Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
So...the only place in the USA you can't display talk about Brooke Shields' n**e photography....is on the "Free Speech, No Spam" Literotica.
Cool!
Cool!
title removed by admin - Best Thread Ever!
- Thread starter Lancecastor
- Start date
dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,964
did you start the thread, knowing it would be deleted, just so that you could play the outrage card? that's a bit naughty.
pointless
¿por qué no?
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 58,994
you spelled fucking lame wrong.
Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
Sounds devious to me.
How about Lewis Carroll's B&W child photography?
Are we allowed to talk about that?
How about I describe the photos to you....
Last edited:
Hard_Rom
Northumbrian Skald
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Posts
- 13,623
Wanna bet LE had a look at Lanc. Post about nudes of 10 year old. Pedo searches engines will be pinging off that. Might even get a ping from an NSA computer tracking key words that gets sent to local LE.
Watch it Lanc, the Horseman are looking at you!
p.s. dissing mods decisions is not a good idea.
Watch it Lanc, the Horseman are looking at you!
p.s. dissing mods decisions is not a good idea.
Last edited:
trysail
Catch Me Who Can
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Posts
- 25,593
Fata Morgana
Deckel Edged
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Posts
- 32,606
Exactly! Some of those are very uncomfortable. He was obsessed with that kid.
Fata Morgana
Deckel Edged
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Posts
- 32,606
He's not dumb, he's just shit stirring!
about_average
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
- Posts
- 11,430
Well, everyone who viewed the thread now has the photos on their computer, so if you're going to be paranoid...
Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
The courts have declared her photos non-pornographic, so it shouldn't be an issue.
Que sera, sera.
I was about to post one of his photos of "alice' when the thread was disappeared.
Strange story, that whole affair.
...if only we were allowed to discuss it!
Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
So there were originally photos in the thread too (I didn't see it until after it had been edited and closed)? Yeah, this site and about a billion others would have a problem with that.
Hard_Rom
Northumbrian Skald
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Posts
- 13,623
It was meant jokingly. Sorry if it went over your head. Could still be true though. Don't under estimate the Five Eyes technology. Or the amount of probably trivial and irrelevant material they store. They are government agencies after all.
Personally I feel safe because of such things as the Five Eyes. I got nada to hide. I can imagine what capabilities are brought to bear against our "enemies".
Pay cash for a payasyougo phone. Call that number once a week at exactly the same time. Text or speak random lines from the Koran. See if a black suv or telephone repair truck takes up residence on your street.
dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,964
the way my thoughts go are like this...
you post these pics. no, they're not going to make a regular guy into a pedo. no, they aren't illegal.
but they're sexualised pics of a child.
so you have a pedo scrolling through lit. and i'm sure they do. some must appreciate women of all ages, even if they are abusing their daughter/niece/whatever on the side.
so he's sat with a beer, scrolling through, sees the pic. that pic of a child posed sexually, with a painted face, in a way that makes her seem far more knowing and seductive than she is. a picture of a child mimicking a woman's ''you know I want it'' allure.
and he decides that, instead of having anther beer and hitting the hay, he's feeling horny now so before bed he'll hit his niece/daughter/whatever instead.
even if it's just one event, it's still one more nightmare for a child to live through.
because you made his cock twitch.
because you posted a pic.
...and even if my scenario is unlikely, it's still distinctly possible.
you shouldn't have posted them.
you post these pics. no, they're not going to make a regular guy into a pedo. no, they aren't illegal.
but they're sexualised pics of a child.
so you have a pedo scrolling through lit. and i'm sure they do. some must appreciate women of all ages, even if they are abusing their daughter/niece/whatever on the side.
so he's sat with a beer, scrolling through, sees the pic. that pic of a child posed sexually, with a painted face, in a way that makes her seem far more knowing and seductive than she is. a picture of a child mimicking a woman's ''you know I want it'' allure.
and he decides that, instead of having anther beer and hitting the hay, he's feeling horny now so before bed he'll hit his niece/daughter/whatever instead.
even if it's just one event, it's still one more nightmare for a child to live through.
because you made his cock twitch.
because you posted a pic.
...and even if my scenario is unlikely, it's still distinctly possible.
you shouldn't have posted them.
Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
Ha!
Here....now some older woman somewhere can rape a young gay male model:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xhRFkt6eZCQ/UMZPDpXniNI/AAAAAAAAKeY/yLcFCz1c1X4/s1600/6a00e54ecca8b988330120a5c672c4970c-500wi.jpg
Here....now some older woman somewhere can rape a young gay male model:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xhRFkt6eZCQ/UMZPDpXniNI/AAAAAAAAKeY/yLcFCz1c1X4/s1600/6a00e54ecca8b988330120a5c672c4970c-500wi.jpg
Fata Morgana
Deckel Edged
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Posts
- 32,606
You're dead right, I don't disagree with any of that. But the discussion of how the fuck those or the Gates ones I was referring to could be considered art is an interesting topic. But different era of course. And the Lewis Carroll ones are obviously not as in your face, but still very sexualised.
Beco
I'm Not Your Guru
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2002
- Posts
- 57,795
I have the visual in my head, thanks to you.....oh god
Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
For me, the interesting discussion points are:
1: How much more restrictive American Depictions of Sexuality have become in the past 30 years;
2. How much more liberal American Depictions of Violence have become in the same time.
1: How much more restrictive American Depictions of Sexuality have become in the past 30 years;
2. How much more liberal American Depictions of Violence have become in the same time.
Lancecastor
Lit's Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 54,670
dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,964
i'm of the opinion that something can be both art and porn. often the purpose of art is to challenge our perceptions and trigger our emotions. sometimes it's ugly. like the scene in silence of the lambs, what he does to the guard on the bars of the cage, were it real I would class something like that as art.
Kelleebabes
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Posts
- 9,273
I find you all so very fascinating...I didn't really look at your names...I just am so intrigued by your banter...I enjoy it so much...I believe it's because...your are like the old farts with the Muppets...you know the two old dudes who would make comments about all the other Muppets...and, please take that as a compliment...for that's how it's given...my name is Kellee...I'm so glad I discovered this site...it's opened a whole new world tome...
Wings
Zucchini Muffin
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Posts
- 22,300
Don't be so harsh, it opened a whole new world tome.
dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,964
it...posts like...this...though...all the fucking...time...
Wings
Zucchini Muffin
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Posts
- 22,300
(I know, I was making fun)
Similar threads
