Vampireism: Modern day vampires in today's society

Fantasies-only

Really Experienced
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Posts
237
Vampirism: Modern day vampires in today's society

This true story can be fictionalized for a more dramatic effect, concerning the sensual appeal of the vampire story (erotic mind control, seducing young women with the promise of ever lasting life, even contorting and morphing one's body at will).
What I'm really interest in, is the sensual description of, taste of, and the intimate experience of sharing human blood applying to erotic stories.
 
Last edited:
It could be done. Its kind of a difficult subject since not a lot of people have experienced it ir any.
 
I'm a Satanist, I totally disagree with the topic of vampires. It's simply pathetic. If you think that sucking blood, while fucking is romantic, then consider it Fetish, not VAMPIRISM. :devil: Vampirism was simply made up by idiots back when Vlad Dracul was alive. If anyone knows their history, Vlad Dracul ( aka Vlad the Impaler) never sucked anyone's blood. Although he had a FETISH for it, and proved it by sticking his "victims" heads on stakes. Vampirism was made up by a stupid queer of a teenager that wanted attention. Is this what you are? A stupid queer? Why follow a trend, why try to immitate that your "Goth?" grow up, be an actual individual. But for everyone's sake- if your going to continue doing this, and trying to "experiment" with this so called " cult/religion", then have respect for Vlad Dracul. If your gonna be bloodthirsty, cut the head off after your done, and stick it infront of your home. If you do, you have my respect and my apologies.



Don't bother posting back. I will NOT respond :cathappy:
 
I have to disagree on why Vlad put his enemies heads on a pole, Transylvania at the time was the barrier between christians and the Turks and Islamics, mostly the Turks.

Every little while the Turks would try and invade and take the land, which scared the christians because well, Turkey at the time was entirely Islamic and would mean a loss of gold to the Christians, and they figured would mean an invasion of the rest of Europe to make them Islamic or dead. OK I know stupid fear, nobody ever said there was intelligence then either. ;)

Anyway on to the point, Vlad would put the heads on poles in vast feilds for two reasons, one the turks did it to and would understand, strong army and no mercy, and second, because walking through a couple miles of decapitated heads on poles is a really serious downer.

The Reason Vlad was feared through the rest of Europe is because of his methods in other things, when he took power, he invited all of his enemies and your basic theives to a dinner locked them all in and lit the building on fire. I beleive he did it a few times after as well, not to mention he had a habit of inviting people to dinner and then poisoning them and then putting their heads on a pole at the entrance to his castle as a warning to people like them.

He also had a liking for blood, Pretty sure it was cow and pig bloods but then again you never really can tell without being there. Anyway the tales of his deeds had spread throughout europe and he was generally regarded as a bloodthirsty maniac, which is why he was used as a vampire story. Whether or not written by a gay goth guy I don't know, but the reasons for his reputation aren't what you described.

Oh yeah Snooper your a pervert, drinking blood. :p
 
Lady Reiha said:
Don't bother posting back. I will NOT respond :cathappy:

Why bother giving your opinion then? Are your beliefs so fragile that you can't stand to have a little controversy?
 
bisexplicit said:
Why bother giving your opinion then? Are your beliefs so fragile that you can't stand to have a little controversy?
nahs, just going to bed. G'night :p
 
Lady Reiha said:
I'm a Satanist, I totally disagree with the topic of vampires. It's simply pathetic. If you think that sucking blood, while fucking is romantic, then consider it Fetish, not VAMPIRISM. :devil: Vampirism was simply made up by idiots back when Vlad Dracul was alive. If anyone knows their history, Vlad Dracul ( aka Vlad the Impaler) never sucked anyone's blood. Although he had a FETISH for it, and proved it by sticking his "victims" heads on stakes. Vampirism was made up by a stupid queer of a teenager that wanted attention. Is this what you are? A stupid queer? Why follow a trend, why try to immitate that your "Goth?" grow up, be an actual individual. But for everyone's sake- if your going to continue doing this, and trying to "experiment" with this so called " cult/religion", then have respect for Vlad Dracul. If your gonna be bloodthirsty, cut the head off after your done, and stick it infront of your home. If you do, you have my respect and my apologies.



Don't bother posting back. I will NOT respond :cathappy:
I'm tired of people who think they know it all by seeing a semi accurate movie fictionalized for dramatic affect.
The father of Vlad was a viking who shunned his child after Vlad got into Satanism.
Vlad believed taking in blood would ensure everlasting life (which is why Romania had wild boar on the endangered species list).
Vlad was considered a hero to his people, having a war with the Gypsies residing in the country.
He ruined the lives of many of his own people, by burning crop symbols that can be seen from the air (high towers), burning huts for smoke signal, and scaring villagers with effigies and burning crucifixes.

Vlad (only went by first name) got the nick name Dracul (pronounced Drak-cool) by the myth that he can shake the ground at will and breath fire (dracul means dragon).
On many of Vlad Dracul's adventures, he'd fight in the jungles of Africa and the surrounding areas.
Imitating the natives who frighten evil spirits, he would decapitate his victim, hollow out the head, and impale it with a large sharp pole.
A once living head sticking out of the ground, would warn passers by that Dracul was near.
Not one to waist good blood, he then dug into the body, pulled out the heart, and took a big bite or two.
He had to do this immediately or else the heart would not be as fresh.
He became known as Vlad The Impaler.

Dracula is a prince that lived in the 1600s (I think that was the century), and is not the same person as Vlad Dracul.
He lived in a spooky stone castle among many coyotes.
He thought mirrors are nothing but picture frames that steal one's soul, so there were no mirrors in his castle, which contributed to the myth.
Knowing that their was protein in the most common resource around (insects and scorpions) from Egyptian legend, he decided to take this to heart, and eat insects all of the time.
Dracula had a rare skin disorder where he doesn't get enough oxygen to his cells, thus making him loose pigment and burn easily in the sun.
Wearing all black (colour of Romanian flag) and eating insects, made him misunderstood by the town's people.

Years later, the vampire myth (walking dead, spawn of the devil, practices black magic to lure women to witchcraft) would be intertwined with Prince Dracula and Vlad Dracul.

I don't care if you respond or not.
Just knowing that I'm right and you're wrong is good enough for me. :p
 
Last edited:
emap said:
I have to disagree on why Vlad put his enemies heads on a pole, Transylvania at the time was the barrier between christians and the Turks and Islamics, mostly the Turks.
The only religion at the time was muslum.
Transylvania was called Romania when Dracula was born (changed name a century later).
Gypsies (what we would call "white trash") were a constant nuisance, having nowhere else to go.

This thread was meant to be about vampirism, which has nothing to do with vampires or worshiping them, and everything to do with the seductive nature of sharing blood.

Vampirism has as much to do with vampires, as rhinoplasty has to do with rhinos.
Any further discussion of the vampire legend, must be in PMs only.
 
Last edited:
:nana: YES! i love people who prove me wrong :heart:

Thank you everyone for proving me wrong and making this into a heated debate. I'd fuck you all if I wasn't a idiot.
 
I

think vampires are sexy and enjoy reading fiction. I am not a goth but anne rice's books were very sexual in nature. However I think they should have had sex... and lots of it!
 
I agree.
Apprently she does have a line or erotic books.
 
FallenAngelsSlut said:
Yeah sleeping beauty. Hot as hell!
and exit to eaden good too.
I am a Anne Rice whore :)
1: The Claiming of Sleeping Beauty
2: Beauty's Punishment
3: Beauty's Release

I don't know how the story can be made erotic.
I mean, she works (spinning wheel) in sweat shop conditions for god sake, in a musty old shed.
The only thing I can think of is the play on words "she pricks her finger" and "she feels his prick" (the term isn't used anymore).

Back to the subject of blood lust:
I was wondering if anyone has this fetish, so I may describe it.
 
Lady Reiha said:
Vampirism was made up by a stupid queer of a teenager that wanted attention. Is this what you are? A stupid queer?

Don't bother posting back. I will NOT respond :cathappy:

So, a "stupid queer teenager" invented Vampyrism in the middle ages? Wow!


Why so hostile, anyway? Oh, yeah. You won't respond. My bad. :rolleyes:
 
I think we should stop this flaming now and get back to the subject, ok?
Anything you want to add about individual posters, should not and MUST not be in this thread.

The interest of vampire movies with a seductive edge, may have gotten the fetish going, but before that, animal blood was a beverage reserved mainly for brute strength and royalty (meant for health and longevity).
It morphed into an intimate experience between family members and spouses, and somehow it got to be lust after Satanism or devil worship came into mainstream.
 
Just a reminder... The "common" Dracula tale we've all come to know in society was Bram Stoker's fiction based very loosely on a real Prince from the middle ages. Never once was it said "people who turn into bats", "suck blood", "can't cast reflections in a mirror", Or Stoker's words, was real.


"Modern day Vampyrism" (yes, I do spell it with a "y" on purpose, thank you) is a way of life, for the most part. Some of the old vampyre myths can be very erotic and sexy. I, for one, love being bitten. Anywhere on my body...though areas like the neck/throat, my sides/hips, and pubic area are far more sensitive. :eek: However, I don't follow the fetish/lifestyle that many do.
 
Fantasies-only said:
I think we should stop this flaming now and get back to the subject, ok?
Anything you want to add about individual posters, should not and MUST not be in this thread.

Arguing is completely different from flaming. You do not seem to realize the difference.

Also, you don't get to decide what others can say. I'm glad to see that you like to stick to the topic of story ideas - however, people are allowed to have side discussions.
 
Fantasies-only said:
1: The Claiming of Sleeping Beauty
2: Beauty's Punishment
3: Beauty's Release

I don't know how the story can be made erotic.
I mean, she works (spinning wheel) in sweat shop conditions for god sake, in a musty old shed.
The only thing I can think of is the play on words "she pricks her finger" and "she feels his prick" (the term isn't used anymore).

Back to the subject of blood lust:
I was wondering if anyone has this fetish, so I may describe it.

I've read the series. The premise is that the Prince comes from a country that is heavily into BDSM and he awakens Beauty with a kiss and from their trains her. Its pretty good reading if you are open minded. Not only on the subjects of submission and such but on bisexuality. If you didn't notice that Lestat is probably gay and calling him Bi is almost being kind to the man. (I love Lestat to death, that doesn't change the fact that he has a lot more male love interests in the 4 books I've read (Interview, Lestat, Queen, Body Theif) than he does female ones. Anne doesn't really bother to conceal the fact that she doesn't really notice the difference between men and women when it comes to sex.
 
Fantasies-only said:
Anything you want to add about individual posters, should not and MUST not be in this thread.
Who died and made you a moderator?
 
The Beauty books are very erotic. I loved them. And though the tale was fiction, it really opened my eyes about myself and my own submission.
 
bisexplicit said:
Arguing is completely different from flaming. You do not seem to realize the difference.

Also, you don't get to decide what others can say. I'm glad to see that you like to stick to the topic of story ideas - however, people are allowed to have side discussions.
I've had that in another forum I was at, and after multiple times of begging with the moderator to lock it, it ended up as a constant flame war I was caught in the middle of.
Now I started this thread, and should have the last word on it's content.
If guests come into my home, and start fighting with each other, so much so it disrupts the entire houshold, I am free to kick them out.
I'm just saying, there are more appropriate venues for arguments about individual posters.
PM each other for that.
Maybe even the General forum would allow personal ranting, but I don't.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top