Trolls, keyboard warriors... ignore, block or digilantism?

To most of your guys (who post in the Blurt thread)'s and even my credit, we don't encourge harassment (aka consistent, over a period of time // to be differentiated from bad comments or behaviors, since some people confuse the two).
Even if we otherwise like or engage with the person who does it or we dislike the target.

But there still are a handful of posters who tend to encourage the alts or trolling, either by quoting and giggling with them or stating that the target totally deserves to be trolled.

^ Deserves to be trolled for shameless goat-fucking.
 
^ Deserves to be trolled for shameless goat-fucking.

That guy is one of the biggest, self admitted trolls on Literotica and has been for the last 2 years, now all of a sudden he doesn't want to play like that anymore and he has taken the assumed moral high ground. He should stick to aunty and goat raping.
 
As I said, people's definition of what constitutes a troll varies.

For example: Some Blurt posters call Ann a troll, whereas I and others have seen no evidence of trolling or mean comments coming from her.
--- She never harassed or followed around any poster. Just some one off shit - stirring threads and posts, which generally lack malice and are intelligent and witty. Since I joined the forum 2 years ago, don't know about prior to that.

By the same token, the same Blurt posters either turn a blind eye on or approve of (the target is a "racist" so totally deserves it) of Rob/ Luk & alts.' trolling.
---Whereas I call what they're doing: following people around every day, for years with all sorts of stupid and malicious slurs harassment and bullying.
 
That is interesting backstory. I also agree that there should be a line drawn at harassment, but it might also come down to the legality of how much Laurel and Manu are able to police. She could ban an IP address, but determined folks could get around that pretty easily. It is also, ultimately, a judgement call (though in some cases it's clearly black and white). Intervening at all could open them up to culpability for a failure to do more. Talking out of my ass, really. Make no mistake - if I had the keys, a bunch of these fuckers would be nuclear banned 4 lyfe, but I trust that it's complicated and I trust Laurel.

Question: has there ever been a female poster who's crossed the boundary and threatened someone's real work or family life? Granted, it's likely a bunch of things have happened behind the scenes that none of us will ever know about, but I'm just seeing a pattern of angry, jilted men making lit a hostile place for women.

I was just thinking the other day that it's kind of a bummer that I can't really post pictures anymore. I've just crossed too many of the crazies. How sad is that?? The best part of this place has always been the occasional flash of titty, and shitty men are ruining it for all of us.

Obligatory #notallmen - some of you here are the best in the world. But lit seems to be a cozy place for misogynists.

we've had quite a few female predators but it doesnt seem to be as many of them as the menz
 
Google postmodern science for yourself.

I became aware of the term from Bret Weinstein. The professor central to the Evergreen stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq4Y87idawk

Watch from 43:30 to 44:30


Outstanding talk and links.
Many thanks, LibSam.

RE POSTMODERNISM:

While some reputable public personalities talk a lot of sense, they also come up occasionally with outlandish ideas, and those dissonances can be baffling for the reader. The concept of postmodernism makes one understand why that is.

ie : In "A fair country: Telling truths about Canada": J.R.Saul -rightfully- argues for the need to recognize and incorporate the indigenous cultural background of the country and make it mainstream too.
The downside is that he also advocates for mainly oral- based teaching in certain Institutions (as traditionally done by indigenuous communities in the past), which is outdated.
 
Outstanding talk and links.
Many thanks, LibSam.

RE POSTMODERNISM:

While some reputable public personalities talk a lot of sense, they also come up occasionally with outlandish ideas, and those dissonances can be baffling for the reader. The concept of postmodernism makes one understand why that is.

ie : In "A fair country: Telling truths about Canada": J.R.Saul -rightfully- argues for the need to recognize and incorporate the indigenous cultural background of the country and make it mainstream too.
The downside is that he also advocates for mainly oral- based teaching in certain Institutions (as traditionally done by indigenuous communities in the past), which is outdated.

It's cute that you try to be intellectual. Sad that it's so pathetic. :eek:
 
That is interesting backstory. I also agree that there should be a line drawn at harassment, but it might also come down to the legality of how much Laurel and Manu are able to police. She could ban an IP address, but determined folks could get around that pretty easily. It is also, ultimately, a judgement call (though in some cases it's clearly black and white). Intervening at all could open them up to culpability for a failure to do more. Talking out of my ass, really. Make no mistake - if I had the keys, a bunch of these fuckers would be nuclear banned 4 lyfe, but I trust that it's complicated and I trust Laurel.

Question: has there ever been a female poster who's crossed the boundary and threatened someone's real work or family life? Granted, it's likely a bunch of things have happened behind the scenes that none of us will ever know about, but I'm just seeing a pattern of angry, jilted men making lit a hostile place for women.

I was just thinking the other day that it's kind of a bummer that I can't really post pictures anymore. I've just crossed too many of the crazies. How sad is that?? The best part of this place has always been the occasional flash of titty, and shitty men are ruining it for all of us.

Obligatory #notallmen - some of you here are the best in the world. But lit seems to be a cozy place for misogynists.

I trust Laurel too, but I also recall a time when the General Board had a bit of a moral compass. Way back in the day, when "Karen Kraft" and miles were posting pictures of my kids, relatives and in-laws damned near every day for three solid months, Pereg made a very simple poll asking if it was okay for miles to d. 95% said no (120-6...and 4 of the 6 were alts). My political opponents, who normally backed every single thing miles did (Ishmael, Vetteman, AJ) sat on their hands because they realized miles was radioactive. Laurel never banned him or Karen (she did ban their joint alt Xanophil and about 20 other alts). She did respond promptly when those two posted my private pictures here and poof them.
 
ME ME ME ME ME ME

Give your raging narcissism a break, Rob.

If true, and as awful as those must have been, they happened ages ago and those posters are no longer doing it.
If they start harassing you again, rest assured that many -myself included- would ask them to stop.

Whereas you and Luk infested the board with all sorts of retardedly idiotic personal attacks and alts.. In order to pursue personal wars and grudges for what happened 10 years ago.
 
I trust Laurel too, but I also recall a time when the General Board had a bit of a moral compass. Way back in the day, when "Karen Kraft" and miles were posting pictures of my kids, relatives and in-laws damned near every day for three solid months, Pereg made a very simple poll asking if it was okay for miles to d. 95% said no (120-6...and 4 of the 6 were alts). My political opponents, who normally backed every single thing miles did (Ishmael, Vetteman, AJ) sat on their hands because they realized miles was radioactive. Laurel never banned him or Karen (she did ban their joint alt Xanophil and about 20 other alts). She did respond promptly when those two posted my private pictures here and poof them.

Interesting to watch a sociopath talk about a moral compass.

Nevermind then, what about ...I don't know, say... today. What did Perg have to say about your behavior today? You did say I should bring it up. Now seems appropriate.

What did the board tell you in the much more recent poll about specifically your odious behavior?

Not to mention your own little recent gulf-of-tonkin gambit that Laurel nuked at my request before you possibly could have seen it. You showed up in the morning and begin your poutrage until I pointed out that you could not possibly have seen it unless you had been online and you, yourself had posted it.

You quietly slunk away, and haven't brought it up again since. That's a lot of why you have made it your mission to "run me off the board." You can't stand that I catch you in your sophmoric little fuck-fuck games and that I know exactly how low you will sink to "win" one of the idiotic internet battles that give you that false sense of power you so desperately crave.
 
Last edited:
ME ME ME ME ME ME

Give your raging narcissism a break, Rob.

If true, and as awful as those must have been, they happened ages ago and those posters are no longer doing it.
If they start harassing you again, rest assured that many -myself included- would ask them to stop.

Whereas you and Luk infested the board with all sorts of retardedly idiotic personal attacks and alts.. In order to pursue personal wars and grudges for what happened 10 years ago.

Shut the fuck up you ignorant, 3rd world donkey fucker. If somebody did that to you and, well nobody would breed with you, but if they posted pictures of your sister's kids, would you forgive them? That's what I thought, samosa rapist!

Also, look at the little tranny was sitting waiting to pounce at a rob post too. :0
Pathetic little guy
 
Shut the fuck up you ignorant, 3rd world donkey fucker. If somebody did that to you and, well nobody would breed with you, but if they posted pictures of your sister's kids, would you forgive them? That's what I thought, samosa rapist!

If they did that to you, you have every right to feel angry, Rob,

But not at everyone else's expense.

Can't you find a different way of getting revenge, than erecting armies of idiotic alts or attacks on children?
Your daily personal attacks are loathesome and creepy.
 
Last edited:
Interesting to watch a sociopath talk about a moral compass.

Nevermind then, what about ...I don't know, say... today. What did Perg have to say about your behavior today? You did say I should bring it up. Now seems appropriate.

What did the board tell you in the much more recent poll about specifically your odious behavior?

Not to mention your own little recent gulf-of-tonkin gambit that Laurel nuked at my request before you possibly could have seen it. You showed up in the morning and begin your poutrage until I pointed out that you could not possibly have seen it unless you had been online and you, yourself had posted it.

You quietly slunk away, and haven't brought it up again since. That's a lot of why you have made it your mission to "run me off the board." You can't stand that I catch you in your sophmoric little fuck-fuck games and that I know exactly how low you will sink to "win" one of the idiotic internet battles that give you that false sense of power you so desparately crave.

Like posting Rob's personal information all of Reddit, trannager? Fuck you and your tranny compass! :)

#sooooironic
 
If they did that to you, you have every right to feel angry, Rob,

But not at everyone else's expense.

Can't you find a different way of getting revenge, than erecting armies of idiotic alts or attacks on children?

It's not at everyone's expense, Que.
 
Why do you keep stalking BotanyBoy and a few others with racist slurs then, Rob?

They never did what you say prompted your trolling.



And you know damn well that I'm not Que. That's just another one of your retarded "mind games".
 
Why do you keep stalking BotanyBoy and a few others with racist slurs then, Rob?

They never did what you say prompted your trolling.

I'm not sure what you're talking about, connie. Your 3rd world education is showing.
 
Why do you keep stalking BotanyBoy and a few others with racist slurs then, Rob?

They never did what you say prompted your trolling.



And you know damn well that I'm not Que. That's just another one of your retarded "mind games".

Mind game?

It's only a mind game because you're a curry-smelling, goat-fucking illiterate. :rolleyes:
 
Interesting to watch a sociopath talk about a moral compass.

Nevermind then, what about ...I don't know, say... today. What did Perg have to say about your behavior today? You did say I should bring it up. Now seems appropriate.

What did the board tell you in the much more recent poll about specifically your odious behavior?

Not to mention your own little recent gulf-of-tonkin gambit that Laurel nuked at my request before you possibly could have seen it. You showed up in the morning and begin your poutrage until I pointed out that you could not possibly have seen it unless you had been online and you, yourself had posted it.

You quietly slunk away, and haven't brought it up again since. That's a lot of why you have made it your mission to "run me off the board." You can't stand that I catch you in your sophmoric little fuck-fuck games and that I know exactly how low you will sink to "win" one of the idiotic internet battles that give you that false sense of power you so desperately crave.

What's sociopathic about keeping the URL of a five year old poll used to make himself appear to be the victim?
 
Back
Top