This Will Be A Quick War With China.....

Lost Cause

It's a wrap!
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
30,949
Brought to you by the previous administration.....

China is stepping up its military preparedness to force reunification with Taiwan while maintaining the ability to keep at bay foreign forces sent to help defend the island democracy.

According to regional press accounts, Chinese military sources also say U.S. attempts to undermine Beijing's readiness won't have any effect on the communist regime's bid to upgrade the capabilities of the People's Liberation army, air force and navy.

China is preparing to interdict U.S. carriers if sent to aid Taiwan.

One report in the pro-Beijing Wen Wei Po newspaper July 19 also quoted a senior PLA officer as saying China's "chief aim now is to preserve national unification."

"It is natural that all our military preparedness is for this," the officer said.

Al Santoli, national security adviser to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., and author of the American Foreign Policy Council's China Reform Monitor, said the Wen Wei Po usually reflects the viewpoints of China's top leadership.

He said the paper "for the first time quoted a top military source as 'not denying' the PLA had shifted its strategic focus to the southeast coastal region," which appears to indicate "Beijing is prepared to invade Taiwan and confront any U.S. forces in the region."

Last year, President Bush said the U.S. would defend Taiwan in any way possible if attacked by China or any other nation. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, speaking to Taiwanese military officials earlier this summer, reiterated the administration's position.

Meanwhile, the South China Morning Post reported July 21 that secrecy is the "trump card" in China's military arsenal.

"Among things irking the Pentagon as it engages Beijing is a perception that America, while former President Bill Clinton was in power, gave Chinese military officers high-level access to politicians, officials and facilities, but received little in return," Santoli wrote.

Assistant Secretary of Defense Peter Rodman, in a recent visit to Beijing, has also reportedly expressed frustration over what the U.S. believes is the Chinese military's reluctance to give American officials better access to PLA soldiers and equipment.

One of two Russian-built Sovremenny-class destroyers currently active in China's Navy, which is set to purchase two more.

During the Clinton years, PLA officials were given access to U.S. military combat exercises and bases, but recently Bush administration officials are being shown martial arts demonstrations, displays of outdated aircraft and, Santoli says, "even tours of irrelevant facilities such as canteens."

"It is clear China understands its own strategic interests … would be undermined by giving away too much information," Santoli said. He also noted that Beijing is attempting to rely heavily "on elements of surprise as integral factors for any future military action."

"China, as a developing power, seeks to retain ambiguity about its capabilities in order to gain strategic advantages," he said, quoting Chinese policy analysts.

Recently, China has begun to deploy weapons such as hundreds of mobile-launched, medium-range ballistic missiles in military districts facing Taiwan. Also, U.S. officials believe China is working on strategies to target and defeat U.S. carrier battle groups that would likely be sent by Washington to defend Taiwan, should Beijing launch an attack.

A recent Pentagon report also said the Chinese were making qualitative leaps in military technology, aircraft and warships, and that under current conditions, Taiwan could lose its qualitative edge by 2005 if the island democracy did not spend more on its defense.

Chinese troops march between rows of short-range DF-15 missiles

Richard Fisher, a senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation and author of the think tank's weekly "China Brief," said,
"This is a sort of medium- to long-term goal that will be fulfilled before the end of the decade or shortly thereafter," "I haven't seen any indication that China is preparing to achieve unification [with Taiwan]" over the next couple of months.

However, he said, "there are several reports" that China will use "the opportunity" of current and future military exercises "to demonstrate its displeasure with [Taiwan] President Chen Shiu-bian's recent statements."

Earlier this week, Chen declared that Taiwan is "an independent, sovereign country" distinct from the communist Chinese mainland, drawing praise from his countrymen but ire from the United States, which officially has a "one-China policy," recognizing only mainland China.

"Our country cannot be bullied, dwarfed or marginalized, and we are not a part or a province of another country," Chen said via video-link to a gathering of pro-independence Taiwanese campaigners in Japan. "We cannot become the second Hong Kong or Macau because we are an independent sovereign country."

Judging by Beijing's pace of military modernization, in the coming years China is likely to become more powerful than Taiwan, making a declaration of independence infinitely more dangerous. On the other hand, declaring it now would also most assuredly bring war with the mainland, though militarily, experts believe Taipei still has the upper hand for now.

Chinese T-63A amphibious tanks would likely be used in any direct invasion of Taiwan

"Ten years from now the People's Liberation Army will be far stronger and better able to enforce Beijing's will on Taipei," adding that there was no guarantee the Taiwanese people would even vote to declare independence from China.

A recent Pentagon report said China currently spends nearly $65 billion a year on its military, the second-largest military expenditure in the world. Officially, China says it only spends about $20 billion. While nowhere near the $300 billion figure spent by the U.S., China's defense expenditures have been deemed high for Asia.


*Do you think we'll fight this one? Conventional or nuclear? Ready or not?
:D
 
Lost Cause said:
Brought to you by the previous administration.....
<snip>
"Ten years from now the People's Liberation Army will be far stronger and better able to enforce Beijing's will on Taipei," adding that there was no guarantee the Taiwanese people would even vote to declare independence from China.

No guarantee's either way in this above commentary.

A recent Pentagon report said China currently spends nearly $65 billion a year on its military, the second-largest military expenditure in the world. Officially, China says it only spends about $20 billion. While nowhere near the $300 billion figure spent by the U.S., China's defense expenditures have been deemed high for Asia.

Basic calculating puts this at roughly $1000.00 per US tax payer goes to military. With consideration that many dont pay taxes and the excess cost is picked up by those whom do. Chinese citizens get a better financial deal with over six times the population and spending nearly five times less as a group.

Would make more practical sense for those on both sides of this issue to spend less on military toys. With spending more money on individual citizens.. soldiers salaries included. For what soldiers are expected to do they are very underpaid in immediate wages and long term benefits.

As far as China rushing in to any wars any time soon is unlikely due to there having more pressing internal societal issues. The " Three Gorges Dam " to name one is a project to build the worlds largest hydro-electric dam. With having additional costs to relocate whole cities from the areas to be flooded by dam, which are currently under construction. This is being done to help clean up pollution with a more environmentally friendly source of energy.


*Do you think we'll fight this one? Conventional or nuclear? Ready or not?
:D
"Both sides still have accumulated debt incured from previous cold war era expenses. Better to pay that off first before rushing blindly in to another cold war."

I also think that either way a great deal of money will be made with military contracts. Also that people need to look at more than just a few military/ political reports to make a more informed decision on this and other matters. The instigators on both sides of this issue are those with own personal agenda's.

 
Last edited:
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif, has a National Security Advisor? I thought it was the Democrats who were to blame for the bloated size of our federal government.
 
IMHO - the history of the world for the next 50 years or longer will take place on the Pacific Rim.

China means business. Business means three things:

1). Removing the presence of the United States from "China's" sphere of influence.
2). Establishing "Space" superiority.
3). The return of Taiwan to the mainland.

As to this they have:

1). Secured a partnership with a collapsing Russia to secure access to technology and raw materials.
2). Have obtained technology through bribery and reverse engineering.
3). Sponsored terrorism. Threatened to nuke the United States. Built a blue-water fleet. Built new landing craft. Built new long-range missiles. Modernized their army…

To think that they will not move on Taiwan at the first sign of weakness is a tad optimistic. There are people alive in China, in control, in the bureaucracy, who still remember the revolution. With the return of Macao and Hong Kong, the lust for the return of pre-war China and the rise of China as the center of the world has become strong.

They are a xenophobic race. They are ultra-egoists. They are the next really big threat to the stability of the world.
 
Let's also not forget that the Chinese Government, through it's front Wampoa-Hutchinson, owns the Panama Canal and more inportantly, all that band-width laid by no other than, Global Crossing. Both of which are direct threats to our national security, especially the latter as the first step of the Chinese invasion will be a cyber attack on the United States communication systems and the World-Wide-Web. This thay have practiced.

Why is Global Crossing so familiar?

Terry McCauliffe...
 
Back
Top