Trump White House sabotaged FBI confirmation investigation of Brett Kavanaugh

RobDownSouth

Oh Look....
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Posts
75,207

FBI probe of Kavanaugh constrained by Trump White House, report finds

None of the 450 tips provided to the FBI tip line were investigated by the FBI, instead they were boxed up and sent to the Trump White House for review. TWO sexual assault claims against Rapey McRaperson were not investigated. $200K debt suddenly "disappearing" was not investigated.

Senators were able to review the boxed raw data....no report was ever produced....exactly one hour before the confirmation vote on the rapist.

Shocking
 

FBI probe of Kavanaugh constrained by Trump White House, report finds

None of the 450 tips provided to the FBI tip line were investigated by the FBI, instead they were boxed up and sent to the Trump White House for review. TWO sexual assault claims against Rapey McRaperson were not investigated. $200K debt suddenly "disappearing" was not investigated.

Senators were able to review the boxed raw data....no report was ever produced....exactly one hour before the confirmation vote on the rapist.

Shocking
That's awesome! Whatever it takes.
 
And how is this known? Why did the Senate Democrats with dear Kamala and FBI Director Wray in their back pocket not persuade Schumer to review this raw data? Just curious!
 
Kavanaugh had a history of sexual assault, AND he lied to Senators during confirmation about his views on the Roe decision. A rapist and a liar.
It could be grounds for impeachment, but there will never be the votes for conviction.
 
And how is this known? Why did the Senate Democrats with dear Kamala and FBI Director Wray in their back pocket not persuade Schumer to review this raw data? Just curious!
Uh, yeah, you’re the new alt but with the same old bot dunce knowledge.

Democrats, nor dear Kamala, were in control of the Senate during the kavanaugh confirmation.
 
Absolutely correct never any reason to doubt such a fine and honourable woman.She is still milking her fifteen minutes of fame, appearing on ‘The View’ where she was treated with the reverence due to a martyr!

Why do I get the sneaking suspicion from you that no woman accusing a person of sexual assault is to be believed unless it’s against Bill Clinton or if her name is Tara Reade?
 
They were in control less than four months later and able to review all this evidence.Perhaps not the copies that were ‘sent’ to the White House, but the original documents or copies of the original documents still existed from the Senate Hearing. Not the sort of thing that opponents of Kavanaugh would use as cat litter.
 
Why do I get the sneaking suspicion from you that no woman accusing a person of sexual assault is to be believed unless it’s against Bill Clinton or if her name is Tara Reade?
For the sake of decency I hope you never sit on a jury if you believe Ford’s ‘evidence’ as the truth. She was unsure of all the details of the encounter, just that it was Kavanaugh and that it happened. Did she provide her story when Kavanaugh was confirmed to a lower court.

You do make a good point that a woman’s accusation should be heard and corroborating evidence investigated. But it is clear that the evidence heard was insufficient and would never stand up in a criminal court hearing
 
For the sake of decency I hope you never sit on a jury if you believe Ford’s ‘evidence’ as the truth.
I have had the opportunity and privilege to sit on a jury. I let my voice be known and thought that all 12 of us did both litigants fair justice. It was an insurance settlement case and several of us jurors had the opportunity to speak to one of the lawyers afterwards and they informed us that the monetary award we gave was the exact amount initially offered that was disputed and subsequently brought the case to trial. I only say this to back up that we felt we did our due diligence despite both parties never mentioning a dollar amount for us to work with.
She was unsure of all the details of the encounter, just that it was Kavanaugh and that it happened. Did she provide her story when Kavanaugh was confirmed to a lower court.
The kavanaugh confirmation was not a trial.
You do make a good point that a woman’s accusation should be heard and corroborating evidence investigated. But it is clear that the evidence heard was insufficient and would never stand up in a criminal court hearing
The bar for the confirmation of a SC justice is not as high as the bar against a defendant in a criminal case. See Robert Bork and Harriet Miers and the now long forgotten past of when character and past jurisprudence rulings mattered for being able to be seated on the highest court.

Lyndsay Graham, and Jeff Flake especially, held up the voting until hearing further testimony from Ford. Flake apparently caved under pressure and kavanaugh’s confirmation proceeded without the FBI giving a thorough report or anyone listening to the then growing list of women coming forward with even more allegations. That’s how I remember it going down. Now I’ll have to go read this new reporting which I’m sure you will doubt.
 
They were in control less than four months later and able to review all this evidence.Perhaps not the copies that were ‘sent’ to the White House, but the original documents or copies of the original documents still existed from the Senate Hearing. Not the sort of thing that opponents of Kavanaugh would use as cat litter.

My apologies. Your replies seem too cogent to be attributed to the infamous snailspace and his numerous alts. They are still lacking in thought though.

Are you of the belief that today, or even 4 months after his confirmation, you are of the belief that the senate democratic leadership of Schumer and Durbin sitting on the Senate Judiciary have a desire to listen to Sheldon Whitehouse or AOC and their urgings to investigate Kavanaugh?
 
If a Democratic administration had done something similar, the "republicans" would have called for the death penalty.

As a Democrat; if a Democratic administration had done something similar, I (and many others) would have demanded the President’s resignation.

Meanwhile, the "republicans" turn a blind eye to DonOld’s corruption.

There is a stark difference between Democrats and "republicans”.

🇺🇸
 
My apologies. Your replies seem too cogent to be attributed to the infamous snailspace and his numerous alts. They are still lacking in thought though.

Are you of the belief that today, or even 4 months after his confirmation, you are of the belief that the senate democratic leadership of Schumer and Durbin sitting on the Senate Judiciary have a desire to listen to Sheldon Whitehouse or AOC and their urgings to investigate Kavanaugh?
I am from the United Kingdom so perhaps the niceties of the process have escaped me but the central point remains that Ford was not a credible witness. I understand why the whole process was vitriolic.

However the result has been that Roe v Wade has now been abandoned and the constitutional rights of each state have been restored in accordance with the United States constitution.

Current events are far more important for your Democrats. I thought we had problems with ‘Progressive Liberal’ politicians but your mob are now about to undergo a humiliation of the highest order. So Good Luck with all that!

Who is snailspace? All the best to you from Saffron Walden Essex.
 
Kavanaugh had a history of sexual assault, AND he lied to Senators during confirmation about his views on the Roe decision. A rapist and a liar.
He lied about stare decisis as well.

Just like the other conservative justices.

Over the past 10 years it has become patently obvious that the number one trait of Republicans in general is to be blatant liars.
 
I am from the United Kingdom so perhaps the niceties of the process have escaped me but the central point remains that Ford was not a credible witness. I understand why the whole process was vitriolic.

However the result has been that Roe v Wade has now been abandoned and the constitutional rights of each state have been restored in accordance with the United States constitution.

Current events are far more important for your Democrats. I thought we had problems with ‘Progressive Liberal’ politicians but your mob are now about to undergo a humiliation of the highest order. So Good Luck with all that!

Who is snailspace? All the best to you from Saffron Walden Essex.

As a liberal democrat I welcome the opinions of Torries. 👍
 
Back
Top