Walmart Culture

sweetnpetite

Intellectual snob
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Posts
9,135
With a small-town culture, Wal-Mart dominates


The company had to learn to do many things on its own because it started in little Bentonville, Ark., but that helped it become a retailing power. Has it gone too far?

By David Faber
8:57 AM EST November 10, 2004

Love it or hate it, Wal-Mart is one of the greatest powers American business has ever seen. This year its annual sales will top $270 billion. It's the largest private employer in the United States with more than 1.2 million workers.

Wal-Mart sells more DVDs, groceries, bicycles, guns, diamonds, engine oil, bedding, detergent, dog food, sporting goods, CDs, socks and toothpaste than any other company in the world. It's the nation's biggest film developer and optician, largest private fleet truck operator, energy consumer and real estate developer.

To some Wal-Mart is an example of capitalism at its finest, a company whose success allows people of limited means to live well. To others, Wal-Mart is a predatory monster responsible for low wages, suburban sprawl and lost jobs.

"They're exploiting workers by the conditions that they have them working under, by the low salaries that they pay them and by depriving them of benefits that workers are entitled to," says John Sweeney, AFL-CIO president.

"If you listen to the outside world and you said, 'why is Wal-Mart different,' the people who don't particularly care for us might list all things you might have asked me about, health insurance, wages or whatever else. But the truth is, what makes us different is our logistics, our information systems, our culture," says CEO Lee Scott.

Indeed, what's important at Wal-Mart is sustaining the culture that founder Sam Walton created. It's a culture that expects managers at all levels to wake up early and work long hours.

Early hours
It's 5:30 a.m. when regional manager Pat Curran leaves her Bentonville, Ark., home. Around the world in Shenzen, China, Joe Hatfield, Wal-Mart Asia CEO, likes to hit the office by 4:30 a.m. Every Saturday morning, Wal-Mart's top execs get together at 7 a.m., citing their biggest sellers and going over the latest sales numbers. Its semi-annual managers' gathering starts at 6 a.m. and gets right down to business. Even its shareholders have to get up early because Wal-Mart's annual meeting gets rocking by 7 a.m.

"It's like our management meeting we have on Fridays and Saturdays, and they're early meetings, but they're designed to get action started before the day is over," says David Glass, a Wal-Mart director and former CEO. "I used to always come to work at 6:30. That was just a time that worked out well for me. And when I'd get here, Sam would always be here. He'd get here about 3 o'clock in the morning."

Adds Scott, "David Glass has been retired for, gosh, four and a half years now, semi-retired now, and I try to get in to work at 6:25 because he gets in at 6:30 and I just can't stand the thought that he might know more than me at first."

Wal-Mart's culture also comes from being in a small town.

"A lot of our competitors were headquartered in cities or operated in cities where they had access to wholesalers and other services that they could employ," Glass says. "We didn't have that. Being located in northwest Arkansas ... we had to do a lot of things for ourselves. And initially, we created our own distribution logistics network which served us very well. We were on the leading edge of technology because we had to do that to control the growth. And as we began to do things for ourselves, it gave us a competitive advantage over the other folks."

That small-town culture also creates an almost cult-like atmosphere.

Like almost everything else about Wal-Mart, the annual shareholders' meeting is the biggest in the nation. More than 18,000 people from around the world come to the Bud Walton Arena at the University of Arkansas. Like many Wal-Mart events, it's part pep rally, part revival meeting, giving management another opportunity to spread the gospel.

But for all the cheering, Wal-Mart remains wary of the outside world.

"You can see us getting criticized more and more and even attacked more and more," says Jay Allen, a senior vice president of corporate affairs. "The media, political leaders, it's going to continue."

Always improving
Wal-Mart can look paranoid. "I think it's probably with good reason," Scott says. "There's always somebody who's just really good, and if you ever get satisfied with what you're doing, you're in real trouble."

The focus on improvement usually leads to a focus on how to cut costs. Wal-Mart is relentlessly efficient. Whether it's the conveyor belt that makes sure there's no wasted space between goods moving through one of its 110 distribution centers or the company's health benefits policy under which employees bear a significant cost, no expense, large or small, is overlooked.

Scott and Chief Financial Officer Tom Schoewe earned a combined $14 million in stock and cash in 2003. But on business trips, the two will share a $49 hotel room.

"Sharing rooms is a very symbolic part of what we do," Scott says. "It's also an equalizer. If I'm asking the district managers to share a room, but I won't share a room with Schoewe, then what am I saying? There are two different standards here? The customer is the most important thing for all of you, but for me I think I'll run a different standard.

"You can't do that. You can't do it because it's not how Sam would have done it."

Says Glass, "Sam has been gone for a number of years now, but he's still alive and well in this company to a great extent. There's not a day that goes by that I don't hear conversations around here about what Sam would do or how he felt about something."

http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/CNBCTV/Articles/TVReports/P100061.asp?GT1=5809
 
So the reason why Mall-Wart has been able to metastasises so malignantly is because their managers get up early enough to milk the cows as well as milk their customers.
 
Virtual_Burlesque said:
So the reason why Mall-Wart has been able to metastasises so malignantly is because their managers get up early enough to milk the cows as well as milk their customers.

Yeah and they are starting it here too - UK - with their take over of Asda or whatever - so we will all be back in our pastroral bliss soon
 
sweetnpetite said:
Scott and Chief Financial Officer Tom Schoewe earned a combined $14 million in stock and cash in 2003. But on business trips, the two will share a $49 hotel room.

"Sharing rooms is a very symbolic part of what we do," Scott says. "It's also an equalizer. If I'm asking the district managers to share a room, but I won't share a room with Schoewe, then what am I saying? http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/CNBCTV/Articles/TVReports/P100061.asp?GT1=5809

Sounds like a porn good story here.
 
sweetnpetite said:
...
"If you listen to the outside world and you said, 'why is Wal-Mart different,' the people who don't particularly care for us might list all things you might have asked me about, health insurance, wages or whatever else. But the truth is, what makes us different is our logistics, our information systems, our culture," says CEO Lee Scott.
...
The focus on improvement usually leads to a focus on how to cut costs. Wal-Mart is relentlessly efficient. Whether it's the conveyor belt that makes sure there's no wasted space between goods moving through one of its 110 distribution centers or the company's health benefits policy under which employees bear a significant cost, no expense, large or small, is overlooked.
...
They don't seem much different to other supermarkets in the aspects mentioned.

eg 1 - Both big supermarkets in my town make the checkout staff buy their own pens for the customers to sign card chits

eg 2 - As an agency driver, I've delivered to distribution centres for Asda, Tesco, the Co-op, Sainsburies & Morrisons. There are minor differences, but they all deliberately create big queues of delivery trucks, so as to optimise their own, internal efficiency, at the expense of their suppliers, who have to pay for trucks and drivers to just sit and wait (6 hours has been my own worst so far). Today was exceptional - 35 mins from arrival to departure. Around 2 hours is typical. On an 8-hour day, that's 25% down-time for the delivery truck, factoring in an extra third (25 vs 75) to every transport cost except the diesel and mileage related maintenance.

Both practices are effectively 'demanding money with menaces': both staff and suppliers can piss off if they don't like it - the pay won't go up for either, no matter how bad things are.

:confused:

Eff
 
There was an excellent Frontline last night called "Is Wal~Mart Good for America?"

It's here.

To me, this is a national security issue. We are letting our manufacturing capacity die, and mortgaging our future to foreign investors, mainly the Chinese in both instances.
 
Re: Re: Walmart Culture

fifty5 said:
eg 2 - As an agency driver, I've delivered to distribution centres for Asda, Tesco, the Co-op, Sainsburies & Morrisons. There are minor differences, but they all deliberately create big queues of delivery trucks, so as to optimise their own, internal efficiency, at the expense of their suppliers, who have to pay for trucks and drivers to just sit and wait (6 hours has been my own worst so far).

One of the things about Wal-Mart not mentioned in the article is that they have their own integral Trucking Division. I'm not sure where their trucks take over completely, but from comments my brother has made about his conversations with Wal-Mart drivers, they apply the same sort of ruthless efficiency to the schedules they hold their trucks to -- so as to avoid the kinds of delays you experience.
 
YOu double dumb fucking idiots....

Do you see the Gestapho herding the millions of shoppers into the parking lots?

Lower prices, a central shopping area, wages for employees higher than minimum wage and usually higher than most casual labor in the vicinity....

The function of the market place is not to enrich the coffers of the AFofL/Cio...nor to profit high cost local producers...but to secure the best product and the lowest cost and meet the demand of the consumer...

It reallys says something about american unions, that a company can import from 10,000 miles away and present a better and cheaper product than union labor can...

christ...you guys really suck!

amicus...
 
Wal-Mart has thrived in one of the toughest industries in the US. They have practically put K-Mart and Sears out of business. In fact Sears and K-Mart just announced a merger agreement to try to compete with Wal-Mart.

No one is forced to work there and no one is forced to buy there.

Wal-Mart operates legally and in most locations is considered a good corporate citizen.

I don't see the problem.


Ed
 
Wal-Mart has helped our town reach the big city by bringing in more fashionable stores. If it wasn't for them we would have to travel more than a half hour for good shopping that doesn't gouge our pockets everytime we turn around. It makes me laugh when down town store owners say- "Shop in town", my question is why? I am not paying 14 bucks for a pair of tightie whities I don't care who's name is on them, I just wont! (unless they are for me! lol)

At wal mart at least I can buy my kids stuff like undies and socks, things that the others dont always see and get away with paying a heck of alot less.

In the box mall our new Wal- Mart brought in 14 new stores and has developed our city closer to the main highway bringing travellers into our town, anyone else done that- NO!

Target in the US has a partener up here, its Zellers, they suck! Old lady fashions in the plus sizes, no inbetween little kids sizes and teen sizes, and their stuff falls apart easily. Their return policy is like a circus, the little poodle hopping through the hoops.
I did hear that Target is changing over their Zellers stores to carry the Target name, well if they do they better bring in the Target atmosphere or they are going to lose out.

K-mart in Canada is very far and few between, I would imagine they will change them to sears stores. Now Id prefer them to stay K-mart and bring K-mart back in full force.

Just my two cents worth,
C
 
Edward Teach said:
Wal-Mart has thrived in one of the toughest industries in the US. They have practically put K-Mart and Sears out of business. In fact Sears and K-Mart just announced a merger agreement to try to compete with Wal-Mart.

No one is forced to work there and no one is forced to buy there.

Wal-Mart operates legally and in most locations is considered a good corporate citizen.

I don't see the problem.


Ed

I know they engaged in anti-competive practices when they came to my town. The first six months they were open, they had unbelievably low prices. The seemed to good to be true, because they *were* too good to be true. Once they ran the local K-Mart, 2 drug stores, and 2 grocery stores out of business, they raised their prices.

The only way Wal-Mart can do this is because they have thousands of stores that can support their new stores losing money.

They also hold classes to help their employees apply for welfare. Perhaps it is expecting too much for the largest and wealthiest company in America to pay their employees enough to live on.

They also fire any employee who mentions the U word. Nor will they hire workers from union backgrounds.

However, I do like the fact that I can almost always find what I want in a Wal-mart. I also like the fact that they encourage gay love by having their same-sex employees sleep together on out of town trips. Sam Walton would be proud.
 
Both me and Wal-Mart pretty much ignore each other. They rarely (read never) carry anything that I'm looking for or even remotely relates to my tastes so I just don't shop there. I would like it if there were more shops that catered to my desires (especially bizarre independent bookstores like they have in Soho, London), but I make do as best I can through mostly online outlets.

I have a friend that works at Wal-Mart now and he says its no better or worse than any other shitty retail job. So, on all counts. I'm pretty much take it or leave it towards them. Let others buy there if they want, let others boycott and shop at a trend store, I'll just continue buying shirts in conventions, games, movies, and anime online, and books wherever I can get my grubby little paws on them.
 
They do under cut local stores. They also tailor what they carry in their early days to put any local mom & pops out of bussiness. For example, the one that opened in Jackson, on County line Rd. carried a pretty nice selection of needles, thread, bobbins and material. Once they ran the local fabric shop down the road out of bussiness, they scaled back their sewing stuff to a bare minimum.

I don't blame them for not wanting a Union, their roots are in the South east. I worked for several companies that were anti union. Unions don't go over very well in right to work states. In fact I saw an entire warehouse operation fire their staff and start over fresh when the drivers and floor workers tried to form a union.

Being ruthlessly effiecnt is how most big companies got to be big in the first place. I know in Jackson, Madison, Clinton, Hattisburg, Starkville, Oxford, and a lot of other places in Mississippi, working for Walmart is cnsidered a plumb job. Of course you can rent a house for between 400 and 550 a month in most places in mississsippi, so the wage goes a lot farter, even if it's just a few cents better than minimum.

I don't see them as any better or worse than any other big retail bussiness. I do wonder if they aren't skirting the edge of the anti trust laws, but so far no one has accused them of that.

-Colly
 
Most of you were not around 50 years ago...when the 'five and dime' stores were in abundance, or the 'Woolworths' or a dozen others that have been long forgotten....even 'JC Penny's' exists only in memory...

Times change...the issue here...with Walmart and K Mart...which just absorbed Sears...is Union Labor...as I have pointed out in previous posts...

Unions...like the Guilds of Medieval Europe, exist to limit and stifle competition, keep the wage high for those with 'union acceptance' and penalize the rest of the poplulation with high prices and limited goods....

In a free market place...no one is given a 'free lunch'... open competion is the judge...and the winner takes all...the fucking pussy, pinko left wing, marxist liberals can't stand the concept of free men making free decisions in a free market place because in the narcissistic agrandizement they wish to control all that occurs beneath their artistic, superior, intellectual perch.

These motherfucking liberals are nothing more than thieves, they prey upon former slaves...the african americans...they pander to the Hispanics...they bribe the poor white trash with foodstamps and government handouts...they do pork barrel deals with every Union that mandates a Demo vote...

Liberal Democrats are the fucking scourge of the earth...they squeeze tax dollars from the working class to support the fucking PBS to give Opera and Classic Literature to the Proletariat when more people watch Nascar and NFL and NBA in one weekend than watch PBS in a year. And they say..."oh for shame...such illiterates are they...we must educate them!"

Fuck YOu! BaCK OFF YOU FUCKING PARASITES! You Pissant perambulatory ivory tower worms that feast on the productivity of real people.

You have corrupted just about every level of american society and you have done so, fancy free...for nearly half a century...

You begin to pay now...you motherfuckers are gonna be up against the wall and I for one think it is long overdue...

You had your run...now somebody else will rule the roost....

Damn...that felt really good...

the unapologetic amicus....
 
Um, okay. Apparently when I said that I exercise my right to not buy at a location that doesn't sell what I want, I meant to say that I like tying doing poor baby corporations with twine and piss on them with my mighty union dick. Such instant translations are really going to play havoc on my life.

All right, ami, like all the other 'I want to be a victim' too jackasses on the planet, it's time for a wakeup slap. Corporations are greedy. Unions are greedy. People are greedy. If people weren't greedy bastards communism and anarchy would work flawlessly. I don't have much problem with corporations as long as they don't treat their employees like fodder to be downsized or exploited for stock manipulation. I don't much like unions as my grandfather was in one and was treated like shit by one. I don't much participate in most aspects of consumerism. What with the diminishing venues that sell anything that resembles what I want driving all my shopping to pretty much whenever Comic Con shows up and whenever I can get to the one independent Sci-fi/Fantasy bookstore I can reach (which has a whole ton of signed works, yea).

Anyway, the point of the counter-rant is this.

Along with a corporation's freedom to exist and compete is the shopper's right to refrain from buying at a locale. To protect the latter right, anti-trust laws at a bare minimum must exist. Since this insures competition and thus perpetuates a free-market this is a capitalistically good thing.

True, this doesn't touch on all your points, but frankly your rant was wickedly out of place in its own right. A few minor complaints of "they're a little monopolistic" somehow driving you into enough righteous rage about unions which were discussed here about mmm, not at all.

Eh, but if you needed an excuse to rant against faggy libs, then you wouldn't be the psychotic we know and abhor.
 
Lucifer Carroll....

you said..in part:

"To protect the latter right, anti-trust laws at a bare minimum must exist...."


I disagree...there is no need for government to enact 'anti trust' laws under any circumstances.....

Open market competion will lead to a natural consolidation as less efficient purveyors are bought out by the more efficient. As the competition continues to garner a larger share of the market, as competition is wont to do...there will be fewer competitors operatiing at a more efficient level (or they would not exist) and offering higher quality products at lower prices than before...tis but the nature of a free market....

Now...should any such enterprise approach a monopolistic supremacy and begin to dictate prices higher than the market would support...under a free market system...competitors would once again arise and undercut the monopoly.

Of course..this is predicated upon the existence of a judicial and law enforcement system...that upheld the right of all competitors, not just the large...and therein...of course lies the rub....

Large enterprises can indeed afford lawyers and can even bribe legislators and judges...which corrupts...but does not destroy the concept of the free market...it only signifies that we need...always..men of honor and integrity in all walks of life...

and when has that not been so?

amicus...
 
amicus said:
and when has that not been so?

amicus...

End of 19th/Early 20th century. But then history has never been a strong suit of yours. Nor thinking for that matter. In fact, I greatly suspect that you are a broken ELIZA program written by some drunken pro-Randist compsci major in a third-rate liberal arts college.

I stick by what I said before. Monopolies hinder free-trade. I'm with strongly anti-unionist Teddy Roosevelt and nearly all reputable economists including 100% of those who have won Economic Nobel Prizes when I say that.
 
Yassir Immarat won the Nobel peace prize...what does that tell you...Christ man...get a life...!
 
amicus said:
Yassir Immarat won the Nobel peace prize...what does that tell you...Christ man...get a life...!

And Peace prizes are related to Economic prizes how?

And as far as life. It's very shiny. All the cool kids have one. :D
 
You've really lost it...Luc...take a hot bath...and a percodan or what the fuck ever you misguided nut cases use in place of reality....


amicus...not even a little bit sober...
 
amicus said:
amicus...not even a little bit sober...

Believe us when we tell you it's really really obvious.

When you sober up we'll have a nice man in a clean white coat explain the concept of subtle mockery to you.
 
Lucifer_Carroll said:
Believe us when we tell you it's really really obvious.

When you sober up we'll have a nice man in a clean white coat explain the concept of subtle mockery to you.

Could you have him explain it to me too, because I still don't get and still don't like shopping at WalMart (notice the smoothe transition back to the thread title? Hunh? Hunh?):confused:
 
Back
Top