Washington Post eschews relevant politics to discuss tits

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[Sapphire_O]

I look forward to seeing equal coverage about the other candidates. Such as, "Obama wore a pair of snug fitted Valentino slacks that clung provactively to his ball sack."

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[The_Fool]

Exactly.

You were had at ball sack...

 

[lisa123414]

Hey, tits and ball sacs are important!

Okay, well maybe not on our politicians, nevermind.

 

[Jenny_Jackson]

And don't forget cocks. Bill Clinton had his cock used regularly and the economy was great.

Who's our current president? Bush. Now that's both scary and appropriate.

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[Roxanne Appleby]

Couldn't we have tits, ball sacs, and good pubic, er public policy?

 

[SimpleGifts]

Um, folks? Robin Givhan is the FASHION writer for the Post. She's SUPPOSED to cover necklines and decolletage (damn, I love that word), not floor speeches and filibusters.

And believe me, as a fashion writer in this town, you can imagine how far down the barrel she has to scrape to come up with a decent story.

And she has written plenty of other pieces about other politicians' choice of attire. Many of them very funny.

SG

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[SimpleGifts]

Well, I feel sheepish.

You think she'll cover Obama's ball sack next?

Based on her article about Hillary, she will definitely write about that if he FAILS to keep it covered...

SG