very sad day in UK

The problem Dixon is that we focus on the perps and not the enablers.

Who are the enablers?

A web site with no age verification and an author who writes positive stories about young teens having sex with older professors.

Think of it as a "Seal of Approval" for those young minds curious about sex and whom to engage in sex with.

It's a valid point.

A real man would change his story to take place in college or junior college.

At least then you are only violating the Teacher-Student bond...

But the appeal of your story is based on something much baser. The dark side of the human psyche that part of us which is still animal and knows no bounds or rules, just lust and conquest.

I thought you held yourself above the rest of us.

If anyone is to be compared to an animal, it is you.

PS

Provide the link to that silly argument as well as the threat I made about the FBI and just how is that slander suit going Dixon? Did it feel good forcing me to track down your good friend Laurel?
 
SINthysist said:
The problem Dixon is that we focus on the perps and not the enablers.

Who are the enablers?

A web site with no age verification and an author who writes positive stories about young teens having sex with older professors.

Think of it as a "Seal of Approval" for those young minds curious about sex and whom to engage in sex with.

It's a valid point.

A real man would change his story to take place in college or junior college.

At least then you are only violating the Teacher-Student bond...

But the appeal of your story is based on something much baser. The dark side of the human psyche that part of us which is still animal and knows no bounds or rules, just lust and conquest.

I thought you held yourself above the rest of us.

If anyone is to be compared to an animal, it is you.

PS

Provide the link to that silly argument as well as the threat I made about the FBI and just how is that slander suit going Dixon? Did it feel good forcing me to track down your good friend Laurel?

And how much of a 'real man' hijacks a thread about the murders of two young girls to have a swipe at someone whom he dislikes? Take your spite somewhere else!
 
hornylady said:


And how much of a 'real man' hijacks a thread about the murders of two young girls to have a swipe at someone whom he dislikes? Take your spite somewhere else!

I may still be pretty new and have no clue as to the history of this dispute.....but i second that point.
 
Myrrdin said:

We've yet to find out whether he was mentally unstable before hand, or whether he has now suffered a nervous breakdown .

Positions working with children would have needed background checks for previous convictions, reprimands and also whether that person was on a government register of people considered unsuitable to work with children.
This would have weeded out people with prior records. To do these three checks would have entailed checking with three different government agencies. To streamline operations the Government combined it so all checks would be done through one bureau.
This streamlining has failed. Bureacracy snowballed Checks are now up to twelve months behind. despite the Government employing an Indian company to process raw data and speed checks up. Because of the backlog, the government suspended two of the three checks. But unchecked people are working with children. So a system to weed out some of the undesirables is floundering.

I see what you mean...funny how both of them changed thier surnames for 'family reasons' just before thety applied for the jobs.......
 
Back
Top