U.S. apologizes to Guatemalans for secret STD experiments

AllardChardon

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Posts
4,797
U.S. apologizes to Guatemalans for secret STD experiments
By Brett Michael Dykes

U.S. scientific researchers infected hundreds of Guatemalan mental patients with sexually transmitted diseases from 1946 to 1948 -- a practice that only came recently to light thanks to the work of an academic researcher. On Friday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius issued a formal apology to the Central American nation, and to Guatemalan residents of the United States.

"Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research could have occurred under the guise of public health," said Clinton and Sebelius in a joint statement. "We deeply regret that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research practices."

The discovery of the long-ago experiments stems from another, far better known episode of federal tampering with test subjects to study sexually transmitted diseases: the long-running "Tuskegee experiment," studying 399 poor black men from Macon County, Ala., who had been diagnosed with syphilis but never informed of their condition. Federal scientists simply told the men they had "bad blood" and researchers compiled a four-decades-long study monitoring "untreated syphilis in the male Negro." Researchers never treated the illness over its usually fatal course, even after the simple remedy of penicillin was shown to be an effective syphilis treatment; participants received only free meals and medical exams, together with federal funding of their funeral expenses after they died. The study began in 1932, continuing right through to 1972, when it was exposed in media reports.

One of the better-known experts on the Tuskegee scandal is Susan Reverby, a professor of women's and gender studies at Wellesley College who has published two books on the subject. As she was researching her most recent book, Reverby learned of the Guatemalan project, in which researchers from the U.S. Public Health Service conducted experiments on 696 male and female patients housed at Guatemala's National Mental Health Hospital. The scientists injected the patients with gonorrhea and syphilis -- and even encouraged many of them to pass the disease on to others.

"It was done in conjunction with the Guatemalan government," Reverby told The Upshot in a phone interview Friday morning. "They had permission from the Guatemalan government."

Reverby explained that she learned of the Guatemala study purely by accident.
"I was in the archives of the University of Pittsburgh looking at the papers of the surgeon general at the time," Reverby said. "And the papers there were also the papers of a man named John Cutler, who had also been involved in the Tuskegee study. When I opened the boxes of the Cutler papers, there was nothing in it about Tuskegee, but there was everything about this Guatemala study."

Reverby -- who was instrumental in getting former President Bill Clinton to offer an apology for the Tuskegee experiment in 1997 -- told us that she informed Dr. David Sencer, the former head of the Centers for Disease Control; Sencer then passed the discovery up the chain of command in the U.S. government.

"As with many of these things, it was just pure serendipity," Reverby said. "I was the right person in the right place at the right time."
 
When I first learned of Tuskegee, I was repulsed. This is even worse, and all of it done in the name of science... makes you wonder about some scientists. I mean, I could never make a living like that! I would rather sell my body than another person's health, mentally ill or not.
 
When I first learned of Tuskegee, I was repulsed. This is even worse, and all of it done in the name of science... makes you wonder about some scientists. I mean, I could never make a living like that! I would rather sell my body than another person's health, mentally ill or not.
Ideology can be, and usually is, separate from scientific bent.

Some really important medical knowledge comes from incredibly reprehensible experiments done by the Nazis on Jewish prisoners-- knowledge that has saved many many lives since then. :(
 
Debatable. There's a fine line between men who use the cheesy lesbian line, and men who genuinely identify as lesbians.

Both are creepy. :cool:

Maybe some research on the family named Dykes might prove interesting and informative.
 
Indeed.

I wonder if anyone on this forum besides me and one or two others other was even born in 1946-1948.

I don't even see a plot bunny in this crap.

Hello, youngster!

I can see plot bunnies anywhere, even breeding in mental hospitals.

Og
 
Well, I for one was not born until 1952.

I am always amazed how most people our government has abused in the past rarely survive for the big apology or the pay-off money, either.

Even horrific research can have beneficial results, but that is no justification for the atrocities performed in the first place. IMHO
 
Well, I for one was not born until 1952.

I am always amazed how most people our government has abused in the past rarely survive for the big apology or the pay-off money, either.

Even horrific research can have beneficial results, but that is no justification for the atrocities performed in the first place. IMHO
Quite true Ma'am! :rose:

And some doctors thought that the knowledge about hypothermia should not be used because it came from a tainted source. But to ignore it would have been insulting to the victims of that research, if you think about it. And people would have died if it were ignored.

And as far as I know the STD experiments didn't gain us much of anything that wasn't already known. :mad::mad::mad:
 
The US government isn't the only one to have skeletons in its cupboard.

For example, the UK government behaved very badly towards some of its servicemen and the aborigines of Australia with atomic bomb tests, using both as test subjects for unshielded radiation when they already had massive amounts of data from the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The government knew that there would be short-term and long-term health problems but went ahead "in the interests of research".

I could quote other cases of democratic governments doing secret research on unsuspecting humans that they knew the public would not accept. What Nazi Germany did in the concentration camps and what Imperial Japan did to Chinese people was bad enough but when democratically elected governments do it too, they should be held to account by their own people.

One of the advantages of the internet age is that keeping that sort of secret has become far more difficult.

Og

PS. One of the disadvantages of conspiracy theorists is that they conceal the really dangerous government conspiracies under a cloud of imagined ones.
 
Indeed.

I wonder if anyone on this forum besides me and one or two others other was even born in 1946-1948.

I don't even see a plot bunny in this crap.


Erm, me ?

It has to be said that the poor and disadvantaged, the halt & the lame, have been the target of "experiments" for medical science for many decades.
 
Yes, countless cases by both government and private interests. Currently, the lack of FDA testing on new products have made all Americans guinea pigs if they take their prescribed medicine. Now that is really scary!
 
Back
Top