizens-...hooters-than-the-fbi-said-new-report-reveals/
We knew they were always lying about this.
Wow.Armed Citizens Stop Far More Active Shooters Than the FBI Said, New Report Reveals
1 Comment / By Shay Bottomley / October 7, 2025
A decade-long review by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) said armed citizens have stopped active shootings at least 10 times more often than reflected in commonly cited federal tallies, arguing that defensive actions by private individuals are significantly undercounted in official and media summaries.
In an update released Monday and shared with Washington Secrets, the center reported that good Samaritans halted 36% to 62% of active-shooter incidents from 2014 through 2024, compared with 3.7% in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s published reports.
The CPRC attributed the gap to definitional limits and classification choices in federal data.
The group said the FBI’s approach excludes situations where an armed citizen displays a firearm but does not fire, even when the display stops an attack.
https://wokespy.com/armed-citizens-...hooters-than-the-fbi-said-new-report-reveals/
We knew they were always lying about this.
These are the key takeaways:36-62%?
Seems a bit of a range there...lol
The conspicuous part is the extreme range of percentages. I understand it is still more than the previous.These are the key takeaways:
"at least 10 times more often than reflected"
"the center reported that good Samaritans halted 36% to 62% of active-shooter incidents from 2014 through 2024, compared with 3.7% in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s published reports."
Data which meshes well with Gary Kleck's earlier studies.These are the key takeaways:
"at least 10 times more often than reflected"
"the center reported that good Samaritans halted 36% to 62% of active-shooter incidents from 2014 through 2024, compared with 3.7% in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s published reports."
The FBI’s political motivations are on full display, makes you wonder what other “facts” in their files are more fiction than truth.The conspicuous part is the extreme range of percentages. I understand it is still more than the previous.
I get that you don't understand what I'm calling out and why.The FBI’s political motivations are on full display, makes you wonder what other “facts” in their files are more fiction than truth.
I get that you're always picking fly shit out of pepper.I get that you don't understand what I'm calling out and why.
If I tell you that the electrical outlet is faulty between 5% and 45% of the time. That 1. Isn't helpful and 2. Is likely based on a shitty study that was cherry picked for a narrative.I get that you're always picking fly shit out of pepper.
The FBI counts almost nothing unless someone actually fires a shot, while armed citizens who prevent attacks quietly are invisible in the stats. That’s not data, that’s a narrative dressed up as numbers. No wonder their “official” reports make heroic citizens look like bystanders. The FBI’s numbers aren’t just incomplete; they actively erase the role of armed citizens. Cherry-picked “definitions” don’t make up for ignoring reality. Which, in the final analysis, is what you do.If I tell you that the electrical outlet is faulty between 5% and 45% of the time. That 1. Isn't helpful and 2. Is likely based on a shitty study that was cherry picked for a narrative.
Giving such a wide range isn't helpful.The FBI counts almost nothing unless someone actually fires a shot, while armed citizens who prevent attacks quietly are invisible in the stats. That’s not data, that’s a narrative dressed up as numbers. No wonder their “official” reports make heroic citizens look like bystanders. The FBI’s numbers aren’t just incomplete; they actively erase the role of armed citizens. Cherry-picked “definitions” don’t make up for ignoring reality. Which, in the final analysis, is what you do.