Vice President JD Vance: UK-USA Tariff Trade Agreement will require King Charles to "bend the knee" to King Donald

RobDownSouth

No Kings
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Posts
77,664
American Vice President JD Vance argued very strongly yesterday that any trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States MUST contain a provision that would essentially require His Majesty King Charles of the United Kingdom to "bend the knee" to newly crowned American monarch King Donald.

The proposed treaty would specify that American law, as interpreted by King Donald, would supersede British law insofar as "hate speech crime" is concerned.

Specifically, all British "hate speech" laws directed against those who would criticize and/or terrorize any British crown subject who happens to be LBGTQ+ would be "null and void". Protections against "Antisemitic speech", again as defined by King Donald, would still remain in place in Great Britain, until Jewish people are no longer necessary to serve as political tokens.

Trump has argued in the past that the "Hate Speech Crime" legislation passed in Great Britain "unfairly" restricts conservative candidates in the UK from espousing their beliefs.

Vance indicated...twice...that this addendum was a "red line" addendum, i.e. a non-negotiable position for the United States.

No truth to the rumor that the British throne must also cede the Royal Orb and Scepter to Trump for the remainder of his reign.
 
Sounds silly -- but this is the president who actually demanded to ride in the Queen's golden coach.
If a ride in a horse-drawn coach whilst he makes clippety-clop noises is all it takes, Charlie will keep a straight face and let him have a go.
 
The proposed treaty would specify that American law, as interpreted by King Donald, would supersede British law insofar as "hate speech crime" is concerned.

Specifically, all British "hate speech" laws directed against those who would criticize and/or terrorize any British crown subject who happens to be LBGTQ+ would be "null and void". Protections against "Antisemitic speech", again as defined by King Donald, would still remain in place in Great Britain, until Jewish people are no longer necessary to serve as political tokens.
Won't happen. There are standard clauses used in such deals and they never ever change to the detriment of the Sovereign rights of either party.
 
American Vice President JD Vance argued very strongly yesterday that any trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States MUST contain a provision that would essentially require His Majesty King Charles of the United Kingdom to "bend the knee" to newly crowned American monarch King Donald.
I see no knee-bending from King Charles (or Keir Starmer as head of the gov't) in this latest trade agreement

seems being so close to trump so often means that 'everything he touches, dies' thing is rubbing off
 
UK food and environmental safety has long been superior to the USA's. However, despite there being a ban on chlorinated chickens and hormone-fed beef in the UK (NOT in the USA... hey, brain-worm man, get on that), peter navarro is determined brits will love it once they taste it. He hasn't a fucking clue about british consumers.

The Trump official went on to describe sanitary standards as “simply a phony tool used to suppress what is very fine American agricultural product”.
“So if more of that comes into the market and the British people don’t want to buy it, that’s one set of facts,” he said. “We don’t believe that once they taste American beef and chicken that they would prefer not to have it.”

The USA permits so many more dangerous poisons in everything from food to weedkiller, stuff banned for decades in the UK. Education is key.

https://www.alternet.org/trump-official-us-chicken/
 
The USA permits so many more dangerous poisons in everything from food to weedkiller, stuff banned for decades in the UK. Education is key.

https://www.alternet.org/trump-official-us-chicken/
It's worth noting that recently, RFK the US Health secretary banned the use of certain non-natural flavourings and dyes in US foods. Not one of my favourite guys but Kudos on that modest start.

The problem with USA sourced beef has 6 main strands, 1. It is full of hormones, particularly testosterone to promote faster growth. 2. It is not in fact USA beef as the big meat packers include Beef sourced from South America. Beef sold in the UK and EU must be traceable to its farm or locality of origin. 3. American beef is exposed to a number of diseases not found in UK/EU. 5. Europeans generally prefer grass fed beef while the US market prefers corn finished beef. 6. 95% of the meat packed in the USA is sold within the US domestic market so the meatpackers do not want to cater to the small requirements of foreign consumers.

I suspect that US farmers would be prepared to cater to buyer preferences but the meat packer industry is not interested, and that highly concentrated industry has the money when politicians seek donations.

An acquaintance of mine sells beef to Japan and if anyone thinks that UK/EU rules are strict, the Japanese are much tougher. The Japanese market however, has always been prepared to pay top $ but insists on the very best.
 
Our President is a piece of shit
Not 'our' president! 'Their' president you mean. 'They' didn't claim the one before him was a 'presidential man' you recall?

So, I'm going with 'He's not my president.' Just going to pretend he doesn't exist until he goes away, like a bad nightmare.
 
Not 'our' president! 'Their' president you mean. 'They' didn't claim the one before him was a 'presidential man' you recall?

So, I'm going with 'He's not my president.' Just going to pretend he doesn't exist until he goes away, like a bad nightmare.
Our President is what I said and meant.

I don't give a shit about what you need to call him to feel better
 
Not 'our' president! 'Their' president you mean. 'They' didn't claim the one before him was a 'presidential man' you recall?

So, I'm going with 'He's not my president.' Just going to pretend he doesn't exist until he goes away, like a bad nightmare.
I remember seeing bumper stickers that said "Charlton Heston is my President!"

I wanted to get one saying, "Martin Sheen is my President!"
 
If US farms could grow poultry in hygienic conditions like most of the world instead of soaking the slaughtered birds in chlorine to kill the diseases, the UK and EU would happily accept the meat.

As it is, even if the barriers were removed nobody would buy it.
 
American Vice President JD Vance argued very strongly yesterday that any trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States MUST contain a provision that would essentially require His Majesty King Charles of the United Kingdom to "bend the knee" to newly crowned American monarch King Donald.

The proposed treaty would specify that American law, as interpreted by King Donald, would supersede British law insofar as "hate speech crime" is concerned.

Specifically, all British "hate speech" laws directed against those who would criticize and/or terrorize any British crown subject who happens to be LBGTQ+ would be "null and void". Protections against "Antisemitic speech", again as defined by King Donald, would still remain in place in Great Britain, until Jewish people are no longer necessary to serve as political tokens.

Trump has argued in the past that the "Hate Speech Crime" legislation passed in Great Britain "unfairly" restricts conservative candidates in the UK from espousing their beliefs.

Vance indicated...twice...that this addendum was a "red line" addendum, i.e. a non-negotiable position for the United States.

No truth to the rumor that the British throne must also cede the Royal Orb and Scepter to Trump for the remainder of his reign.
Lets compare the two kings, shall we. King Donald's daughter marries an Orthodox Jew, and Trump more than accepts him. Trump's son marries a Jew, since divorced, and he accepts her, too. King Chuck's son marries a girl with a black mother and not only throws his son out of the not so Royal family, but said son is forced to flee the not so united kingdom. Not much of a comparison.
 
If US farms could grow poultry in hygienic conditions like most of the world instead of soaking the slaughtered birds in chlorine to kill the diseases, the UK and EU would happily accept the meat.

As it is, even if the barriers were removed nobody would buy it.
What is done in other countries to keep the chicken farms hygienic?
 
What is done in other countries to keep the chicken farms hygienic?
Seems like basic stuff, cleaning the farms and abattoirs properly. The EU keeps the animals clean during their life, the US cleans them up after death. They care about the animals in Europe.

The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System tests samples of raw chicken from shops for bacteria.

In its most recent round of testing it found a significant amount of the bacteria campylobacter - the most common cause of food poisoning - in 30% of chicken carcasses, 26% of chicken parts and 58% of "mechanically separated" chicken, which is used to make things like chicken nuggets.

It recorded how much of the chicken had more than 400 units of bacteria per gram of meat.

In the UK, the government's Food Standards Agency found 54% of chickens had traces of the bacteria but only 6% had the highest levels - more than 1,000 units of bacteria per gram of meat. Since they don't measure exactly the same thing, it's difficult to compare these results.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47440562
 
American Vice President JD Vance argued very strongly yesterday that any trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States MUST contain a provision that would essentially require His Majesty King Charles of the United Kingdom to "bend the knee" to newly crowned American monarch King Donald.

The proposed treaty would specify that American law, as interpreted by King Donald, would supersede British law insofar as "hate speech crime" is concerned.

Specifically, all British "hate speech" laws directed against those who would criticize and/or terrorize any British crown subject who happens to be LBGTQ+ would be "null and void". Protections against "Antisemitic speech", again as defined by King Donald, would still remain in place in Great Britain, until Jewish people are no longer necessary to serve as political tokens.

Trump has argued in the past that the "Hate Speech Crime" legislation passed in Great Britain "unfairly" restricts conservative candidates in the UK from espousing their beliefs.

Vance indicated...twice...that this addendum was a "red line" addendum, i.e. a non-negotiable position for the United States.

No truth to the rumor that the British throne must also cede the Royal Orb and Scepter to Trump for the remainder of his reign.
What trade agreement? it hasn't been si9gned and Trump has already broken it.
 
Lets compare the two kings, shall we. King Donald's daughter marries an Orthodox Jew, and Trump more than accepts him. Trump's son marries a Jew, since divorced, and he accepts her, too. King Chuck's son marries a girl with a black mother and not only throws his son out of the not so Royal family, but said son is forced to flee the not so united kingdom. Not much of a comparison.
Royal family relations? You sure that's a hill you want to die on?
King Trump believes that his disabled subject (like his nephew Fred's son) should "just die"

I will admit it was nice of him to bury his first wife on one of his golf courses (even if he didn't get the "cemetery tax exemption he sought for the course afterwards). I just wish he had selected another site for burial instead of the golf cart overflow parking area.....
 
Any time, rub up north. After spending 3 years in the UK, I found it to be thee most racially intolerant country in all of Europe. King Chuck appitimizes the bigotry.
 
Back
Top