Three key states embarrassed by con artist

[someoneyouknow]

A recent NBC/Marist poll shows a majority of people in three key states, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all states the con artist was able to win, are embarrassed by his delusional antics. 63% in Pennsylvania and 64% in both Michigan and Wisconsin.

The con artist's approval ratings continue to fall in those three states as well, with 36%, 35% and 34% in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, respectively, having a favorable approval of his chaotic performance.

Oddly, people in those three states are happy with the job the con artist has done for the economy despite him not putting forth a single economic initiative. Apparently when he took office all the work his predecessor had done to drag this country out of the depths of a Republican-created recession magically stopped working.

In a surprising result, less than half of the uneducated con artist supporters in those three states believe the con artist has done anything to bring jobs back to this country, especially since neither he nor his daughter have moved their clothes companies to the United States and he continues to hire foreign workers for his vineyard and clubs, such as Mar a Lago.

This same poll showed all three states had a very favorable opinion of former president Obama. All three had an approval rating in the low 60s.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/20/politics/nbc-marist-poll-donald-trump/index.html

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/820-return-to-the-rust-belt-dismal-job-approval-ratings-for-trump-in-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin/

http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/trump-s-approval-rating-stands-below-40-percent-three-key-n794061

 

[HisArpy]

You know, you're a nutjob.

I know, not the best way to start a reply but, really, you are.

I posted a chart couple of weeks ago showing Obama's DISapproval rating which fluctuated between 52% and 63% during his Presidency.

Which, coincidentally, is about the same numbers Trump seems to have in your poll. (Which BTW, isn't accurate since a NEW POLL shows his numbers climbing into the 40+% range. Not that it matters since those numbers are still in the same range as Obama's were.)

So, all your noise and smoke and flashing lights to hide the truth aren't all that awe inspiring. (I mean, really, who hasn't seen the movie The Wizard of Oz?) All your fake news makes you look foolish to those of us who do more than parrot the MSM propaganda. If you want to impress us, you need to do better. LOTS better.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Well considering how much you bash Obama, saying Trump is just about where he was is pretty damning, wouldn't you say?

You know, you're a nutjob.

I know, not the best way to start a reply but, really, you are.

I posted a chart couple of weeks ago showing Obama's DISapproval rating which fluctuated between 52% and 63% during his Presidency.

Which, coincidentally, is about the same numbers Trump seems to have in your poll. (Which BTW, isn't accurate since a NEW POLL shows his numbers climbing into the 40+% range. Not that it matters since those numbers are still in the same range as Obama's were.)

So, all your noise and smoke and flashing lights to hide the truth aren't all that awe inspiring. (I mean, really, who hasn't seen the movie The Wizard of Oz?) All your fake news makes you look foolish to those of us who do more than parrot the MSM propaganda. If you want to impress us, you need to do better. LOTS better.

 

[someoneyouknow]

You know, you're a nutjob.

I know, not the best way to start a reply but, really, you are.

I posted a chart couple of weeks ago showing Obama's DISapproval rating which fluctuated between 52% and 63% during his Presidency.

Which, coincidentally, is about the same numbers Trump seems to have in your poll. (Which BTW, isn't accurate since a NEW POLL shows his numbers climbing into the 40+% range. Not that it matters since those numbers are still in the same range as Obama's were.)

So, all your noise and smoke and flashing lights to hide the truth aren't all that awe inspiring. (I mean, really, who hasn't seen the movie The Wizard of Oz?) All your fake news makes you look foolish to those of us who do more than parrot the MSM propaganda. If you want to impress us, you need to do better. LOTS better.

So much crap. Do you have diarrhea often?

Obama's polls (which I didn't see you post) were most likely after he had served several years in office. By that time his policies would have been well known and the white supremacists like Steve Bannon, or partisan organizations like the Fox tabloid would have had time to go out and beat the war drums about how bad things were despite us working our way out of a Republican-created recession. The worst in 80 years.

These polls are the first six months of the con artist administration. As a rule, incoming folks are given the benefit of the doubt and generally enjoy good approval numbers. That the con artist is this low already does not bode well.

As to these supposed new numbers, this poll just came out on Wednesday. Is your poll any more fresh? Here's an even fresher poll which runs through Thursday. Guess what, he's still below 40%:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx

That you can't accept facts is not my fault. Claiming poll after poll showing the con artist administration is a shitfest as fake only shows who the true nutjob is.

 

[DrDelirium]

I didn't vote for Trump, don't like him, etc, etc. The polls really don't mean anything, though- if they did, Hillary would be president. The major media, the corporate Democrats and the neocons have all been opposed to Trump from day one, and he came into office without support from his own party. No organized political movement. No clearly defined ideology. No army of brownshirts. His policy direction, particularly foreign policy, was in opposition to the 'bi-partisan consensus' of many decades, and both Congress and the executive branch are full of people whose careers were built on implementing that consensus. It doesn't matter what Trump's actually policy positions are, just that they aren't the DC consensus and therefore they get no movement. Anyone who thought they were voting for those policies feels frustrated and betrayed, so of course Trump isn't wildly popular. He can't get anything done.
A question worth asking, though, is whether we'll be better off if Trump is driven out of office or effectively captured by the forces working against him. Left or right, "President Pence" ought to scare the crap out of you.

 

[sr71plt]

A question worth asking, though, is whether we'll be better off if Trump is driven out of office or effectively captured by the forces working against him. Left or right, "President Pence" ought to scare the crap out of you.

I don't think we would be much better off, no, but Trump's complete lack of morals and character is quite enough to want him gone regardless--and then see what happens with what comes after.

 

[HisArpy]

So much crap. Do you have diarrhea often?

Obama's polls (which I didn't see you post) were most likely after he had served several years in office. By that time his policies would have been well known and the white supremacists like Steve Bannon, or partisan organizations like the Fox tabloid would have had time to go out and beat the war drums about how bad things were despite us working our way out of a Republican-created recession. The worst in 80 years.

These polls are the first six months of the con artist administration. As a rule, incoming folks are given the benefit of the doubt and generally enjoy good approval numbers. That the con artist is this low already does not bode well.

As to these supposed new numbers, this poll just came out on Wednesday. Is your poll any more fresh? Here's an even fresher poll which runs through Thursday. Guess what, he's still below 40%:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx

That you can't accept facts is not my fault. Claiming poll after poll showing the con artist administration is a shitfest as fake only shows who the true nutjob is.

You are a buffoon full of BS. You post FAKE drivel and tout it as fact.

Try this:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/202742/obama-averages-job-approval-president.aspx

LOTS of charts and even some simple worded text for the intellectually challenged like you.

One highlight from the article:

Only Truman, Ford, Carter had lower averages as president.

A chart from the article:

http://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/mxqsv_rax06u47g0f1mwga.png

Moron. Try spending 30 seconds with Mr. Google before you open your stupid mouth next time.

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.gallup.com/poll/202742/obama-averages-job-approval-president.aspx

Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.

And now you know the rest of the story.

 

[John Blackhawk]

Yea and how many of these pollsters predicted trump wouldn't win the presidency?

 

[sr71plt]

Yea and how many of these pollsters predicted trump wouldn't win the presidency?

You mean the voters didn't do what the polls said they would? That sounds like a reason to form a commission to investigate why Trump got so many more votes than he should have.

Are you suggesting that maybe he got some outside help?

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Not true.

The polls showed it could go either way, right up until the end. When Trump won it was within the margin of error. It's not like he came back from a 10% difference. It was vacillating 2 - 4 points on either side. The POLLS were correct.

I didn't vote for Trump, don't like him, etc, etc. The polls really don't mean anything, though- if they did, Hillary would be president..

 

[someoneyouknow]

Moron. Try spending 30 seconds with Mr. Google before you open your stupid mouth next time.

Perhaps you should heed your own words. Also, reading comprehension is your friend.

The number you're trying to pass off is an average, meaning his numbers were both higher and lower than that number over his eight years in office. That same graph shows his final rating was 59, which was pointed out below to be the third highest among presidents recorded by Gallup.

But go ahead, keep flailing while to trying find any excuse, and excuses are all you keep coming up with, why the con artist is doing so miserably compared to every other president at the same point in time. That you keep claiming reality is fake is reason enough to ignore everything you say since.

It's interesting to note you claim the facts I provide are fake, then turn around and use the exact same source of information to try and justify your position. If the information I provided from the source is fake, your information is also fake.

 

[DrDelirium]

Not true.

The polls showed it could go either way, right up until the end. When Trump won it was within the margin of error. It's not like he came back from a 10% difference. It was vacillating 2 - 4 points on either side. The POLLS were correct.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...-polls-clinton-lead-1478618744-htmlstory.html

 

[Hypoxia]

"B-b-but Obama..." does not hold office. Tromp does, but with abysmally low favorables and a toxic relationship with the party he nominally heads. Thus he has little political clout, little power to reward or punish pols, little means of accomplishing anything legislative.

DJT rules by executive decree and agency rule changes. This "artist of the deal" is incompetent at cutting deals with lawmakers and gov't and corporate executives, most of whom are fleeing his presence. Do the exact relationships of Tromp's vs Obama's poll rating matter? Nope. They just show that an unsupported 'leader' can't get much done. That's just as well, hey?

 

[sr71plt]

But . . . Obama . . . but . . . Hillary . . . . but e-mails.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Proves my point.

You have one poll at least on there showing Trump winning.

The largest CLinton lead was 6% in only one poll. Otherwise, she was ahead 2 - 4 points, which like I said was within the margin of error.

Clinton was not predicted to win by an easy 10 points ahead victory. Statistically, it was a toss-up.

I listen to leftie podcasts, and my favorites were calling a Trump win way back in July.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...-polls-clinton-lead-1478618744-htmlstory.html

 

[DrDelirium]

Note that Clinton was given a 96% chance of winning going into election day. The polling consensus was quite clear, and a simple google search will yield tons of articles on the theme of "Why were the polls so wrong!?!?!!" Apparently the pollsters understand statistics differently than you do, because they were shocked by the results, as were the vast majority of mainstream media pundits.

 

[Hypoxia]

Note that Clinton was given a 96% chance of winning going into election day. The polling consensus was quite clear, and a simple google search will yield tons of articles on the theme of "Why were the polls so wrong!?!?!!"

The polls were not wrong. Clinton convincingly won the popular vote. She lost by a few tens of thousands of votes in three counties. She won the vote but lost the game. That should tell you something about USA politics.

But that's over. Tromp won the game but lost the nation. With little, support, he accomplishes little. What a sore winner!

 

[HisArpy]

Perhaps you should heed your own words. Also, reading comprehension is your friend.

The number you're trying to pass off is an average, meaning his numbers were both higher and lower than that number over his eight years in office. That same graph shows his final rating was 59, which was pointed out below to be the third highest among presidents recorded by Gallup.

But go ahead, keep flailing while to trying find any excuse, and excuses are all you keep coming up with, why the con artist is doing so miserably compared to every other president at the same point in time. That you keep claiming reality is fake is reason enough to ignore everything you say since.

It's interesting to note you claim the facts I provide are fake, then turn around and use the exact same source of information to try and justify your position. If the information I provided from the source is fake, your information is also fake.

The AVERAGE is just that, an AVERAGE. Which means that it was higher and lower.

Gee, guess what. If it's an average with LOWER numbers, Obama must NOT have been so wonderful. In fact, his DISAPPROVAL numbers seem to be on par with Trumps current numbers. Granted, they are not equal and Trump seems to have lower numbers, but the difference isn't so great that you can tout Obama as being oh so much higher... You know, like you're trying to do.

THAT is what is fake about your posts. Not the source; YOU. Fake. Faker. Fool. Buffoon. Sap. LIAR! CON ARTIST!

You post drivel and claim it's some sign from above about how evil Trump supposedly is. But, when it's pointed out that your divine message isn't so divine or even a message, you DEFLECT and try to spin the truth.

Yeah, Obama's final approval number was 59%. So what. It doesn't mean he did a good job DURING his presidency. It means that a lot of you whiners decided to elevate his failings at the last second to avoid looking like the idiots you really are.

Look at the charts. SEE what other Presidents' ratings were. NOTICE that Obama was WORSE.

What a maroon. (Props to B. Bunny for the expression)

 

[sr71plt]

I see you're trying to show us what real fake news is.

 

[Trumpire]

source

I'm still left questioning how many registered voters in any of those states (whether those questioned in these polls or not) actually legally voted for him.

Also, edit thread title: He's made trips to many states & a few countries, so MANY states (as well as his spouse & other family) are/were likely embarrassed by him.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The AVERAGE is just that, an AVERAGE. Which means that it was higher and lower.

Gee, guess what. If it's an average with LOWER numbers, Obama must NOT have been so wonderful. In fact, his DISAPPROVAL numbers seem to be on par with Trumps current numbers. Granted, they are not equal and Trump seems to have lower numbers, but the difference isn't so great that you can tout Obama as being oh so much higher... You know, like you're trying to do.

THAT is what is fake about your posts. Not the source; YOU. Fake. Faker. Fool. Buffoon. Sap. LIAR! CON ARTIST!

You post drivel and claim it's some sign from above about how evil Trump supposedly is. But, when it's pointed out that your divine message isn't so divine or even a message, you DEFLECT and try to spin the truth.

Yeah, Obama's final approval number was 59%. So what. It doesn't mean he did a good job DURING his presidency. It means that a lot of you whiners decided to elevate his failings at the last second to avoid looking like the idiots you really are.

Look at the charts. SEE what other Presidents' ratings were. NOTICE that Obama was WORSE.

What a maroon. (Props to B. Bunny for the expression)

UNFORTUNATELY for YOU, President Obama's NUMBERS are BETTER than Cheetos' NUMBERS on ALL metrics. ESPECIALLY now.

So THERE. Own your FAIL. Ha HA ha HA ha HAAAA.

 

[Hypoxia]

UNFORTUNATELY for YOU, President Obama's NUMBERS are BETTER than Cheetos' NUMBERS on ALL metrics. ESPECIALLY now.

"Figgers don't lie but liars figger."
--anon

I ran all the presidential numbers through a rigorous analytical AI that mapped trends, tendencies, attempts, results, all that shit. After much processing, it said,

Does not compute.​

But that was an old computer. And it smoked.

 

[Trumpire]

But that was an old computer. And it smoked.

Melania was smoking too, before she married that idiot. (Who now appears ready to ban her friends & family.)

Not sure who, but saw an ep of MTV "SafeWord" the other night where someone sent a "tweet" to Don2 about being his "new stepmom".

 

[Hypoxia]

But that was an old computer. And it smoked.

I mean that literally. The old Heathkit H8 we built took a nonstandard memory card. I plugged it in wrong; a chip on the board smoked and exploded. Ya don't want to see a smoking computer, believe me. Worse than a burnt-out CB radio.

Melania was smoking too, before she married that idiot. (Who now appears ready to ban her friends & family.)

Not sure who, but saw an ep of MTV "SafeWord" the other night where someone sent a "tweet" to Don2 about being his "new stepmom".

Oh fuck, now you're heading toward Trompian Incest, one of the sickest pervo pr0n fetish fantasies around. Real boner-killers and pussy-driers there, story-wise. The women are all Barbie-clones. The boys are all... deeply disturbed. Kill me now.