WaPo Acknowledges Pile Up At White House

[unregistered]

 

[CHNOPS]

I've said it before, I'll say it again: I think there are people who honestly don't know what the different parts of a newspaper mean. I believe the OP truly thinks the "WaPo" said this, because he doesn't know what an op-ed column is as opposed to an editorial or a news page.

It's funny and scary.

 

[busybody..]

I've said it before, I'll say it again: .

why?

wasnt worth reading the FIRST TIME you said it

didnt get better the second time

STFU!

 

[RobDownSouth]

I've said it before, I'll say it again: I think there are people who honestly don't know what the different parts of a newspaper mean. I believe the OP truly thinks the "WaPo" said this, because he doesn't know what an op-ed column is as opposed to an editorial or a news page.

It's funny and scary.

The Vettebigot is one person I truly wonder about: is he naturally ignorant or willfully ignorant?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I've said it before, I'll say it again: I think there are people who honestly don't know what the different parts of a newspaper mean. I believe the OP truly thinks the "WaPo" said this, because he doesn't know what an op-ed column is as opposed to an editorial or a news page.

It's funny and scary.

Is not the piece "factual?"

Did they make something up?

Was something taken out of context?


How much of the "reporting" has become thinly guised opinion?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Is not the piece "factual?"
Did they make something up?
Was something taken out of context?
How much of the "reporting" has become thinly guised opinion?

It's a one-sided opinion piece, something YOU are very familiar with.

 

[Liar]

I'm amused by this narrative of the horrible, terrible, no good month that Obama is supposed to have had.

It hasn't hurt his populatity and approval numbers. Like, at all. So while the beltway and the right wing delight in their new found hook, it seems like everyday America couldn't care less.

 

[miles]

Is not the piece "factual?"

Did they make something up?

Was something taken out of context?


How much of the "reporting" has become thinly guised opinion?

They just can't handle facts, logic, and the truth.

 

[miles]

I'm amused by this narrative of the horrible, terrible, no good month that Obama is supposed to have had.

It hasn't hurt his populatity and approval numbers. Like, at all. So while the beltway and the right wing delight in their new found hook, it seems like everyday America couldn't care less.

You're watching too much MSNBC. They said the WI election will help Obama.

 

[RobDownSouth]

They just can't handle facts, logic, and the truth.

There he goes again.....

 

[Liar]

You're watching too much MSNBC. They said the WI election will help Obama.

Lame standard answer.

I'm watching no msnbc. No cable here carries it and my net is too slow. I read poll aggregators. Obama's approval has gone slightly up the last month.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Lame standard answer.

I'm watching no msnbc. No cable here carries it and my net is too slow. I read poll aggregators. Obama's approval has gone slightly up the last month.

Miles discards any inconvenient facts that don't fit his narrative.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

ABC Political analysis reaches the same conclusions:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...dent-obamas-rough-stretch-exposes-weak-spots/

The leaks are huge, a big deal...

The economic news isn't getting appreciably better, in fact, we seem to be sliding back into recession, and he pronounces the private sector as doing just fine while calling for more spending as if spending itself were a huge revenue generator.

 

[RobDownSouth]

ABC Political analysis reaches the same conclusions:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...dent-obamas-rough-stretch-exposes-weak-spots/

The leaks are huge, a big deal...

The economic news isn't getting appreciably better, in fact, we seem to be sliding back into recession, and he pronounces the private sector as doing just fine while calling for more spending as if spending itself were a huge revenue generator.

So are you willing to be a man and go on record with your presidential election prediction? Hmmm?





....didn't think so.

 

[Beco]

WAPO is consistently in the corner of Obama and the Democrats, its a shit newspaper to say the least. I wouldnt even line my birdcage with this rag...

The only thing I read in this rag is the sport's section, and since Mike Wilbon stopped writing, I barely read that.

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Chin-ops thinks an OP-ED piece is always a lie.

^^^Nostradumbass not only makes stoopid predictions, he can read minds too! DERP!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Chin-ops thinks an OP-ED piece is always a lie.

Unless it's Krugman...

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

They just can't handle facts, logic, and the truth.

Thank you for this. The hilarity of irony this statement makes coming from you gave me the buttgiggles.

 

[MeeMie]

Here's another good op ed recently published at WaPo:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ocratic-party/2012/06/06/gJQAGCVlJV_blog.html


Yeah, the loonies need to trivialize the dissension in their ranks (ObamaMedia oddity) by saying "it's only an op ed" ... while completely ignoring the fact that the editors at the Washington Post allowed the negativity to be published. It is rare for them to allow any opinion to be versed that is critical of Obama.

Hopefully, now we will begin to see less bias throughout ObamaMedia.

Not likely, the Obama campaign is already shifting into high gear:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77213.html
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/lanny-davis-goes-off-on-obama-campaign-you-have

 

[pete]

I've said it before, I'll say it again: I think there are people who honestly don't know what the different parts of a newspaper mean. I believe the OP truly thinks the "WaPo" said this, because he doesn't know what an op-ed column is as opposed to an editorial or a news page.

It's funny and scary.

actually the most significant part of this is that story was written by dana millbank, who is usually neck-deep in BO's ass, he inhales democrat love and exhales republican hate.

but you'd have to be pretty familiar with the washington post to notice this nuance.

 

[Wrong Element]

Yeah, the loonies need to trivialize the dissension in their ranks (ObamaMedia oddity) by saying "it's only an op ed" ... while completely ignoring the fact that the editors at the Washington Post allowed the negativity to be published. It is rare for them to allow any opinion to be versed that is critical of Obama.

Correct. Except for Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Kathleen Parker, Marc Theissen, Robert Kagan, Michael Gerson, Fred Hiatt, Jennifer Rubin, Robert Samuelson, and Anne Applebaum, there's no conservative opinion at all in the Post.

I'm amused by this narrative of the horrible, terrible, no good month that Obama is supposed to have had.

It hasn't hurt his populatity and approval numbers. Like, at all. So while the beltway and the right wing delight in their new found hook, it seems like everyday America couldn't care less.

Not unlike how the people of Massachusetts seem not to have noticed that they're supposed to have buried Elizabeth Warren by now. Or for that matter, the way that the American people always thought more of Bill Clinton than the punditocracy did.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Correct. Except for Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Kathleen Parker, Marc Theissen, Robert Kagan, Michael Gerson, Fred Hiatt, Jennifer Rubin, Robert Samuelson, and Anne Applebaum, there's no conservative opinion at all in the Post.

http://files.chesscomfiles.com/images_users/tiny_mce/Shivsky/oh%20snap%20flowchart.jpg

 

[Wok]

Mitt, the sudden conservative hero. Laughs all around.

 

[pete]

Correct. Except for Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Kathleen Parker, Marc Theissen, Robert Kagan, Michael Gerson, Fred Hiatt, Jennifer Rubin, Robert Samuelson, and Anne Applebaum, there's no conservative opinion at all in the Post.

it's folly to even pretend that the washington post is balanced. it's true they publish conservative pieces, but the crushing mass of their opinion pieces, the selection and slant of their news stories, and even the editor's pieces are all left-leaning.