Try This & Report Back

[shy slave]

Whoa, where do you get off?

As a matter of fact, Mr. G, I've added suggestions about technique, position and the AFE zone, which, btw you were noticeably less than enthusiastic about commenting on. A wholly different errogenous area with far less research than the G-spot but equally as pleasurable if not more intense -- and it rates bupkiss by you. Huh.

When *you* post, you expect unconditional and lavish gratitude, but when anyone demurs about the reported efficacy of your technique or suggests alternatives you have a tendency to get snitty with them, implying that they're not "doing it" right or saying that "many" women have a psychological block. That's just callous, and I'll call you on that.
Of course your success stories are PM'ing you with their tales, and the latter aren't. That's why threads such as this are affirmatively self-selecting.

If you were committed to merely posting helpful guidelines or "generalizations" as you say -- with considerate YMMV disclaimers -- I'd never have cause to speak up. But by jumping on this thread right after someone has posted a valid counterexample to your "research" findings demonstrates an arrogant disregard for their experiences. I would be more helpful to the Community if your approach were more encouraging and less directorial.

It's not your enthusiasm that's being criticized. I think you truly want to be helpful. But keep in mind that we're here to help lurkers as well as active thread participants. My hunch is that while some women find the g-spot extremely pleasurable, it's not so to plenty of others. If the goal here is to lessen the anxiety in both men and women about their ability to have Os (or inability), then the score-keeping has got be toned down considerably.
It's a shame you view this something personal, Mr. G. My intent isn't to sling brickbats but to ask that the temperament of this thread try to be as welcoming and mindful to everyone who joins the discussion and not just to those who affirm the majority.

Thank you for posting this.

It was MR GGG's increased posting on this 'being the best ever way to get a woman off' that prompted me to comment that it does not work for me.

Yews, I then received a barrage of abuse from him to the point of his being very personal.

I fail to understand why women tolerate such things from any man, much less a stranger on a porn board.

This thread has not been mindful of everyone, it made me feel like a freak for not bowing down and saying 'Thank the Lord' for this thread.

Not every woman is going to respond to this technique and few are going to respond to a man who thinks he has found the key to the Kingdom of heaven for a woman.

I have met men in r/l who have tried to tell me who I can orgasm, but until they have a cunt they really have no idea. Just as I have have no idea how it feels to cum with a cock.

My point is for those women who do not like being brow beaten into liking this technique, or simply don't like the technique; this thread does not seem to accept people are different and therefore some women feel they are odd, freakish or unnatural.

Mr GGG's comments in return to my response would only increase that belief. Anyone who lurks and read his comments to me would feel they were abnormal.

Not a good way to make someone feel, thank God I have a thick skin and personally will not stoop to personal insults, nor allow a man to tell me that his way for me to orgasm is the best way.

 

[shy slave]

I have tried to warn couples away from G-Spotting during pregnancy due to the outward spasms of the vaginal G-Spot orgasms AND I've played down the interest in A-Spot manipulation because there is a MUCH higher danger of lacerating or damaging the bladder neck during exuberant A-Spot play. Both techniques can result in severe injury, loss of a baby or a requirement for surgery to mend a torn bladder neck.

Are you a doctor? if not it is best to leave such advice to people who know about such things.

Again, you have misread and misinterpreted the reasons why I did this. You assume it is my ego and my single-mindedness in "directing" couple to exactly repeat the Technique as posted. It isn't. Never has been...pisses me off that you constantly do this.

That is how your posts read, your ego driving your comments.

Ya, I do really want to be helpful and the numbers pretty much ratify that. The women who do NOT find any G-spot manipulation enjoyable probably don't spend a lot of time in here, doncha think? Why would they. *NEWS ALERT* People who do not enjoy anal sex do NOT spend a lot of time reading through the anal sex threads.

This is not how you responded when I said it would not work for me.
You were very personal, insulting and rude. I do not have to justify any time I spend in Lit, nor time I have spent understanding my own body and orgasms to you; however, I am not alone in understanding what works for a woman is not always what a man believes works for a woman. It may work for many but we are not all the same, it does not have to be because of 'blockages' or 'past abuse' sometimes it just 'is.' If this technique worked for every woman, every time, it would be given in a handbook at the start of puberty to every person and there would be no need to explore any other aspect of sex.

The temperament of this thread, I think, is one of the most welcoming threads in not just LIT but all the other sites I've found where ideas are presented and discussed.

In three years and over 5000 posts you are the rudest person I have ever come acroos in Lit. To bodly state you think this thread is welcoming made me laugh so much I I almost cried. Your posts to me were not what I consider welcoming, perhaps manners are different in your part of the Universe.

 

[cumhungry]

so if you DON'T like this thread, and you DON'T like the topic, and you DON'T like the author..............WHY do you keep coming back again and again and arguing about it? i mean that's kinda dumb don't ya think? like hating broccoli, but ordering it every time you go to dinner?

all the guy did was a post a technique that works for many as a way for a man to please a woman. heck, a lot of men don't really consider the woman in the whole sex thing, you know, more of just masturbation with a witness, so i find it rather refreshing!!!!

geez........lighten up.

 

[tribbles]

Socks DO matter....well...ok, it really is how cold my feet are...

Cold feet and I just can't cum.

 

[kaledonia]

horrified...

...to find such unhappy folk posting here. there are lots of other fora (?) where one can gripe : I felt that this thread was a cheery world wide search for pleasure among consenting adults. the technique hasnt worked as described for us, but I have discovered how to squirt, and the searching takes me to states of consciousness which must approach nirvana,or bliss, or whatever descriptor fits. SO loves it, our sex life is a continuing voyage of discovery, and I recommend this thread to friends. there is a culture of complaint endemic in the West, which may bring down our civilisation. the uk has followed the us into being litigious and paranoid (thankfully still without the damned guns). spreading the word about the technique is a contribution to world peace, and I would recommend anyone interested to google 'positive psychology', which runs counter to the complaining culture. lets celebrate the joy, be grateful, kind and humble. Merry Christmas to you all, enjoy the solstice, relax on holiday.

 

[MR.GGG]

Such is life.

...there are those who build and those who only know how to tear down ...

Thanks for the back-up guys. I know I'm a tad abrupt sometimes and sarcastic as hell but I'm NOT rude just because somebody hasn't been able to make the Technique work.

Sadly many such threads get mired in unhappy, jealous, complaining folk whose only claim to the actual topic is , " I don't like this and I don't like the way you're saying it." They keep coming back, posting irrelevant nonsense about it NOT working for them or, even worse, "I haven't even tried this but I don't like IT and I don't like you." People respond and the whole thread gets completely hijacked by posts that have nothing to do with the topic.

All they had to do was take it private and I would have explained why or how I respond the way I do but morons like that feel it is their duty to reduce a thread to a big fight. There were a few near the beginning of this thread who tried to do the same thing but the momentum of the page left them in its wake. It'll be nice to see these two trundle off and wreck a thread on screwing animals or something useful instead of ruining the aspirations of the newbies here and bugging the veterans continuing to share.

 

[eudaemonia]

...there are those who build and those who only know how to tear down ...

Thanks for the back-up guys. I know I'm a tad abrupt sometimes and sarcastic as hell but I'm NOT rude just because somebody hasn't been able to make the Technique work.

Sadly many such threads get mired in unhappy, jealous, complaining folk whose only claim to the actual topic is , " I don't like this and I don't like the way you're saying it." They keep coming back, posting irrelevant nonsense about it NOT working for them or, even worse, "I haven't even tried this but I don't like IT and I don't like you." People respond and the whole thread gets completely hijacked by posts that have nothing to do with the topic.

All they had to do was take it private and I would have explained why or how I respond the way I do but morons like that feel it is their duty to reduce a thread to a big fight. There were a few near the beginning of this thread who tried to do the same thing but the momentum of the page left them in its wake. It'll be nice to see these two trundle off and wreck a thread on screwing animals or something useful instead of ruining the aspirations of the newbies here and bugging the veterans continuing to share.

The self-aggrandizement displayed here is stunning.

Your posts are routinely dismissive, derisive, obnoxious ... on and on and on. Can you really not hear yourself? Or are you actually being willfully evasive?

This is our objection, the tone of voice you write in and obvious lack of empathy for others. And for good measure, you then amp it up a notch further by demonizing the person who's simply asking that you be civil. This is just reprehensible.

Frankly, I have better things to do than "reduce a thread to a big fight." Forfuckssakes, this isn't high school!

My sole intention is to add a modicum of civility to a thread that is otherwise abrasive and off-putting to the very people you claim you're trying to help: your "newbie aspirants."

As for the retired teacher comment, nice try at poisoning the well. I'm just a smart, savvy, child of the 70s who's had the great fortune to revel unhindered in her sexuality since childhood. I'm damned lucky to have grown up not knowing shame or fear about my body and its pleasure. That is something of an uncommon experience, I've come to understand.

I want to be able to help others who come to Lit searching for some sane bits of wisdom and erotic enlightenment, and make them feel as at home as possible. When I read some of the childish and downright mean-spirited comments of one who claims to be the bearer of great knowledge, I'm enraged by such callousness. Enraged to the point of wanting to stand up and warn others to not get too caught up in someone else's pet cause at expense of their own sexual self-confidence and growth.

That's it.

 

[MR.GGG]

Obsessive compulsive jealous nitwits - there's room for all here.

NOT !!!

""Frankly, I have better things to do than "reduce a thread to a big fight." Forfuckssakes, this isn't high school! ""

Obviously you don't. You're acting exactly like it IS some high school. I can just imagine you and a couple of other vicious little hens in your senior grade clique nattering about what some girl looked like or backstabbing somebody else because they were popular. You've got nothing to add to the thread but here you are, back, blood pressure sky-rocketing because I'm not about to acquiesce to your view of how things should be.

Like some of the posts have already suggested, WHY, if this bugs you so much do you bother coming back clucking in self righteous indignation? If you've got better things to do - go do them. I think the numbers speak for themselves in here. I may be sarcastic but this thread is pushing towards 300,000 reads. It's obvious to anybody who isn't consumed by self importance and jealousy that maybe the 300,000 are right and you're the ones out of sync. If the thread was filled, as you FALSELY claim, with insults by me directed at unsuccessful newbies don't you think every other post would be complaining about the same things? They're not. Anybody reading - really reading, not nitpicking in a jealous frump - can see you claims of abuse are complete BS. That was very clever, BTW, turning some of my post into obscure greys and the parts you didn't like into BOLD. Very smart. A tad OBVIOUS though, don't you think? Even for somebody as "smart" as you.

""I'm enraged by such callousness. Enraged to the point of wanting to stand up and warn others to not get too caught up in someone else's pet cause at expense of their own sexual self-confidence and growth.""

Again. woman, the numbers speak for themselves. In the middle of your shrieks and complaints two more found NIRVANA using THE Technique (or a variation) - I REALLY don't care which friggin THUMB they used... ((WAHOOO - GO Newbies!!!)) Despite your claims I have NEVER been abusive to posters who have used their own method(s) ... what nonsense ... which thread are you even reading? Other than fu¢king up a damn good thread enjoyed by a third of a MILLION people so far, I really don't care how "enraged" you've become. Pull your hair out some other place and let us continue to explore Nirvana without your paranoiac ravings.


ps""searching for some sane bits of wisdom and erotic enlightenment""

... and your equally outraged friend suggested that if I wasn't a doctor I have NO business WARNING couples against inducing premature child birth or risk lacerating a bladder neck by practicing the G or A-Spot Technique.

What kind of defective mental process is going on in her head that she feels compelled to criticize me for that? It's obvious both of you have lost any thread of common sense. I'm called abusive one second and told because I'm not a doctor I shouldn't even warn people to be careful with some G and A-Spot variations.

 

[eudaemonia]

::sigh::

 

[ickle_stace]

I may be sarcastic but this thread is pushing towards 300,000 reads. It's obvious to anybody who isn't consumed by self importance and jealousy that maybe the 300,000 are right and you're the ones out of sync.

woah now hang on a minute there! just because some people don't get pleasure from "THE technique" it does not mean they are out of sync. Everyone has different things they like, and everyone has a right to express their opinion. The title of your thread says "Try this and report back" not "try this and only report back if you enjoyed it to make me look good" everyone can express an opinion.

and don't forget, it may be coming up to 300,000 reads, but I've read it a few times, never tried your technique, and there are probably alot of other people who have read and never tried too, plus people who have tried and read multiple times, so don't assume that 300,000 people have tried the technique and are right

nobody is right, it's just you offering a technique, and some people have tried it, some haven't but would like to, some won't want to try, and others will have tried and not liked it, they all are part of the 300,000 reads

there is no need for anyone to backbite or argue. And if you didn't notice it, eudaemonia wasn't actually saying against the technique, in fact she actually said "I want to be able to help others who come to Lit searching for some sane bits of wisdom and erotic enlightenment, and make them feel as at home as possible." but I also agree with her that you have to understand not everyone will like your technique, and you have no need or right to get angry with people for stating this in here.

Now I am not trying to insult you in anyway, in fact I have enjoyed reading about reviews from people who have had pleasure from the technique, and I have subscribed to this thread for a number of months now, but I have to agree that sometimes you do "get on your high horse" a little bit if people are not as impressed with your technique as other people might be. If you have pleasured as many women as you claim, you should also know that every female is different and we all like different things

 

[orgasmless]

after reading this technique and trying it out a few months back i did just what Mr G G G wants and reported back that it did absolutely nothing for me at all, i got a load of abuse and stuff from him, however as the adult here, or so i felt i am i didnt respond to his name calling and stuff, but this time i have been reading this backstabbing etc and this is getting way out of hand!! cant someone please put a stop to it and the people involved accept that other s are entitled to there own thoughts and keep it like that, thoughts, read it . think about it, but shut the fuck up and stop bitching together!!! grow up the lot of you!!!!!

 

[eudaemonia]

I think it's because I have an abnormally sloped vagina, but I'm not really sure...

As my pal here on Lit, Cathleen, is fond of saying, "Normal is a setting on the washing machine."

Keeping playing with different positions, pillows/cushions placed just so, etc. (Emphasis on "playing". Sex is supposed to be about pleasure.) Discovery of what does it for you is at least half of the fun and 100% worth your time and effort.

Keep us posted.

 

[Mesachie]

Two Days Plus Of Reading

Okay, this is a fairly long thread. My computer had a hiccup, so I only made it from page 1 to somewhere around page 53 or 54 before I had to reboot. Now, I did slide quickly through some sections where it was fairly self-congratulatory or chatty between regulars.

But I tried to pause and read the how-tos, the didn't-works, the still-trying, the Thank-You's, and so forth. I watched guys talk about unrequited love, women talk about unrequited passion, and a lot of people talk about having a lot of orgasms. Which, I thought was generally very cool.

The owner of the thread, Mr.G, or Mr.GGG, depending on his computer configuration, can be a caustic guy occasionally. Perhaps a bit full of himself even. Oh wow, such a rare thing in life,eh? His intentions are good, he tends to back off when he sees he is wrong, and doesn't like taking much crap from anyone if he thinks he is right.

eudaemonia, go back and read the first fifty pages. Keep your hands off the keyboard, just use the mouse to move from page to page. You may not come to like Mr.G, but I think your sense of "his way or the highway" will fade.

You are right, this is not a thread that focuses on the diversity of women's reactions to a specific technique or anatomical feature. It focuses on the technique(s) and the feature itself. You made your point.

Perhaps, if you feel the necessity of expounding on the variabity of feminine reaction, you should start a thread on that? Or a thread on G-spot abuse, consoling women who have been forced into orgasm after orgasm against their will. I would be a cheerful reader of such a thread myself. Or the anquish of women who find the technique distasteful for whatever reason.

I agree that all women will not find this technique useful. Not all individuals are wired the same, enjoy the same activities, or appreciate the same things in life. Feel free to be yourself. But hopefully on a different thread if you aren't going to do your homework first.

 

[Gil_T2]

Mr G this thread DOES help & it works for lots of ppl the ones who know won't let a few piss ants spoil our party, just reading the thread will show anyone who takes note that there is great JOY to be had & as a male the benifits of giving a lady a G spot orgasm & then keeping it running on & on & on & on pleases me as well as the lady I'm playing with including my lady love.

 

[eudaemonia]

BMJ paper: [MRI] of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal

A few weeks ago while logged into my university's library (where I have access to many academic and professional journals) searching for info on the G-spot, I some how/why linked to a public site that showed pictures of the G-spot. Unfortunately, where I filed the bookmark is anyone's guess. But once I find it, I will definitely post it because it seems to validate the various reports here of the shape and texture of the G-spot. The variation in the pictures is remarkable.

In the meantime here's an excellent article on the feasibility of obtaining good images of PIV intercourse for the purpose of understanding female anatomy. Spoiler: The news is good! (Check out the beautiful MRIs below.)

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7225/1596

What is already known on this topic

It has been extremely difficult to investigate anatomical changes during the act of coitus and the female sexual response

Modern magnetic resonance imaging allows exploration of aspects of living anatomy

What this paper adds

Taking MR images of the male and female genitals during coitus is feasible

During `missionary position' intercourse the penis has the shape of a boomerang*

During female sexual arousal without intercourse the uterus rises and the anterior vaginal wall lengthens**

The size of the uterus does not increase during sexual arousal

If it's true that the penis is more boomerang-shaped during missionary PIV sex, then this says quite a lot about the reports here about how angle matters. Vaginal stimulation of the G-spot and AFE-zone are very much dependent upon how couples fit together -- we here understand this intuitively and practically. And now we have some solid proof for some of our intuitions, although not others.

Fig 3. Midsagittal image of the anatomy of sexual intercourse (experiment 12). P=penis, Ur=urethra, Pe=perineum, U=uterus, S=symphysis, B=bladder, I=intestine, L5=lumbar 5, Sc=scrotum

http://www.bmj.com/content/vol319/issue7225/images/small/schw4391.f3l.gif
http://www.bmj.com/content/vol319/issue7225/images/small/schw4391.f3r.gif

View larger version (199169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 

[MR.GGG]

Geee

It has been a fascinating "research" project. The people who have posted to this thread over the years appear to have a much better handle on the vagaries of the GSpot than the so-called experts.

Visit a large book store and look up any and ALL of the sexual self-help and sex education books. Check the index of damn near every book you pick up and half of them show NO reference to the GSpot. Half have a one or two page notation but when you go to those pages they speak of increased lubrication in "some cases" and openly question the existence of the GSpot in women.

I have posted articles by Hines (he has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the GSpot does NOT exist) and Whipple who says it does exist but has, from what I've read, never managed to figure how to get it fired up. Women who have reported multiple orgasms caused by GSpot manipulation are ridiculed or it is suggested that they are delusional or fabricating their experiences ("claims" of orgasmS) to make themselves appear sexier or more knowledgeable to the researchers. That looks like some of the web sites where one woman says she has them all the time and another says it is impossible. It is NOT something you'd expect from a true researcher but their clinical investiagtions have included carving up cadavers looking for G's and lab work which is, doubtless, about as conducive to G-Gasms as having a BLT in a slaughter house.

The fact that some women can G-gasm with such speed and ease and OTHERS CAN'T, of course, makes it hard for sexperts to state anything universally acceptable. Instead they rely on probes and autopsies and are still stumbling around in the dark when really all they need to do is read some posts in here, find a woman who can CUM 100 times a night riding a pair of thumbs (or whatever turns your crank and in any position you enjoy *DISCLAIMER*) and be amazed! Pity none of them has managed to do that yet.

 

[Netzach]

No chatty I never have but my guess is you're still a few years away from actually getting your first piece of real tail anyway.

""being brutally rasped by my knuckles"" & ""i really like a big wet juicy pussy that i can move around in""

Ya right!

If you are actually as stupid as you sound you'll probably end up in prison for killing one of the "many" women you fist. Then I just hope your new roomie, "BUBBA" gets to introduce you to some real fisting.

I've spent too many evenings in ER's watching doctors trying to remove objects from vaginas and rectums and sew up torn and bleeding interiors and in a lot of cases the success rate is low if infection sets in.

Feelings of inadequacy come from, I suspect, not being able to get a reaction unless you're using what amounts to a weapon. Read the posts. I've never felt inadequate...certainly not since I found out how to stimulate the G&A spots.

For anybody thinking of doing this you might consider that the primary dangers of fisting are damage in and around the vaginal opening. Damage can come in the form vaginal fissures - tears in the skin surrounding the anal/vaginal opening, tenderness associated with the stretching of the openings and/or a lack of lubrication and bleeding caused when fissures occur. Severe damage is the actual tearing and ripping of the anal/vaginal muscles sometimes leading to incontinence (a loss of bowel retention /control and internal bleeding), usually caused by an over eager- ness to achieve full insertion of the fist without allowing the muscle tissue to relax and adjust. The severest form of damage are the tearing of the vaginal and intestinal
walls and peritonitis, an infection caused by fecal material entering the sterile abdominal cavity through those tears. The death rate is well over 60% when this condition occurs as there are no nerve endings to tell you something is wrong.

Grow up chatty before you kill somebody either thru what you say you do (which I doubt) or somebody who doesn't know any better takes your advice and kills their SO.

Hm.

Well I'm one of those "ho hum, take it or leave it" people on penetration, my PCG muscle can't be all that bad as I do kegel, and I've spent many an hour on self love and exploration. However I'm filing this info for use on girls in the future.

However I'm a happy fister. There's nothing dangerous or brutal about fisting done right, in fact it's a lot gentler to the tissues than the description of G spot stim you give. The whole point of fisting is to work with your fistee to a slow, transcendental deep kind of fuck.

Of course I have little hands and no worries about dick inadequacy, but your mileage may vary...

 

[uptoplay2]

some downloading... you might like

http://azureus.sourceforge.net/ first download asureus... then let your computer take some time to download this.... http://bmtorrents.net/details.php?id=8373

Look at the second one to decide if you want to take the time.

No fair getting mad at me again Mr.GGG... Sorry about the previous worthless download... this one might be better, but it takes a lot of time and needs a special program to enable the download.

 

[MR.GGG]

??? WTF is it ???

""No fair getting mad at me again Mr.GGG... Sorry about the previous worthless download... this one might be better, but it takes a lot of time and needs a special program to enable the download.""

Maybe you could give details about what you're asking us to sign on with. I went to the site and there was a USER NAME and PASSWORD asked for so whatever the page is about, you have to JOIN first - something I don't want to do until I at least know what the theme of the site is all about.

The only page you can look at is the STATS page and it shows a 16 to 1 male to female ratio. NOT the kind of odds I like.

WHAT is the page about. I'm on hi-speed so any download unless it is 100meg or more is not an issue but without knowing what the site is even about I'm not going to bother and neither, I suspect, will most others.

 

[uptoplay2]

fair enough

The download is a video of a man taking a woman through relaxation massages that he says are key before expecting the most from a G-spot orgasm. He then procedes to give his lovely model a few body convulsing orgasm that leave her quite happy.

I think this one does not require a "membership". but you have to download the program to do these "torrent" downloads. The download is over 600 MB

http://www.btmon.com/file/squirting_orgasms_how_to.avi

I don't think I joined anything to download this... I'm a mac so it was a done deal. You might have to play around to get the PC version.

http://azureus.sourceforge.net/download.php

 

[MR.GGG]

I'm on a MAC too. Latest G4 and other than the stats page everywhere I went they asked for a USER NAME and PASSWORD.

600megs would be a pain even on HiSPeed. Dial up is about 7 weeks!

Why not just suggest giving your woman a nice relaxing massage (which will lull her into a false sense of passivity) and then G her into a frenzie. As discussed, above, it is amazing the differences in reported orgasms from women depending on their situations, sense of self-confidence or security. It can come down to wearing nice warm socks too. I've always found a long relaxing massage (giving AND getting) usually results in anything BUT relaxation and is a great way to transition into G-Spotting - and anything else ...

 

[jl22play]

Holy cow!

I happened upon this thread because of someone posting (on another site)info quoted from here. I am so glad I found it! I haven't yet read thru the whole thing (something like 4 years worth of postings), although I have read thru about 1/2....

Anyway, I'm an oldie but a newbie to the G-Spot (it has been impossible for me to cum except via clit stim, usually oral or vibe required) - have heard of the G-Spot, but couldn't find it, so thought it was BS, now I'm thinking my husband and I need to start spending a ton of time researching!!! I can't wait to cum like my friends have described (or the way it seems porn stars can do it)! Maybe I'm not the freak I thought I have been......maybe I'll actually want to have sex more often than my husband (hmmm, wonder if that's actually possible????).....gosh, I'm starting to tingle right now....

BTW, I initially read the snottiness, now just ignore it by skipping over it. Pettiness is so annoying.

 

[uptoplay2]

I'm on a MAC too. Latest G4 and other than the stats page everywhere I went they asked for a USER NAME and PASSWORD.

600megs would be a pain even on HiSPeed. Dial up is about 7 weeks!

The massages weren't what you'd normally get from a professional. Agreed 600 MB is huge. Sorry about the user name etc, I guess I dove in and gave them the same info as I did at Lit. When I go back to look now, I don't see those initial webpages. So, sorry. One friend who does know about the G-spot enjoyed the vids. She thought they might be helpful.

On the bright side..... it was nice to see the effects that you've been writing about on this thread, and how easy it is to keep them cumming and cumming with the just a few moments of the right touch.

 

[jl22play]

Dang! No Holy Cow results!!!

BUMMERS!!!!!!!!

We just tried. And tried. And tried. No luck.

Hubby is 99.5% certain he found the spot; we tried for some time, but for me it never became enjoyable....more achy and annoying. I did feel the "like I need to pee" sensation, but nothing more than as descibed. I am really really bummed!

 

[MR.GGG]

jl22play , did you just dive in and try the Technique? I agree. BUMMER it didn't work for you but the first time can be a difficult time if that's all you did. Until your bod KNOWS what it feels like, and there are TONS of posts suggesting this and giving details, you have to spend a looong time turning on, making sure you either have cum already or are so hair-trigger that you feel you're just about to cum. Then try the Technique. If nothing happens go back a step and do everything else that turns you on, then try the method again for a bit. DON'T get frustrated if nothing happens. STOP. Turn on and try again another time or later.

There have been lots of posts from people who tried JUST the method described and, again, until your bod knows the first time rarely works all that easily or quickly. There have also been lots of posts from couples who tried this over and over again while being turned on in all the regular ways and as the ad sez all of a sudden BADDABOOM BADDA BING!!!

After that it is very easy to trigger the G. The first time is sometimes very frustrating but keep trying. My dearly departed was just like you. Oral or vibe and nothing else worked. Giving her a nightly tongue lashing was FINE with me for 19 yrs until I stumbled on this Technique. SHE fired up right away (lucky there or maybe I'd have given up early) and from then on she'd feel satiated at 12 to 15 BIG G-Gasms a night AND a tongue lashing and all was well with the world.

Keep up your "research" because it probably will happen for you. It just has to be arrived at slowly the first time for many. Others are lucky. They go BOOOM right away. Wish you'd been able to report that but it looks like a bit more research is needed. G'luck.