US Constitution

Let's say that those arguing that it is not an invasion are correct, then Texas is not "defending" the border, but securing the peace and prosperity of its commonwealth.

:)

It should be free to assist foreign nationals in returning to their right and proper state and status.

Or just not let them in to begin with.

And don't forget, "OR" was the conjunction used, not "AND."

Ishmael
 
I think logic is lost on our current crop...

;) ;)

... no way could they figure out the design of a nand gate.
 
????? Impeach?

Impeach for what reason? The giving of a tacky gift. It wasn't the iPod per se' but what it contained. Kinda like Hitler handing out copied of 'Mein Kampf' as state gifts. Incredibly tacky.

Ishmael

As Vette pointed out and you supported you don't actually need a reason to impeach the President other than he makes you feel bad about yourself. Good luck convincing the rest of us but legally you'd be on what appears to be solid ground.
 
As Vette pointed out and you supported you don't actually need a reason to impeach the President other than he makes you feel bad about yourself. Good luck convincing the rest of us but legally you'd be on what appears to be solid ground.

You're truly insane, you know that don't you? No one was talking about impeachment for an iPod. You're just pulling shit out of your ass.

Ishmael
 
I believe, in the absence of federal action due to the kind of perfidy we see from the President, Texas has the right to remove those people and kick them the hell back across the border, in self defense. The open border agenda of the left is a prescription for national suicide. We have a right to be a country. We have a right to defend our way of life.

What you believe...and a taco...will feed a refugee child in Texas today.
 
You're truly insane, you know that don't you? No one was talking about impeachment for an iPod. You're just pulling shit out of your ass.

Ishmael

You were talking about doing it for any reason you please. I don't see why an iPad to the Queen is any less rediculous than failure to secure a border that hasn't been secure in. . .ever. We established the President doesn't need to commit a crime only piss off Congress did we not?
 
Obviously the state of Texas becomes unfairly saddled with a disproportionate demand on its law enforcement, judicial and penal resources with an unfairly disproportionate tax burden on its citizens.

But, illegal immigrants do pay taxes -- maybe not federal income tax if they work off-book, but they pay state sales tax when they buy things.
 
Look, why does anyone think the National Guard would be any use as a border patrol? That has never been part of their mission, they are not any kind of police force or law-enforcement agency and are not trained for such functions, with the possible exception of crowd control.
 
Why don't you read Professor Turley's article on the subject I posted. You might get an education for a change. Impeachment is a political exercise not a criminal exercise. The President can be impeached for a breach of the public trust, and if sustained by the Senate, he can thus be removed.

I'm in agreement with you. I did read the article and found no fault with your logic. Is there a reason you're acting this way?
 
So, when did paying sales tax grant lawful citizenship? Was Al Capone a better American when he paid a sales tax? Just askin'.

He's not one of your heroes? A brave man fighting against the over reach of big government telling people what they can and can't do with their money?

When liquor is outlawed, only outlaws have liquor!
 
Back
Top