This Question Comes To Mind

[Bray123]

It's not even a secret that Russia meddled in US elections to get the pedophile elected. The manner in which he then backed the invasion of Ukraine will be a permanent stain on US history.

 

[OralAllOver]

Is the nation on the brink of seeing intelligence that confirms foreign meddling in 2020? Will Donald Trump reveal proof of victory so compelling that the Senate has no choice but to move on the Save America Act? Just askin'.

Wow
Trump may have been a money laundering asset for Russians after he burned through his daddy's $
Campaign chairman Manafort, a criminal and foreign agent, has PUBLICLY ADMITTED to passing detailed voter info to known Russian agent
Trump Jr and several others (I've forgotten) met in Trump Tower with Russian agents during campaign
Computer security folks traced myriad pro-Trump misinformation in social media to Russia
Just recently, quite a few Republican or right leaning influencers were caught on Putin's payroll
And Trump is the best thing to happen to Russia since the T-34 tank -- better infact! Trump will hand them Ukraine

And you think Russians tilted the election AGAINST Trump?
I guess you work for Pravda

 

[OralAllOver]

"Proof" of victory ....

Yeah, that's coming any second
Right after Trump stops tweeting batshit crazy stuff on holidays because he is so alone and lonely

 

[OralAllOver]

And Trump meeting ALONE with Putin in Helsinki ... nope, nothing suspicious about that!

Or Putin calling his wife!

 

[eric_erosfan]

View attachment 2597158

Don't worry. A crack team is on it. Live from the Four Seasons press conference...

 

[LLCox]

zzzz

 

[MajorRewrite]

EVERYONE who cheated is going to prison.

Trump is already in GITMO!!! !! !

 

[eric_erosfan]

Trump is already in GITMO!!! !! !

Serious question. Is that guy truly that insane or is that his troll schtick?

 

[Wat_Tyler]

6,264,271….

 

[Rebel5soul]

Is the nation on the brink of seeing intelligence that confirms foreign meddling in 2020? Will Donald Trump reveal proof of victory so compelling that the Senate has no choice but to move on the Save America Act? Just askin'.

Nope. Regardless of the polling the dementedcraps are going to hang on to the "voter suppression" mantra come hell or high water.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Serious question. Is that guy truly that insane or is that his troll schtick?

Sometimes it seems like an act, but as he gets more agitated he doubles down. So I think he’s an actual conspiracy nut, like that BuffaloGurl guy.

 

[Bray123]

Serious question. Is that guy truly that insane or is that his troll schtick?

Pretty sure it's a resurrection of T&T69, banned for threats developed from very similar posts. Not so much down a rabbit hole as digging a deep mine of rabbit shit.

 

[Rightguide]

Mushbrain seems insistent on relitigating the 2020 presidential election.
Why?
He's softening up the public....getting them to nod their head that his 2020 election was somehow "stolen" from him, he plans to use public indifference and apathy to "federalize" the upcoming Congressional midterms. He wants to implement the deeply flawed "SAVE" act by executive order instead of, you know, Congress passing a law.

The SAVE act is projected to lower voter turnout by women and minorities by around 14%....which should be enough to turn away the Blue Tsunami of Accountability that will hit in November.

Mushbrain won't be alive to see this, of course, but he needs something to fixate on.

This is Rob exposing his racism by suggesting that minorities are too dumb to obtain proper ID.

 

[OralAllOver]

Serious question. Is that guy truly that insane or is that his troll schtick?

He's been crazy for decades and a known clown (lying about height of Trump Tower and skipping 10 floors in numbering. The perfect crime)

You know of John Barron? Every NYC reporter did. Trump cosplayed being his own press agent and called ( every day?) media reporters pretending to be John Barron, press agent to Mr Trump

 

[RobDownSouth]

This is Rob exposing his racism by suggesting that minorities are too dumb to obtain proper ID.

Wrong as usual, to the surprise of no one who reads your shit takes on the issues of the day.

White men such as yourself are not unduly burdened by the requirements of the SAVE act. They simply show their birth certificate once at the passport office, the driver's license bureau and for voter's registration....then they are done.

Minorities and especially women who are married and/or divorced face the unenviable task of being forced to carry around the documentation of their life each and every time they move to a new address.....birth certificates, naturalization papers, divorce decrees, marriage licenses, etc.

The Mushbrain administration is committed to placing as many roadblocks as possible in the path of minorities and women desiring to vote. Your limited comprehension capacity triggers the usual "nuh UH!" reflexive response, and your substandard intellect decided that the root cause of this issue must be "my" racism, when actually it's both racism and misogyny on the part of Orange Hitler and his merry gang of Brownshits.

 

[Rightguide]

Wrong as usual, to the surprise of no one who reads your shit takes on the issues of the day.

White men such as yourself are not unduly burdened by the requirements of the SAVE act. They simply show their birth certificate once at the passport office, the driver's license bureau and for voter's registration....then they are done.

Minorities and especially women who are married and/or divorced face the unenviable task of being forced to carry around the documentation of their life each and every time they move to a new address.....birth certificates, naturalization papers, divorce decrees, marriage licenses, etc.

The Mushbrain administration is committed to placing as many roadblocks as possible in the path of minorities and women desiring to vote. Your limited comprehension capacity triggers the usual "nuh UH!" reflexive response, and your substandard intellect decided that the root cause of this issue must be "my" racism, when actually it's both racism and misogyny on the part of Orange Hitler and his merry gang of Brownshits.

First, drop the racial framing. Voting laws apply to citizens, not to “white men such as yourself.” The requirements under the SAVE Act proposal don’t change based on race or sex, and assuming they do is precisely the kind of identity-based thinking you claim to oppose.

Second, the claim that minorities and married women would be forced to “carry around the documentation of their life” every time they vote is inaccurate. The documentation would be required at the point of registration (or when updating registration), not every time someone casts a ballot. Once verified, the registration stands unless there’s a change requiring an update, which is already how most voter rolls function.

Third, name changes due to marriage or divorce are not a new administrative challenge created by voter ID proposals. That documentation is already required for passports, Social Security updates, driver’s licenses, bank accounts, mortgages, and countless other legal processes. The argument seems to assume that voting should be the only civic function completely insulated from standard identity verification.

Fourth, if there are specific implementation concerns, cost of documents, access to issuing offices, bureaucratic delays, those are legitimate policy discussions. They can be addressed through fee waivers, streamlined verification systems, or automatic data matching. But labeling the entire concept “racism and misogyny” without engaging the mechanics of the law is misinformed rhetoric, not analysis.

Finally, when an argument leans heavily on insults (“Mushbrain,” “Orange Hitler,” etc.), it usually signals your emotional certainty replacing factual precision. If the case against the SAVE Act is strong, it doesn’t need caricatures to survive. If the concern is access, let’s talk access. If the concern is equal protection, let’s talk equal protection. But shouting groundless motives into existence isn’t the same as proving them.

 

[ll74]

First, drop the racial framing. Voting laws apply to citizens, not to “white men such as yourself.” The requirements under the SAVE Act proposal don’t change based on race or sex, and assuming they do is precisely the kind of identity-based thinking you claim to oppose.

Second, the claim that minorities and married women would be forced to “carry around the documentation of their life” every time they vote is inaccurate. The documentation would be required at the point of registration (or when updating registration), not every time someone casts a ballot. Once verified, the registration stands unless there’s a change requiring an update, which is already how most voter rolls function.

Third, name changes due to marriage or divorce are not a new administrative challenge created by voter ID proposals. That documentation is already required for passports, Social Security updates, driver’s licenses, bank accounts, mortgages, and countless other legal processes. The argument seems to assume that voting should be the only civic function completely insulated from standard identity verification.

Fourth, if there are specific implementation concerns, cost of documents, access to issuing offices, bureaucratic delays, those are legitimate policy discussions. They can be addressed through fee waivers, streamlined verification systems, or automatic data matching. But labeling the entire concept “racism and misogyny” without engaging the mechanics of the law is misinformed rhetoric, not analysis.

Finally, when an argument leans heavily on insults (“Mushbrain,” “Orange Hitler,” etc.), it usually signals your emotional certainty replacing factual precision. If the case against the SAVE Act is strong, it doesn’t need caricatures to survive. If the concern is access, let’s talk access. If the concern is equal protection, let’s talk equal protection. But shouting groundless motives into existence isn’t the same as proving them.

You're assuming they don't question her registration at the polling station.

 

[Wilson23]

First, drop the racial framing. Voting laws apply to citizens, not to “white men such as yourself.” The requirements under the SAVE Act proposal don’t change based on race or sex, and assuming they do is precisely the kind of identity-based thinking you claim to oppose.

Second, the claim that minorities and married women would be forced to “carry around the documentation of their life” every time they vote is inaccurate. The documentation would be required at the point of registration (or when updating registration), not every time someone casts a ballot. Once verified, the registration stands unless there’s a change requiring an update, which is already how most voter rolls function.

Third, name changes due to marriage or divorce are not a new administrative challenge created by voter ID proposals. That documentation is already required for passports, Social Security updates, driver’s licenses, bank accounts, mortgages, and countless other legal processes. The argument seems to assume that voting should be the only civic function completely insulated from standard identity verification.

Fourth, if there are specific implementation concerns, cost of documents, access to issuing offices, bureaucratic delays, those are legitimate policy discussions. They can be addressed through fee waivers, streamlined verification systems, or automatic data matching. But labeling the entire concept “racism and misogyny” without engaging the mechanics of the law is misinformed rhetoric, not analysis.

Finally, when an argument leans heavily on insults (“Mushbrain,” “Orange Hitler,” etc.), it usually signals your emotional certainty replacing factual precision. If the case against the SAVE Act is strong, it doesn’t need caricatures to survive. If the concern is access, let’s talk access. If the concern is equal protection, let’s talk equal protection. But shouting groundless motives into existence isn’t the same as proving them.

The case against it is that it isn't necessary. There is no real problem it would solve. Noncitizens are not voting.

 

[Rightguide]

The case against it is that it isn't necessary. There is no real problem it would solve. Noncitizens are not voting.

That's BS.

 

[Rebel5soul]

You're assuming they don't question her registration at the polling station.

^^^^^More bull shit from the mental defective.

 

[ll74]

^^^^^More bull shit from the mental defective.

With ICE at every polling station, how do you expect things to go?

 

[Wilson23]

That's BS.

Yet again: https://www.brennancenter.org/topics/voting-elections/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraud

 

[Rightguide]

You're assuming they don't question her registration at the polling station.

If they do, produce a Real ID, also known as a Star Card, or a driver's license. You have to have one of the following to receive food stamp benefits: a driver’s license, State-issued ID card, a U.S. passport, a Military ID, a birth certificate, a Social Security card, a Work or school ID, or a Voter registration card.

 

[ll74]

If they do, produce a Real ID, also known as a Star Card, or a driver's license. You have to have one of the following to receive food stamp benefits: a driver’s license, State-issued ID card, a U.S. passport, a Military ID, a birth certificate, a Social Security card, a Work or school ID, or a Voter registration card.

Lol....of course.

ICE has been good at accepting those things

 

[Rightguide]

Yet again: https://www.brennancenter.org/topics/voting-elections/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraud

https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/...ection-and-making-false-statements-while?utm_

https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/202...-says-87-noncitizens-voted-in-elections/?utm_