US Plummets In Press Freedom Rankings

Of course. In particular you asking do I think Rob, Zumi and other various libs are dicks for making Jew jokes or calling Vette Grandpa Urine. Yes, they are dicks. I don't call them on it, but I don't call Koala, miles, BB, Vette or Ishy on it either. BB I put on ignore and more because he insists on posting three and four times in a row than because he's offensive to mine ears.

No jokes here, because unlike the stains who have nothing else to offer and make their racist ish an every day thing, I don't toss around anti-semitic and bigoted rhetoric towards Jewish people like it's cheap. Now, what you might be confusing that with is when I make sure to highlight a particular GB Jewish member's ignorance using their slang lingo or historical circumstance to remind that person of their not-so-lofty place when they glibly and freely mouth off about Blacks or other people of color's interests, subjects and concerns in the general negative as if they're the final word. I know exactly who participates in that fuckery and only their cards will continue to be pulled along with Moe slaps whenever I read their bullshit.

True talk, if I'll be a dick, then I'll make it for a tangible reason. And the "grandpa urine" meme is harmless ball-busting fluff. I can't take credit for it, but I'm most def shipping it as long as it lasts. :D
 
No jokes here, because unlike the stains who have nothing else to offer and make their racist ish an every day thing, I don't toss around anti-semitic and bigoted rhetoric towards Jewish people like it's cheap. Now, what you might be confusing that with is when I make sure to highlight a particular GB Jewish member's ignorance using their slang lingo or historical circumstance to remind that person of their not-so-lofty place when they glibly and freely mouth off about Blacks or other people of color's interests, subjects and concerns in the general negative as if they're the final word. I know exactly who participates in that fuckery and only their cards will continue to be pulled along with Moe slaps whenever I read their bullshit.

True talk, if I'll be a dick, then I'll make it for a tangible reason. And the "grandpa urine" meme is harmless ball-busting fluff. I can't take credit for it, but I'm most def shipping it as long as it lasts. :D

It was a blanket statement. The important detail being that we aren't blameless and I don't make a habit of calling anybody out on it. I'll occasionally say something when I feel that someone has gone above and beyond but generally speaking everybody flings their mud and it's not like I don't too.
 
I assume that holds true for both sides of the political spectrum?

Indeed it does, and we promise to treat you stinking greedy selfish mean-minded ill-natured willfully-ignorant bigoted knuckle-dragging xenophobic RW shitbags with respect and courtesy, as always.
 
On the first point I have to disagree. He has made a minimal lip service efforts but the actions of his administrations are quite different.

You mean where he abandon practically his entire campaign to placate the RW?

Didn't end Operation Freedumb

Didn't end the failed war on cannabis

Kept and then expanded PATRIOT act, another stroking of RW policy.

Didn't reform HC for SHIT, all he did was suck HC mega corp dick...and to top it all off it's modeled after a REPUBLICAN program. We got taken to the fuckin' cleaners for slightly...SLIGHTLY expanded coverage.

Let's talk about how much he has avoided the gay marriage issue as not to piss the RW off to much. In short he is a lying, spineless fuckin' sell out.

Now you tell me EXACTLY where he didn't bend over backwards and bail on his own constituency to reach across the isle to the RW when you know damn well he could have gone the other direction and railed the GOP into shitting their pants and either attempting to or making his untimely demise happen.

On the second point college campuses should be places of free thinking. Not just for the free thinking folks on the left.

I'm sorry man but when RW comes into a post grad genetics class and starts running their mouths about creationism they will just be laughed out of the class for being an inbred dumb ass mother fuckers that don't have a clue and rightfully so. They always try and defend the religion they have been indoctrinated into (Christianity almost every time) and that get's them failed and sent packing real quick, because it's WRONG and we can prove it. If they can't let that go of ancient myths that tell them owning slaves, beating your wife and selling your daughters off like cattle is totally good to go, then they have no place at an institute of higher learning. Fuck them.

Feel free to disagree, it's not even a matter of degrees. Obama has refused to throw down the gauntlet and as a result his base has become increasingly disillusioned because he doesn't have our back. He's a thrice damned Centrist.

Nailed it.

How much farther left would you like him to go.

uhhhh as far left as it takes to

1) end the horrible failure of a republican welfare program we call the war on terror....

2) end the horrible failure of a republican welfare program we call the war on drugs

3) Actually reform HC so the US Tax payer isn't paying 3x what UHC would cost at MSRP b/c big corruption is skimming so much cream it's moved so much wealth from the poor to the rich it actually shifted the social, economic and political dynamics of an entire fucking nation, nay the most powerful nation on the planet.

I would like to see a fair tax code and we can have that discussion at any time.

Let's have it now, what is a fair tax code?

I think you would be surprised at my opinions on that.

I fuckin' doubt it.

I would just hate for the country to turn more conservative and have free speech be stiffed by religious thought.

So team (D), (S) or (I) can count on your vote right?? :cool:
 
Last edited:
You mean where he abandon practically his entire campaign to placate the RW?

Didn't end Operation Freedumb

Didn't end the failed war on cannabis

Kept and then expanded PATRIOT act, another stroking of RW policy.

Didn't reform HC for SHIT, all he did was suck HC mega corp dick...and to top it all off it's modeled after a REPUBLICAN program. We got taken to the fuckin' cleaners for slightly...SLIGHTLY expanded coverage.

Let's talk about how much he has avoided the gay marriage issue as not to piss the RW off to much. In short he is a lying, spineless fuckin' sell out.

Now you tell me EXACTLY where he didn't bend over backwards and bail on his own constituency to reach across the isle to the RW when you know damn well he could have gone the other direction and railed the GOP into shitting their pants and either attempting to or making his untimely demise happen.



I'm sorry man but when RW comes into a post grad genetics class and starts running their mouths about creationism they will just be laughed out of the class for being an inbred dumb ass mother fuckers that don't have a clue and rightfully so. They always try and defend the religion they have been indoctrinated into (Christianity almost every time) and that get's them failed and sent packing real quick, because it's WRONG and we can prove it. If they can't let that go of ancient myths that tell them owning slaves, beating your wife and selling your daughters off like cattle is totally good to go, then they have no place at an institute of higher learning. Fuck them.



Nailed it.



uhhhh as far left as it takes to

1) end the horrible failure of a republican welfare program we call the war on terror....

2) end the horrible failure of a republican welfare program we call the war on drugs

3) Actually reform HC so the US Tax payer isn't paying 3x what UHC would cost at MSRP b/c big corruption is skimming so much cream it's moved so much wealth from the poor to the rich it actually shifted the social, economic and political dynamics of an entire fucking nation, nay the most powerful nation on the planet.



Let's have it now, what is a fair tax code?



I fuckin' doubt it.



So team (D), (S) or (I) can count on your vote right?? :cool:



You would love type cast me. Again show a difference of opinion and some people have to take swings.

By the way I am pro pot.

Tax code is simple. Every one pays 1% of their income no matter what.

No deductions except:
interest on primary residence (with limits),rent (with
limits),
health care insurance and expenses.
personal and dependent deductions enough so a family
at the poverty level pays no tax except for the 1%

Everyone is taxed on every dime they are compensated for at the same rate.

3 or 4 tax brackets with the hiegst being no more than 35%

SS and medicare at a lower rate but on all income.

The fine details can be work out later,
 
I missed your earlier question and apologize. I'd like Obama to do anything left at all. By and large he's the third and fourth terms of Bush.

And your tax code. . .is basically what we have now just simplified. Which is bad.

the 1% thing is all good and well, annoying and stupid but ultimately harmless. Three or four tax brackets is crazy I'd probably start with six or seven and then see if we needed more.
 
I missed your earlier question and apologize. I'd like Obama to do anything left at all. By and large he's the third and fourth terms of Bush.

And your tax code. . .is basically what we have now just simplified. Which is bad.

the 1% thing is all good and well, annoying and stupid but ultimately harmless. Three or four tax brackets is crazy I'd probably start with six or seven and then see if we needed more.

THE MAIN POINT IS BEING TAXED ON ALL INCOME! Investments, business, perks, bla bla bla
 
THE MAIN POINT IS BEING TAXED ON ALL INCOME! Investments, business, perks, bla bla bla

I'm down with that, however I disagree that's the main point or at least the main functioning point. That may have been your point but it's akin to saying airbags are the main point of a car.
 
You would love type cast me. Again show a difference of opinion and some people have to take swings.

Duh...what did you expect, post an opinion and have everyone suck your dick for it? No....it's a forum, people are going to swing at everything you post no matter what subject you chose or side you take.

By the way I am pro pot.

Sweet, tell your elected officials, I can't wait to export to all the sad fuckers in the south/midwest :cool:

Tax code is simple. Every one pays 1% of their income no matter what.

No deductions except:
interest on primary residence (with limits),rent (with
limits),
health care insurance and expenses.
personal and dependent deductions enough so a family
at the poverty level pays no tax except for the 1%

Ok...better raise the definition of the poverty level though or this is going to just fuck most people.

And what about business? God damn if you tax people on their gross vs net you will insta sink numerous industries as plenty of buisness's cost more than they net. My first indoor farm? 60% of my total income out the fuckin' door...A/C light bill was 8 grand a month, rent 4500 a mo, nutrients 2,000 a month etc etc etc......are you seriously suggesting we tax the cost of doing bidnizz? MAN...that is an economy killer right there...people can bitch about how horrible O is (he's doing a hell of a lot better than the last several morons from the RW) but that would seriously butt fuck things.

Everyone is taxed on every dime they are compensated for at the same rate.

1% right? And define compensated....

3 or 4 tax brackets with the hiegst being no more than 35%

With our broad spectrum of incomes we need a few more than 4 or re-categorize up the scale to match modern times.

35% ain't cutting it bubba......we got a tab to pay and I would be shocked if 35% max would even cover the interest. I'm sorry but the hand full of folks holding 90%+ of the nations wealth....are going to have to cover 90+% of that fuckin' tab or it's not getting paid. B/c all the folks making 500k a year or less... CAN'T DO IT...NOT EVEN CLOSE TO POSSIBLE.

SS and medicare at a lower rate but on all income.

SS ok...why not just withold the shit and avoid the whole "Pay us and we will give it back and you can pay taxes on it again" clusterfuck in the first place?

So you want to tax people for the cost of the benefits they get out of medicare? Seriously?

The fine details can be work out later,

Unfortunately the fine details are where the devil is in all this and in our complex society I doubt seriously if a "Simple tax code" 1 size fits all is an even reasonably sane concept.
 
Last edited:
This is where the Obama administration as failed miserably. They have perpetuated the them against us you are with us or against us attitude. I want one liberal to defend this without saying "GWB did it so it's ok." I'll wait but they can't. See with many liberals it's okay to use Gestapo tactics as long as it's for a cause they agree with. Just look at political correctness on college campuses.

They have done a total 180...

Yesterday, they celebrated a victory, the victory of more debt without a fight (even though most of them wanted the fight as an issue for the election).

America, of all places, is becoming Orwellian. The president repeatedly reminds the American people that under his leadership, the U.S. has produced a record level of new oil and natural gas. But didn’t Obama radically curtail leases for just such new energy production on federal lands? Have the edicts on the barn wall of Animal Farm been changed again, with the production of new oil and gas suddenly going from bad to good?

Does anyone remember that the Affordable Care Act was sold on the premise that it would guarantee retention of existing health plans and doctors, create 4 million new jobs, and save families $2,500 a year in premiums, all while extending expanded coverage to more people at a lower cost?

Only in Orwell’s world of doublespeak could raising taxes, while the costs of millions of health plans soars, be called “affordable.” Is losing your existing plan and doctor a way of retaining them?

The Congressional Budget Office recently warned that Obamacare would “keep hours worked and potential output during the next 10 years lower than they would be otherwise.” That nonpartisan verdict should be bad news for workers.

Not in our brave new world. The Obama administration says it is pleased that workers will now be freed from “job lock.” What is job lock — a made-up Newspeak word right out of 1984? Work fewer hours, make less money, and create fewer outputs — and be happy.

About every January since 2009, the president has promised to close Guantanamo Bay. Is the detention facility now sort of virtually closed — in the manner that Syrian president Bashar Assad and his chemical weapons are now virtually gone as Obama decreed years ago, and in the manner that we are still hunting down the murderers in Benghazi who were supposedly outraged over a video? Is there an Orwellian “memory hole” where these embarrassing proclamations are disposed?

In 2004, many in the media reported that George W. Bush, the demonized Emmanuel Goldstein of our era, had overseen a “jobless recovery.” Unemployment at election time in 2004 was 5.4 percent.

Yet since January 2009, only two months have seen joblessness dip slightly below 7 percent. A record 90 million able-bodied Americans are not participating in the workforce. Yet the president, in Orwellian doublespeak fashion, recently claimed that the job picture is good. If 5.4 percent unemployment was once called a jobless recovery, are we now in a jobless recovery from a jobless recovery?
Victor Davis Hanson, NRO
 
I missed your earlier question and apologize. I'd like Obama to do anything left at all. By and large he's the third and fourth terms of Bush.

And your tax code. . .is basically what we have now just simplified. Which is bad.

the 1% thing is all good and well, annoying and stupid but ultimately harmless. Three or four tax brackets is crazy I'd probably start with six or seven and then see if we needed more.

Then where is the vilification?

He must be doing something the Left likes.

I think it is the lavish spectacles and star-studded dinners...
 
Well, no. Trying to block leaks and watch reporters is reprehensible in its own way, but it's not the same as stifling opposing views, which Obama is not doing even to the extent W did, and is largely impossible here in any case; it's beyond the government's power. To stifle opposing views in America, you pretty much have to be a corporation; reporters answer to editors who answer to MBAs in suits who answer to other MBAs sitting on the interlocking directorates of conglomerates.

Not even you believe that pile of steaming horseshit.
 
Indeed it does, and we promise to treat you stinking greedy selfish mean-minded ill-natured willfully-ignorant bigoted knuckle-dragging xenophobic RW shitbags with respect and courtesy, as always.

I would expect nothing different from you and your ilk. Its typical for your type to race bait and call people with other views names when you can't support your argument or refute another.
 
I would expect nothing different from you and your ilk. Its typical for your type to race bait and call people with other views names when you can't support your argument or refute another.

Right, because the left is even remotely close to the Conservatives in that regard.
 
Back
Top