Wat’s Carbon Water-N-Stuff Thread - Concepts In Iron And Wood!!!

My favourite was when he said, we have banned them before and we’ll ban them again.

If he banned them before, then why did they not stay banned???

We know why. They don’t….
The Clinton ban expired, and then the Deplorables and right-wing media fought like hell to make sure every unstable nut in America could access a major glut of semi-automatic weapons.

Pandora's box was opened wide.
 
I’ve been to three or four Cardinals games. First one was at the old Busch stadium with the wooden scoreboard out in the outfield. All the others at the new park.

Let me just say two things.

There’s plenty of “Her’s” at those games. Second, Cardinal fans are some of the most knowledgeable fans of any of the parks I’ve been to. Just into the game and even gals like her are there for the game and not so much as a social club/date.
 
The Clinton ban expired, and then the Deplorables and right-wing media fought like hell to make sure every unstable nut in America could access a major glut of semi-automatic weapons.

Pandora's box was opened wide.
Let’s break that down. What exactly did the ban do? Why did it have a sunset provision? If you Radicalized dems were so savvy about it, why didn’t the Dalai Bama (peace be upon his exalted name) follow through with his campaign promise to reenact it? You can’t blame “deplorables,” a term not even yet invented by you goobers.

I’ll give you a little hint…it has to do with Ol’ Pudd’n Head. Yes, the idiot in chief who they had to make cue cards with pictures just to remind him of who Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton was…amongst others.

See, Pudd’n Head Biden and other wormy Radicalized democrats got behind stricter sentencing guidelines and expanded the category of federal crimes punishable with the death penalty in ‘94. They also lumped in the Federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act…that was the Weapons Ban portion. Gett’n “tough on crime” they were!

You Radicalized Killer Furries defended the legislation against charges of weakness by saying: "We do everything but hang people for jaywalking in this bill."——Ol’ Pudd’n Head Biden

Here’s the problem though…

It led to a surge in prison populations that has since been reviled as "mass incarceration" by democrats throughout the years! 🤣

Want to take a guess ant who was incarcerated most? African Americans. Shit for brains Biden almost was held to account for it but sadly, you Furries let him slide.

There was a silver lining in ‘94 though. The backlash was so strong with us salt of the earth gun owners, we went out and voted in MASS in the ‘94 midterms and ushered in the Republican Revolution led by Mr. Newt! So it’s not as simple as us evil “right wing deplorable” types…It’s your own bumbling Radicalized democrats that can’t take the pulse of the country.

Hope ya learned something today.

 
Let’s break that down. What exactly did the ban do? Why did it have a sunset provision? If you Radicalized dems were so savvy about it, why didn’t the Dalai Bama (peace be upon his exalted name) follow through with his campaign promise to reenact it? You can’t blame “deplorables,” a term not even yet invented by you goobers.

I’ll give you a little hint…it has to do with Ol’ Pudd’n Head. Yes, the idiot in chief who they had to make cue cards with pictures just to remind him of who Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton was…amongst others.

See, Pudd’n Head Biden and other wormy Radicalized democrats got behind stricter sentencing guidelines and expanded the category of federal crimes punishable with the death penalty in ‘94. They also lumped in the Federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act…that was the Weapons Ban portion. Gett’n “tough on crime” they were!



Here’s the problem though…

It led to a surge in prison populations that has since been reviled as "mass incarceration" by democrats throughout the years! 🤣

Want to take a guess ant who was incarcerated most? African Americans. Shit for brains Biden almost was held to account for it but sadly, you Furries let him slide.

There was a silver lining in ‘94 though. The backlash was so strong with us salt of the earth gun owners, we went out and voted in MASS in the ‘94 midterms and ushered in the Republican Revolution led by Mr. Newt! So it’s not as simple as us evil “right wing deplorable” types…It’s your own bumbling Radicalized democrats that can’t take the pulse of the country.

Hope ya learned something today.



And this is why Pudd'n Corn pop didn't touch that shit with a 39 and a half foot pole when they had yet another whack at it. That and their handlers done tol' 'em not to.


And that's why you're one of my more favored Horrible People.


 
https://gatdaily.com/articles/the-3...ottleneck Pistol Cartridge&utm_term=READ MORE


The .38/.45 Clerke – A Bizarre 1911 Cartridge​



The .357 SIG was produced by taking a 9mm projectile and necking down a .40 S&W case to accommodate it. This produced a high-pressure, fast-moving 9mm round that was attempting to replicate .357 Magnum performance. Bottleneck pistol rounds are odd, but many people thought the .357 SIG was the first to try to combine a popular case with a popular projectile. However, there was a cartridge called the .38/.45 Clerke that came before it.

The .357 SIG did achieve a SAAMI spec, which pulled it out of the wildcard market. The .38/.45 Clerke never made it that far. A man named Bo Clerke designed the cartridge in 1963, and it premiered in Gun and Ammo magazine. The .38/.45 Clerke combined a .357 projectile with a .45 ACP case. The case was bottlenecked to accommodate the smaller projectile.

The .357 SIG wanted to replicate .357 Magnum performance in a semi-automatic format. They wanted to maximize velocity and accepted the increase in recoil. The .38/.45 Clerke had a different goal. Bo Clerke’s intention was to design a low-recoiling target round. Bo Clerke also wanted the gun to work with a wide variety of projectile types.

You could use a standard round-nose bullet, but the use of .357 projectiles opened up the market to wadcutters. Wadcutters were immensely popular for shooting targets. They left a perfect circle in the target and made scoring easy. The problem was that flat rounds don’t feed well in semi-autos.


And so on . . . .
 
Dude, in 1874 Winchester came out with the 38-40 for their rifles and Colt immediately chambered it in their single action armies. The 38-40 was a bottle necked cartridge.
 
Let’s break that down. What exactly did the ban do? Why did it have a sunset provision? If you Radicalized dems were so savvy about it, why didn’t the Dalai Bama (peace be upon his exalted name) follow through with his campaign promise to reenact it? You can’t blame “deplorables,” a term not even yet invented by you goobers.

I’ll give you a little hint…it has to do with Ol’ Pudd’n Head. Yes, the idiot in chief who they had to make cue cards with pictures just to remind him of who Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton was…amongst others.

See, Pudd’n Head Biden and other wormy Radicalized democrats got behind stricter sentencing guidelines and expanded the category of federal crimes punishable with the death penalty in ‘94. They also lumped in the Federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act…that was the Weapons Ban portion. Gett’n “tough on crime” they were!



Here’s the problem though…

It led to a surge in prison populations that has since been reviled as "mass incarceration" by democrats throughout the years! 🤣

Want to take a guess ant who was incarcerated most? African Americans. Shit for brains Biden almost was held to account for it but sadly, you Furries let him slide.

There was a silver lining in ‘94 though. The backlash was so strong with us salt of the earth gun owners, we went out and voted in MASS in the ‘94 midterms and ushered in the Republican Revolution led by Mr. Newt! So it’s not as simple as us evil “right wing deplorable” types…It’s your own bumbling Radicalized democrats that can’t take the pulse of the country.

Hope ya learned something today.

Nope, it had to do with insufficient votes in the House and Senate. NRA wanted mass proliferation of semi-auto guns in the general population, and they got the votes to do it.

Pandora's box has been opened. The USA leads the world in gun violence. Deplorables do nothing to stop that trend-- they merely regurgitate talking points.
 
One day as I was meditating, I saw a rusty gutter, and I suddenly felt sad and sorry that it was going bad and rusty. I experienced that life was impermanent. I learned Dharma from that gutter.

~ Mae Chi Boonliang




All your thoughts are garbage. You may think that some of them are good but you should consider the possibility that all your thoughts are garbage.

~ Ajahn Sumedho
 
The constitution is not a cafeteria serve yourself line. It's the meal that Mom serves.


That includes the whole thing.


All of it.
 
Nope, it had to do with insufficient votes in the House and Senate. NRA wanted mass proliferation of semi-auto guns in the general population, and they got the votes to do it.

Pandora's box has been opened. The USA leads the world in gun violence. Deplorables do nothing to stop that trend-- they merely regurgitate talking points.
You neither read nor understood a thing I wrote. The facts are easy enough to check. Unlike your assertion of “NRA wanted mass proliferation of semi-auto guns in the general population”…

We’re going to need a source and citation for that statement! 😂

You say insufficient votes in the house and senate…well you kind of blundered into the truth. I told you WHY they didn’t get those votes. It’s never going to be a winning plank in the platform except for the most rabid of you Radical dems.

Hence, why the Dalia Bama (peace be upon him), your best chance at reforming, never really campaigned on the issue, other than lip service. He tried in ‘13 but didn’t have any kind of mandate and senate furry dems didn’t support him. Little Albert Arnold “AL” Gore cast a tie-breaking vote to allow background checks (at gun shows) around ‘99, but the Radicalized dems asses were still sore from ‘94 and they had no political will.

We’ll be looking forward to your report on that mass proliferation…as always. Reputable sources only.😉
 
You neither read nor understood a thing I wrote. The facts are easy enough to check. Unlike your assertion of “NRA wanted mass proliferation of semi-auto guns in the general population”…

We’re going to need a source and citation for that statement! 😂

You say insufficient votes in the house and senate…well you kind of blundered into the truth. I told you WHY they didn’t get those votes. It’s never going to be a winning plank in the platform except for the most rabid of you Radical dems.

Hence, why the Dalia Bama (peace be upon him), your best chance at reforming, never really campaigned on the issue, other than lip service. He tried in ‘13 but didn’t have any kind of mandate and senate furry dems didn’t support him. Little Albert Arnold “AL” Gore cast a tie-breaking vote to allow background checks (at gun shows) around ‘99, but the Radicalized dems asses were still sore from ‘94 and they had no political will.

We’ll be looking forward to your report on that mass proliferation…as always. Reputable sources only.😉
So what about Democrats who were too wimpy to vote for more restrictions on access to guns? Fools are fools. Members of both parties were fools. The NRA turned a lot of people into single issue voters in the 90s.

Especially right now, there are insufficient votes in the House and Senate to restrict access to guns (cuz Jeezus wrote the 2A).

So now we have excessive gun violence in the USA. It's gotten so bad that a radical-right gun promoter was assassinated at a public event when he was in the middle of making the argument that gun violence is not excessive in the USA.
 
Well, there is solving problems.


Then there is identifying problems.


Then there is finding problems where few to none exist.


I think we have identified who is who in this dramatic unimportant corner of the Internet universe….
 
So what about Democrats who were too wimpy to vote for more restrictions on access to guns? Fools are fools. Members of both parties were fools. The NRA turned a lot of people into single issue voters in the 90s.

Especially right now, there are insufficient votes in the House and Senate to restrict access to guns (cuz Jeezus wrote the 2A).

So now we have excessive gun violence in the USA. It's gotten so bad that a radical-right gun promoter was assassinated at a public event when he was in the middle of making the argument that gun violence is not excessive in the USA.
Shot by a leftist Killer Furry loon. That angle of the story has been buried hasn’t it? Again, you’ve accidentally blundered into a truth. The mental health issue of the people pulling the trigger. You don’t want to go there (neither does our media) because it will shine a light on some protected classes that we were told were untouchable.
 
So what about Democrats who were too wimpy to vote for more restrictions on access to guns? Fools are fools. Members of both parties were fools. The NRA turned a lot of people into single issue voters in the 90s.

Especially right now, there are insufficient votes in the House and Senate to restrict access to guns (cuz Jeezus wrote the 2A).

So now we have excessive gun violence in the USA. It's gotten so bad that a radical-right gun promoter was assassinated at a public event when he was in the middle of making the argument that gun violence is not excessive in the USA.
You’ve made this argument twice. The NRA turned people into single issue voters. You aren’t the first so I can only assume that’s a meme running in leftist circles. While I have no doubt there’s a bubba out there that that may be his only issue, the vast majority of us are voting to protect the constitution. All seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. There is one party dedicated to preserving it. The other party, Radicalized democrats, are trampling all over it.

Just remember this term. Shall not be infringed. Say it, live it, love it.
 
Shot by a leftist Killer Furry loon. That angle of the story has been buried hasn’t it? Again, you’ve accidentally blundered into a truth. The mental health issue of the people pulling the trigger. You don’t want to go there (neither does our media) because it will shine a light on some protected classes that we were told were untouchable.
Bullshit.

Kirk was in the middle of arguing that gun violence in America was mostly caused by "gangs", when suddenly a lone privileged white guy shot him in the throat. The right-wing guy who argued that arming as many people as possible was necessary to prevent government overreach got capped by another guy whose right-wing family raised him to be proud of their fascination with guns (and posted photos on social media to prove it).

Kirk had long asserted that high profile and senseless shootings in America are just the price we pay to nourish the "Tree of Liberty".

So what was the outcome of Kirk personally irrigating the Tree of Liberty with his own blood? It was government overreach. Freedom of speech was curtailed. People were "canceled" if they contradicted the President's simple-minded narrative that gun violence is caused by Democrats.

Too many people were raised to think that we need to arm everyone with military grade weapons to prevent government overreach, which leads to crazy people getting guns and attempting to resolve political disputes with violence. We exercise free speech and hold elections to prevent violent civil war. Being obsessed with guns is an indication that Amercan society is on the wrong track.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top