Was Shaft and Balls a Design Flaw?

Black_Bird

Not Innocent
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Posts
9,019
What was mamma nature thinking when she put such important parts of our ananomy outside out bodies? Was she crazy? Do you realize how easily a guys penis and scrotum can be damaged?

Look at the female in contrast; internal. Sure, there's still flesh that can be damaged, and the whole nine month birth thing kind of sucks, but just look at her! Stream-lined. Beautiful. She doesn't have to worry about her balls being smashed or her prick being caught in a zipper; it's just so much more tidy.
 
But so pretty to look at

I can't even imagine a part of my body able to grow to such delicious proportions. It must feel amazing.
 
just pet said:
But so pretty to look at

I can't even imagine a part of my body able to grow to such delicious proportions. It must feel amazing.

Breast size increases by 25% when a woman is aroused.
 
foxinsox said:
Yep, you guys were definitely shafted.

:rolleyes:

Yeah, we were, so to speak, shafted. I don't mind being male, but I'm sure there must have been a better way to design this thing.

Maybe it just need retractable armor or something. Hmm.
 
Black_Bird said:


:rolleyes:

Yeah, we were, so to speak, shafted. I don't mind being male, but I'm sure there must have been a better way to design this thing.

Maybe it just need retractable armor or something. Hmm.

You know they had those in ancient times.

They had armored penis sheaths for when guys went into battle.
 
Azwed said:
You know they had those in ancient times.

They had armored penis sheaths for when guys went into battle.

Actually, that isn't too far from the truth. You know the "prince albert" peircing? It was so men to tie their pricks back, away from the armor. Armor had a bad tendency to shear through tender flesh, if you get my meaning.
 
Black_Bird said:
What was mamma nature thinking when she put such important parts of our ananomy outside out bodies? Was she crazy? Do you realize how easily a guys penis and scrotum can be damaged?

Look at the female in contrast; internal. Sure, there's still flesh that can be damaged, and the whole nine month birth thing kind of sucks, but just look at her! Stream-lined. Beautiful. She doesn't have to worry about her balls being smashed or her prick being caught in a zipper; it's just so much more tidy.

Fish & Birds& Reptiles & Amphibians keep their reproductive organs tucked up their rectal canals.

Protected? Yes.
Much more tidy? I don't think so!
 
A design flaw?
I don't think so, I've been using them for years and never had any problems.
 
Azwed said:


Breast size increases by 25% when a woman is aroused.

I was wondering when she would remember her breasts. Thanks for taking those lovely words out of my mind.
 
Black_Bird said:
What was mamma nature thinking when she put such important parts of our ananomy outside out bodies? Was she crazy? Do you realize how easily a guys penis and scrotum can be damaged?

Look at the female in contrast; internal. Sure, there's still flesh that can be damaged, and the whole nine month birth thing kind of sucks, but just look at her! Stream-lined. Beautiful. She doesn't have to worry about her balls being smashed or her prick being caught in a zipper; it's just so much more tidy.

I would vote no. When I am cupping a man's balls in my hand, my other hand is on the shaft of his penis, and my mouth gently gliding over the beautiful head I feel that it has been perfectly designed. And then, when he is fucking me I know the inventor was a fucking genius.
 
Parts of anatomy....

I couldn't agree more with psyche...
Need any help??? ;)

Wing
 
Back
Top