To XXX or not XXX, that is the question.

Liar

now with 17% more class
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
43,715
Tools for a self regulating and free adult market, a gateway to a porn flood, or opportunity for censorship? Damned if I know. Them politicking peeps are apparently still bitching about it.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4155568.stm

----------------------------------------

Delay for .xxx 'net sex' domain

The plan for a virtual red light district through the creation of a .xxx net domain name has hit delays after concern from government officials.

An official from President George Bush's administration has asked for the brakes be put on the planned domain name until its impact is studied more.

The domain was given the go-ahead by Icann (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) in June.

But some are concerned that it would encourage more porn on the net.

The domain name was expected to get final approval by the net's supervisory body, Icann (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), on Tuesday.

Net domains such as .com. and org. are overseen by Icann. It polices the companies that run the different domains and approves the expansion of the different net names that can be bought and used.

The ICM Registry, the not-for-profit group which would operate the .xxx domain name, said it would agree to a month's delay in order to explore some of the concerns which have been voiced.

Easy filter?

The .xxx domain name was approved five years after it was first proposed.
The idea is that sexually-explicit sites will move to the new domains to make it easier for people to filter and avoid them.

In a statement, the ICM Registry which originally proposed the idea said it would "help protect children from exposure to online pornography and also have a positive impact on online adult entertainment through voluntary efforts of the industry".

But some are sceptical that it will allow for more controls over sexually-explicit content.

"The Department of Commerce has received nearly 6,000 letters and e-mails from individuals expressing concern about the impact of pornography on families and children," said Mr Michael Gallagher, assistant secretary at the US Commerce Department, in a letter.

There has been growing opposition to the new domain name. In June, concern was expressed by net privacy campaigners who said it could provoke censorship problems for years.

Last week, a letter from Mohamed Sharil Tarmizi, chairman of Icann's Government Advisory Committee, reiterated the concern that several countries had over the decision.

It requested that Icann "allow time for additional governmental and public policy concerns to be expressed before reaching a final decision" on the registration of the domain name.

More than 10% of all online traffic and 25% of all global net searches are for adult content, according to the ICM Registry.
 
:rolleyes:

Fucking hilarious. They receive letters from 0.002% of the population and it's 'Oh no! Not porn!'

I think these people are in serious need of a blow job.
 
impressive said:
rgraham666 said:
:rolleyes:
Fucking hilarious. They receive letters from 0.002% of the population and it's 'Oh no! Not porn!'

I think these people are in serious need of a blow job.
*shudder* Don't look at ME! My philantrophic urges only go so far.
I know how to get around impressive's lack of public spirit, but it would entail government recognition and employment of unlicenced prostitutes.

Further, it would probably just artificially inflate the numbers objecting to the proposal. :D
 
impressive said:
*shudder* Don't look at ME! My philantrophic urges only go so far.
I'm in favor of the .xxx domains.....can I have one just to let you warm up? :devil:
 
Liar said:
*snip*

But some are concerned that it would encourage more porn on the net.

*snip*

Yeah, cuz there's almost no porn on the web now. :rolleyes:

Liar said:
*snip*

More than 10% of all online traffic and 25% of all global net searches are for adult content, according to the ICM Registry.

*snip*

Yeah, it's only that almost insignifigant 25% of the population that actually likes porn. Perverts. :D
 
cheerful_deviant said:
Yeah, cuz there's almost no porn on the web now. :rolleyes:



Yeah, it's only that almost insignifigant 25% of the population that actually likes porn. Perverts. :D
Uh, I'm a pervert. Shit.


:D
 
cheerful_deviant said:
Yeah, it's only that almost insignifigant 25% of the population that actually likes porn. Perverts. :D
Cool! I've never belonged to a minoroity before. :)
 
blackhaus7 said:
Uh, I'm a pervert. Shit.


:D


hate to be the one to tell ya BH but you're in the same category that I'm in....

You are now officially a .....PROVERT.... :D

A profesional pervert.....
 
TxRad said:
hate to be the one to tell ya BH but you're in the same category that I'm in....

You are now officially a .....PROVERT.... :D

A profesional pervert.....
And damn proud of it, too.
 
Liar said:
Tools for a self regulating and free adult market, a gateway to a porn flood, or opportunity for censorship? Damned if I know. Them politicking peeps are apparently still bitching about it.

I can see why several different groups might object to "ghettoizing" Porn with the XXX domain names.

The XXX domains would make it much harder to "stumble into" porn amd much easier for "net-nannies" to block porn sites -- that is NOT a good thing for much of internet porn industry that depends on hit counts for their advertising rates; people "stumbling into" or tricked into porn sites provide many of those hits. Sites like Whitehouse.COM depend mostly on hits from people looking for Whitehouse.GOV for their revenue; Changing to Whitehouse.XXX removes that advertising revenue (except for people looking for the history of the Clinton years. :p)

The anti-porn have a diferent dilemna -- the XXX domain would make the internet safer for people who don't want to encounter porn, but it also tacitly acknowledges porn's right to exist. Allowing XXX domains legitimizes Porn by recognising that it exists and has a place on the internet.

XXX domains aren't going to be popular from either side of the fence and defining just which sites should be required to use them is a tricky question -- and make no mistake, porn sites WILL be required to use them eventually if they are allowed.

I'm generally in favor of XXX domains being available on a voluntary basis because the sites that choose to use them voluntarily are generally those responsible erotica sites, like Lit, who already participate in as many net-nanny programs as possible. The unscrupulous porn sites that indulge in bait and switch to generte as many hits for as litle bandwidth as possible aren't going to use the XXX domains even if they're made mandatory because there is no way to force them to any more than there is a way to stop the unscrupulous practices they already indulge in.

However, I think in the long term, they're just a "separate but equal," "tip of the wedge" scam by the politicins that is going to result in the unscrupulous porn operaters continuing to spam e-mail inboxes and send the gullible to Pop-up Hell while the responsible and the moderate and responsible erotica sites, like Lit, are going to get hedged in with extra costs and tighter regulations until they become economically unviable.
 
Back
Top