Gil_T2
KICK ASS !
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2002
- Posts
- 19,757
Short fingers shouldn't be a problem as the G spot is just inside your pussy, I use my fingers from the second knuckle to please BANDIT
Short fingers shouldn't be a problem as the G spot is just inside your pussy, I use my fingers from the second knuckle to please BANDIT
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
Mr. G
has returned - briefly - from a tour of the known Galaxy.
I need a tank of gas and a BEACH that isn't covered in huge chunks of ICE !!
Hey everyone. SO nice to see the regulars and a few very very brave anons posting for the first time. It's a shame so many appear to think we somehow KNOW WHO YOU ARE when you post in here and are gonna tell yo momma if you don't pay up. What's posted on LIT stays on LIT and nobody knows it's YOU, OK?
So join in. Lets hear from some lurkers.
I'm still interested in hearing from any of the myriad RACES. Are women of one race more GSpot sensitive? Oriental? Black? Whiter? Brown? Any GREYS out there with a GSpot? Naw, too much to hope for there. Anyway if YOU happen to be any particular race other than what appears to be the "norm" in here, let's hear from you? Is the Technique known by your men? Do you mommas tell you about this or do they even know? I do NOT imagine cultures where they think sawing off a girls clit and cauterizing her vagina closed is cool will be too interested in WHAT a woman feels - ever - but I'm interested in hearing form some others. I'm just curious about neural responses and how that MAY differ between races - cultures even.
POST, plse.
MR.G has left the quadrant ....
has returned - briefly - from a tour of the known Galaxy.
I need a tank of gas and a BEACH that isn't covered in huge chunks of ICE !!
Hey everyone. SO nice to see the regulars and a few very very brave anons posting for the first time. It's a shame so many appear to think we somehow KNOW WHO YOU ARE when you post in here and are gonna tell yo momma if you don't pay up. What's posted on LIT stays on LIT and nobody knows it's YOU, OK?
So join in. Lets hear from some lurkers.
I'm still interested in hearing from any of the myriad RACES. Are women of one race more GSpot sensitive? Oriental? Black? Whiter? Brown? Any GREYS out there with a GSpot? Naw, too much to hope for there. Anyway if YOU happen to be any particular race other than what appears to be the "norm" in here, let's hear from you? Is the Technique known by your men? Do you mommas tell you about this or do they even know? I do NOT imagine cultures where they think sawing off a girls clit and cauterizing her vagina closed is cool will be too interested in WHAT a woman feels - ever - but I'm interested in hearing form some others. I'm just curious about neural responses and how that MAY differ between races - cultures even.
POST, plse.
MR.G has left the quadrant ....
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
*** Newsz Alert ***
Well kiddies, it seems there's been a "breakthrough" in some sex research in the UK (but where else could it possibly have happened??) and .... hold onto your hats folks ... but there may actually be a GSPOT after-all.
Of course I am flabbergasted! Everybody knows the GSPot is a MYTH, a fabrication, an invention of an overactive and delusional female mind ... right?
No kiddies. It MAY be true. Science has finally broken into the secret crypt and found ... something ... CATSCANS show well they're not sure but it may have something to do with the thickness of the vaginal walls in SOME areas in SOME females. The women who CLAIM to have some sort of GSpot added arousal (SOME actually claim they can ORGASM from direct stimulation of this area - WHAT AREA?) AHHH there's the rub. They say it may - if it exists at all - MAY be different on different women.
Of course even this research is being questioned and criticized for promoting a "one size fits all" mentality which as any of the participants of OUR discussions in here with attest is the LAST thing we've advocated.
""It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do.""
Well they got ONE thing right, at least.
OK, just thought I'd share. I'll look for the longer article in NEW SCIENTIST. The newspapers NEVER get anything right anyway. I was kind of excited when I read the title and then ... what? They're not sure after all. Who can tell? Who knew?
***************
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7254523.stm
Female G spot 'can be detected'
Some doubt the existence of a G spot at all.
The mysterious G spot - supposedly a route to female sexual satisfaction - can be located with ultrasound, claim Italian scientists.
Some women say stimulating a certain part of the vagina triggers powerful orgasms, but medicine has not been able to pin down the exact location.
Researchers told New Scientist magazine they found an area of thicker tissue among the women reporting orgasms.
But specialists warned there could be other reasons for this difference.
The existence of the G spot has remained controversial since the 1980s, when the term was coined as a way to explain why some women were able to achieve orgasm through vaginal stimulation, while others were not.
Some specialists claim that the term has led to over-anxiety among women who cannot reach satisfaction this way, and their partners.
The latest research, published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, was carried out the Dr Emmanuele Jannini at the University of L'Aquila, and involved just 20 women.
Ultrasound was used to measure the size and shape of the tissue beyond the "front" wall of the vagina, often suggested as the location of the G spot.
In the nine women who reported being able to achieve vaginal orgasm, the tissues between the vagina and the urethra - which carries urine out of the body - were on average thicker than in the 11 women who could not reach orgasm this way.
It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do
Dr Jannini said: "For the first time, it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has got a G spot or not."
However, Dr Tim Spector, from St Thomas' Hospital in London, told New Scientist that the thicker tissue might actually be part of the clitoris - another extremely sensitive area.
Another suggestion was that, rather than being the cause of more orgasms, having these frequently might actually lead to better-developed musculature in this area.
Dr Petra Boynton, a sexual psychologist at University College London, said that an entire industry had grown up around the idea of a G spot, and it was unhelpful to label women unable to find theirs as "dysfunctional".
She said: "We're all different. Some women will have certain area within the vagina which will be very sensitive, and some won't - but they won't necessarily be in the area called the G spot.
"If a woman spends all her time worrying about whether she is normal, or has a G spot or not, she will focus on just one area, and ignore everything else.
"It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do."
Well kiddies, it seems there's been a "breakthrough" in some sex research in the UK (but where else could it possibly have happened??) and .... hold onto your hats folks ... but there may actually be a GSPOT after-all.
Of course I am flabbergasted! Everybody knows the GSPot is a MYTH, a fabrication, an invention of an overactive and delusional female mind ... right?
No kiddies. It MAY be true. Science has finally broken into the secret crypt and found ... something ... CATSCANS show well they're not sure but it may have something to do with the thickness of the vaginal walls in SOME areas in SOME females. The women who CLAIM to have some sort of GSpot added arousal (SOME actually claim they can ORGASM from direct stimulation of this area - WHAT AREA?) AHHH there's the rub. They say it may - if it exists at all - MAY be different on different women.
Of course even this research is being questioned and criticized for promoting a "one size fits all" mentality which as any of the participants of OUR discussions in here with attest is the LAST thing we've advocated.
""It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do.""
Well they got ONE thing right, at least.
OK, just thought I'd share. I'll look for the longer article in NEW SCIENTIST. The newspapers NEVER get anything right anyway. I was kind of excited when I read the title and then ... what? They're not sure after all. Who can tell? Who knew?
***************
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7254523.stm
Female G spot 'can be detected'
Some doubt the existence of a G spot at all.
The mysterious G spot - supposedly a route to female sexual satisfaction - can be located with ultrasound, claim Italian scientists.
Some women say stimulating a certain part of the vagina triggers powerful orgasms, but medicine has not been able to pin down the exact location.
Researchers told New Scientist magazine they found an area of thicker tissue among the women reporting orgasms.
But specialists warned there could be other reasons for this difference.
The existence of the G spot has remained controversial since the 1980s, when the term was coined as a way to explain why some women were able to achieve orgasm through vaginal stimulation, while others were not.
Some specialists claim that the term has led to over-anxiety among women who cannot reach satisfaction this way, and their partners.
The latest research, published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, was carried out the Dr Emmanuele Jannini at the University of L'Aquila, and involved just 20 women.
Ultrasound was used to measure the size and shape of the tissue beyond the "front" wall of the vagina, often suggested as the location of the G spot.
In the nine women who reported being able to achieve vaginal orgasm, the tissues between the vagina and the urethra - which carries urine out of the body - were on average thicker than in the 11 women who could not reach orgasm this way.
It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do
Dr Jannini said: "For the first time, it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has got a G spot or not."
However, Dr Tim Spector, from St Thomas' Hospital in London, told New Scientist that the thicker tissue might actually be part of the clitoris - another extremely sensitive area.
Another suggestion was that, rather than being the cause of more orgasms, having these frequently might actually lead to better-developed musculature in this area.
Dr Petra Boynton, a sexual psychologist at University College London, said that an entire industry had grown up around the idea of a G spot, and it was unhelpful to label women unable to find theirs as "dysfunctional".
She said: "We're all different. Some women will have certain area within the vagina which will be very sensitive, and some won't - but they won't necessarily be in the area called the G spot.
"If a woman spends all her time worrying about whether she is normal, or has a G spot or not, she will focus on just one area, and ignore everything else.
"It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do."
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
OK. HERE's the WHOLE ARTICLE
To make a long story short the whole thing is summed up by this sentence:
"It might mean that there is a G spot, after all.""
Oh WOW !!
********************************************
Ultrasound nails location of the elusive G spot
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19726444.100#comForm
FOR women, it is supposed to trigger one of the most intense orgasms imaginable, with waves of pleasure spreading out across the whole body. If the "G spot orgasm" seems semi-mythical, however, that's because there has been scant evidence of its existence. Now for the first time gynaecological scans have revealed clear anatomical differences between women who claim to experience vaginal orgasms involving a G spot and those who don't. It might mean that there is a G spot, after all. What's more, a simple test could tell you if it's time to give up the hunt, or if your partner just needs to try harder.
“A simple test could tell you if it is time to give up the hunt for your G spot or if your partner just needs to try harder”
"For the first time it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has a G spot or not," says Emmanuele Jannini at the University of L'Aquila in Italy, who carried out the research.
Jannini had already found biochemical markers relating to heightened sexual function in tissue between the vagina and urethra, where the G spot is said to be located. The markers include PDES - an enzyme that processes the nitric oxide responsible for triggering male erections (see New Scientist, 6 July 2002, p 23).
However, the team had been unable to link the presence of these markers to the ability to experience a vaginal orgasm - that is, an orgasm triggered by stimulation of the front vaginal wall without any simultaneous stimulation of the clitoris.
So Jannini's team took a different approach, and used vaginal ultrasound to scan the entire urethrovaginal space - the area of tissue between the vagina and urethra thought to house the G spot (see Diagram). The team scanned nine women who said they had vaginal orgasms and 11 who said they didn't. They found that tissue in the urethrovaginal space was thicker in the first group of women (Journal of Sexual Medicine, DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00739.x). This means, says Jannini, that "women without any visible evidence of a G spot cannot have a vaginal orgasm".
Other researchers question whether what Jannini says is the G spot is a distinct structure or the internal part of the clitoris. The urethrovaginal space is rich in blood vessels, glands, muscle fibres, nerves, and - in some women - a remnant of the embryological prostate called the Skene's glands. Some researchers have suggested that the Skene's glands are involved in triggering vaginal orgasms and, more controversially, enable a small number of women to ejaculate (see "Can women ejaculate or not?").
"The authors found a thicker vaginal wall near the urethra and hypothesise this may be related to the presence of the controversial G spot," says Tim Spector at St Thomas' Hospital in London. "However, many other explanations are possible - such as the actual size of the clitoris, which, although not measured in this study - appears highly variable."
Others challenge the notion that the G spot is missing in women who don't experience orgasm. "It is an intriguing study, but it doesn't necessarily mean that women who don't experience orgasm don't have any tissue there," says Beverly Whipple at Rutger's University School of Nursing in Newark, New Jersey, whose team coined the term "G spot" in 1981.
Whipple's studies suggest that all women describe some degree of sensitivity in the area where the G spot should be. She says the next step is to ask women to stimulate themselves and then repeat the ultrasounds, as the area is believed to swell in response to physical pressure. This might reveal that all women have G spots.
Another possibility is that the women who experienced vaginal orgasms had learned to do so through practice, which has altered their anatomy, much like exercising a muscle makes it grow, says Leonore Tiefer, a psychiatrist at New York University School of Medicine. "The research would be much stronger if women without vaginal orgasm were taught how to have this experience and then repeated measurements were taken of the urethral-vaginal area," she says. "Of course this would involve teaching their partners a great deal." She would also have liked to see more extensive questioning of the women to fully understand their sexual practices.
Jannini accepts that there are limitations to his study. In particular, the small number of women he studied doesn't allow him to say what proportion of all women have G spot - although it would seem that a large number do not.
This tentative conclusion is supported by previous questionnaire-based studies such as The Hite Report, which found that 70 per cent of women do not have orgasms through intercourse, but are able to experience orgasm easily by direct clitoral stimulation.
Studies of identical and non-identical twins also support the idea that there may be physiological differences between women who do and don't experience vaginal orgasms. In 2005, Spector found that up to 45 per cent of the differences between women in their ability to reach orgasm could be explained by their genes (see New Scientist, 11 June 2005, p 6). "We know that genes are partly responsible for the variation in women's responses and this study raises the possibility that local genital differences rather than purely genetic differences in brain responses or personality may be important," says Spector.
Elisabeth Lloyd of Indiana University in Bloomington, and author of The Case of the Female Orgasm, agrees. "If Jannini's correlation does hold true, it would help explain the fact that most women do not reliably have orgasm with intercourse," she says.
Jannini is now planning larger studies to confirm his findings, and measure how many women have a G spot - if that is indeed what he has been measuring. Eventually, he says, ultrasound could be used to test whether a woman has a G spot or not.
If she does, it may even be possible to increase its size using testosterone, which both the clitoris and Skene's glands can respond to. This could increase sexual responsiveness, but could be dangerous in women with normal testosterone levels. Jannini is running a trial in post-menopausal women and those who have experienced early menopause to see if testosterone treatment can increase the size of the G spot as measured by vaginal ultrasound.
Lloyd thinks Jannini's findings could make it harder to promote the idea that women who find it difficult to orgasm are suffering from some kind of sexual dysfunction, as it suggests there are physiological differences between women. "The wide variability among women in their patterns of sexual response has made the pharmaceutical industry's challenge all the greater," she says. "If this research holds up, they would need to be very clear in marketing any product they eventually come up with."
Those women who suspect they may not have a G spot need not despair. "They can still have a normal orgasm through stimulation of the clitoris," Jannini says.
In fact, Jannini thinks his study should reassure women who have never experienced a vaginal orgasm that this is completely normal. "One clear finding is that each woman is different. This is one reason why women are so interesting."
Love - Learn more about the science behind it in our comprehensive special report.
From issue 2644 of New Scientist magazine, 20 February 2008, page 6-7
Can women ejaculate or not?
Female ejaculation is considered rare in the west, and even, by some, abnormal. In Rwanda, however, it is the norm.
Social scientists Marian Koster and Lisa Price of Wageningen University in the Netherlands interviewed 11 women and two men in Rwanda about "gukuna imishino", which is the practice of elongating the labia minora, the inner vaginal lips. "The Rwandan women and men we interviewed were clear in their opinion that all Rwandan women are able to ejaculate, the ejaculation being different from the mere squirting of urine," Koster says. "Elongated labia are seen as crucial in this respect."
From around puberty onwards, Rwandan girls start stretching the labia minora using plant extracts with antiseptic and anti-inflammatory properties, with the aim of achieving a length of about 5 centimetres. The WHO considers this practice as a form of genital mutilation, but Koster and Price argue that it should be reclassified as genital modification. "We believe that there are cultural practices that are not harmful to women's integrity and rights," says Koster.
Their interviewees reported, and Koster and Price speculate, that labial elongation increases the sexual pleasure of both sexes. "Since the labia minora swell during sexual excitement, there is a larger surface area for penile friction during coitus," they write (Culture, Health & Sexuality, DOI: 10.1080/13691050701775076).
To make a long story short the whole thing is summed up by this sentence:
"It might mean that there is a G spot, after all.""
Oh WOW !!
********************************************
Ultrasound nails location of the elusive G spot
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19726444.100#comForm
FOR women, it is supposed to trigger one of the most intense orgasms imaginable, with waves of pleasure spreading out across the whole body. If the "G spot orgasm" seems semi-mythical, however, that's because there has been scant evidence of its existence. Now for the first time gynaecological scans have revealed clear anatomical differences between women who claim to experience vaginal orgasms involving a G spot and those who don't. It might mean that there is a G spot, after all. What's more, a simple test could tell you if it's time to give up the hunt, or if your partner just needs to try harder.
“A simple test could tell you if it is time to give up the hunt for your G spot or if your partner just needs to try harder”
"For the first time it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has a G spot or not," says Emmanuele Jannini at the University of L'Aquila in Italy, who carried out the research.
Jannini had already found biochemical markers relating to heightened sexual function in tissue between the vagina and urethra, where the G spot is said to be located. The markers include PDES - an enzyme that processes the nitric oxide responsible for triggering male erections (see New Scientist, 6 July 2002, p 23).
However, the team had been unable to link the presence of these markers to the ability to experience a vaginal orgasm - that is, an orgasm triggered by stimulation of the front vaginal wall without any simultaneous stimulation of the clitoris.
So Jannini's team took a different approach, and used vaginal ultrasound to scan the entire urethrovaginal space - the area of tissue between the vagina and urethra thought to house the G spot (see Diagram). The team scanned nine women who said they had vaginal orgasms and 11 who said they didn't. They found that tissue in the urethrovaginal space was thicker in the first group of women (Journal of Sexual Medicine, DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00739.x). This means, says Jannini, that "women without any visible evidence of a G spot cannot have a vaginal orgasm".
Other researchers question whether what Jannini says is the G spot is a distinct structure or the internal part of the clitoris. The urethrovaginal space is rich in blood vessels, glands, muscle fibres, nerves, and - in some women - a remnant of the embryological prostate called the Skene's glands. Some researchers have suggested that the Skene's glands are involved in triggering vaginal orgasms and, more controversially, enable a small number of women to ejaculate (see "Can women ejaculate or not?").
"The authors found a thicker vaginal wall near the urethra and hypothesise this may be related to the presence of the controversial G spot," says Tim Spector at St Thomas' Hospital in London. "However, many other explanations are possible - such as the actual size of the clitoris, which, although not measured in this study - appears highly variable."
Others challenge the notion that the G spot is missing in women who don't experience orgasm. "It is an intriguing study, but it doesn't necessarily mean that women who don't experience orgasm don't have any tissue there," says Beverly Whipple at Rutger's University School of Nursing in Newark, New Jersey, whose team coined the term "G spot" in 1981.
Whipple's studies suggest that all women describe some degree of sensitivity in the area where the G spot should be. She says the next step is to ask women to stimulate themselves and then repeat the ultrasounds, as the area is believed to swell in response to physical pressure. This might reveal that all women have G spots.
Another possibility is that the women who experienced vaginal orgasms had learned to do so through practice, which has altered their anatomy, much like exercising a muscle makes it grow, says Leonore Tiefer, a psychiatrist at New York University School of Medicine. "The research would be much stronger if women without vaginal orgasm were taught how to have this experience and then repeated measurements were taken of the urethral-vaginal area," she says. "Of course this would involve teaching their partners a great deal." She would also have liked to see more extensive questioning of the women to fully understand their sexual practices.
Jannini accepts that there are limitations to his study. In particular, the small number of women he studied doesn't allow him to say what proportion of all women have G spot - although it would seem that a large number do not.
This tentative conclusion is supported by previous questionnaire-based studies such as The Hite Report, which found that 70 per cent of women do not have orgasms through intercourse, but are able to experience orgasm easily by direct clitoral stimulation.
Studies of identical and non-identical twins also support the idea that there may be physiological differences between women who do and don't experience vaginal orgasms. In 2005, Spector found that up to 45 per cent of the differences between women in their ability to reach orgasm could be explained by their genes (see New Scientist, 11 June 2005, p 6). "We know that genes are partly responsible for the variation in women's responses and this study raises the possibility that local genital differences rather than purely genetic differences in brain responses or personality may be important," says Spector.
Elisabeth Lloyd of Indiana University in Bloomington, and author of The Case of the Female Orgasm, agrees. "If Jannini's correlation does hold true, it would help explain the fact that most women do not reliably have orgasm with intercourse," she says.
Jannini is now planning larger studies to confirm his findings, and measure how many women have a G spot - if that is indeed what he has been measuring. Eventually, he says, ultrasound could be used to test whether a woman has a G spot or not.
If she does, it may even be possible to increase its size using testosterone, which both the clitoris and Skene's glands can respond to. This could increase sexual responsiveness, but could be dangerous in women with normal testosterone levels. Jannini is running a trial in post-menopausal women and those who have experienced early menopause to see if testosterone treatment can increase the size of the G spot as measured by vaginal ultrasound.
Lloyd thinks Jannini's findings could make it harder to promote the idea that women who find it difficult to orgasm are suffering from some kind of sexual dysfunction, as it suggests there are physiological differences between women. "The wide variability among women in their patterns of sexual response has made the pharmaceutical industry's challenge all the greater," she says. "If this research holds up, they would need to be very clear in marketing any product they eventually come up with."
Those women who suspect they may not have a G spot need not despair. "They can still have a normal orgasm through stimulation of the clitoris," Jannini says.
In fact, Jannini thinks his study should reassure women who have never experienced a vaginal orgasm that this is completely normal. "One clear finding is that each woman is different. This is one reason why women are so interesting."
Love - Learn more about the science behind it in our comprehensive special report.
From issue 2644 of New Scientist magazine, 20 February 2008, page 6-7
Can women ejaculate or not?
Female ejaculation is considered rare in the west, and even, by some, abnormal. In Rwanda, however, it is the norm.
Social scientists Marian Koster and Lisa Price of Wageningen University in the Netherlands interviewed 11 women and two men in Rwanda about "gukuna imishino", which is the practice of elongating the labia minora, the inner vaginal lips. "The Rwandan women and men we interviewed were clear in their opinion that all Rwandan women are able to ejaculate, the ejaculation being different from the mere squirting of urine," Koster says. "Elongated labia are seen as crucial in this respect."
From around puberty onwards, Rwandan girls start stretching the labia minora using plant extracts with antiseptic and anti-inflammatory properties, with the aim of achieving a length of about 5 centimetres. The WHO considers this practice as a form of genital mutilation, but Koster and Price argue that it should be reclassified as genital modification. "We believe that there are cultural practices that are not harmful to women's integrity and rights," says Koster.
Their interviewees reported, and Koster and Price speculate, that labial elongation increases the sexual pleasure of both sexes. "Since the labia minora swell during sexual excitement, there is a larger surface area for penile friction during coitus," they write (Culture, Health & Sexuality, DOI: 10.1080/13691050701775076).
KokopelliRises
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Posts
- 547
Short fingers shouldn't be a problem as the G spot is just inside your pussy, I use my fingers from the second knuckle to please BANDIT
Yeah, but for some reason I can't quite get it right, maybe it's something to do with putting just the right pressure on the right spot. I'm looking into a new toy I saw tonight that I think would be just perfect, but it might also be a little on the pricey side (I'm hoping under $40). If it works it will be well worth my time and money. If not, heck. I'd have a cool new toy to play around with.
Edit: Shoot. $48. More money than I really want to spend right now while I'm on a relatively limited budget.
Last edited:
Gil_T2
KICK ASS !
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2002
- Posts
- 19,757
BANDIT
also has trouble with self G spotting but she says it's worth it to keep trying.We have bought several types of toys to G spot & other pleasures but nothing works like my fingers with BANDIT
not even her & our lady playmates although 2 of the ladies have given her G spot orgasms.
psyche
Whorizontally Whedonistic
- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Posts
- 10,280
BANDIT
We have bought several types of toys to G spot & other pleasures but nothing works like my fingers with BANDIT
There's something about your man holding you and giving you g-spot orgasms.........
My experience has been that I can't really 'let go' when I'm doing it to myself since I have to concentrate on what I'm doing. When my lover is doing this to me I don't have to think about anything but him and what he's doing to me, and it's not thinking at all, it's feeling and being totally lost in the physical aspect. There's a big difference. And any of you who have been with someone who doesn't completely 'take you away' from thinking can probably identify with this. If you're able to think, he or she is not doing it for you! LOL!
There is also another level to this. You can have g-spot orgasms with someone you don't have a loving relationship with, but part of it is missing. In some ways it's more of a mechanical response. Satisfying on a physical level certainly. But when someone you trust and love and have a deep relationship with does this to you it's one of the most wonderful feelings in the entire world. It's an expression of his love for you and the response that you have is complete on every level, both physical and emotionally.
Gil_T2
KICK ASS !
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2002
- Posts
- 19,757
There's something about your man holding you and giving you g-spot orgasms.........
My experience has been that I can't really 'let go' when I'm doing it to myself since I have to concentrate on what I'm doing. When my lover is doing this to me I don't have to think about anything but him and what he's doing to me, and it's not thinking at all, it's feeling and being totally lost in the physical aspect. There's a big difference. And any of you who have been with someone who doesn't completely 'take you away' from thinking can probably identify with this. If you're able to think, he or she is not doing it for you! LOL!
There is also another level to this. You can have g-spot orgasms with someone you don't have a loving relationship with, but part of it is missing. In some ways it's more of a mechanical response. Satisfying on a physical level certainly. But when someone you trust and love and have a deep relationship with does this to you it's one of the most wonderful feelings in the entire world. It's an expression of his love for you and the response that you have is complete on every level, both physical and emotionally.
Yes for BANDIT
& I this is so true even though we do have other Bi ladies who have joined us for some fun & I do enjoy showing the ones who have not had a G spot orgasm that they can what BANDIT & I have that special love bond that makes it all so much more enjoyable for us, she also has her Bi lady playmate who she enjoys time with yet is always keen to come home to have some G spotting with me. It's so beautiful watching her twitching, trembling & shaking after a G spot orgasm.
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
IT'S MUTUALWe
BELIEVE ME ... THAT feeling is completely MUTUAL. There is nothing and I mean NOTHING more satisfying in a relationship than lying beside a twitching, sweat covered, semi conscious LOVER and knowing that you were able to take her to that place. A lot of women never get to that place or level of intensity and never even know about. There is a deep deep level of not just satisfaction but if you love the person you're doing this with and you know how this has affected her on a deep deep emotional level then the two feelings kind of meld - join. I've had SOOO many emails describing how much CLOSER couples feel to each other after adding this to their love/sex lives.
In earlier posts there has been some discussion on the Power-tripping aspect to this too - being able to MAKE her cum like this. Hard. Bone crunching hard and over and over again until SHE is begging for a break or even passes out from the intensity. If you're new at this and you see what you're able to do for (even TO) a lover there is a very strong desire to push her limits with this but once it becomes part of your regular love making things will settle down. There is no longer a desire to exert your POWER. You know approximately what she "needs" on any given day and can take her there with only a few tweaks of your thumb. You might take her just a notch past that but making her pass out is no longer the hoot it once was and waiting with thumb in place for her to cum to and then hit her one more time is still fun but not something you do on a daily basis. That kind of "abuse" only happens on those wild nights or where she has done things and teased you until you thought your lower half was gonna blow off.
SHE will feel the physical exhaustion that comes with G-orgasming over and over again for 2 hours. She also feels the deep emotional bond that, whatever you had before, INCREASES when you turbo charge you sex/love lives with this Technique. It is hard to describe without getting into gooie emotional terms but that emotional bond, satisfaction, deeper love - however you want to describe it certainly happens to the guy / G-Gasm givers too. We (guys) may not be able to cum over and over again (so jealous) like you can but being able to do that to a lover, as most lovers understand, becomes 90% of YOUR satisfaction too and that's cool.
I wish a few more LURKERS would bite the bullet and post. Come on. Let us know there are more than just the regulars reading these posts and doing some serious RESEARCH on their own.
BELIEVE ME ... THAT feeling is completely MUTUAL. There is nothing and I mean NOTHING more satisfying in a relationship than lying beside a twitching, sweat covered, semi conscious LOVER and knowing that you were able to take her to that place. A lot of women never get to that place or level of intensity and never even know about. There is a deep deep level of not just satisfaction but if you love the person you're doing this with and you know how this has affected her on a deep deep emotional level then the two feelings kind of meld - join. I've had SOOO many emails describing how much CLOSER couples feel to each other after adding this to their love/sex lives.
In earlier posts there has been some discussion on the Power-tripping aspect to this too - being able to MAKE her cum like this. Hard. Bone crunching hard and over and over again until SHE is begging for a break or even passes out from the intensity. If you're new at this and you see what you're able to do for (even TO) a lover there is a very strong desire to push her limits with this but once it becomes part of your regular love making things will settle down. There is no longer a desire to exert your POWER. You know approximately what she "needs" on any given day and can take her there with only a few tweaks of your thumb. You might take her just a notch past that but making her pass out is no longer the hoot it once was and waiting with thumb in place for her to cum to and then hit her one more time is still fun but not something you do on a daily basis. That kind of "abuse" only happens on those wild nights or where she has done things and teased you until you thought your lower half was gonna blow off.
SHE will feel the physical exhaustion that comes with G-orgasming over and over again for 2 hours. She also feels the deep emotional bond that, whatever you had before, INCREASES when you turbo charge you sex/love lives with this Technique. It is hard to describe without getting into gooie emotional terms but that emotional bond, satisfaction, deeper love - however you want to describe it certainly happens to the guy / G-Gasm givers too. We (guys) may not be able to cum over and over again (so jealous) like you can but being able to do that to a lover, as most lovers understand, becomes 90% of YOUR satisfaction too and that's cool.
I wish a few more LURKERS would bite the bullet and post. Come on. Let us know there are more than just the regulars reading these posts and doing some serious RESEARCH on their own.
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
For Your Amuzement
Some of these comments were as a result of a person on another web site "claiming" his woman had 33 G-Gasms in an hour or so.
Some of the other comments come from a few morons who claim proudly that they've NEVER EVER found a G thing and furthermore that makes them experts on the FACT that the GSPOT is a MYTH. My absolute favorite IS:
""... he (Dr. GRAFENBERG) created a whole new generation of people eager to pretend they get better sexual pleasure than any one else.
Gawd!!
I hope you have a good laugh. Sad how some people think. Little wonder the divorce rate is so freakin high with guys with attitudes this BAD.
*******************************************
33 in a month maybe.....
No need for book... If you understand the whole female body and how u can please so well, why the hell are u single? lol. Bottom line, if a guy could give me 33 Big O's in a hour.. I'd marry him...lol
how is that possible? in an hour?! she'd have to be almost continuous if you know what I mean
NOt even possible to have 33 in one hour...thats just not possible. No woman can have an orgasm that long.
who does he think he is KAREEM? lol 33 yeah and bush means democrat! tell pinochio his nose is gonna grow !
33 for a woman also seems impossible.
I can't see 33 in an hour and usually when a guy brags like that, it's BS.
33 times in an hour........HA HA HA.can't be good orgasms if she can kep track of that many
Hmmm....Lets do the Math...
60Min / 33 Orgasms = 1.818181 Orgasms per Minute
Okay...lets pass around the stuff you've been smokin...
Of course, we can all DREAM!!
30 in an hour, PLEASE....not possible.
Every 100 seconds one???? Thats an idiot who tell tales like this!!!!
Orgasims...maybe, Orgasms...NO.
he's full of crap.
Methinks the math might be off on this one.
Are you sure she was having orgasms and not siezures rotflmao.
He is a legend in his own mind. 33 in an hour..ah come on. I don't even think the human body is capable of that
both men and women (fake) alot of there stories about sex ,and than turn it around and blame the rest of us for being dumb about sex , and in a word that NORTH EXPOSED used this is what i (BELIVE)
33 in one hour? oh puhlease.
Usually after an earth shattering orgasm you are too physically drained. You do need a few minutes of recoup time. I call bullshit.
Bet her throat was sore from all that FAKE ASS moaning
i don't beleive this.
you know threads like this one ,if you really read the posts and read between the lines , you got to laugh
If he was so great she wouldn't have let him go. Thanks for the laugh.
maybe you sir are the (MORON) ... i never said everybody on here has did this
33? In one hour? Yeah, right...
LOL..women that fake are foolish..
Not possible...it would mean she had to have one every minute and a half...
33 in one hour? I don't think it can happen.
If this is true (cough cough), then your ex is from another planet. The other theory is of course that his ex FAKED IT everytime they had sex and he couldn't tell! The 3rd theory is that his ex doesn't know what an orgasm is
Please that's just a straight up lie. I don't think that's even physically possible.
********
Sorry to disappoint you but the G-spot is in Sexology what the unconscious is in Psychology: NOT PROVEN. It only exists in porno and freak magazines. There is not magical spot of ultra orgasm inside of the vagina except the normal sensitiveness of that whole area.
Do you think a photograph of the alleged "G-spot" with the caption "The G-spot: pleasure at your fingerprint" is scientific? Come on! We are more intelligent than that. Kind of pleasure seekers and freaks but intelligent! Keep looking at porn! lol
That is why I say the G-spot was created from and for freaks. Some freaks can't find it, some others say it is located 3 inches inside the vagina wall. Others say it is located between the entrance and the clitorix. Others say it is located deep inside and only a large penis can reach it. nonsense@
You cannot place your whole sexual life thinking on one alleged magical spot in your vagina. This mythical "G-spot" is just doing the work for which it was created: to create sexually frustrated people who, even when they experiment ecstasy and explosive orgasms, they keep on saying that they never find this so called "G-O". Enjoy sex and don't worry about the G-spot. The more you worry about it, the more frustrated you will be. Have you ever wondered why the same physician who invented the theory of the G-spot did not come out with the male version of G-spot?
Do you believe in God? The G-spot is also matter of beliefs and faith, not scientific proof. The clitorix does exists , the G-spot does not.
Dr. Grafenberg only uses the term "spot" two times on his treaty on this matter. ... his work is not a scientific research but just a discussion theory that have not been proven. Yet, he created a whole new generation of people eager to pretend they get better sexual pleasure than any one else.
A "Sexologist" takes a couple of courses in psychology, anatomy and biology, but Sexology is not a certified science. A Sexologist may tell you the G-spot exists with no doubts, a Gynecologist can't, otherwise he/she would lose the license.
Some of these comments were as a result of a person on another web site "claiming" his woman had 33 G-Gasms in an hour or so.
Some of the other comments come from a few morons who claim proudly that they've NEVER EVER found a G thing and furthermore that makes them experts on the FACT that the GSPOT is a MYTH. My absolute favorite IS:
""... he (Dr. GRAFENBERG) created a whole new generation of people eager to pretend they get better sexual pleasure than any one else.
Gawd!!
I hope you have a good laugh. Sad how some people think. Little wonder the divorce rate is so freakin high with guys with attitudes this BAD.
*******************************************
33 in a month maybe.....
No need for book... If you understand the whole female body and how u can please so well, why the hell are u single? lol. Bottom line, if a guy could give me 33 Big O's in a hour.. I'd marry him...lol
how is that possible? in an hour?! she'd have to be almost continuous if you know what I mean
NOt even possible to have 33 in one hour...thats just not possible. No woman can have an orgasm that long.
who does he think he is KAREEM? lol 33 yeah and bush means democrat! tell pinochio his nose is gonna grow !
33 for a woman also seems impossible.
I can't see 33 in an hour and usually when a guy brags like that, it's BS.
33 times in an hour........HA HA HA.can't be good orgasms if she can kep track of that many
Hmmm....Lets do the Math...
60Min / 33 Orgasms = 1.818181 Orgasms per Minute
Okay...lets pass around the stuff you've been smokin...
Of course, we can all DREAM!!
30 in an hour, PLEASE....not possible.
Every 100 seconds one???? Thats an idiot who tell tales like this!!!!
Orgasims...maybe, Orgasms...NO.
he's full of crap.
Methinks the math might be off on this one.
Are you sure she was having orgasms and not siezures rotflmao.
He is a legend in his own mind. 33 in an hour..ah come on. I don't even think the human body is capable of that
both men and women (fake) alot of there stories about sex ,and than turn it around and blame the rest of us for being dumb about sex , and in a word that NORTH EXPOSED used this is what i (BELIVE)
33 in one hour? oh puhlease.
Usually after an earth shattering orgasm you are too physically drained. You do need a few minutes of recoup time. I call bullshit.
Bet her throat was sore from all that FAKE ASS moaning
i don't beleive this.
you know threads like this one ,if you really read the posts and read between the lines , you got to laugh
If he was so great she wouldn't have let him go. Thanks for the laugh.
maybe you sir are the (MORON) ... i never said everybody on here has did this
33? In one hour? Yeah, right...
LOL..women that fake are foolish..
Not possible...it would mean she had to have one every minute and a half...
33 in one hour? I don't think it can happen.
If this is true (cough cough), then your ex is from another planet. The other theory is of course that his ex FAKED IT everytime they had sex and he couldn't tell! The 3rd theory is that his ex doesn't know what an orgasm is
Please that's just a straight up lie. I don't think that's even physically possible.
********
Sorry to disappoint you but the G-spot is in Sexology what the unconscious is in Psychology: NOT PROVEN. It only exists in porno and freak magazines. There is not magical spot of ultra orgasm inside of the vagina except the normal sensitiveness of that whole area.
Do you think a photograph of the alleged "G-spot" with the caption "The G-spot: pleasure at your fingerprint" is scientific? Come on! We are more intelligent than that. Kind of pleasure seekers and freaks but intelligent! Keep looking at porn! lol
That is why I say the G-spot was created from and for freaks. Some freaks can't find it, some others say it is located 3 inches inside the vagina wall. Others say it is located between the entrance and the clitorix. Others say it is located deep inside and only a large penis can reach it. nonsense@
You cannot place your whole sexual life thinking on one alleged magical spot in your vagina. This mythical "G-spot" is just doing the work for which it was created: to create sexually frustrated people who, even when they experiment ecstasy and explosive orgasms, they keep on saying that they never find this so called "G-O". Enjoy sex and don't worry about the G-spot. The more you worry about it, the more frustrated you will be. Have you ever wondered why the same physician who invented the theory of the G-spot did not come out with the male version of G-spot?
Do you believe in God? The G-spot is also matter of beliefs and faith, not scientific proof. The clitorix does exists , the G-spot does not.
Dr. Grafenberg only uses the term "spot" two times on his treaty on this matter. ... his work is not a scientific research but just a discussion theory that have not been proven. Yet, he created a whole new generation of people eager to pretend they get better sexual pleasure than any one else.
A "Sexologist" takes a couple of courses in psychology, anatomy and biology, but Sexology is not a certified science. A Sexologist may tell you the G-spot exists with no doubts, a Gynecologist can't, otherwise he/she would lose the license.
clitylicker
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
- Posts
- 4
Um, hate to be the science geek here, but 60 min/33 orgasms is 1.8 min per orgasm, not 1.8 orgasms per minute.
Yeah, the math might be off.
emptynester
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 275
OK even I have to come out of lurking for this one. Doesn't matter whether the math is off or the science geek is right, I don't believe this is possible.
Even if it were possible, seems to me the real question is quality vs quantity. The build up to an orgasm and the orgasm itself would take longer than that.
I am no expert on the subject but I am one of the fortunate ones who can have multiple orgasms. I've never kept count but I do know they become more intense as I go. For me, the slower the buildup, the more intense the orgasm is.
Whether it works out to be 1.8 min. per orgasm or 1.8 orgasms per minute doesn't really matter, IMHO. To say she had 33 in 60 minutes, they couldn't be much. If you don't have to stop in between to catch your breath or take a drink before you go again, I would guess someone is faking it to impress her partner.
emptynester
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 275
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
Impossible ????
I'd try an AVOID the word IMPOSSIBLE when it comes to the human condition and what some people can and others can NOT do. A big FAT guy might think running the 100M in less than 12 minutes is IMPOSSIBLE. Pointless argument that simply shows ones own limits.
But if there IS NO build up - just orgasm after orgasm? YOU may enjoy the build up. Certainly the "foreplay" aspect is a positive in any relationship but we're talking billions of people enjoying varied styles of sex play. Why do things either have to be finite - ONE way only - or "impossible" ?
I'm no "expert" either but I've seen what I've seen and there is enough feedback from ladies in here who have experienced HUNDREDS of G-Gasms over a period of an evening so, again. "Impossible" ?
"For me" OK but what about somebody else? What if they just like G-Gasms which in my experience don't really "build up" they just slam you when the stimulation is happening the right way.
Question: Are you talking clitoral orgasm or G? BIG difference. The buildup during multiple clitoral orgasms allows the clit to DE-sensitize to some degree so most women CAN without it being too sensitive to even look at.
I have heard from women who have, in the past ONLY been able to experience ONE orgasm. They might (probably) term your "claim" to be able to enjoy multiples as "impossible." Don't forget that a mere century ago the scientific and medical experts of the day were only just coming (pun!) to grips with the FACT that some women's outrageous claims that they were claiming able to orgasm MIGHT just prove accurate.
The math genius is making the (wrong) assumption that each orgasm takes precisely so many seconds. Everybody knows that varies. A clitoral orgasm can last several seconds ...maybe a minute if she doesn't become too sensitive too quickly plus a few other factors which I'm assuming are pretty obvious to others too. A G-Gasm can last from a second to an hour or more - SOLID UNENDING ORGASM. So to peg it at X-seconds is erroneous. 33 in an hour is not impossible. 33 in 15 minutes is not impossible for the woman who can G-Gasm and simply hits a series of super-peaks instead of the crest - trough - crest - trough - crest associated with a more leisurely G-Spotting or clitoral orgasms.
Couldn't be much? Sorry but I've seen G-Gasms happen in such frequency and intensity that they've passed out. You do NOT generally pass out from the "ooo that was nice, dear" kind of orgasms. Granted the recipients of that degree of G-Gasms have to be in damn good shape but there are dozens of posts JUST in this thread where they state that that is exactly how intense AND frequent they can be.
Your ""I would guess someone is faking it to impress her partner..."" sounds familiar. Almost as silly and demeaning as the moron from the other thread who wrote that all Grafenburg did was create, "" a whole new generation of people eager to pretend they get better sexual pleasure than any one else.""
emptynester said:
I'd try an AVOID the word IMPOSSIBLE when it comes to the human condition and what some people can and others can NOT do. A big FAT guy might think running the 100M in less than 12 minutes is IMPOSSIBLE. Pointless argument that simply shows ones own limits.
But if there IS NO build up - just orgasm after orgasm? YOU may enjoy the build up. Certainly the "foreplay" aspect is a positive in any relationship but we're talking billions of people enjoying varied styles of sex play. Why do things either have to be finite - ONE way only - or "impossible" ?
I'm no "expert" either but I've seen what I've seen and there is enough feedback from ladies in here who have experienced HUNDREDS of G-Gasms over a period of an evening so, again. "Impossible" ?
"For me" OK but what about somebody else? What if they just like G-Gasms which in my experience don't really "build up" they just slam you when the stimulation is happening the right way.
Question: Are you talking clitoral orgasm or G? BIG difference. The buildup during multiple clitoral orgasms allows the clit to DE-sensitize to some degree so most women CAN without it being too sensitive to even look at.
I have heard from women who have, in the past ONLY been able to experience ONE orgasm. They might (probably) term your "claim" to be able to enjoy multiples as "impossible." Don't forget that a mere century ago the scientific and medical experts of the day were only just coming (pun!) to grips with the FACT that some women's outrageous claims that they were claiming able to orgasm MIGHT just prove accurate.
The math genius is making the (wrong) assumption that each orgasm takes precisely so many seconds. Everybody knows that varies. A clitoral orgasm can last several seconds ...maybe a minute if she doesn't become too sensitive too quickly plus a few other factors which I'm assuming are pretty obvious to others too. A G-Gasm can last from a second to an hour or more - SOLID UNENDING ORGASM. So to peg it at X-seconds is erroneous. 33 in an hour is not impossible. 33 in 15 minutes is not impossible for the woman who can G-Gasm and simply hits a series of super-peaks instead of the crest - trough - crest - trough - crest associated with a more leisurely G-Spotting or clitoral orgasms.
To say she had 33 in 60 minutes, they couldn't be much. If you don't have to stop in between to catch your breath or take a drink before you go again, I would guess someone is faking it to impress her partner.
Couldn't be much? Sorry but I've seen G-Gasms happen in such frequency and intensity that they've passed out. You do NOT generally pass out from the "ooo that was nice, dear" kind of orgasms. Granted the recipients of that degree of G-Gasms have to be in damn good shape but there are dozens of posts JUST in this thread where they state that that is exactly how intense AND frequent they can be.
Your ""I would guess someone is faking it to impress her partner..."" sounds familiar. Almost as silly and demeaning as the moron from the other thread who wrote that all Grafenburg did was create, "" a whole new generation of people eager to pretend they get better sexual pleasure than any one else.""
Last edited:
Laila_Aurora
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Posts
- 204
.......................
Last edited:
KokopelliRises
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Posts
- 547
Here's a thought
Next time you plan on doing this make sure you go to the bathroom first. Then when you get that feeling, give in to it. Your bladder is empty so you won't be peeing. This feeling is a good thing, just relax and let it flow.
report back
Mr. G your information is heaven sent. I tried the G-Gasm on my girlfriend and let's just say she couldn't stop telling me how much she loves me. With this technic I just renewed my love life and relationship. Thanks again, If you have anymore tips please post.
Mr. G your information is heaven sent. I tried the G-Gasm on my girlfriend and let's just say she couldn't stop telling me how much she loves me. With this technic I just renewed my love life and relationship. Thanks again, If you have anymore tips please post.
Mr.G
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 9, 2001
- Posts
- 1,292
With your statements and some posts from others who state the same thing WHY are there so many out there who still claim it is impossible or that you guys are lying just to make other women jealous and give them the impression YOUR sex lives are so much better than their's. Some of the other threads I've posted this Technique on just fill with idiots who continually post that BS despite the fact that many women write in to say the GSPOT does work and the orgasms are amazing. I've often wondered why these twits feel compelled to drop negative and insulting posts in an otherwise helpful and encouraging thread.
I guess there's no accounting for idiots.
I don't think women can "fake" it. The muscle contractions are fast and spasmodic to such an extent I don't think very many women anywhere have that kind of control over their vaginal and PCG muscles to duplicate that frequency or intensity. Also if you're faking it how do you fake a heart beat of 180bpm or more?? If they can fake it they're waaay past an OSCAR.
Noor
Citizen of the World
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Posts
- 32,143
They probably are with women who don't have gspots
I bet you could get your heart rate up by hyperventilating, lol, of course some of us do that sometimes do that unintentionally
Wanted to say thanks again for the information on this thread. For anyone still asking, this is VERY REAL. This technique has enhanced my physical relationship with my wife greatly. It is so incredible holding her, taking care of her in this way, seeing and feeling her completely let go. The look on her face, the feel and motion of her body while being held and taken care of in this way. It blows me away. Thanks
VaGentleOne
Who wants to peak?
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2007
- Posts
- 5,784
Being a long time follower of this thread I wanted to add something back to the community. Here is a link to an article that does a pretty good job backing up the GSpot mystery with some medical research. I would love to know what impression others get from reading it.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336572,00.html
And I am happy to say that my wife has had 3 Gspot orgasm and one combined clitorial and g-gasm in the past 6 months or so. It is definitely not a weekly type occurance, but when it does happen, she really does see the fireworks and glows afterwards. Thanks for all the information and resources you have given and shared.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336572,00.html
And I am happy to say that my wife has had 3 Gspot orgasm and one combined clitorial and g-gasm in the past 6 months or so. It is definitely not a weekly type occurance, but when it does happen, she really does see the fireworks and glows afterwards. Thanks for all the information and resources you have given and shared.
Similar threads
